All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Makarand Pawagi <makarand.pawagi@nxp.com>,
	Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@nxp.com>,
	stuyoder@gmail.com, nleeder@codeaurora.org,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@nxp.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Andy Wang <Andy.Wang@arm.com>, Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@nxp.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>,
	Paul Yang <Paul.Yang@arm.com>,
	"<netdev@vger.kernel.org>" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Shameerali Kolothum Thodi  <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] bus: fsl-mc: Add ACPI support for fsl-mc
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:29:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200131142906.GG9639@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b136adc4-be48-82df-0592-97b4ba11dd79@arm.com>

> > But by design SFP, SFP+, and QSFP cages are not fixed function network
> > adapters.  They are physical and logical devices that can adapt to
> > what is plugged into them.  How the devices are exposed should be
> > irrelevant to this conversation it is about the underlying
> > connectivity.
> 
> Apologies - I was under the impression that SFP and friends were a
> physical-layer thing and that a MAC in the SoC would still be fixed such
> that its DMA and interrupt configuration could be statically described
> regardless of what transceiver was plugged in (even if some configurations
> might not use every interrupt/stream ID/etc.) If that isn't the case I shall
> go and educate myself further.

Hi Robin

It gets interesting with QSFP cages. The Q is quad, there are 4 SERDES
lanes. You can use them for 1x 40G link, or you can split them into 4x
10G links. So you either need one MAC or 4 MACs connecting to the
cage, and this can change on the fly when a modules is ejected and
replaced with another module. There are only one set of control pins
for i2c, loss of signal, TX disable, module inserted. So where the
interrupt/stream ID/etc are mapped needs some flexibility.

There is also to some degree a conflict with hiding all this inside
firmware. This is complex stuff. It is much better to have one core
implementing in Linux plus some per hardware driver support, than
having X firmware blobs, generally closed source, each with there own
bugs which nobody can fix.

     Andrew

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@nxp.com>,
	stuyoder@gmail.com, nleeder@codeaurora.org,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@nxp.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>,
	Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Andy Wang <Andy.Wang@arm.com>,
	Makarand Pawagi <makarand.pawagi@nxp.com>,
	Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@nxp.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>,
	Paul Yang <Paul.Yang@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"<netdev@vger.kernel.org>" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] bus: fsl-mc: Add ACPI support for fsl-mc
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:29:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200131142906.GG9639@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b136adc4-be48-82df-0592-97b4ba11dd79@arm.com>

> > But by design SFP, SFP+, and QSFP cages are not fixed function network
> > adapters.  They are physical and logical devices that can adapt to
> > what is plugged into them.  How the devices are exposed should be
> > irrelevant to this conversation it is about the underlying
> > connectivity.
> 
> Apologies - I was under the impression that SFP and friends were a
> physical-layer thing and that a MAC in the SoC would still be fixed such
> that its DMA and interrupt configuration could be statically described
> regardless of what transceiver was plugged in (even if some configurations
> might not use every interrupt/stream ID/etc.) If that isn't the case I shall
> go and educate myself further.

Hi Robin

It gets interesting with QSFP cages. The Q is quad, there are 4 SERDES
lanes. You can use them for 1x 40G link, or you can split them into 4x
10G links. So you either need one MAC or 4 MACs connecting to the
cage, and this can change on the fly when a modules is ejected and
replaced with another module. There are only one set of control pins
for i2c, loss of signal, TX disable, module inserted. So where the
interrupt/stream ID/etc are mapped needs some flexibility.

There is also to some degree a conflict with hiding all this inside
firmware. This is complex stuff. It is much better to have one core
implementing in Linux plus some per hardware driver support, than
having X firmware blobs, generally closed source, each with there own
bugs which nobody can fix.

     Andrew

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-31 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-28  8:08 [PATCH] bus: fsl-mc: Add ACPI support for fsl-mc Makarand Pawagi
2020-01-28  8:08 ` Makarand Pawagi
2020-01-28 10:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-28 10:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-28 11:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-01-28 11:09   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-01-31 10:35   ` [EXT] " Makarand Pawagi
2020-01-31 10:35     ` Makarand Pawagi
2020-01-31 11:06     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-01-31 11:06       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-01-31 11:06     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-31 11:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-31 12:01       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-01-31 12:01         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-01-31 12:28         ` Jon Nettleton
2020-01-31 12:28           ` Jon Nettleton
2020-01-31 12:48           ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-31 12:48             ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-31 13:11             ` Jon Nettleton
2020-01-31 13:11               ` Jon Nettleton
2020-01-31 13:29               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-01-31 13:29                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-01-31 13:39               ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-31 13:39                 ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-31 14:29                 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-01-31 14:29                   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-01-31 14:47                   ` Will Deacon
2020-01-31 14:47                     ` Will Deacon
2020-01-31 15:09                     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-01-31 15:09                       ` Andrew Lunn
2020-01-31 15:14                       ` Jon Nettleton
2020-01-31 15:14                         ` Jon Nettleton
2020-01-31 15:41                         ` Andrew Lunn
2020-01-31 15:41                           ` Andrew Lunn
2020-01-31 15:39                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-01-31 15:39                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-01-31 15:15                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-01-31 15:15                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-01-31 15:40                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-31 15:40                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-02-01 11:49                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-01 11:49                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-01 17:36                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-02-01 17:36                           ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-02-14 15:05         ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-02-14 15:05           ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-02-14 15:54           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-14 15:54             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-14 15:58             ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-02-14 15:58               ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-02-14 16:19               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-14 16:19                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-14 16:35                 ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-02-14 16:35                   ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-02-14 17:49                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-14 17:49                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-17 12:35                     ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-02-17 12:35                       ` Pankaj Bansal
2020-02-17 15:25                       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-17 15:25                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-17 15:35                         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-17 15:35                           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-17 16:26                           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-17 16:26                             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-18  8:02                         ` Pankaj Bansal (OSS)
2020-02-18  8:02                           ` Pankaj Bansal (OSS)
2020-02-14 16:29               ` Robin Murphy
2020-02-14 16:29                 ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200131142906.GG9639@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=Andy.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=Paul.Yang@arm.com \
    --cc=V.Sethi@nxp.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=calvin.johnson@nxp.com \
    --cc=cristian.sovaiala@nxp.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=jon@solid-run.com \
    --cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=makarand.pawagi@nxp.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nleeder@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=pankaj.bansal@nxp.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=stuyoder@gmail.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.