All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] selftests: net: tls: remove recv_rcvbuf test
@ 2019-12-13 10:39 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  2019-12-13 17:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
  2019-12-15  3:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo @ 2019-12-13 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller
  Cc: Shuah Khan, Jakub Kicinski, Simon Horman, netdev,
	linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Paolo Pisati,
	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo

This test only works when [1] is applied, which was rejected.

Basically, the errors are reported and cleared. In this particular case of
tls sockets, following reads will block.

The test case was originally submitted with the rejected patch, but, then,
was included as part of a different patchset, possibly by mistake.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20191007035323.4360-2-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com/#t

Thanks Paolo Pisati for pointing out the original patchset where this
appeared.

Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Fixes: 65190f77424d (selftests/tls: add a test for fragmented messages)
Reported-by: Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 28 ----------------------------
 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
index 13e5ef615026..0ea44d975b6c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
@@ -722,34 +722,6 @@ TEST_F(tls, recv_lowat)
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(send_mem, recv_mem + 10, 5), 0);
 }
 
-TEST_F(tls, recv_rcvbuf)
-{
-	char send_mem[4096];
-	char recv_mem[4096];
-	int rcv_buf = 1024;
-
-	memset(send_mem, 0x1c, sizeof(send_mem));
-
-	EXPECT_EQ(setsockopt(self->cfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF,
-			     &rcv_buf, sizeof(rcv_buf)), 0);
-
-	EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, send_mem, 512, 0), 512);
-	memset(recv_mem, 0, sizeof(recv_mem));
-	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, recv_mem, sizeof(recv_mem), 0), 512);
-	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(send_mem, recv_mem, 512), 0);
-
-	if (self->notls)
-		return;
-
-	EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, send_mem, 4096, 0), 4096);
-	memset(recv_mem, 0, sizeof(recv_mem));
-	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, recv_mem, sizeof(recv_mem), 0), -1);
-	EXPECT_EQ(errno, EMSGSIZE);
-
-	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, recv_mem, sizeof(recv_mem), 0), -1);
-	EXPECT_EQ(errno, EMSGSIZE);
-}
-
 TEST_F(tls, bidir)
 {
 	char const *test_str = "test_read";
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests: net: tls: remove recv_rcvbuf test
  2019-12-13 10:39 [PATCH] selftests: net: tls: remove recv_rcvbuf test Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
@ 2019-12-13 17:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
  2019-12-15  3:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2019-12-13 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  Cc: David S. Miller, Shuah Khan, Simon Horman, netdev,
	linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Paolo Pisati

On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 07:39:02 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> This test only works when [1] is applied, which was rejected.
> 
> Basically, the errors are reported and cleared. In this particular case of
> tls sockets, following reads will block.
> 
> The test case was originally submitted with the rejected patch, but, then,
> was included as part of a different patchset, possibly by mistake.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20191007035323.4360-2-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com/#t

Ah, damn, you're right, sorry about that!

> Thanks Paolo Pisati for pointing out the original patchset where this
> appeared.
> 
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> Fixes: 65190f77424d (selftests/tls: add a test for fragmented messages)
> Reported-by: Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests: net: tls: remove recv_rcvbuf test
  2019-12-13 10:39 [PATCH] selftests: net: tls: remove recv_rcvbuf test Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  2019-12-13 17:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2019-12-15  3:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2019-12-15  3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  Cc: David S. Miller, Shuah Khan, Simon Horman, netdev,
	linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Paolo Pisati

On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 07:39:02 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> This test only works when [1] is applied, which was rejected.
> 
> Basically, the errors are reported and cleared. In this particular case of
> tls sockets, following reads will block.
> 
> The test case was originally submitted with the rejected patch, but, then,
> was included as part of a different patchset, possibly by mistake.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20191007035323.4360-2-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com/#t
> 
> Thanks Paolo Pisati for pointing out the original patchset where this
> appeared.
> 
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> Fixes: 65190f77424d (selftests/tls: add a test for fragmented messages)
> Reported-by: Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>

Applied to net and queued for stable, thank you!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-12-15  3:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-13 10:39 [PATCH] selftests: net: tls: remove recv_rcvbuf test Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2019-12-13 17:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-12-15  3:57 ` Jakub Kicinski

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.