[PATCH 0/4] drm/dp,i915: eDP DPCD backlight control detection fixes

[PATCH 0/4] drm/dp,i915: eDP DPCD backlight control detection fixes

[Lyude Paul]

Unfortunately, it turned out that the DPCD is also not a reliable way of
probing for DPCD backlight support as some panels will lie and say they
have DPCD backlight controls when they don't actually.

So, revert back to the old behavior and add a bunch of EDID-based DP
quirks for the panels that we know need this. As you might have already
guessed, OUI quirks didn't seem to be a very safe bet for these panels
due to them not having their device IDs filled out.

Lyude Paul (4):
  Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"
  drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks
  drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED
    panel
  drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode for some Precision 7750 panels

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c               | 78 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c         |  3 +-
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       | 11 ++-
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 28 +++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      |  2 +-
 include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   | 21 ++++-
 8 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/dp, i915: eDP DPCD backlight control detection fixes

[Lyude Paul]

Unfortunately, it turned out that the DPCD is also not a reliable way of
probing for DPCD backlight support as some panels will lie and say they
have DPCD backlight controls when they don't actually.

So, revert back to the old behavior and add a bunch of EDID-based DP
quirks for the panels that we know need this. As you might have already
guessed, OUI quirks didn't seem to be a very safe bet for these panels
due to them not having their device IDs filled out.

Lyude Paul (4):
  Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"
  drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks
  drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED
    panel
  drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode for some Precision 7750 panels

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c               | 78 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c         |  3 +-
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       | 11 ++-
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 28 +++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      |  2 +-
 include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   | 21 ++++-
 8 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 0/4] drm/dp,i915: eDP DPCD backlight control detection fixes

[Lyude Paul]

Unfortunately, it turned out that the DPCD is also not a reliable way of
probing for DPCD backlight support as some panels will lie and say they
have DPCD backlight controls when they don't actually.

So, revert back to the old behavior and add a bunch of EDID-based DP
quirks for the panels that we know need this. As you might have already
guessed, OUI quirks didn't seem to be a very safe bet for these panels
due to them not having their device IDs filled out.

Lyude Paul (4):
  Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"
  drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks
  drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED
    panel
  drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode for some Precision 7750 panels

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c               | 78 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c         |  3 +-
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       | 11 ++-
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 28 +++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      |  2 +-
 include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   | 21 ++++-
 8 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 1/4] Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"

[Lyude Paul]

This reverts commit d2a4bb6f8bc8cf2d788adf7e59b5b52fe3a3333c.

So, turns out that this ended up just breaking things. While many
laptops incorrectly advertise themselves as supporting PWM backlight
controls, they actually will only work with DPCD backlight controls.
Unfortunately, it also seems there are a number of systems which
advertise DPCD backlight controls in their eDP DPCD but don't actually
support them. Talking with some laptop manufacturers has shown it might
be possible to probe this support via the EDID (!?!?) but I haven't been
able to confirm that this would work on any other manufacturer's
systems.

So in the mean time, we'll just revert this commit for now and go back
to the old way of doing things. Additionally, let's print out an info
message into the kernel log so that it's a little more obvious if a
system needs DPCD backlight controls enabled through a quirk (which
we'll introduce in the next commit).

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
index e86feebef299..48276237b362 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
@@ -328,16 +328,15 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
 int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
 {
 	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
-	enum intel_backlight_type type =
-		to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev)->vbt.backlight.type;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
 
 	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
 	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
-	     !intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector)))
+	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	if (type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
-		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Ignoring VBT backlight type\n");
+	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	panel->backlight.setup = intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight;
 	panel->backlight.enable = intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight;
-- 
2.24.1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"

[Lyude Paul]

This reverts commit d2a4bb6f8bc8cf2d788adf7e59b5b52fe3a3333c.

So, turns out that this ended up just breaking things. While many
laptops incorrectly advertise themselves as supporting PWM backlight
controls, they actually will only work with DPCD backlight controls.
Unfortunately, it also seems there are a number of systems which
advertise DPCD backlight controls in their eDP DPCD but don't actually
support them. Talking with some laptop manufacturers has shown it might
be possible to probe this support via the EDID (!?!?) but I haven't been
able to confirm that this would work on any other manufacturer's
systems.

So in the mean time, we'll just revert this commit for now and go back
to the old way of doing things. Additionally, let's print out an info
message into the kernel log so that it's a little more obvious if a
system needs DPCD backlight controls enabled through a quirk (which
we'll introduce in the next commit).

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
index e86feebef299..48276237b362 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
@@ -328,16 +328,15 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
 int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
 {
 	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
-	enum intel_backlight_type type =
-		to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev)->vbt.backlight.type;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
 
 	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
 	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
-	     !intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector)))
+	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	if (type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
-		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Ignoring VBT backlight type\n");
+	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	panel->backlight.setup = intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight;
 	panel->backlight.enable = intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight;
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 1/4] Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"

[Lyude Paul]

This reverts commit d2a4bb6f8bc8cf2d788adf7e59b5b52fe3a3333c.

So, turns out that this ended up just breaking things. While many
laptops incorrectly advertise themselves as supporting PWM backlight
controls, they actually will only work with DPCD backlight controls.
Unfortunately, it also seems there are a number of systems which
advertise DPCD backlight controls in their eDP DPCD but don't actually
support them. Talking with some laptop manufacturers has shown it might
be possible to probe this support via the EDID (!?!?) but I haven't been
able to confirm that this would work on any other manufacturer's
systems.

So in the mean time, we'll just revert this commit for now and go back
to the old way of doing things. Additionally, let's print out an info
message into the kernel log so that it's a little more obvious if a
system needs DPCD backlight controls enabled through a quirk (which
we'll introduce in the next commit).

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
index e86feebef299..48276237b362 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
@@ -328,16 +328,15 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
 int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
 {
 	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
-	enum intel_backlight_type type =
-		to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev)->vbt.backlight.type;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
 
 	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
 	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
-	     !intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector)))
+	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	if (type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
-		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Ignoring VBT backlight type\n");
+	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	panel->backlight.setup = intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight;
 	panel->backlight.enable = intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight;
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 04 Feb 2020, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
> This reverts commit d2a4bb6f8bc8cf2d788adf7e59b5b52fe3a3333c.
>
> So, turns out that this ended up just breaking things. While many
> laptops incorrectly advertise themselves as supporting PWM backlight
> controls, they actually will only work with DPCD backlight controls.
> Unfortunately, it also seems there are a number of systems which
> advertise DPCD backlight controls in their eDP DPCD but don't actually
> support them. Talking with some laptop manufacturers has shown it might
> be possible to probe this support via the EDID (!?!?) but I haven't been
> able to confirm that this would work on any other manufacturer's
> systems.
>
> So in the mean time, we'll just revert this commit for now and go back
> to the old way of doing things.

