* [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation
@ 2020-02-20 11:47 Misono Tomohiro
2020-02-20 11:47 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr Misono Tomohiro
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Misono Tomohiro @ 2020-02-20 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: virtio-fs; +Cc: vgoyal
This fixes the xattr operation for directory and special files
(which can be tested by xfstests generic/062 with -o xattr option).
The overall logic is switched back to the same as v1 in favor of performance
(i.e. keep original implementation for regular files/directories)
but I add a cleanup patch to improve readability as requested by Vivek.
Known issue is that if xattr enabled, seek sanity tests (generic/285,
436) will fail. However, I understand this is not a very serious bug
like data corruption so leave it for now.
One question; I remove error handling of fchdir() in v3 since
I believe fchdir to proc_self_fd/root.fd cannot fail in the situation
but should I add error handling?
change v2 -> v3:
- rebased to current dev branch
- add cleanup path (first one) to simplify main patch (second patch)
- restore the logic of v1 in favor of performance
(as a result seek sanity test failure is not fixed by this series)
- remove error handling of fchdir
- drop ACL fix included in v2 for now to focus xattr
v2 patch: https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2020-January/msg00131.html
Thanks!
Misono Tomohiro (2):
virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr
virtiofs: Fix xattr operations
tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 13 +++
tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------------
tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c | 6 ++
3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr
2020-02-20 11:47 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation Misono Tomohiro
@ 2020-02-20 11:47 ` Misono Tomohiro
2020-02-21 15:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-20 11:47 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/2] virtiofs: Fix xattr operations Misono Tomohiro
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Misono Tomohiro @ 2020-02-20 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: virtio-fs; +Cc: vgoyal
This is a cleanup patch to simplify the following xattr fix and
there is no functional changes.
- Move memory allocation to head of the function
- Unify fgetxattr/flistxattr call for both size == 0 and
size != 0 case
- Remove redundant lo_inode_put call in error path
(Note: second call is ignored now since @inode is already NULL)
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 62 ++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 9772823066..33cff8c2c8 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -2370,8 +2370,8 @@ static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
return;
}
- saverr = ENOSYS;
if (!lo_data(req)->xattr) {
+ saverr = ENOSYS;
goto out;
}
@@ -2384,34 +2384,30 @@ static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
goto out;
}
+ if (size) {
+ value = malloc(size);
+ if (!value) {
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+ }
+
sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
if (fd < 0) {
goto out_err;
}
+ ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, value, size);
+ if (ret == -1) {
+ goto out_err;
+ }
if (size) {
- value = malloc(size);
- if (!value) {
- goto out_err;
- }
-
- ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, value, size);
- if (ret == -1) {
- goto out_err;
- }
- saverr = 0;
if (ret == 0) {
+ saverr = 0;
goto out;
}
-
fuse_reply_buf(req, value, ret);
} else {
- ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, NULL, 0);
- if (ret == -1) {
- goto out_err;
- }
-
fuse_reply_xattr(req, ret);
}
out_free:
@@ -2427,7 +2423,6 @@ out_free:
out_err:
saverr = errno;
out:
- lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
goto out_free;
}
@@ -2448,8 +2443,8 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size)
return;
}
- saverr = ENOSYS;
if (!lo_data(req)->xattr) {
+ saverr = ENOSYS;
goto out;
}
@@ -2462,34 +2457,30 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size)
goto out;
}
+ if (size) {
+ value = malloc(size);
+ if (!value) {
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+ }
+
sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
if (fd < 0) {
goto out_err;
}
+ ret = flistxattr(fd, value, size);
+ if (ret == -1) {
+ goto out_err;
+ }
if (size) {
- value = malloc(size);
- if (!value) {
- goto out_err;
- }
-
- ret = flistxattr(fd, value, size);
- if (ret == -1) {
- goto out_err;
- }
- saverr = 0;
if (ret == 0) {
+ saverr = 0;
goto out;
}
-
fuse_reply_buf(req, value, ret);
} else {
- ret = flistxattr(fd, NULL, 0);
- if (ret == -1) {
- goto out_err;
- }
-
fuse_reply_xattr(req, ret);
}
out_free:
@@ -2505,7 +2496,6 @@ out_free:
out_err:
saverr = errno;
out:
- lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
goto out_free;
}
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/2] virtiofs: Fix xattr operations
2020-02-20 11:47 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation Misono Tomohiro
2020-02-20 11:47 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr Misono Tomohiro
@ 2020-02-20 11:47 ` Misono Tomohiro
2020-02-21 16:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-21 15:18 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation Vivek Goyal
2020-02-21 18:50 ` Vivek Goyal
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Misono Tomohiro @ 2020-02-20 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: virtio-fs; +Cc: vgoyal
Current virtiofsd has problems about xattr operations and
they does not work properly for directory/symlink/special file.
