All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	PUVICHAKRAVARTHY RAMACHANDRAN <puvichakravarthy@in.ibm.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
	Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm, slub: prevent kmalloc_node crashes and memory leaks
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:55:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320115533.9604-1-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)

Sachin reports [1] a crash in SLUB __slab_alloc():

BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x000073b0
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000003d55f4
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
Modules linked in:
CPU: 19 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200218-autotest #1
NIP:  c0000000003d55f4 LR: c0000000003d5b94 CTR: 0000000000000000
REGS: c0000008b37836d0 TRAP: 0300   Not tainted  (5.6.0-rc2-next-20200218-autotest)
MSR:  8000000000009033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 24004844  XER: 00000000
CFAR: c00000000000dec4 DAR: 00000000000073b0 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 1
GPR00: c0000000003d5b94 c0000008b3783960 c00000000155d400 c0000008b301f500
GPR04: 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000002 c0000000003443d8 c0000008bb398620
GPR08: 00000008ba2f0000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR12: 0000000024004844 c00000001ec52a00 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR16: c0000008a1b20048 c000000001595898 c000000001750c18 0000000000000002
GPR20: c000000001750c28 c000000001624470 0000000fffffffe0 5deadbeef0000122
GPR24: 0000000000000001 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000002 c0000000003443d8
GPR28: c0000008b301f500 c0000008bb398620 0000000000000000 c00c000002287180
NIP [c0000000003d55f4] ___slab_alloc+0x1f4/0x760
LR [c0000000003d5b94] __slab_alloc+0x34/0x60
Call Trace:
[c0000008b3783960] [c0000000003d5734] ___slab_alloc+0x334/0x760 (unreliable)
[c0000008b3783a40] [c0000000003d5b94] __slab_alloc+0x34/0x60
[c0000008b3783a70] [c0000000003d6fa0] __kmalloc_node+0x110/0x490
[c0000008b3783af0] [c0000000003443d8] kvmalloc_node+0x58/0x110
[c0000008b3783b30] [c0000000003fee38] mem_cgroup_css_online+0x108/0x270
[c0000008b3783b90] [c000000000235aa8] online_css+0x48/0xd0
[c0000008b3783bc0] [c00000000023eaec] cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x2ec/0x4d0
[c0000008b3783ca0] [c000000000242318] cgroup_mkdir+0x228/0x5f0
[c0000008b3783d10] [c00000000051e170] kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x90/0xf0
[c0000008b3783d50] [c00000000043dc00] vfs_mkdir+0x110/0x230
[c0000008b3783da0] [c000000000441c90] do_mkdirat+0xb0/0x1a0
[c0000008b3783e20] [c00000000000b278] system_call+0x5c/0x68

This is a PowerPC platform with following NUMA topology:

available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus:
node 0 size: 0 MB
node 0 free: 0 MB
node 1 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
node 1 size: 35247 MB
node 1 free: 30907 MB
node distances:
node   0   1
  0:  10  40
  1:  40  10

possible numa nodes: 0-31

This only happens with a mmotm patch "mm/memcontrol.c: allocate shrinker_map on
appropriate NUMA node" [2] which effectively calls kmalloc_node for each
possible node. SLUB however only allocates kmem_cache_node on online
N_NORMAL_MEMORY nodes, and relies on node_to_mem_node to return such valid node
for other nodes since commit a561ce00b09e ("slub: fall back to
node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node"). This is however not
true in this configuration where the _node_numa_mem_ array is not initialized
for nodes 0 and 2-31, thus it contains zeroes and get_partial() ends up
accessing non-allocated kmem_cache_node.

A related issue was reported by Bharata (originally by Ramachandran) [3] where
a similar PowerPC configuration, but with mainline kernel without patch [2]
ends up allocating large amounts of pages by kmalloc-1k kmalloc-512. This seems
to have the same underlying issue with node_to_mem_node() not behaving as
expected, and might probably also lead to an infinite loop with
CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL [4].