The below sentence does not seem to match the patch:

> Additionally, let's print out an info
> message into the kernel log so that it's a little more obvious if a
> system needs DPCD backlight controls enabled through a quirk (which
> we'll introduce in the next commit).

I've pushed the revert to dinq, with the above removed, thanks for the
patch.

I'll try to look into the rest of the patches soon...

BR,
Jani.

>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index e86feebef299..48276237b362 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -328,16 +328,15 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
>  {
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
> -	enum intel_backlight_type type =
> -		to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev)->vbt.backlight.type;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
>  
>  	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
>  	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
> -	     !intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector)))
> +	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	if (type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
> -		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Ignoring VBT backlight type\n");
> +	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	panel->backlight.setup = intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight;
>  	panel->backlight.enable = intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 04 Feb 2020, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
> This reverts commit d2a4bb6f8bc8cf2d788adf7e59b5b52fe3a3333c.
>
> So, turns out that this ended up just breaking things. While many
> laptops incorrectly advertise themselves as supporting PWM backlight
> controls, they actually will only work with DPCD backlight controls.
> Unfortunately, it also seems there are a number of systems which
> advertise DPCD backlight controls in their eDP DPCD but don't actually
> support them. Talking with some laptop manufacturers has shown it might
> be possible to probe this support via the EDID (!?!?) but I haven't been
> able to confirm that this would work on any other manufacturer's
> systems.
>
> So in the mean time, we'll just revert this commit for now and go back
> to the old way of doing things.

The below sentence does not seem to match the patch:

> Additionally, let's print out an info
> message into the kernel log so that it's a little more obvious if a
> system needs DPCD backlight controls enabled through a quirk (which
> we'll introduce in the next commit).

I've pushed the revert to dinq, with the above removed, thanks for the
patch.

I'll try to look into the rest of the patches soon...

BR,
Jani.

>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index e86feebef299..48276237b362 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -328,16 +328,15 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
>  {
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
> -	enum intel_backlight_type type =
> -		to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev)->vbt.backlight.type;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
>  
>  	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
>  	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
> -	     !intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector)))
> +	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	if (type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
> -		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Ignoring VBT backlight type\n");
> +	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	panel->backlight.setup = intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight;
>  	panel->backlight.enable = intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 04 Feb 2020, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
> This reverts commit d2a4bb6f8bc8cf2d788adf7e59b5b52fe3a3333c.
>
> So, turns out that this ended up just breaking things. While many
> laptops incorrectly advertise themselves as supporting PWM backlight
> controls, they actually will only work with DPCD backlight controls.
> Unfortunately, it also seems there are a number of systems which
> advertise DPCD backlight controls in their eDP DPCD but don't actually
> support them. Talking with some laptop manufacturers has shown it might
> be possible to probe this support via the EDID (!?!?) but I haven't been
> able to confirm that this would work on any other manufacturer's
> systems.
>
> So in the mean time, we'll just revert this commit for now and go back
> to the old way of doing things.

The below sentence does not seem to match the patch:

> Additionally, let's print out an info
> message into the kernel log so that it's a little more obvious if a
> system needs DPCD backlight controls enabled through a quirk (which
> we'll introduce in the next commit).

I've pushed the revert to dinq, with the above removed, thanks for the
patch.

I'll try to look into the rest of the patches soon...

BR,
Jani.

>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index e86feebef299..48276237b362 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -328,16 +328,15 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
>  {
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
> -	enum intel_backlight_type type =
> -		to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev)->vbt.backlight.type;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
>  
>  	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
>  	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
> -	     !intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector)))
> +	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	if (type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
> -		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Ignoring VBT backlight type\n");
> +	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	panel->backlight.setup = intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight;
>  	panel->backlight.enable = intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 2/4] drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks

[Lyude Paul]

The whole point of using OUIs is so that we can recognize certain
devices and potentially apply quirks for them. Normally this should work
quite well, but there appears to be quite a number of laptop panels out
there that will fill the OUI but not the device ID. As such, for devices
like this I can't imagine it's a very good idea to try relying on OUIs
for applying quirks. As well, some laptop vendors have confirmed to us
that their panels have this exact issue.

So, let's introduce the ability to apply DP quirks based on EDID
identification. We reuse the same quirk bits for OUI-based quirks, so
that callers can simply check all possible quirks using
drm_dp_has_quirk().

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c               | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c         |  3 +-
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       | 11 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      |  2 +-
 include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   | 11 +++-
 7 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 5a103e9b3c86..db23308f4d8b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1221,6 +1221,67 @@ drm_dp_get_quirks(const struct drm_dp_dpcd_ident *ident, bool is_branch)
 #undef DEVICE_ID_ANY
 #undef DEVICE_ID
 
+struct edid_quirk {
+	u8 mfg_id[2];
+	u8 prod_id[2];
+	u32 quirks;
+};
+
+#define MFG(first, second) { (first), (second) }
+#define PROD_ID(first, second) { (first), (second) }
+
+/*
+ * Some devices have unreliable OUIDs where they don't set the device ID
+ * correctly, and as a result we need to use the EDID for finding additional
+ * DP quirks in such cases.
+ */
+static const struct edid_quirk edid_quirk_list[] = {
+};
+
+#undef MFG
+#undef PROD_ID
+
+/**
+ * drm_dp_get_edid_quirks() - Check the EDID of a DP device to find additional
+ * DP-specific quirks
+ * @edid: The EDID to check
+ *
+ * While OUIDs are meant to be used to recognize a DisplayPort device, a lot
+ * of manufacturers don't seem to like following standards and neglect to fill
+ * the dev-ID in, making it impossible to only use OUIDs for determining
+ * quirks in some cases. This function can be used to check the EDID and look
+ * up any additional DP quirks. The bits returned by this function correspond
+ * to the quirk bits in &drm_dp_quirk.
+ *
+ * Returns: a bitmask of quirks, if any. The driver can check this using
+ * drm_dp_has_quirk().
+ */
+u32 drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(const struct edid *edid)
+{
+	const struct edid_quirk *quirk;
+	u32 quirks = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!edid)
+		return 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_quirk_list); i++) {
+		quirk = &edid_quirk_list[i];
+		if (memcmp(quirk->mfg_id, edid->mfg_id,
+			   sizeof(edid->mfg_id)) == 0 &&
+		    memcmp(quirk->prod_id, edid->prod_code,
+			   sizeof(edid->prod_code)) == 0)
+			quirks |= quirk->quirks;
+	}
+
+	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP sink: EDID mfg %*phD prod-ID %*phD quirks: 0x%04x\n",
+		      (int)sizeof(edid->mfg_id), edid->mfg_id,
+		      (int)sizeof(edid->prod_code), edid->prod_code, quirks);
+
+	return quirks;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_get_edid_quirks);
+
 /**
  * drm_dp_read_desc - read sink/branch descriptor from DPCD
  * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index a811247cecfe..68247670427a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -5452,7 +5452,8 @@ struct drm_dp_aux *drm_dp_mst_dsc_aux_for_port(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
 	if (drm_dp_read_desc(port->mgr->aux, &desc, true))
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_DSC_WITHOUT_VIRTUAL_DPCD) &&
+	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&desc, 0,
+			     DP_DPCD_QUIRK_DSC_WITHOUT_VIRTUAL_DPCD) &&
 	    port->mgr->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_14 &&
 	    port->parent == port->mgr->mst_primary) {
 		u8 downstreamport;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
index 7c6133a9c51b..eebf02ff4ed2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
@@ -1231,6 +1231,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
 	int max_link_rate;
 	/* sink or branch descriptor */
 	struct drm_dp_desc desc;
+	u32 edid_quirks;
 	struct drm_dp_aux aux;
 	u32 aux_busy_last_status;
 	u8 train_set[4];
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index f4dede6253f8..245e21d1cadd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -2386,7 +2386,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
 	struct intel_digital_connector_state *intel_conn_state =
 		to_intel_digital_connector_state(conn_state);
-	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc,
+	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0,
 					   DP_DPCD_QUIRK_CONSTANT_N);
 	int ret = 0, output_bpp;
 