The fundamental cause is that virtiofsd uses openat() + f...xattr()
systemcalls for xattr operation but we should not open symlink/special
file in the daemon. Therefore the function is restricted.
Fix this problem by:
1. during setup of each thread, call unshare(CLONE_FS)
2. in xattr operations (i.e. lo_getxattr), if inode is not a regular
file or directory, use fchdir(proc_loot_fd) + ...xattr() +
fchdir(root.fd) instead of openat() + f...xattr()
(Note: for a regular file/directory openat() + f...xattr()
is still used for performance reason)
With this patch, xfstests generic/062 passes on virtiofs.
This fix is suggested by Miklos Szeredi and Stefan Hajnoczi.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 13 +++++
tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++---------------
tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c | 6 ++
3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
index 655b9a1413..21c5d76d58 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
@@ -463,6 +463,8 @@ err:
return ret;
}
+static __thread bool clone_fs_called;
+
/* Process one FVRequest in a thread pool */
static void fv_queue_worker(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
{
@@ -478,6 +480,17 @@ static void fv_queue_worker(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
assert(se->bufsize > sizeof(struct fuse_in_header));
+ if (!clone_fs_called) {
+ int ret;
+
+ /* unshare FS for xattr operation */
+ ret = unshare(CLONE_FS);
+ /* should not fail */
+ assert(ret == 0);
+
+ clone_fs_called = true;
+ }
+
/*
* An element contains one request and the space to send our response
* They're spread over multiple descriptors in a scatter/gather set
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 33cff8c2c8..7d648af916 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct lo_inode {
pthread_mutex_t plock_mutex;
GHashTable *posix_locks; /* protected by lo_inode->plock_mutex */
- bool is_symlink;
+ mode_t filetype;
};
struct lo_cred {
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static int utimensat_empty(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *inode,
struct lo_inode *parent;
char path[PATH_MAX];
- if (inode->is_symlink) {
+ if (S_ISLNK(inode->filetype)) {
res = utimensat(inode->fd, "", tv, AT_EMPTY_PATH);
if (res == -1 && errno == EINVAL) {
/* Sorry, no race free way to set times on symlink. */
@@ -1037,7 +1037,8 @@ static int lo_do_lookup(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name,
goto out_err;
}
- inode->is_symlink = S_ISLNK(e->attr.st_mode);
+ /* cache only filetype */
+ inode->filetype = (e->attr.st_mode & S_IFMT);
/*
* One for the caller and one for nlookup (released in
@@ -1264,7 +1265,7 @@ static int linkat_empty_nofollow(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *inode,
struct lo_inode *parent;
char path[PATH_MAX];
- if (inode->is_symlink) {
+ if (S_ISLNK(inode->filetype)) {
res = linkat(inode->fd, "", dfd, name, AT_EMPTY_PATH);
if (res == -1 && (errno == ENOENT || errno == EINVAL)) {
/* Sorry, no race free way to hard-link a symlink. */
@@ -2378,12 +2379,6 @@ static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_getxattr(ino=%" PRIu64 ", name=%s size=%zd)\n",
ino, name, size);
- if (inode->is_symlink) {
- /* Sorry, no race free way to getxattr on symlink. */
- saverr = EPERM;
- goto out;
- }
-
if (size) {
value = malloc(size);
if (!value) {
@@ -2392,12 +2387,19 @@ static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
}
sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
- fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
- if (fd < 0) {
- goto out_err;
+ if (S_ISREG(inode->filetype) || S_ISDIR(inode->filetype)) {
+ fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+ ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, value, size);
+ } else {
+ /* fchdir should not fail here */
+ assert(fchdir(lo->proc_self_fd) == 0);
+ ret = getxattr(procname, name, value, size);
+ assert(fchdir(lo->root.fd) == 0);
}
- ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, value, size);
if (ret == -1) {
goto out_err;
}
@@ -2451,12 +2453,6 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size)
fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_listxattr(ino=%" PRIu64 ", size=%zd)\n", ino,
size);
- if (inode->is_symlink) {
- /* Sorry, no race free way to listxattr on symlink. */
- saverr = EPERM;
- goto out;
- }
-
if (size) {
value = malloc(size);
if (!value) {
@@ -2465,12 +2461,19 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size)
}
sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
- fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
- if (fd < 0) {
- goto out_err;
+ if (S_ISREG(inode->filetype) || S_ISDIR(inode->filetype)) {
+ fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+ ret = flistxattr(fd, value, size);
+ } else {
