From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, soc@kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] soc/fsl drivers changes for next(v5.6)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:47:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200116204743.uwyo2mjvhj46vgxq@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADRPPNQm2ZK+trtKCo2Mjr+ga2vKCR4hWMoFXd3AMMxRQZ_4ZA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:14:07PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:41 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:19:11PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> > > Hi soc maintainers,
> > >
> > > Please merge the following new changes for soc/fsl drivers.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Leo
> > >
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit e42617b825f8073569da76dc4510bfa019b1c35a:
> > >
> > > Linux 5.5-rc1 (2019-12-08 14:57:55 -0800)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leo/linux.git tags/soc-fsl-next-v5.6
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 6e62bd36e9ad85a22d92b1adce6a0336ea549733:
> > >
> > > soc: fsl: qe: remove set but not used variable 'mm_gc' (2020-01-08 16:02:48 -0600)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > NXP/FSL SoC driver updates for v5.6
> > >
> > > QUICC Engine drivers
> > > - Improve the QE drivers to be compatible with ARM/ARM64/PPC64
> > > architectures
> > > - Various cleanups to the QE drivers
> >
> > This branch contains a cross-section of drivers, including those who are
> > normally sent to other maintainers/subsystems. I don't see dependencies that
> > make them a requirement/easier to merge through the SoC tree at this time --
> > for example the ucc_uart driver updates are mostly independent cleanups.
> >
> > Am I missing some aspect here, or should those just be merged through
> > drivers/tty as other driver changes there? At the very least, we expect drivers
> > that aren't merged through the normal path to have acks from those maintainers.
> >
> > Mind following up on that? Thanks!
>
> Hi Olof,
>
> Some of the driver cleanups are dependent to core QE changes. Some
> maybe not but could have contextual dependency with other patches. I
> will be easier to have them all go in from the same place. We have
> collected the ack and confirmation from all the related maintainers.
> For the ucc_uart it is not a formal ack. Quoted the confirmation from
> Greg below:
Ok, getting that in the pull request (tag) would be useful for future cases.
Merging. Thanks!
-Olof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
Cc: soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] soc/fsl drivers changes for next(v5.6)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:47:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200116204743.uwyo2mjvhj46vgxq@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADRPPNQm2ZK+trtKCo2Mjr+ga2vKCR4hWMoFXd3AMMxRQZ_4ZA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:14:07PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:41 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:19:11PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> > > Hi soc maintainers,
> > >
> > > Please merge the following new changes for soc/fsl drivers.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Leo
> > >
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit e42617b825f8073569da76dc4510bfa019b1c35a:
> > >
> > > Linux 5.5-rc1 (2019-12-08 14:57:55 -0800)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leo/linux.git tags/soc-fsl-next-v5.6
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 6e62bd36e9ad85a22d92b1adce6a0336ea549733:
> > >
> > > soc: fsl: qe: remove set but not used variable 'mm_gc' (2020-01-08 16:02:48 -0600)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > NXP/FSL SoC driver updates for v5.6
> > >
> > > QUICC Engine drivers
> > > - Improve the QE drivers to be compatible with ARM/ARM64/PPC64
> > > architectures
> > > - Various cleanups to the QE drivers
> >
> > This branch contains a cross-section of drivers, including those who are
> > normally sent to other maintainers/subsystems. I don't see dependencies that
> > make them a requirement/easier to merge through the SoC tree at this time --
> > for example the ucc_uart driver updates are mostly independent cleanups.
> >
> > Am I missing some aspect here, or should those just be merged through
> > drivers/tty as other driver changes there? At the very least, we expect drivers
> > that aren't merged through the normal path to have acks from those maintainers.
> >
> > Mind following up on that? Thanks!
>
> Hi Olof,
>
> Some of the driver cleanups are dependent to core QE changes. Some
> maybe not but could have contextual dependency with other patches. I
> will be easier to have them all go in from the same place. We have
> collected the ack and confirmation from all the related maintainers.
> For the ucc_uart it is not a formal ack. Quoted the confirmation from
> Greg below:
Ok, getting that in the pull request (tag) would be useful for future cases.
Merging. Thanks!
-Olof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-09 22:19 [GIT PULL] soc/fsl drivers changes for next(v5.6) Li Yang
2020-01-09 22:19 ` Li Yang
2020-01-16 18:39 ` Olof Johansson
2020-01-16 18:39 ` Olof Johansson
2020-01-16 19:14 ` Li Yang
2020-01-16 19:14 ` Li Yang
2020-01-16 20:47 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2020-01-16 20:47 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200116204743.uwyo2mjvhj46vgxq@localhost \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.