From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: remove redundant assignment to variable max_addr Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 08:33:14 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200301063314.GA6636@linux.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200228235003.112718-1-colin.king@canonical.com> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:50:03PM +0000, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > The variable max_addr is being initialized with a value that is never > read and it is being updated later with a new value. The initialization > is redundant and can be removed. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> > --- > mm/memblock.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index eba94ee3de0b..4d06bbaded0f 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -1698,7 +1698,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init_memblock __find_max_addr(phys_addr_t limit) > > void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit) > { > - phys_addr_t max_addr = PHYS_ADDR_MAX; > + phys_addr_t max_addr; > > if (!limit) > return; > -- > 2.25.0 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: remove redundant assignment to variable max_addr Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 06:33:14 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200301063314.GA6636@linux.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200228235003.112718-1-colin.king@canonical.com> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:50:03PM +0000, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > The variable max_addr is being initialized with a value that is never > read and it is being updated later with a new value. The initialization > is redundant and can be removed. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> > --- > mm/memblock.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index eba94ee3de0b..4d06bbaded0f 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -1698,7 +1698,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init_memblock __find_max_addr(phys_addr_t limit) > > void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit) > { > - phys_addr_t max_addr = PHYS_ADDR_MAX; > + phys_addr_t max_addr; > > if (!limit) > return; > -- > 2.25.0 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-01 6:33 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-02-28 23:50 [PATCH] mm/memblock: remove redundant assignment to variable max_addr Colin King 2020-02-29 7:47 ` Pankaj Gupta 2020-02-29 7:47 ` Pankaj Gupta 2020-02-29 7:47 ` Pankaj Gupta 2020-03-01 6:33 ` Mike Rapoport [this message] 2020-03-01 6:33 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200301063314.GA6636@linux.ibm.com \ --to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \ --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.