@@ -4499,7 +4499,8 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	 * it don't care about read it here and in intel_edp_init_dpcd().
 	 */
 	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
-	    !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_SINK_COUNT)) {
+	    !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0,
+			      DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_SINK_COUNT)) {
 		u8 count;
 		ssize_t r;
 
@@ -5666,6 +5667,7 @@ intel_dp_set_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 
 	intel_dp->has_audio = drm_detect_monitor_audio(edid);
 	drm_dp_cec_set_edid(&intel_dp->aux, edid);
+	intel_dp->edid_quirks = drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(edid);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -5678,6 +5680,7 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	intel_connector->detect_edid = NULL;
 
 	intel_dp->has_audio = false;
+	intel_dp->edid_quirks = 0;
 }
 
 static int
@@ -7409,8 +7412,8 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc);
 	if (edid) {
 		if (drm_add_edid_modes(connector, edid)) {
-			drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector,
-								edid);
+			drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid);
+			intel_dp->edid_quirks = drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(edid);
 		} else {
 			kfree(edid);
 			edid = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index b8aee506d595..82843272a873 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
 		&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
 	void *port = connector->port;
-	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc,
+	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0,
 					   DP_DPCD_QUIRK_CONSTANT_N);
 	int bpp, slots = -EINVAL;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index db3d1561e9bf..377828dd2884 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "eDP panel supports PSR version %x\n",
 		    intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0]);
 
-	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR)) {
+	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR)) {
 		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
 			    "PSR support not currently available for this panel\n");
 		return;
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
index 262faf9e5e94..7f5dd2ee4a94 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
@@ -1495,13 +1495,16 @@ struct drm_dp_desc {
 
 int drm_dp_read_desc(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_desc *desc,
 		     bool is_branch);
+u32 drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(const struct edid *edid);
 
 /**
  * enum drm_dp_quirk - Display Port sink/branch device specific quirks
  *
  * Display Port sink and branch devices in the wild have a variety of bugs, try
  * to collect them here. The quirks are shared, but it's up to the drivers to
- * implement workarounds for them.
+ * implement workarounds for them. Note that because some devices have
+ * unreliable OUIDs, the EDID of sinks should also be checked for quirks using
+ * drm_dp_get_edid_quirks().
  */
 enum drm_dp_quirk {
 	/**
@@ -1537,14 +1540,16 @@ enum drm_dp_quirk {
 /**
  * drm_dp_has_quirk() - does the DP device have a specific quirk
  * @desc: Device decriptor filled by drm_dp_read_desc()
+ * @edid_quirks: Optional quirk bitmask filled by drm_dp_get_edid_quirks()
  * @quirk: Quirk to query for
  *
  * Return true if DP device identified by @desc has @quirk.
  */
 static inline bool
-drm_dp_has_quirk(const struct drm_dp_desc *desc, enum drm_dp_quirk quirk)
+drm_dp_has_quirk(const struct drm_dp_desc *desc, u32 edid_quirks,
+		 enum drm_dp_quirk quirk)
 {
-	return desc->quirks & BIT(quirk);
+	return (desc->quirks | edid_quirks) & BIT(quirk);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_DP_CEC
-- 
2.24.1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks

[Lyude Paul]

The whole point of using OUIs is so that we can recognize certain
devices and potentially apply quirks for them. Normally this should work
quite well, but there appears to be quite a number of laptop panels out
there that will fill the OUI but not the device ID. As such, for devices
like this I can't imagine it's a very good idea to try relying on OUIs
for applying quirks. As well, some laptop vendors have confirmed to us
that their panels have this exact issue.

So, let's introduce the ability to apply DP quirks based on EDID
identification. We reuse the same quirk bits for OUI-based quirks, so
that callers can simply check all possible quirks using
drm_dp_has_quirk().

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c               | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c         |  3 +-
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       | 11 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      |  2 +-
 include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   | 11 +++-
 7 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 5a103e9b3c86..db23308f4d8b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1221,6 +1221,67 @@ drm_dp_get_quirks(const struct drm_dp_dpcd_ident *ident, bool is_branch)
 #undef DEVICE_ID_ANY
 #undef DEVICE_ID
 