+ /* fchdir should not fail here */
+ assert(fchdir(lo->proc_self_fd) == 0);
+ ret = listxattr(procname, value, size);
+ assert(fchdir(lo->root.fd) == 0);
}
- ret = flistxattr(fd, value, size);
if (ret == -1) {
goto out_err;
}
@@ -2524,20 +2527,21 @@ static void lo_setxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_setxattr(ino=%" PRIu64
", name=%s value=%s size=%zd)\n", ino, name, value, size);
- if (inode->is_symlink) {
- /* Sorry, no race free way to setxattr on symlink. */
- saverr = EPERM;
- goto out;
- }
-
sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
- fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDWR);
- if (fd < 0) {
- saverr = errno;
- goto out;
+ if (S_ISREG(inode->filetype) || S_ISDIR(inode->filetype)) {
+ fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ saverr = errno;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ret = fsetxattr(fd, name, value, size, flags);
+ } else {
+ /* fchdir should not fail here */
+ assert(fchdir(lo->proc_self_fd) == 0);
+ ret = setxattr(procname, name, value, size, flags);
+ assert(fchdir(lo->root.fd) == 0);
}
- ret = fsetxattr(fd, name, value, size, flags);
saverr = ret == -1 ? errno : 0;
if (!saverr) {
@@ -2575,20 +2579,21 @@ static void lo_removexattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name)
fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_removexattr(ino=%" PRIu64 ", name=%s)\n", ino,
name);
- if (inode->is_symlink) {
- /* Sorry, no race free way to setxattr on symlink. */
- saverr = EPERM;
- goto out;
- }
-
sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
- fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDWR);
- if (fd < 0) {
- saverr = errno;
- goto out;
+ if (S_ISREG(inode->filetype) || S_ISDIR(inode->filetype)) {
+ fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ saverr = errno;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ret = fremovexattr(fd, name);
+ } else {
+ /* fchdir should not fail here */
+ assert(fchdir(lo->proc_self_fd) == 0);
+ ret = removexattr(procname, name);
+ assert(fchdir(lo->root.fd) == 0);
}
- ret = fremovexattr(fd, name);
saverr = ret == -1 ? errno : 0;
if (!saverr) {
@@ -3185,7 +3190,7 @@ static void setup_root(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *root)
exit(1);
}
- root->is_symlink = false;
+ root->filetype = S_IFDIR;
root->fd = fd;
root->key.ino = stat.st_ino;
root->key.dev = stat.st_dev;
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c b/tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c
index 2d9d4a7ec0..bd9e7b083c 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
SCMP_SYS(exit),
SCMP_SYS(exit_group),
SCMP_SYS(fallocate),
+ SCMP_SYS(fchdir),
SCMP_SYS(fchmodat),
SCMP_SYS(fchownat),
SCMP_SYS(fcntl),
@@ -62,7 +63,9 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
SCMP_SYS(getpid),
SCMP_SYS(gettid),
SCMP_SYS(gettimeofday),
+ SCMP_SYS(getxattr),
SCMP_SYS(linkat),
+ SCMP_SYS(listxattr),
SCMP_SYS(lseek),
SCMP_SYS(madvise),
SCMP_SYS(mkdirat),
@@ -85,6 +88,7 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
SCMP_SYS(recvmsg),
SCMP_SYS(renameat),
SCMP_SYS(renameat2),
+ SCMP_SYS(removexattr),
SCMP_SYS(rt_sigaction),
SCMP_SYS(rt_sigprocmask),
SCMP_SYS(rt_sigreturn),
@@ -98,10 +102,12 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
SCMP_SYS(setresuid32),
#endif
SCMP_SYS(set_robust_list),
+ SCMP_SYS(setxattr),
SCMP_SYS(symlinkat),
SCMP_SYS(time), /* Rarely needed, except on static builds */
SCMP_SYS(tgkill),
SCMP_SYS(unlinkat),
+ SCMP_SYS(unshare),
SCMP_SYS(utimensat),
SCMP_SYS(write),
SCMP_SYS(writev),
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation
2020-02-20 11:47 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation Misono Tomohiro
2020-02-20 11:47 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr Misono Tomohiro
2020-02-20 11:47 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/2] virtiofs: Fix xattr operations Misono Tomohiro
@ 2020-02-21 15:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-27 5:16 ` misono.tomohiro
2020-02-21 18:50 ` Vivek Goyal
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Goyal @ 2020-02-21 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Misono Tomohiro; +Cc: virtio-fs
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:47:02PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> This fixes the xattr operation for directory and special files
> (which can be tested by xfstests generic/062 with -o xattr option).
>
> The overall logic is switched back to the same as v1 in favor of performance
> (i.e. keep original implementation for regular files/directories)
> but I add a cleanup patch to improve readability as requested by Vivek.
>
> Known issue is that if xattr enabled, seek sanity tests (generic/285,
> 436) will fail. However, I understand this is not a very serious bug
> like data corruption so leave it for now.
