* [RFC PATCH] virtio: Change order of appling runstate to device and bus
@ 2019-12-20 12:52 Anton Kuchin
2020-01-06 12:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anton Kuchin @ 2019-12-20 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Anton Kuchin, yc-core, Michael S. Tsirkin
On transition to running first apply state to bus and then to device
so device can access bus functions correctly. When going to stopped
notify device first and then the bus.
Signed-off-by: Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>
---
hw/virtio/virtio.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
index 04716b5f6c..2ea2edba10 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -3096,7 +3096,7 @@ static void virtio_vmstate_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState state)
bool backend_run = running && virtio_device_started(vdev, vdev->status);
vdev->vm_running = running;
- if (backend_run) {
+ if (!backend_run) {
virtio_set_status(vdev, vdev->status);
}
@@ -3104,7 +3104,7 @@ static void virtio_vmstate_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState state)
k->vmstate_change(qbus->parent, backend_run);
}
- if (!backend_run) {
+ if (backend_run) {
virtio_set_status(vdev, vdev->status);
}
}
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio: Change order of appling runstate to device and bus
2019-12-20 12:52 [RFC PATCH] virtio: Change order of appling runstate to device and bus Anton Kuchin
@ 2020-01-06 12:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-01-06 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anton Kuchin; +Cc: qemu-devel, yc-core
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 03:52:45PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> On transition to running first apply state to bus and then to device
> so device can access bus functions correctly. When going to stopped
> notify device first and then the bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>
I kind of like this but this has the potential to break lots of things.
How was this tested?
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 04716b5f6c..2ea2edba10 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -3096,7 +3096,7 @@ static void virtio_vmstate_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState state)
> bool backend_run = running && virtio_device_started(vdev, vdev->status);
> vdev->vm_running = running;
>
> - if (backend_run) {
> + if (!backend_run) {
> virtio_set_status(vdev, vdev->status);
> }
>
> @@ -3104,7 +3104,7 @@ static void virtio_vmstate_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState state)
> k->vmstate_change(qbus->parent, backend_run);
> }
>
> - if (!backend_run) {
> + if (backend_run) {
> virtio_set_status(vdev, vdev->status);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-06 12:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-20 12:52 [RFC PATCH] virtio: Change order of appling runstate to device and bus Anton Kuchin
2020-01-06 12:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.