+struct edid_quirk {
+	u8 mfg_id[2];
+	u8 prod_id[2];
+	u32 quirks;
+};
+
+#define MFG(first, second) { (first), (second) }
+#define PROD_ID(first, second) { (first), (second) }
+
+/*
+ * Some devices have unreliable OUIDs where they don't set the device ID
+ * correctly, and as a result we need to use the EDID for finding additional
+ * DP quirks in such cases.
+ */
+static const struct edid_quirk edid_quirk_list[] = {
+};
+
+#undef MFG
+#undef PROD_ID
+
+/**
+ * drm_dp_get_edid_quirks() - Check the EDID of a DP device to find additional
+ * DP-specific quirks
+ * @edid: The EDID to check
+ *
+ * While OUIDs are meant to be used to recognize a DisplayPort device, a lot
+ * of manufacturers don't seem to like following standards and neglect to fill
+ * the dev-ID in, making it impossible to only use OUIDs for determining
+ * quirks in some cases. This function can be used to check the EDID and look
+ * up any additional DP quirks. The bits returned by this function correspond
+ * to the quirk bits in &drm_dp_quirk.
+ *
+ * Returns: a bitmask of quirks, if any. The driver can check this using
+ * drm_dp_has_quirk().
+ */
+u32 drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(const struct edid *edid)
+{
+	const struct edid_quirk *quirk;
+	u32 quirks = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!edid)
+		return 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_quirk_list); i++) {
+		quirk = &edid_quirk_list[i];
+		if (memcmp(quirk->mfg_id, edid->mfg_id,
+			   sizeof(edid->mfg_id)) == 0 &&
+		    memcmp(quirk->prod_id, edid->prod_code,
+			   sizeof(edid->prod_code)) == 0)
+			quirks |= quirk->quirks;
+	}
+
+	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP sink: EDID mfg %*phD prod-ID %*phD quirks: 0x%04x\n",
+		      (int)sizeof(edid->mfg_id), edid->mfg_id,
+		      (int)sizeof(edid->prod_code), edid->prod_code, quirks);
+
+	return quirks;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_get_edid_quirks);
+
 /**
  * drm_dp_read_desc - read sink/branch descriptor from DPCD
  * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index a811247cecfe..68247670427a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -5452,7 +5452,8 @@ struct drm_dp_aux *drm_dp_mst_dsc_aux_for_port(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
 	if (drm_dp_read_desc(port->mgr->aux, &desc, true))
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_DSC_WITHOUT_VIRTUAL_DPCD) &&
+	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&desc, 0,
+			     DP_DPCD_QUIRK_DSC_WITHOUT_VIRTUAL_DPCD) &&
 	    port->mgr->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_14 &&
 	    port->parent == port->mgr->mst_primary) {
 		u8 downstreamport;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
index 7c6133a9c51b..eebf02ff4ed2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
@@ -1231,6 +1231,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
 	int max_link_rate;
 	/* sink or branch descriptor */
 	struct drm_dp_desc desc;
+	u32 edid_quirks;
 	struct drm_dp_aux aux;
 	u32 aux_busy_last_status;
 	u8 train_set[4];
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index f4dede6253f8..245e21d1cadd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -2386,7 +2386,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
 	struct intel_digital_connector_state *intel_conn_state =
 		to_intel_digital_connector_state(conn_state);
-	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc,
+	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0,
 					   DP_DPCD_QUIRK_CONSTANT_N);
 	int ret = 0, output_bpp;
 
@@ -4499,7 +4499,8 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	 * it don't care about read it here and in intel_edp_init_dpcd().
 	 */
 	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
-	    !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_SINK_COUNT)) {
+	    !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0,
+			      DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_SINK_COUNT)) {
 		u8 count;
 		ssize_t r;
 
@@ -5666,6 +5667,7 @@ intel_dp_set_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 
 	intel_dp->has_audio = drm_detect_monitor_audio(edid);
 	drm_dp_cec_set_edid(&intel_dp->aux, edid);
+	intel_dp->edid_quirks = drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(edid);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -5678,6 +5680,7 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	intel_connector->detect_edid = NULL;
 
 	intel_dp->has_audio = false;
+	intel_dp->edid_quirks = 0;
 }
 
 static int
@@ -7409,8 +7412,8 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc);
 	if (edid) {
 		if (drm_add_edid_modes(connector, edid)) {
-			drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector,
-								edid);
+			drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid);
+			intel_dp->edid_quirks = drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(edid);
 		} else {
 			kfree(edid);
 			edid = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index b8aee506d595..82843272a873 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
 		&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
 	void *port = connector->port;
-	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc,
+	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0,
 					   DP_DPCD_QUIRK_CONSTANT_N);
 	int bpp, slots = -EINVAL;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index db3d1561e9bf..377828dd2884 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "eDP panel supports PSR version %x\n",
 		    intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0]);
 
-	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR)) {
+	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR)) {
 		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
 			    "PSR support not currently available for this panel\n");
 		return;
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
index 262faf9e5e94..7f5dd2ee4a94 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
@@ -1495,13 +1495,16 @@ struct drm_dp_desc {
 
 int drm_dp_read_desc(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_desc *desc,
 		     bool is_branch);
+u32 drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(const struct edid *edid);
 
 /**
  * enum drm_dp_quirk - Display Port sink/branch device specific quirks
  *
  * Display Port sink and branch devices in the wild have a variety of bugs, try
  * to collect them here. The quirks are shared, but it's up to the drivers to
- * implement workarounds for them.
+ * implement workarounds for them. Note that because some devices have
+ * unreliable OUIDs, the EDID of sinks should also be checked for quirks using
+ * drm_dp_get_edid_quirks().
  */
 enum drm_dp_quirk {
 	/**
@@ -1537,14 +1540,16 @@ enum drm_dp_quirk {
 /**
  * drm_dp_has_quirk() - does the DP device have a specific quirk
  * @desc: Device decriptor filled by drm_dp_read_desc()
+ * @edid_quirks: Optional quirk bitmask filled by drm_dp_get_edid_quirks()
  * @quirk: Quirk to query for
  *
  * Return true if DP device identified by @desc has @quirk.
  */
 static inline bool
-drm_dp_has_quirk(const struct drm_dp_desc *desc, enum drm_dp_quirk quirk)
+drm_dp_has_quirk(const struct drm_dp_desc *desc, u32 edid_quirks,
+		 enum drm_dp_quirk quirk)
 {
-	return desc->quirks & BIT(quirk);
+	return (desc->quirks | edid_quirks) & BIT(quirk);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_DP_CEC
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 2/4] drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks

[Lyude Paul]

The whole point of using OUIs is so that we can recognize certain
devices and potentially apply quirks for them. Normally this should work
quite well, but there appears to be quite a number of laptop panels out
there that will fill the OUI but not the device ID. As such, for devices
like this I can't imagine it's a very good idea to try relying on OUIs
for applying quirks. As well, some laptop vendors have confirmed to us
that their panels have this exact issue.

So, let's introduce the ability to apply DP quirks based on EDID
identification. We reuse the same quirk bits for OUI-based quirks, so
that callers can simply check all possible quirks using
drm_dp_has_quirk().

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c               | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c         |  3 +-
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       | 11 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      |  2 +-
 include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   | 11 +++-
 7 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 5a103e9b3c86..db23308f4d8b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1221,6 +1221,67 @@ drm_dp_get_quirks(const struct drm_dp_dpcd_ident *ident, bool is_branch)
 #undef DEVICE_ID_ANY
 #undef DEVICE_ID
 