Hi Misono,
Do you know why generic/285 and generic/436 fail with xattr enabled. Is
it something easily fixable later.
>
> One question; I remove error handling of fchdir() in v3 since
> I believe fchdir to proc_self_fd/root.fd cannot fail in the situation
> but should I add error handling?
I would think its good to have error handling for fchdir() case. We don't
expect it, but if something goes wrong, we will like to catch it.
Thanks
Vivek
>
> change v2 -> v3:
> - rebased to current dev branch
> - add cleanup path (first one) to simplify main patch (second patch)
> - restore the logic of v1 in favor of performance
> (as a result seek sanity test failure is not fixed by this series)
> - remove error handling of fchdir
> - drop ACL fix included in v2 for now to focus xattr
>
> v2 patch: https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2020-January/msg00131.html
>
> Thanks!
>
> Misono Tomohiro (2):
> virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr
> virtiofs: Fix xattr operations
>
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 13 +++
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------------
> tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c | 6 ++
> 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.21.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr
2020-02-20 11:47 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr Misono Tomohiro
@ 2020-02-21 15:49 ` Vivek Goyal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Goyal @ 2020-02-21 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Misono Tomohiro; +Cc: virtio-fs
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:47:03PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> This is a cleanup patch to simplify the following xattr fix and
> there is no functional changes.
>
> - Move memory allocation to head of the function
> - Unify fgetxattr/flistxattr call for both size == 0 and
> size != 0 case
> - Remove redundant lo_inode_put call in error path
> (Note: second call is ignored now since @inode is already NULL)
>
> Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 62 ++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> index 9772823066..33cff8c2c8 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> @@ -2370,8 +2370,8 @@ static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
> return;
> }
>
> - saverr = ENOSYS;
> if (!lo_data(req)->xattr) {
> + saverr = ENOSYS;
What's the advange of moving saverr inside bracket. I thougt this is
not needed.
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -2384,34 +2384,30 @@ static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (size) {
> + value = malloc(size);
> + if (!value) {
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
> fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
> if (fd < 0) {
> goto out_err;
> }
>
> + ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, value, size);
> + if (ret == -1) {
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> if (size) {
> - value = malloc(size);
> - if (!value) {
> - goto out_err;
> - }
> -
> - ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, value, size);
> - if (ret == -1) {
> - goto out_err;
> - }
> - saverr = 0;
> if (ret == 0) {
> + saverr = 0;
Same here. Why to move saverr inside the brackets.
Have same question for lo_listxattr() modifications.
Thanks
Vivek
> goto out;
> }
> -
> fuse_reply_buf(req, value, ret);
> } else {
> - ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, NULL, 0);
> - if (ret == -1) {
> - goto out_err;
> - }
> -
> fuse_reply_xattr(req, ret);
> }
> out_free:
> @@ -2427,7 +2423,6 @@ out_free:
> out_err:
> saverr = errno;
> out:
> - lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
> fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
> goto out_free;
> }
> @@ -2448,8 +2443,8 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size)
> return;
> }
>
> - saverr = ENOSYS;
> if (!lo_data(req)->xattr) {
> + saverr = ENOSYS;
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -2462,34 +2457,30 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (size) {
> + value = malloc(size);
> + if (!value) {
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
> fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
> if (fd < 0) {
> goto out_err;
> }
>
> + ret = flistxattr(fd, value, size);
> + if (ret == -1) {
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> if (size) {
> - value = malloc(size);
> - if (!value) {
> - goto out_err;
> - }
> -
> - ret = flistxattr(fd, value, size);
> - if (ret == -1) {
> - goto out_err;
> - }
> - saverr = 0;
> if (ret == 0) {
> + saverr = 0;
> goto out;
> }
> -
> fuse_reply_buf(req, value, ret);
> } else {
> - ret = flistxattr(fd, NULL, 0);
> - if (ret == -1) {
> - goto out_err;
> - }
> -
> fuse_reply_xattr(req, ret);
> }
> out_free:
> @@ -2505,7 +2496,6 @@ out_free:
> out_err:
> saverr = errno;
> out:
> - lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
> fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
> goto out_free;
> }
> --
> 2.21.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/2] virtiofs: Fix xattr operations
2020-02-20 11:47 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/2] virtiofs: Fix xattr operations Misono Tomohiro
@ 2020-02-21 16:20 ` Vivek Goyal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Goyal @ 2020-02-21 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Misono Tomohiro; +Cc: virtio-fs
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:47:04PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> Current virtiofsd has problems about xattr operations and
> they does not work properly for directory/symlink/special file.
>
> The fundamental cause is that virtiofsd uses openat() + f...xattr()
> systemcalls for xattr operation but we should not open symlink/special
> file in the daemon. Therefore the function is restricted.