This patch should fix both issues by not relying on node_to_mem_node() anymore
and instead simply falling back to NUMA_NO_NODE, when kmalloc_node(node) is
attempted for a node that's not online, or has no usable memory. The "usable
memory" condition is also changed from node_present_pages() to N_NORMAL_MEMORY
node state, as that is exactly the condition that SLUB uses to allocate
kmem_cache_node structures. The check in get_partial() is removed completely,
as the checks in ___slab_alloc() are now sufficient to prevent get_partial()
being reached with an invalid node.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/3381CD91-AB3D-4773-BA04-E7A072A63968@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/fff0e636-4c36-ed10-281c-8cdb0687c839@virtuozzo.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200317092624.GB22538@in.ibm.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/088b5996-faae-8a56-ef9c-5b567125ae54@suse.cz/

Reported-and-tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: PUVICHAKRAVARTHY RAMACHANDRAN <puvichakravarthy@in.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
Debugged-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Fixes: a561ce00b09e ("slub: fall back to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
---
Hi, after the RFC got positive test results from reporters, I'm resending
as a proper patch.
Thanks,
Vlastimil

 mm/slub.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 17dc00e33115..7113b1f9cd77 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1973,8 +1973,6 @@ static void *get_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node,
 
 	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
 		searchnode = numa_mem_id();
-	else if (!node_present_pages(node))
-		searchnode = node_to_mem_node(node);
 
 	object = get_partial_node(s, get_node(s, searchnode), c, flags);
 	if (object || node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
@@ -2563,17 +2561,27 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
 	struct page *page;
 
 	page = c->page;
-	if (!page)
+	if (!page) {
+		/*
+		 * if the node is not online or has no normal memory, just
+		 * ignore the node constraint
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(node != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
+			     !node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)))
+			node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 		goto new_slab;
+	}
 redo:
 
 	if (unlikely(!node_match(page, node))) {
-		int searchnode = node;
-
-		if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_present_pages(node))
-			searchnode = node_to_mem_node(node);
-
-		if (unlikely(!node_match(page, searchnode))) {
+		/*
+		 * same as above but node_match() being false already
+		 * implies node != NUMA_NO_NODE
+		 */
+		if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)) {
+			node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+			goto redo;
+		} else {
 			stat(s, ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH);
 			deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist, c);
 			goto new_slab;
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	PUVICHAKRAVARTHY RAMACHANDRAN <puvichakravarthy@in.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm, slub: prevent kmalloc_node crashes and memory leaks
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:55:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320115533.9604-1-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)

Sachin reports [1] a crash in SLUB __slab_alloc():

BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x000073b0
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000003d55f4
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
Modules linked in:
CPU: 19 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200218-autotest #1
NIP:  c0000000003d55f4 LR: c0000000003d5b94 CTR: 0000000000000000
REGS: c0000008b37836d0 TRAP: 0300   Not tainted  (5.6.0-rc2-next-20200218-autotest)
MSR:  8000000000009033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 24004844  XER: 00000000
CFAR: c00000000000dec4 DAR: 00000000000073b0 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 1
GPR00: c0000000003d5b94 c0000008b3783960 c00000000155d400 c0000008b301f500
GPR04: 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000002 c0000000003443d8 c0000008bb398620
GPR08: 00000008ba2f0000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR12: 0000000024004844 c00000001ec52a00 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR16: c0000008a1b20048 c000000001595898 c000000001750c18 0000000000000002
GPR20: c000000001750c28 c000000001624470 0000000fffffffe0 5deadbeef0000122
GPR24: 0000000000000001 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000002 c0000000003443d8
GPR28: c0000008b301f500 c0000008bb398620 0000000000000000 c00c000002287180
NIP [c0000000003d55f4] ___slab_alloc+0x1f4/0x760
LR [c0000000003d5b94] __slab_alloc+0x34/0x60
Call Trace:
[c0000008b3783960] [c0000000003d5734] ___slab_alloc+0x334/0x760 (unreliable)
[c0000008b3783a40] [c0000000003d5b94] __slab_alloc+0x34/0x60
[c0000008b3783a70] [c0000000003d6fa0] __kmalloc_node+0x110/0x490
[c0000008b3783af0] [c0000000003443d8] kvmalloc_node+0x58/0x110
[c0000008b3783b30] [c0000000003fee38] mem_cgroup_css_online+0x108/0x270
[c0000008b3783b90] [c000000000235aa8] online_css+0x48/0xd0
[c0000008b3783bc0] [c00000000023eaec] cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x2ec/0x4d0
[c0000008b3783ca0] [c000000000242318] cgroup_mkdir+0x228/0x5f0
[c0000008b3783d10] [c00000000051e170] kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x90/0xf0
[c0000008b3783d50] [c00000000043dc00] vfs_mkdir+0x110/0x230
[c0000008b3783da0] [c000000000441c90] do_mkdirat+0xb0/0x1a0
[c0000008b3783e20] [c00000000000b278] system_call+0x5c/0x68