+struct edid_quirk {
+	u8 mfg_id[2];
+	u8 prod_id[2];
+	u32 quirks;
+};
+
+#define MFG(first, second) { (first), (second) }
+#define PROD_ID(first, second) { (first), (second) }
+
+/*
+ * Some devices have unreliable OUIDs where they don't set the device ID
+ * correctly, and as a result we need to use the EDID for finding additional
+ * DP quirks in such cases.
+ */
+static const struct edid_quirk edid_quirk_list[] = {
+};
+
+#undef MFG
+#undef PROD_ID
+
+/**
+ * drm_dp_get_edid_quirks() - Check the EDID of a DP device to find additional
+ * DP-specific quirks
+ * @edid: The EDID to check
+ *
+ * While OUIDs are meant to be used to recognize a DisplayPort device, a lot
+ * of manufacturers don't seem to like following standards and neglect to fill
+ * the dev-ID in, making it impossible to only use OUIDs for determining
+ * quirks in some cases. This function can be used to check the EDID and look
+ * up any additional DP quirks. The bits returned by this function correspond
+ * to the quirk bits in &drm_dp_quirk.
+ *
+ * Returns: a bitmask of quirks, if any. The driver can check this using
+ * drm_dp_has_quirk().
+ */
+u32 drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(const struct edid *edid)
+{
+	const struct edid_quirk *quirk;
+	u32 quirks = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!edid)
+		return 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_quirk_list); i++) {
+		quirk = &edid_quirk_list[i];
+		if (memcmp(quirk->mfg_id, edid->mfg_id,
+			   sizeof(edid->mfg_id)) == 0 &&
+		    memcmp(quirk->prod_id, edid->prod_code,
+			   sizeof(edid->prod_code)) == 0)
+			quirks |= quirk->quirks;
+	}
+
+	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP sink: EDID mfg %*phD prod-ID %*phD quirks: 0x%04x\n",
+		      (int)sizeof(edid->mfg_id), edid->mfg_id,
+		      (int)sizeof(edid->prod_code), edid->prod_code, quirks);
+
+	return quirks;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_get_edid_quirks);
+
 /**
  * drm_dp_read_desc - read sink/branch descriptor from DPCD
  * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index a811247cecfe..68247670427a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -5452,7 +5452,8 @@ struct drm_dp_aux *drm_dp_mst_dsc_aux_for_port(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
 	if (drm_dp_read_desc(port->mgr->aux, &desc, true))
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_DSC_WITHOUT_VIRTUAL_DPCD) &&
+	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&desc, 0,
+			     DP_DPCD_QUIRK_DSC_WITHOUT_VIRTUAL_DPCD) &&
 	    port->mgr->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_14 &&
 	    port->parent == port->mgr->mst_primary) {
 		u8 downstreamport;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
index 7c6133a9c51b..eebf02ff4ed2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
@@ -1231,6 +1231,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
 	int max_link_rate;
 	/* sink or branch descriptor */
 	struct drm_dp_desc desc;
+	u32 edid_quirks;
 	struct drm_dp_aux aux;
 	u32 aux_busy_last_status;
 	u8 train_set[4];
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index f4dede6253f8..245e21d1cadd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -2386,7 +2386,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
 	struct intel_digital_connector_state *intel_conn_state =
 		to_intel_digital_connector_state(conn_state);
-	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc,
+	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0,
 					   DP_DPCD_QUIRK_CONSTANT_N);
 	int ret = 0, output_bpp;
 
@@ -4499,7 +4499,8 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	 * it don't care about read it here and in intel_edp_init_dpcd().
 	 */
 	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
-	    !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_SINK_COUNT)) {
+	    !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0,
+			      DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_SINK_COUNT)) {
 		u8 count;
 		ssize_t r;
 
@@ -5666,6 +5667,7 @@ intel_dp_set_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 
 	intel_dp->has_audio = drm_detect_monitor_audio(edid);
 	drm_dp_cec_set_edid(&intel_dp->aux, edid);
+	intel_dp->edid_quirks = drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(edid);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -5678,6 +5680,7 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	intel_connector->detect_edid = NULL;
 
 	intel_dp->has_audio = false;
+	intel_dp->edid_quirks = 0;
 }
 
 static int
@@ -7409,8 +7412,8 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &intel_dp->aux.ddc);
 	if (edid) {
 		if (drm_add_edid_modes(connector, edid)) {
-			drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector,
-								edid);
+			drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid);
+			intel_dp->edid_quirks = drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(edid);
 		} else {
 			kfree(edid);
 			edid = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index b8aee506d595..82843272a873 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
 		&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
 	void *port = connector->port;
-	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc,
+	bool constant_n = drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0,
 					   DP_DPCD_QUIRK_CONSTANT_N);
 	int bpp, slots = -EINVAL;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index db3d1561e9bf..377828dd2884 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "eDP panel supports PSR version %x\n",
 		    intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0]);
 
-	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR)) {
+	if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, 0, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR)) {
 		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
 			    "PSR support not currently available for this panel\n");
 		return;
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
index 262faf9e5e94..7f5dd2ee4a94 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
@@ -1495,13 +1495,16 @@ struct drm_dp_desc {
 
 int drm_dp_read_desc(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_desc *desc,
 		     bool is_branch);
+u32 drm_dp_get_edid_quirks(const struct edid *edid);
 
 /**
  * enum drm_dp_quirk - Display Port sink/branch device specific quirks
  *
  * Display Port sink and branch devices in the wild have a variety of bugs, try
  * to collect them here. The quirks are shared, but it's up to the drivers to
- * implement workarounds for them.
+ * implement workarounds for them. Note that because some devices have
+ * unreliable OUIDs, the EDID of sinks should also be checked for quirks using
+ * drm_dp_get_edid_quirks().
  */
 enum drm_dp_quirk {
 	/**
@@ -1537,14 +1540,16 @@ enum drm_dp_quirk {
 /**
  * drm_dp_has_quirk() - does the DP device have a specific quirk
  * @desc: Device decriptor filled by drm_dp_read_desc()
+ * @edid_quirks: Optional quirk bitmask filled by drm_dp_get_edid_quirks()
  * @quirk: Quirk to query for
  *
  * Return true if DP device identified by @desc has @quirk.
  */
 static inline bool
-drm_dp_has_quirk(const struct drm_dp_desc *desc, enum drm_dp_quirk quirk)
+drm_dp_has_quirk(const struct drm_dp_desc *desc, u32 edid_quirks,
+		 enum drm_dp_quirk quirk)
 {
-	return desc->quirks & BIT(quirk);
+	return (desc->quirks | edid_quirks) & BIT(quirk);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_DP_CEC
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED panel

[Lyude Paul]

The X1 Extreme is one of the systems that lies about which backlight
interface that it uses in its VBIOS as PWM backlight controls don't work
at all on this machine. It's possible that this panel could be one of
the infamous ones that can switch between PWM mode and DPCD backlight
control mode, but we haven't gotten any more details on this from Lenovo
just yet. For the time being though, making sure the backlight 'just
works' is a bit more important.