Hi Misono,
Can you put a link to the email thread where Miklos had mentioned that
it is not safe to open non-regular, non-directory files on file servers.
That will justify making all these changes and we can easily remember
why did we make these changes.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2019-October/msg00046.html
>
> Fix this problem by:
> 1. during setup of each thread, call unshare(CLONE_FS)
> 2. in xattr operations (i.e. lo_getxattr), if inode is not a regular
> file or directory, use fchdir(proc_loot_fd) + ...xattr() +
> fchdir(root.fd) instead of openat() + f...xattr()
>
> (Note: for a regular file/directory openat() + f...xattr()
> is still used for performance reason)
>
> With this patch, xfstests generic/062 passes on virtiofs.
> This fix is suggested by Miklos Szeredi and Stefan Hajnoczi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 13 +++++
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c | 6 ++
> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> index 655b9a1413..21c5d76d58 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> @@ -463,6 +463,8 @@ err:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static __thread bool clone_fs_called;
> +
> /* Process one FVRequest in a thread pool */
> static void fv_queue_worker(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
> {
> @@ -478,6 +480,17 @@ static void fv_queue_worker(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
>
> assert(se->bufsize > sizeof(struct fuse_in_header));
>
> + if (!clone_fs_called) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* unshare FS for xattr operation */
> + ret = unshare(CLONE_FS);
> + /* should not fail */
> + assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + clone_fs_called = true;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * An element contains one request and the space to send our response
> * They're spread over multiple descriptors in a scatter/gather set
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> index 33cff8c2c8..7d648af916 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct lo_inode {
> pthread_mutex_t plock_mutex;
> GHashTable *posix_locks; /* protected by lo_inode->plock_mutex */
>
> - bool is_symlink;
> + mode_t filetype;
> };
>
> struct lo_cred {
> @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static int utimensat_empty(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *inode,
> struct lo_inode *parent;
> char path[PATH_MAX];
>
> - if (inode->is_symlink) {
> + if (S_ISLNK(inode->filetype)) {
> res = utimensat(inode->fd, "", tv, AT_EMPTY_PATH);
> if (res == -1 && errno == EINVAL) {
> /* Sorry, no race free way to set times on symlink. */
> @@ -1037,7 +1037,8 @@ static int lo_do_lookup(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name,
> goto out_err;
> }
>
> - inode->is_symlink = S_ISLNK(e->attr.st_mode);
> + /* cache only filetype */
> + inode->filetype = (e->attr.st_mode & S_IFMT);
>
> /*
> * One for the caller and one for nlookup (released in
> @@ -1264,7 +1265,7 @@ static int linkat_empty_nofollow(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *inode,
> struct lo_inode *parent;
> char path[PATH_MAX];
>
> - if (inode->is_symlink) {
> + if (S_ISLNK(inode->filetype)) {
> res = linkat(inode->fd, "", dfd, name, AT_EMPTY_PATH);
> if (res == -1 && (errno == ENOENT || errno == EINVAL)) {
> /* Sorry, no race free way to hard-link a symlink. */
> @@ -2378,12 +2379,6 @@ static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_getxattr(ino=%" PRIu64 ", name=%s size=%zd)\n",
> ino, name, size);
>
> - if (inode->is_symlink) {
> - /* Sorry, no race free way to getxattr on symlink. */
> - saverr = EPERM;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> if (size) {
> value = malloc(size);
> if (!value) {
> @@ -2392,12 +2387,19 @@ static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
> }
>
> sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
> - fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
> - if (fd < 0) {
> - goto out_err;
lets put a two line comment here saying that its not safe to do openat()
at non-regular, non-dir files. So use this method only for regular
or directory files.
> + if (S_ISREG(inode->filetype) || S_ISDIR(inode->filetype)) {
> + fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, value, size);
> + } else {
> + /* fchdir should not fail here */
> + assert(fchdir(lo->proc_self_fd) == 0);
> + ret = getxattr(procname, name, value, size);
> + assert(fchdir(lo->root.fd) == 0);
Aha.., you are using assert for fchdir. I think this is fine. You can
ignore my previous comment about introducing error handling for fchdir().
Otherwise this patch looks good to me. Will test it.