This is a PowerPC platform with following NUMA topology:

available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus:
node 0 size: 0 MB
node 0 free: 0 MB
node 1 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
node 1 size: 35247 MB
node 1 free: 30907 MB
node distances:
node   0   1
  0:  10  40
  1:  40  10

possible numa nodes: 0-31

This only happens with a mmotm patch "mm/memcontrol.c: allocate shrinker_map on
appropriate NUMA node" [2] which effectively calls kmalloc_node for each
possible node. SLUB however only allocates kmem_cache_node on online
N_NORMAL_MEMORY nodes, and relies on node_to_mem_node to return such valid node
for other nodes since commit a561ce00b09e ("slub: fall back to
node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node"). This is however not
true in this configuration where the _node_numa_mem_ array is not initialized
for nodes 0 and 2-31, thus it contains zeroes and get_partial() ends up
accessing non-allocated kmem_cache_node.

A related issue was reported by Bharata (originally by Ramachandran) [3] where
a similar PowerPC configuration, but with mainline kernel without patch [2]
ends up allocating large amounts of pages by kmalloc-1k kmalloc-512. This seems
to have the same underlying issue with node_to_mem_node() not behaving as
expected, and might probably also lead to an infinite loop with
CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL [4].

This patch should fix both issues by not relying on node_to_mem_node() anymore
and instead simply falling back to NUMA_NO_NODE, when kmalloc_node(node) is
attempted for a node that's not online, or has no usable memory. The "usable
memory" condition is also changed from node_present_pages() to N_NORMAL_MEMORY
node state, as that is exactly the condition that SLUB uses to allocate
kmem_cache_node structures. The check in get_partial() is removed completely,
as the checks in ___slab_alloc() are now sufficient to prevent get_partial()
being reached with an invalid node.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/3381CD91-AB3D-4773-BA04-E7A072A63968@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/fff0e636-4c36-ed10-281c-8cdb0687c839@virtuozzo.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200317092624.GB22538@in.ibm.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/088b5996-faae-8a56-ef9c-5b567125ae54@suse.cz/

Reported-and-tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: PUVICHAKRAVARTHY RAMACHANDRAN <puvichakravarthy@in.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
Debugged-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Fixes: a561ce00b09e ("slub: fall back to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
---
Hi, after the RFC got positive test results from reporters, I'm resending
as a proper patch.
Thanks,
Vlastimil

 mm/slub.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 17dc00e33115..7113b1f9cd77 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1973,8 +1973,6 @@ static void *get_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node,
 
 	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
 		searchnode = numa_mem_id();
-	else if (!node_present_pages(node))
-		searchnode = node_to_mem_node(node);
 
 	object = get_partial_node(s, get_node(s, searchnode), c, flags);
 	if (object || node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
@@ -2563,17 +2561,27 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
 	struct page *page;
 
 	page = c->page;
-	if (!page)
+	if (!page) {
+		/*
+		 * if the node is not online or has no normal memory, just
+		 * ignore the node constraint
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(node != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
+			     !node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)))
+			node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 		goto new_slab;
+	}
 redo:
 
 	if (unlikely(!node_match(page, node))) {
-		int searchnode = node;
-
-		if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_present_pages(node))
-			searchnode = node_to_mem_node(node);
-
-		if (unlikely(!node_match(page, searchnode))) {
+		/*
+		 * same as above but node_match() being false already
+		 * implies node != NUMA_NO_NODE
+		 */
+		if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)) {
+			node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+			goto redo;
+		} else {
 			stat(s, ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH);
 			deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist, c);
 			goto new_slab;
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-03-20 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-20 11:55 Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2020-03-20 11:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, slub: prevent kmalloc_node crashes and memory leaks Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-20 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "topology: add support for node_to_mem_node() to determine the fallback node" Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-20 13:12   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-24 13:00   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-26  0:54     ` Andrew Morton
2020-03-20 13:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, slub: prevent kmalloc_node crashes and memory leaks Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-20 13:10   ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200320115533.9604-1-vbabka@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=puvichakravarthy@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.