So, add a quirk to force DPCD backlight controls on for these systems
based on EDID (since this panel doesn't appear to fill in the device ID).
Hopefully in the future we'll figure out a better way of probing this.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c               |  4 +++
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
 include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   | 10 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index db23308f4d8b..a39c3cdacb20 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1236,6 +1236,10 @@ struct edid_quirk {
  * DP quirks in such cases.
  */
 static const struct edid_quirk edid_quirk_list[] = {
+	/* Optional 4K AMOLED panel in the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Generation
+	 * only supports DPCD backlight controls
+	 */
+	{ MFG(0x4c, 0x83), PROD_ID(0x41, 0x41), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
 };
 
 #undef MFG
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
index 48276237b362..35a19c0314fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
@@ -328,15 +328,32 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
 int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
 {
 	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
+	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(intel_connector->encoder);
+	struct drm_device *dev = intel_connector->base.dev;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
 
 	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
-	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
-	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
+	    !intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
+	/*
+	 * There are a lot of machines that don't advertise the backlight
+	 * control interface to use properly in their VBIOS, :\
+	 */
+	if (dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type !=
+	    INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE &&
+	    !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, intel_dp->edid_quirks,
+			      DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT)) {
+		DRM_DEV_INFO(dev->dev,
+			     "Panel advertises DPCD backlight support, but "
+			     "VBT disagrees. If your backlight controls "
+			     "don't work try booting with "
+			     "i915.enable_dpcd_backlight=1. If your machine "
+			     "needs this, please file a _new_ bug report on "
+			     "bugs.freedesktop.org against DRI -> "
+			     "DRM/Intel\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	panel->backlight.setup = intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight;
 	panel->backlight.enable = intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight;
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
index 7f5dd2ee4a94..c5580e988826 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
@@ -1535,6 +1535,16 @@ enum drm_dp_quirk {
 	 * The DSC caps can be read from the physical aux instead.
 	 */
 	DP_DPCD_QUIRK_DSC_WITHOUT_VIRTUAL_DPCD,
+	/**
+	 * @DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT:
+	 *
+	 * The device is telling the truth when it says that it uses DPCD
+	 * backlight controls, even if the system's firmware disagrees. This
+	 * quirk should be checked against both the ident and panel EDID.
+	 * When present, the driver should honor the DPCD backlight
+	 * capabilities advertised.
+	 */
+	DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT,
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.24.1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED panel

[Lyude Paul]

The X1 Extreme is one of the systems that lies about which backlight
interface that it uses in its VBIOS as PWM backlight controls don't work
at all on this machine. It's possible that this panel could be one of
the infamous ones that can switch between PWM mode and DPCD backlight
control mode, but we haven't gotten any more details on this from Lenovo
just yet. For the time being though, making sure the backlight 'just
works' is a bit more important.

So, add a quirk to force DPCD backlight controls on for these systems
based on EDID (since this panel doesn't appear to fill in the device ID).
Hopefully in the future we'll figure out a better way of probing this.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c               |  4 +++
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
 include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   | 10 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index db23308f4d8b..a39c3cdacb20 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1236,6 +1236,10 @@ struct edid_quirk {
  * DP quirks in such cases.
  */
 static const struct edid_quirk edid_quirk_list[] = {
+	/* Optional 4K AMOLED panel in the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Generation
+	 * only supports DPCD backlight controls
+	 */
+	{ MFG(0x4c, 0x83), PROD_ID(0x41, 0x41), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
 };
 
 #undef MFG
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
index 48276237b362..35a19c0314fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
@@ -328,15 +328,32 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
 int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
 {
 	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
+	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(intel_connector->encoder);
+	struct drm_device *dev = intel_connector->base.dev;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
 
 	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
-	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
-	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
+	    !intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
+	/*
+	 * There are a lot of machines that don't advertise the backlight
+	 * control interface to use properly in their VBIOS, :\
+	 */
+	if (dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type !=
+	    INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE &&
+	    !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, intel_dp->edid_quirks,
+			      DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT)) {
+		DRM_DEV_INFO(dev->dev,
+			     "Panel advertises DPCD backlight support, but "
+			     "VBT disagrees. If your backlight controls "
+			     "don't work try booting with "
+			     "i915.enable_dpcd_backlight=1. If your machine "
+			     "needs this, please file a _new_ bug report on "
+			     "bugs.freedesktop.org against DRI -> "
+			     "DRM/Intel\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	panel->backlight.setup = intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight;
 	panel->backlight.enable = intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight;
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
index 7f5dd2ee4a94..c5580e988826 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
@@ -1535,6 +1535,16 @@ enum drm_dp_quirk {
 	 * The DSC caps can be read from the physical aux instead.
 	 */
 	DP_DPCD_QUIRK_DSC_WITHOUT_VIRTUAL_DPCD,
+	/**
+	 * @DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT:
+	 *
+	 * The device is telling the truth when it says that it uses DPCD
+	 * backlight controls, even if the system's firmware disagrees. This
+	 * quirk should be checked against both the ident and panel EDID.
+	 * When present, the driver should honor the DPCD backlight
+	 * capabilities advertised.
+	 */
+	DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT,
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED panel

[Lyude Paul]

The X1 Extreme is one of the systems that lies about which backlight
interface that it uses in its VBIOS as PWM backlight controls don't work
at all on this machine. It's possible that this panel could be one of
the infamous ones that can switch between PWM mode and DPCD backlight
control mode, but we haven't gotten any more details on this from Lenovo
just yet. For the time being though, making sure the backlight 'just
works' is a bit more important.

So, add a quirk to force DPCD backlight controls on for these systems
based on EDID (since this panel doesn't appear to fill in the device ID).
Hopefully in the future we'll figure out a better way of probing this.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c               |  4 +++
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
 include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   | 10 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index db23308f4d8b..a39c3cdacb20 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1236,6 +1236,10 @@ struct edid_quirk {
  * DP quirks in such cases.
  */
 static const struct edid_quirk edid_quirk_list[] = {
+	/* Optional 4K AMOLED panel in the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Generation
+	 * only supports DPCD backlight controls
+	 */
+	{ MFG(0x4c, 0x83), PROD_ID(0x41, 0x41), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
 };
 
 #undef MFG
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
index 48276237b362..35a19c0314fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
@@ -328,15 +328,32 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
 int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
 {
 	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
+	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(intel_connector->encoder);
+	struct drm_device *dev = intel_connector->base.dev;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
 
 	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
-	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
-	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
+	    !intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
+	/*
+	 * There are a lot of machines that don't advertise the backlight
+	 * control interface to use properly in their VBIOS, :\
+	 */
+	if (dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type !=
+	    INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE &&
+	    !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, intel_dp->edid_quirks,
+			      DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT)) {
+		DRM_DEV_INFO(dev->dev,
+			     "Panel advertises DPCD backlight support, but "
+			     "VBT disagrees. If your backlight controls "
+			     "don't work try booting with "
+			     "i915.enable_dpcd_backlight=1. If your machine "
+			     "needs this, please file a _new_ bug report on "
+			     "bugs.freedesktop.org against DRI -> "
+			     "DRM/Intel\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	panel->backlight.setup = intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight;
 	panel->backlight.enable = intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight;
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
index 7f5dd2ee4a94..c5580e988826 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
@@ -1535,6 +1535,16 @@ enum drm_dp_quirk {
 	 * The DSC caps can be read from the physical aux instead.
 	 */
 	DP_DPCD_QUIRK_DSC_WITHOUT_VIRTUAL_DPCD,
+	/**
+	 * @DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT:
+	 *
+	 * The device is telling the truth when it says that it uses DPCD
+	 * backlight controls, even if the system's firmware disagrees. This
+	 * quirk should be checked against both the ident and panel EDID.
+	 * When present, the driver should honor the DPCD backlight
+	 * capabilities advertised.
+	 */
+	DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT,
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode for some Precision 7750 panels

[Lyude Paul]

According to Dell, trying to match their panels via OUI is not reliable
enough and we've been told that we should check against the EDID
instead. As well, Dell seems to have some panels that are actually
intended to switch between using PWM for backlight controls and DPCD for
backlight controls depending on whether or not the panel is in HDR or
SDR mode. Yikes.