Vivek
> }
>
> - ret = fgetxattr(fd, name, value, size);
> if (ret == -1) {
> goto out_err;
> }
> @@ -2451,12 +2453,6 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size)
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_listxattr(ino=%" PRIu64 ", size=%zd)\n", ino,
> size);
>
> - if (inode->is_symlink) {
> - /* Sorry, no race free way to listxattr on symlink. */
> - saverr = EPERM;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> if (size) {
> value = malloc(size);
> if (!value) {
> @@ -2465,12 +2461,19 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size)
> }
>
> sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
> - fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
> - if (fd < 0) {
> - goto out_err;
> + if (S_ISREG(inode->filetype) || S_ISDIR(inode->filetype)) {
> + fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + ret = flistxattr(fd, value, size);
> + } else {
> + /* fchdir should not fail here */
> + assert(fchdir(lo->proc_self_fd) == 0);
> + ret = listxattr(procname, value, size);
> + assert(fchdir(lo->root.fd) == 0);
> }
>
> - ret = flistxattr(fd, value, size);
> if (ret == -1) {
> goto out_err;
> }
> @@ -2524,20 +2527,21 @@ static void lo_setxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_setxattr(ino=%" PRIu64
> ", name=%s value=%s size=%zd)\n", ino, name, value, size);
>
> - if (inode->is_symlink) {
> - /* Sorry, no race free way to setxattr on symlink. */
> - saverr = EPERM;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
> - fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDWR);
> - if (fd < 0) {
> - saverr = errno;
> - goto out;
> + if (S_ISREG(inode->filetype) || S_ISDIR(inode->filetype)) {
> + fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + saverr = errno;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + ret = fsetxattr(fd, name, value, size, flags);
> + } else {
> + /* fchdir should not fail here */
> + assert(fchdir(lo->proc_self_fd) == 0);
> + ret = setxattr(procname, name, value, size, flags);
> + assert(fchdir(lo->root.fd) == 0);
> }
>
> - ret = fsetxattr(fd, name, value, size, flags);
> saverr = ret == -1 ? errno : 0;
>
> if (!saverr) {
> @@ -2575,20 +2579,21 @@ static void lo_removexattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name)
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_removexattr(ino=%" PRIu64 ", name=%s)\n", ino,
> name);
>
> - if (inode->is_symlink) {
> - /* Sorry, no race free way to setxattr on symlink. */
> - saverr = EPERM;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
> - fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDWR);
> - if (fd < 0) {
> - saverr = errno;
> - goto out;
> + if (S_ISREG(inode->filetype) || S_ISDIR(inode->filetype)) {
> + fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + saverr = errno;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + ret = fremovexattr(fd, name);
> + } else {
> + /* fchdir should not fail here */
> + assert(fchdir(lo->proc_self_fd) == 0);
> + ret = removexattr(procname, name);
> + assert(fchdir(lo->root.fd) == 0);
> }
>
> - ret = fremovexattr(fd, name);
> saverr = ret == -1 ? errno : 0;
>
> if (!saverr) {
> @@ -3185,7 +3190,7 @@ static void setup_root(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *root)
> exit(1);
> }
>
> - root->is_symlink = false;
> + root->filetype = S_IFDIR;
> root->fd = fd;
> root->key.ino = stat.st_ino;
> root->key.dev = stat.st_dev;
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c b/tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c
> index 2d9d4a7ec0..bd9e7b083c 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
> SCMP_SYS(exit),
> SCMP_SYS(exit_group),
> SCMP_SYS(fallocate),
> + SCMP_SYS(fchdir),
> SCMP_SYS(fchmodat),
> SCMP_SYS(fchownat),
> SCMP_SYS(fcntl),
> @@ -62,7 +63,9 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
> SCMP_SYS(getpid),
> SCMP_SYS(gettid),
> SCMP_SYS(gettimeofday),
> + SCMP_SYS(getxattr),
> SCMP_SYS(linkat),
> + SCMP_SYS(listxattr),
> SCMP_SYS(lseek),
> SCMP_SYS(madvise),
> SCMP_SYS(mkdirat),
> @@ -85,6 +88,7 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
> SCMP_SYS(recvmsg),
> SCMP_SYS(renameat),
> SCMP_SYS(renameat2),
> + SCMP_SYS(removexattr),
> SCMP_SYS(rt_sigaction),
> SCMP_SYS(rt_sigprocmask),
> SCMP_SYS(rt_sigreturn),
> @@ -98,10 +102,12 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
> SCMP_SYS(setresuid32),
> #endif
> SCMP_SYS(set_robust_list),
> + SCMP_SYS(setxattr),
> SCMP_SYS(symlinkat),
> SCMP_SYS(time), /* Rarely needed, except on static builds */
> SCMP_SYS(tgkill),
> SCMP_SYS(unlinkat),
> + SCMP_SYS(unshare),
> SCMP_SYS(utimensat),
> SCMP_SYS(write),
> SCMP_SYS(writev),
> --
> 2.21.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation
2020-02-20 11:47 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation Misono Tomohiro
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-02-21 15:18 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation Vivek Goyal
@ 2020-02-21 18:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-27 5:20 ` misono.tomohiro
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Goyal @ 2020-02-21 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Misono Tomohiro; +Cc: virtio-fs
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:47:02PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> This fixes the xattr operation for directory and special files
> (which can be tested by xfstests generic/062 with -o xattr option).
