All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq()
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:19:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227110713.GA5708@afzalpc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:31:15AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Vs. merging this series, I suggest the following approach:
> 
>    - Resubmit the individual changes as single patches or small series
>      to the relevant maintainers and subsystem mailing lists. They have
>      no dependency on a core change and can be applied where they belong
>      to.
> 
>    - After 5.6-rc6, verify which parts have made their way into
>      linux-next and resubmit the ignored ones as a series to me along
>      with the removal of the core parts.
> 
> That way we can avoid conflicting changes between subsystems and the tip
> irq/core branch as much as possible.

Okay, i will do accordingly.

[ your mail crossed my v3 (only one patch) posting ]

Regards
afzal

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq()
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:37:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227110713.GA5708@afzalpc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:31:15AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Vs. merging this series, I suggest the following approach:
> 
>    - Resubmit the individual changes as single patches or small series
>      to the relevant maintainers and subsystem mailing lists. They have
>      no dependency on a core change and can be applied where they belong
>      to.
> 
>    - After 5.6-rc6, verify which parts have made their way into
>      linux-next and resubmit the ignored ones as a series to me along
>      with the removal of the core parts.
> 
> That way we can avoid conflicting changes between subsystems and the tip
> irq/core branch as much as possible.

Okay, i will do accordingly.

[ your mail crossed my v3 (only one patch) posting ]

Regards
afzal

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq()
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:37:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227110713.GA5708@afzalpc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:31:15AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Vs. merging this series, I suggest the following approach:
> 
>    - Resubmit the individual changes as single patches or small series
>      to the relevant maintainers and subsystem mailing lists. They have
>      no dependency on a core change and can be applied where they belong
>      to.
> 
>    - After 5.6-rc6, verify which parts have made their way into
>      linux-next and resubmit the ignored ones as a series to me along
>      with the removal of the core parts.
> 
> That way we can avoid conflicting changes between subsystems and the tip
> irq/core branch as much as possible.

Okay, i will do accordingly.

[ your mail crossed my v3 (only one patch) posting ]

Regards
afzal

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq()
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:37:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227110713.GA5708@afzalpc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:31:15AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Vs. merging this series, I suggest the following approach:
> 
>    - Resubmit the individual changes as single patches or small series
>      to the relevant maintainers and subsystem mailing lists. They have
>      no dependency on a core change and can be applied where they belong
>      to.
> 
>    - After 5.6-rc6, verify which parts have made their way into
>      linux-next and resubmit the ignored ones as a series to me along
>      with the removal of the core parts.
> 
> That way we can avoid conflicting changes between subsystems and the tip
> irq/core branch as much as possible.

Okay, i will do accordingly.

[ your mail crossed my v3 (only one patch) posting ]

Regards
afzal

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-27 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-12  8:01 [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq() afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:13 ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:01 ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:01 ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:02 ` [PATCH 01/18] alpha: replace setup_irq() by request_irq() afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:02 ` [PATCH 02/18] ARM: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:02   ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:10   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-12  8:10     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-12  8:10     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-12 23:27   ` Alexander Sverdlin
2020-02-12 23:27     ` Alexander Sverdlin
2020-02-12 23:27     ` Alexander Sverdlin
2020-02-12  8:02 ` [PATCH 03/18] c6x: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-13 17:37   ` Mark Salter
2020-02-12  8:03 ` [PATCH 04/18] hexagon: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:03 ` [PATCH 05/18] ia64: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:15   ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:03 ` [PATCH 06/18] m68k: Replace " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12 22:25   ` Finn Thain
2020-02-13  2:03     ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-13  7:11   ` Greg Ungerer
2020-02-14 13:07     ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:03 ` [PATCH 07/18] microblaze: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:04 ` [PATCH 08/18] MIPS: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:04   ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:04 ` [PATCH 09/18] parisc: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:04 ` [PATCH 10/18] powerpc: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:04   ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-13 10:59   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-13 10:59     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-12  8:04 ` [PATCH 11/18] s390: replace " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:04 ` [PATCH 12/18] sh: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:16   ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:05 ` [PATCH 13/18] unicore32: " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:05 ` [PATCH 14/18] x86: Replace " afzal mohammed
2020-02-27 10:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-27 11:36     ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-27 13:29       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-27 14:26         ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:05 ` [PATCH 15/18] xtensa: replace " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  9:10   ` Max Filippov
2020-02-12  8:05 ` [PATCH 16/18] clocksource: Replace " afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:05   ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-12  8:05   ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-20 11:13   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-02-20 11:13     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-02-20 11:13     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-02-20 14:48   ` Linus Walleij
2020-02-20 14:48     ` Linus Walleij
2020-02-20 14:48     ` Linus Walleij
2020-02-12  8:05 ` [PATCH 17/18] irqchip: " afzal mohammed
     [not found]   ` <8e00874d072f32496c2d0da05423bda1cadd6975.1581478324.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail. com>
2020-02-13 16:02     ` Paul Cercueil
2020-02-12  8:06 ` [PATCH 18/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq() and remove_irq() afzal mohammed
2020-02-20 14:49   ` Linus Walleij
2020-02-27 10:31 ` [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-27 10:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-27 10:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-27 10:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-27 11:07   ` afzal mohammed [this message]
2020-02-27 11:19     ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-27 11:07     ` afzal mohammed
2020-02-27 11:07     ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-21 17:43     ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-21 17:55       ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-21 17:43       ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-21 17:43       ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:08       ` [PATCH 0/6] Kill setup_irq() afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:20         ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:08         ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:08         ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:09         ` [PATCH v5 1/6] alpha: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq() afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:09         ` [PATCH v5 2/6] c6x: replace " afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:09         ` [PATCH v5 3/6] hexagon: " afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:10         ` [PATCH v5 4/6] sh: " afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:22           ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:10         ` [PATCH v5 5/6] unicore32: " afzal mohammed
2020-03-27 16:11         ` [PATCH v5 6/6] genirq: Remove setup_irq() and remove_irq() afzal mohammed
2020-04-11 14:10           ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-28  2:48         ` [PATCH 0/6] Kill setup_irq() Brian Cain
2020-03-28  2:48           ` Brian Cain
2020-03-28  2:48           ` Brian Cain
2020-03-28  2:48           ` Brian Cain
2020-03-28  2:48           ` Brian Cain
2020-03-28  7:32           ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-28  7:44             ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-28  7:32             ` afzal mohammed
2020-03-28  7:32             ` afzal mohammed
2020-04-02 15:03             ` Brian Cain
2020-04-02 15:03               ` Brian Cain
2020-04-02 15:03               ` Brian Cain
2020-04-02 15:03               ` Brian Cain
2020-04-02 15:03               ` Brian Cain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200227110713.GA5708@afzalpc \
    --to=afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com \
    --cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.