Regardless, we need to add quirks for these so that DPCD backlight
controls get enabled by default, since without additional driver support
that's the only form of brightness control that will work. Hopefully in
the future we can remove these quirks once we have a better way of
probing for this.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index a39c3cdacb20..c24bbea3e2a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1240,6 +1240,19 @@ static const struct edid_quirk edid_quirk_list[] = {
 	 * only supports DPCD backlight controls
 	 */
 	{ MFG(0x4c, 0x83), PROD_ID(0x41, 0x41), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
+	/*
+	 * Some Dell Precision 7750 systems have panels support both AUX and
+	 * PWM backlight control, and some only support AUX backlight control.
+	 * All said panels start up in AUX mode by default, and we don't have
+	 * any support for disabling HDR mode on these panels which would be
+	 * required to switch to PWM backlight control mode (plus, I'm not
+	 * even sure we want PWM backlight controls over DPCD backlight
+	 * controls anyway...). Until we have a better way of detecting these,
+	 * force DPCD backlight mode on all of them.
+	 */
+	{ MFG(0x06, 0xaf), PROD_ID(0x9b, 0x32), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
+	{ MFG(0x06, 0xaf), PROD_ID(0xeb, 0x41), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
+	{ MFG(0x4d, 0x10), PROD_ID(0xc7, 0x14), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
 };
 
 #undef MFG
-- 
2.24.1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode for some Precision 7750 panels

[Lyude Paul]

According to Dell, trying to match their panels via OUI is not reliable
enough and we've been told that we should check against the EDID
instead. As well, Dell seems to have some panels that are actually
intended to switch between using PWM for backlight controls and DPCD for
backlight controls depending on whether or not the panel is in HDR or
SDR mode. Yikes.

Regardless, we need to add quirks for these so that DPCD backlight
controls get enabled by default, since without additional driver support
that's the only form of brightness control that will work. Hopefully in
the future we can remove these quirks once we have a better way of
probing for this.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index a39c3cdacb20..c24bbea3e2a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1240,6 +1240,19 @@ static const struct edid_quirk edid_quirk_list[] = {
 	 * only supports DPCD backlight controls
 	 */
 	{ MFG(0x4c, 0x83), PROD_ID(0x41, 0x41), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
+	/*
+	 * Some Dell Precision 7750 systems have panels support both AUX and
+	 * PWM backlight control, and some only support AUX backlight control.
+	 * All said panels start up in AUX mode by default, and we don't have
+	 * any support for disabling HDR mode on these panels which would be
+	 * required to switch to PWM backlight control mode (plus, I'm not
+	 * even sure we want PWM backlight controls over DPCD backlight
+	 * controls anyway...). Until we have a better way of detecting these,
+	 * force DPCD backlight mode on all of them.
+	 */
+	{ MFG(0x06, 0xaf), PROD_ID(0x9b, 0x32), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
+	{ MFG(0x06, 0xaf), PROD_ID(0xeb, 0x41), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
+	{ MFG(0x4d, 0x10), PROD_ID(0xc7, 0x14), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
 };
 
 #undef MFG
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode for some Precision 7750 panels

[Lyude Paul]

According to Dell, trying to match their panels via OUI is not reliable
enough and we've been told that we should check against the EDID
instead. As well, Dell seems to have some panels that are actually
intended to switch between using PWM for backlight controls and DPCD for
backlight controls depending on whether or not the panel is in HDR or
SDR mode. Yikes.

Regardless, we need to add quirks for these so that DPCD backlight
controls get enabled by default, since without additional driver support
that's the only form of brightness control that will work. Hopefully in
the future we can remove these quirks once we have a better way of
probing for this.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index a39c3cdacb20..c24bbea3e2a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1240,6 +1240,19 @@ static const struct edid_quirk edid_quirk_list[] = {
 	 * only supports DPCD backlight controls
 	 */
 	{ MFG(0x4c, 0x83), PROD_ID(0x41, 0x41), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
+	/*
+	 * Some Dell Precision 7750 systems have panels support both AUX and
+	 * PWM backlight control, and some only support AUX backlight control.
+	 * All said panels start up in AUX mode by default, and we don't have
+	 * any support for disabling HDR mode on these panels which would be
+	 * required to switch to PWM backlight control mode (plus, I'm not
+	 * even sure we want PWM backlight controls over DPCD backlight
+	 * controls anyway...). Until we have a better way of detecting these,
+	 * force DPCD backlight mode on all of them.
+	 */
+	{ MFG(0x06, 0xaf), PROD_ID(0x9b, 0x32), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
+	{ MFG(0x06, 0xaf), PROD_ID(0xeb, 0x41), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
+	{ MFG(0x4d, 0x10), PROD_ID(0xc7, 0x14), BIT(DP_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
 };
 
 #undef MFG
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/dp, i915: eDP DPCD backlight control detection fixes

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/dp, i915: eDP DPCD backlight control detection fixes
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72991/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7867 -> Patchwork_16422
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/index.html

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16422 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
    - fi-hsw-4770:        [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2] ([i915#725])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_requests:
    - fi-icl-u2:          [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] ([fdo#109644] / [fdo#110464])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads:
    - fi-byt-j1900:       [INCOMPLETE][5] ([i915#45]) -> [PASS][6]
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_close_race@basic-threads.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts:
    - fi-byt-n2820:       [TIMEOUT][7] ([fdo#112271] / [i915#1084]) -> [PASS][8]
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds:
    - fi-byt-n2820:       [TIMEOUT][9] ([fdo#112271]) -> [INCOMPLETE][10] ([i915#45])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
    - fi-hsw-4770r:       [DMESG-FAIL][11] ([i915#725]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][12] ([i915#553] / [i915#725])
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html

  
  [fdo#109644]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109644
  [fdo#110464]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110464
  [fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
  [i915#1084]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1084
  [i915#45]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/45
  [i915#553]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/553
  [i915#725]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/725


Participating hosts (42 -> 38)
------------------------------

  Additional (7): fi-bdw-5557u fi-hsw-peppy fi-kbl-7500u fi-gdg-551 fi-ivb-3770 fi-skl-6600u fi-kbl-r 
  Missing    (11): fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-ilk-650 fi-ctg-p8600 fi-whl-u fi-cfl-8109u fi-elk-e7500 fi-bsw-kefka fi-byt-clapper fi-bsw-nick fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * Linux: CI_DRM_7867 -> Patchwork_16422

