All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] drm/panfrost: Fix a race in panfrost_ioctl_madvise()
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 22:45:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191129224536.6ba79df0@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191129200733.GQ624164@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:07:33 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 02:40:34PM +0000, Steven Price wrote:
> > On 29/11/2019 14:33, Boris Brezillon wrote:  
> > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 14:24:48 +0000
> > > Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > >> On 29/11/2019 13:59, Boris Brezillon wrote:  
> > >>> If 2 threads change the MADVISE property of the same BO in parallel we
> > >>> might end up with an shmem->madv value that's inconsistent with the
> > >>> presence of the BO in the shrinker list.    
> > >>
> > >> I'm a bit worried from the point of view of user space sanity that you
> > >> observed this - but clearly the kernel should be robust!  
> > > 
> > > It's not something I observed, just found the race by inspecting the
> > > code, and I thought it was worth fixing it.  
> > 
> > Good! ;) Your cover letter referring to a "debug session" made me think
> > you'd actually hit all these.  
> 
> Time for some igt to make sure this is actually correct?

That's not something I can easily trigger without instrumenting the
code: I need 2 threads doing MADVISE with 2 different values,
and there has to be a context switch between the
drm_gem_shmem_madvise() call and the mutex_lock(shrinker_lock) one. And
last but not least, I'll need a way to report such inconsistencies to
userspace (trace?).

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] drm/panfrost: Fix a race in panfrost_ioctl_madvise()
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 22:45:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191129224536.6ba79df0@collabora.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191129214536.W97wBtijX3LiHZzRBUkZ9Y-gdfLFPq7GJPVfDlFxYmw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191129200733.GQ624164@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:07:33 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 02:40:34PM +0000, Steven Price wrote:
> > On 29/11/2019 14:33, Boris Brezillon wrote:  
> > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 14:24:48 +0000
> > > Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > >> On 29/11/2019 13:59, Boris Brezillon wrote:  
> > >>> If 2 threads change the MADVISE property of the same BO in parallel we
> > >>> might end up with an shmem->madv value that's inconsistent with the
> > >>> presence of the BO in the shrinker list.    
> > >>
> > >> I'm a bit worried from the point of view of user space sanity that you
> > >> observed this - but clearly the kernel should be robust!  
> > > 
> > > It's not something I observed, just found the race by inspecting the
> > > code, and I thought it was worth fixing it.  
> > 
> > Good! ;) Your cover letter referring to a "debug session" made me think
> > you'd actually hit all these.  
> 
> Time for some igt to make sure this is actually correct?

That's not something I can easily trigger without instrumenting the
code: I need 2 threads doing MADVISE with 2 different values,
and there has to be a context switch between the
drm_gem_shmem_madvise() call and the mutex_lock(shrinker_lock) one. And
last but not least, I'll need a way to report such inconsistencies to
userspace (trace?).
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-29 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-29 13:59 [PATCH 0/8] panfrost: Fixes for 5.4 Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/panfrost: Make panfrost_job_run() return an ERR_PTR() instead of NULL Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:19   ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:19     ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:31     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:31       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:38       ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:38         ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 19:32         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 19:32           ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/panfrost: Fix a race in panfrost_ioctl_madvise() Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:24   ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:24     ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:33     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:33       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:40       ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:40         ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 20:07         ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-29 20:07           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-29 21:45           ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-11-29 21:45             ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-05 23:08       ` Rob Herring
2019-12-05 23:08         ` Rob Herring
2019-12-06  7:53         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-06  7:53           ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-06  8:08           ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-06  8:08             ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/panfrost: Fix a BO leak in panfrost_ioctl_mmap_bo() Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:26   ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:26     ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/panfrost: Fix a race in panfrost_gem_free_object() Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:28   ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:28     ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/panfrost: Open/close the perfcnt BO Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:34   ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:34     ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/panfrost: Make sure imported/exported BOs are never purged Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:14   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:14     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:45   ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:45     ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 14:52     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:52       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 20:12   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-29 20:12     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-29 21:09     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 21:09       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-02  8:52       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-02  8:52         ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-02  9:50         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-02  9:50           ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/panfrost: Add the panfrost_gem_mapping concept Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 15:37   ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 15:37     ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 20:14   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-29 20:14     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-29 21:36     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 21:36       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-02  8:55       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-02  8:55         ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-02  9:13         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-02  9:13           ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-02  9:44           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-02  9:44             ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-04 11:41             ` Steven Price
2019-12-04 11:41               ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/panfrost: Make sure the shrinker does not reclaim referenced BOs Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 13:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 15:48   ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 15:48     ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 16:07     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 16:07       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 16:12       ` Steven Price
2019-11-29 16:12         ` Steven Price
2019-12-02 12:50   ` Robin Murphy
2019-12-02 12:50     ` Robin Murphy
2019-12-02 13:32     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-12-02 13:32       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-29 14:23 ` [PATCH 0/8] panfrost: Fixes for 5.4 Alyssa Rosenzweig
2019-12-06 17:16 ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191129224536.6ba79df0@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.