>
> The overall logic is switched back to the same as v1 in favor of performance
> (i.e. keep original implementation for regular files/directories)
> but I add a cleanup patch to improve readability as requested by Vivek.
>
> Known issue is that if xattr enabled, seek sanity tests (generic/285,
> 436) will fail. However, I understand this is not a very serious bug
> like data corruption so leave it for now.
>
> One question; I remove error handling of fchdir() in v3 since
> I believe fchdir to proc_self_fd/root.fd cannot fail in the situation
> but should I add error handling?
>
> change v2 -> v3:
> - rebased to current dev branch
> - add cleanup path (first one) to simplify main patch (second patch)
> - restore the logic of v1 in favor of performance
> (as a result seek sanity test failure is not fixed by this series)
> - remove error handling of fchdir
> - drop ACL fix included in v2 for now to focus xattr
>
> v2 patch: https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2020-January/msg00131.html
Hi Misono,
This patchset passes my basic test. I have not run xfstests. I am relying
on your testing.
Can you please take care of minor nits I had and repost patces. I will
ack it.
Thanks
Vivek
>
> Thanks!
>
> Misono Tomohiro (2):
> virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr
> virtiofs: Fix xattr operations
>
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 13 +++
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------------
> tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c | 6 ++
> 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.21.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Virtio-fs mailing list
> Virtio-fs@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation
2020-02-21 15:18 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation Vivek Goyal
@ 2020-02-27 5:16 ` misono.tomohiro
2020-02-28 13:00 ` Vivek Goyal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: misono.tomohiro @ 2020-02-27 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Vivek Goyal'; +Cc: virtio-fs
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:47:02PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> > This fixes the xattr operation for directory and special files (which
> > can be tested by xfstests generic/062 with -o xattr option).
> >
> > The overall logic is switched back to the same as v1 in favor of
> > performance (i.e. keep original implementation for regular
> > files/directories) but I add a cleanup patch to improve readability as requested by Vivek.
> >
> > Known issue is that if xattr enabled, seek sanity tests (generic/285,
> > 436) will fail. However, I understand this is not a very serious bug
> > like data corruption so leave it for now.
>
> Hi Misono,
>
> Do you know why generic/285 and generic/436 fail with xattr enabled. Is it something easily fixable later.
Not sure if it can be fixed easily, but here is what I figured out:
The failure case checks lseek SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE with some unwritten extent (by fallocate).
I notice that open/close affects lseek behavior in that case on xfs:
# on xfs
xfs_io> open -ft temp
xfs_io> falloc 0 40k
xfs_io> seek -a 0 # show both SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA with offset 0
Whence Result
HOLE 0 # hole only (fallocated block is treated as hole at this time)
# close and open again
xfs_io> close
xfs_io> open temp
xfs_io> seek -a 0
Whence Result
DATA 0 # fallocated block is treated as data now
HOLE 40960 # hole position is now EOF
I have not yet understand what really causes this in detail (didn't check other fs neither).
Since getxattr operation happens during the test to check "security.capability"
file attribute when writing some data, it seems this behavior affects the test on virtiofs with xfs.
Thanks.
Misono
>
> >
> > One question; I remove error handling of fchdir() in v3 since I
> > believe fchdir to proc_self_fd/root.fd cannot fail in the situation
> > but should I add error handling?
>
> I would think its good to have error handling for fchdir() case. We don't expect it, but if something goes wrong, we will like
> to catch it.
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
>
> >
> > change v2 -> v3:
> > - rebased to current dev branch
> > - add cleanup path (first one) to simplify main patch (second patch)
> > - restore the logic of v1 in favor of performance
> > (as a result seek sanity test failure is not fixed by this series)
> > - remove error handling of fchdir
> > - drop ACL fix included in v2 for now to focus xattr
> >
> > v2 patch:
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2020-January/msg00131.html
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Misono Tomohiro (2):
> > virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr
> > virtiofs: Fix xattr operations
> >
> > tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 13 +++
> > tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------------
> > tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c | 6 ++
> > 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.21.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation
2020-02-21 18:50 ` Vivek Goyal
@ 2020-02-27 5:20 ` misono.tomohiro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: misono.tomohiro @ 2020-02-27 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Vivek Goyal'; +Cc: 'virtio-fs@redhat.com'
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:47:02PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> > This fixes the xattr operation for directory and special files (which
> > can be tested by xfstests generic/062 with -o xattr option).
> >
> > The overall logic is switched back to the same as v1 in favor of
> > performance (i.e. keep original implementation for regular
> > files/directories) but I add a cleanup patch to improve readability as requested by Vivek.
> >
> > Known issue is that if xattr enabled, seek sanity tests (generic/285,
> > 436) will fail. However, I understand this is not a very serious bug
> > like data corruption so leave it for now.