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_7867: a4c409e48c6281538b1e375545dfb5989fa02063 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5418: 4028bd390b41925f6e26f6f11b31e05054652527 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_16422: cb2579a309c71570a4b4100501a96e740a6c6a35 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

cb2579a309c7 drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode for some Precision 7750 panels
db44c503e149 drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED panel
7dd75992d6e8 drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks
ea55ec70bd2e Revert "drm/i915: Don't use VBT for detecting DPCD backlight controls"

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/dp, i915: eDP DPCD backlight control detection fixes

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/dp, i915: eDP DPCD backlight control detection fixes
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72991/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7867_full -> Patchwork_16422_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16422_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#112080]) +11 similar issues
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1.html

  * igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][3] -> [TIMEOUT][4] ([fdo#112271])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#112146]) +4 similar issues
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@writes-after-reads-uncached:
    - shard-hsw:          [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#694]) +1 similar issue
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-hsw1/igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@writes-after-reads-uncached.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-hsw2/igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@writes-after-reads-uncached.html

  * igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#644])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-apl6/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-apl8/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

  * igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][11] -> [DMESG-WARN][12] ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-apl2/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-apl6/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rps@reset:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#413])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_rps@reset.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb8/igt@i915_pm_rps@reset.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][15] -> [TIMEOUT][16] ([fdo#112271])
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-kbl3/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-kbl3/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][17] -> [INCOMPLETE][18] ([i915#58] / [k.org#198133])
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-glk5/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-glk1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-render:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([i915#49])
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-skl7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-render.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-skl4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-render.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-coverage-7efc:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][21] -> [FAIL][22] ([fdo#108145]) +1 similar issue
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-coverage-7efc.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-skl4/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-coverage-7efc.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][23] -> [SKIP][24] ([fdo#109441]) +1 similar issue
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt.html

  * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][25] -> [DMESG-WARN][26] ([i915#180]) +4 similar issues
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html

  * igt@prime_mmap_coherency@ioctl-errors:
    - shard-hsw:          [PASS][27] -> [FAIL][28] ([i915#831])
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-hsw1/igt@prime_mmap_coherency@ioctl-errors.html
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-hsw4/igt@prime_mmap_coherency@ioctl-errors.html

  * igt@prime_vgem@fence-wait-bsd2:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][29] -> [SKIP][30] ([fdo#109276]) +14 similar issues
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb4/igt@prime_vgem@fence-wait-bsd2.html
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb3/igt@prime_vgem@fence-wait-bsd2.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vecs0-s3:
    - shard-apl:          [DMESG-WARN][31] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][32] +1 similar issue
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-apl6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vecs0-s3.html
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-apl8/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vecs0-s3.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-contexts-bsd2:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][33] ([fdo#109276]) -> [PASS][34] +15 similar issues
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-contexts-bsd2.html
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-contexts-bsd2.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][35] ([fdo#112146]) -> [PASS][36] +4 similar issues
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@write-snoop:
    - shard-hsw:          [FAIL][37] ([i915#694]) -> [PASS][38] +1 similar issue
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-hsw7/igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@write-snoop.html
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-hsw8/igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@write-snoop.html

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-dpms:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][39] ([i915#447]) -> [PASS][40]
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb3/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-dpms.html
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-dpms.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
    - shard-hsw:          [DMESG-FAIL][41] ([i915#725]) -> [PASS][42]
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-hsw8/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-hsw6/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-alpha-transparent:
    - shard-skl:          [FAIL][43] ([i915#54]) -> [PASS][44]
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-skl2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-alpha-transparent.html
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-skl9/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-alpha-transparent.html

  * igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][45] ([i915#79]) -> [PASS][46]
   [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-glk5/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html
   [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-glk3/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible:
    - shard-apl:          [FAIL][47] ([i915#34]) -> [PASS][48]
   [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-apl1/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible.html
   [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-apl2/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          [DMESG-WARN][49] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][50] +6 similar issues
   [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend.html
   [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc:
    - shard-skl:          [FAIL][51] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) -> [PASS][52] +1 similar issue
   [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc.html
   [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-skl10/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-x:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][53] ([i915#899]) -> [PASS][54]
   [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-glk9/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-x.html
   [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-glk7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-x.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][55] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][56] +3 similar issues
   [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html
   [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html

  * igt@perf_pmu@busy-vcs1:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][57] ([fdo#112080]) -> [PASS][58] +11 similar issues
   [57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb5/igt@perf_pmu@busy-vcs1.html
   [58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb1/igt@perf_pmu@busy-vcs1.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv-switch:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][59] ([IGT#28]) -> [SKIP][60] ([fdo#112080])
   [59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv-switch.html
   [60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv-switch.html

  * igt@gem_tiled_blits@normal:
    - shard-hsw:          [FAIL][61] ([i915#694]) -> [FAIL][62] ([i915#818])
   [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-hsw4/igt@gem_tiled_blits@normal.html
   [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-hsw2/igt@gem_tiled_blits@normal.html

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr:
    - shard-tglb:         [FAIL][63] ([i915#454]) -> [SKIP][64] ([i915#468])
   [63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-tglb1/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html
   [64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-tglb2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html

  * igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-0-25:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][65] ([fdo#109278] / [fdo#112010]) -> [SKIP][66] ([fdo#109278] / [fdo#112010] / [i915#1149]) +9 similar issues
   [65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-0-25.html
   [66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-0-25.html
    - shard-tglb:         [FAIL][67] ([i915#315]) -> [FAIL][68] ([i915#1149] / [i915#315])
   [67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-0-25.html
   [68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-0-25.html

  * igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp:
    - shard-iclb:         [DMESG-WARN][69] ([fdo#107724]) -> [SKIP][70] ([fdo#109349])
   [69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7867/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp.html
   [70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp.html

  
  [IGT#28]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/issues/28
  [fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724
  [fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
  [fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
  [fdo#109278]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
  [fdo#109349]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109349
  [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
  [fdo#112010]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112010
  [fdo#112080]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112080
  [fdo#112146]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112146
  [fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
  [i915#1149]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1149
  [i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180
  [i915#265]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/265
  [i915#315]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/315
  [i915#34]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/34
  [i915#413]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/413
  [i915#447]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/447
  [i915#454]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/454
  [i915#468]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/468
  [i915#49]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/49
  [i915#54]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/54
  [i915#58]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/58
  [i915#644]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/644
  [i915#694]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/694
  [i915#725]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/725
  [i915#79]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/79
  [i915#818]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/818
  [i915#831]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/831
  [i915#899]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/899
  [k.org#198133]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198133


Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
------------------------------

  No changes in participating hosts


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * Linux: CI_DRM_7867 -> Patchwork_16422

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_7867: a4c409e48c6281538b1e375545dfb5989fa02063 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5418: 4028bd390b41925f6e26f6f11b31e05054652527 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_16422: cb2579a309c71570a4b4100501a96e740a6c6a35 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16422/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx