All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	grant.likely@arm.com, jean-philippe <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, francois.ozog@linaro.org,
	kenneth-lee-2012@foxmail.com, Wangzhou <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	"haojian . zhuang" <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	guodong.xu@linaro.org, linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	Zaibo Xu <xuzaibo@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] uacce: add uacce driver
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 20:40:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200111194006.GD435222@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1578710919-12141-3-git-send-email-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 10:48:37AM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> +static int uacce_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> +{
> +	struct uacce_mm *uacce_mm = NULL;
> +	struct uacce_device *uacce;
> +	struct uacce_queue *q;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	uacce = xa_load(&uacce_xa, iminor(inode));
> +	if (!uacce)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!try_module_get(uacce->parent->driver->owner))
> +		return -ENODEV;

Why are you trying to grab the module reference of the parent device?
Why is that needed and what is that going to help with here?

This shouldn't be needed as the module reference of the owner of the
fileops for this module is incremented, and the "parent" module depends
on this module, so how could it be unloaded without this code being
unloaded?

Yes, if you build this code into the kernel and the "parent" driver is a
module, then you will not have a reference, but when you remove that
parent driver the device will be removed as it has to be unregistered
before that parent driver can be removed from the system, right?

Or what am I missing here?

> +static void uacce_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct uacce_device *uacce = to_uacce_device(dev);
> +
> +	kfree(uacce);
> +	uacce = NULL;

That line didn't do anything :)

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Cc: jean-philippe <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	dave.jiang@intel.com, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	francois.ozog@linaro.org, linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org,
	ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	grant.likely@arm.com,
	"haojian . zhuang" <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	guodong.xu@linaro.org, kenneth-lee-2012@foxmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] uacce: add uacce driver
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 20:40:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200111194006.GD435222@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1578710919-12141-3-git-send-email-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 10:48:37AM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> +static int uacce_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> +{
> +	struct uacce_mm *uacce_mm = NULL;
> +	struct uacce_device *uacce;
> +	struct uacce_queue *q;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	uacce = xa_load(&uacce_xa, iminor(inode));
> +	if (!uacce)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!try_module_get(uacce->parent->driver->owner))
> +		return -ENODEV;

Why are you trying to grab the module reference of the parent device?
Why is that needed and what is that going to help with here?

This shouldn't be needed as the module reference of the owner of the
fileops for this module is incremented, and the "parent" module depends
on this module, so how could it be unloaded without this code being
unloaded?

Yes, if you build this code into the kernel and the "parent" driver is a
module, then you will not have a reference, but when you remove that
parent driver the device will be removed as it has to be unregistered
before that parent driver can be removed from the system, right?

Or what am I missing here?

> +static void uacce_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct uacce_device *uacce = to_uacce_device(dev);
> +
> +	kfree(uacce);
> +	uacce = NULL;

That line didn't do anything :)

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-11 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-11  2:48 [PATCH v11 0/4] Add uacce module for Accelerator Zhangfei Gao
2020-01-11  2:48 ` Zhangfei Gao
2020-01-11  2:48 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] uacce: Add documents for uacce Zhangfei Gao
2020-01-11  2:48   ` Zhangfei Gao
2020-01-11  2:48 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] uacce: add uacce driver Zhangfei Gao
2020-01-11  2:48   ` Zhangfei Gao
2020-01-11 19:40   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-01-11 19:40     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-13  3:34     ` zhangfei
2020-01-13  3:34       ` zhangfei
2020-01-14 14:59       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-14 14:59         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-15 11:18         ` zhangfei
2020-01-15 11:18           ` zhangfei
2020-01-15 12:02           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-15 12:02             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-15 14:11             ` zhangfei
2020-01-15 14:11               ` zhangfei
2020-01-15 16:43           ` Dave Jiang
2020-01-15 16:43             ` Dave Jiang
2020-01-16  2:11             ` zhangfei
2020-01-16  2:11               ` zhangfei
2020-01-11  2:48 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] crypto: hisilicon - Remove module_param uacce_mode Zhangfei Gao
2020-01-11  2:48   ` Zhangfei Gao
2020-01-11  2:48 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] crypto: hisilicon - register zip engine to uacce Zhangfei Gao
2020-01-11  2:48   ` Zhangfei Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200111194006.GD435222@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=francois.ozog@linaro.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
    --cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kenneth-lee-2012@foxmail.com \
    --cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=xuzaibo@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.