> >
> > One question; I remove error handling of fchdir() in v3 since I
> > believe fchdir to proc_self_fd/root.fd cannot fail in the situation
> > but should I add error handling?
> >
> > change v2 -> v3:
> > - rebased to current dev branch
> > - add cleanup path (first one) to simplify main patch (second patch)
> > - restore the logic of v1 in favor of performance
> > (as a result seek sanity test failure is not fixed by this series)
> > - remove error handling of fchdir
> > - drop ACL fix included in v2 for now to focus xattr
> >
> > v2 patch:
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2020-January/msg00131.html
>
> Hi Misono,
>
> This patchset passes my basic test. I have not run xfstests. I am relying on your testing.
>
> Can you please take care of minor nits I had and repost patces. I will ack it.
Thanks for review/comments. I will update the patches and send them soon.
Thanks,
Misono
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Misono Tomohiro (2):
> > virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr
> > virtiofs: Fix xattr operations
> >
> > tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 13 +++
> > tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------------
> > tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c | 6 ++
> > 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.21.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Virtio-fs mailing list
> > Virtio-fs@redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation
2020-02-27 5:16 ` misono.tomohiro
@ 2020-02-28 13:00 ` Vivek Goyal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Goyal @ 2020-02-28 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: misono.tomohiro; +Cc: virtio-fs
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 05:16:21AM +0000, misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:47:02PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> > > This fixes the xattr operation for directory and special files (which
> > > can be tested by xfstests generic/062 with -o xattr option).
> > >
> > > The overall logic is switched back to the same as v1 in favor of
> > > performance (i.e. keep original implementation for regular
> > > files/directories) but I add a cleanup patch to improve readability as requested by Vivek.
> > >
> > > Known issue is that if xattr enabled, seek sanity tests (generic/285,
> > > 436) will fail. However, I understand this is not a very serious bug
> > > like data corruption so leave it for now.
> >
> > Hi Misono,
> >
> > Do you know why generic/285 and generic/436 fail with xattr enabled. Is it something easily fixable later.
>
> Not sure if it can be fixed easily, but here is what I figured out:
>
> The failure case checks lseek SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE with some unwritten extent (by fallocate).
> I notice that open/close affects lseek behavior in that case on xfs:
>
> # on xfs
> xfs_io> open -ft temp
> xfs_io> falloc 0 40k
> xfs_io> seek -a 0 # show both SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA with offset 0
> Whence Result
> HOLE 0 # hole only (fallocated block is treated as hole at this time)
>
> # close and open again
> xfs_io> close
> xfs_io> open temp
> xfs_io> seek -a 0
> Whence Result
> DATA 0 # fallocated block is treated as data now
> HOLE 40960 # hole position is now EOF
>
> I have not yet understand what really causes this in detail (didn't check other fs neither).
Hi Misono,
This is indeed very interesting and confusing. Just opening and closing
file resulted in allocation of blocks.
Will be good if you can narrow it down a bit more and see what's causing
this.
Thanks
Vivek
>
> Since getxattr operation happens during the test to check "security.capability"
> file attribute when writing some data, it seems this behavior affects the test on virtiofs with xfs.
>
> Thanks.
> Misono
>
> >
> > >
> > > One question; I remove error handling of fchdir() in v3 since I
> > > believe fchdir to proc_self_fd/root.fd cannot fail in the situation
> > > but should I add error handling?
> >
> > I would think its good to have error handling for fchdir() case. We don't expect it, but if something goes wrong, we will like
> > to catch it.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vivek
> >
> > >
> > > change v2 -> v3:
> > > - rebased to current dev branch
> > > - add cleanup path (first one) to simplify main patch (second patch)
> > > - restore the logic of v1 in favor of performance
> > > (as a result seek sanity test failure is not fixed by this series)
> > > - remove error handling of fchdir
> > > - drop ACL fix included in v2 for now to focus xattr
> > >
> > > v2 patch:
> > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2020-January/msg00131.html
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Misono Tomohiro (2):
> > > virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr
> > > virtiofs: Fix xattr operations
> > >
> > > tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 13 +++
> > > tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------------
> > > tools/virtiofsd/seccomp.c | 6 ++
> > > 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.21.1
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-28 13:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-20 11:47 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation Misono Tomohiro
2020-02-20 11:47 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofs: passthrough_ll: cleanup getxattr/listxattr Misono Tomohiro
2020-02-21 15:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-20 11:47 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/2] virtiofs: Fix xattr operations Misono Tomohiro
2020-02-21 16:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-21 15:18 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix xattr operation Vivek Goyal
2020-02-27 5:16 ` misono.tomohiro
2020-02-28 13:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-21 18:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-27 5:20 ` misono.tomohiro
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.