Re: [PATCH] check: Inform about missing ranges

[David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1292 bytes --]

On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 05:56:43PM +0100, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> In check_unit_address_vs_reg() warning message already says 'reg _or_
> ranges' when reg or ranges are present but unit name is missing.  Add
> this message for compatibility to say "reg _or_ ranges" when unit name
> is present but neither reg nor ranges are present.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz-42WfZ8EewN5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>

Applied, thanks.

> ---
>  checks.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c
> index 8acbc05..4b3c486 100644
> --- a/checks.c
> +++ b/checks.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static void check_unit_address_vs_reg(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti,
>  			FAIL(c, dti, node, "node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name");
>  	} else {
>  		if (unitname[0])
> -			FAIL(c, dti, node, "node has a unit name, but no reg property");
> +			FAIL(c, dti, node, "node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property");
>  	}
>  }
>  WARNING(unit_address_vs_reg, check_unit_address_vs_reg, NULL);

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]