All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Cc: sameer.lattannavar@intel.com, daniels@collabora.com,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/display: Add Nearest-neighbor based integer scaling support
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:41:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323144137.GU13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200319102103.28895-5-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:51:02PM +0530, Pankaj Bharadiya wrote:
> Integer scaling (IS) is a nearest-neighbor upscaling technique that
> simply scales up the existing pixels by an integer
> (i.e., whole number) multiplier.Nearest-neighbor (NN) interpolation
> works by filling in the missing color values in the upscaled image
> with that of the coordinate-mapped nearest source pixel value.
> 
> Both IS and NN preserve the clarity of the original image. Integer
> scaling is particularly useful for pixel art games that rely on
> sharp, blocky images to deliver their distinctive look.
> 
> Introduce skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter() function which
> configures the scaler filter coefficients to enable nearest-neighbor
> filtering.
> 
> Bspec: 49247
> 
> changes since v1:
> * Rearrange skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter() to iterate the
>   registers directly instead of the phases and taps (Ville)
> 
> changes since RFC:
> * Refine the skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter() logic (Ville)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  2 +
>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 8f23c4d51c33..791dd908aa89 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -6237,6 +6237,78 @@ void skl_scaler_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
>  		skl_detach_scaler(crtc, i);
>  }
>  
> +static int skl_coef_tap(int i)
> +{
> +	return i % 7;
> +}
> +
> +static u16 skl_nearest_filter_coef(int t)
> +{
> +	return t == 3 ? 0x0800 : 0x3000;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + *  Theory behind setting nearest-neighbor integer scaling:
> + *
> + *  17 phase of 7 taps requires 119 coefficients in 60 dwords per set.
> + *  The letter represents the filter tap (D is the center tap) and the number
> + *  represents the coefficient set for a phase (0-16).
> + *
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |Index value | Data value coeffient 1 | Data value coeffient 2 |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   00h      |          B0            |          A0            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   01h      |          D0            |          C0            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   02h      |          F0            |          E0            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   03h      |          A1            |          G0            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   04h      |          C1            |          B1            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   ...      |          ...           |          ...           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   38h      |          B16           |          A16           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   39h      |          D16           |          C16           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   3Ah      |          F16           |          C16           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   3Bh      |        Reserved        |          G16           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *
> + *  To enable nearest-neighbor scaling:  program scaler coefficents with
> + *  the center tap (Dxx) values set to 1 and all other values set to 0 as per
> + *  SCALER_COEFFICIENT_FORMAT
> + *
> + */
> +
> +void skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +					      enum pipe pipe, int id, int set)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/*enable the index auto increment.*/

Pointless comment, and also misformatted.

> +	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv,
> +			  SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set),
> +			  PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 17 * 7; i += 2) {
> +		u32 tmp;
> +		int t;
> +
> +		t = skl_coef_tap(i);
> +		tmp = skl_nearest_filter_coef(t);
> +
> +		t = skl_coef_tap(i+1);
> +		tmp |= skl_nearest_filter_coef(t)<<16;

Missing spaces.

> +
> +		intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET(pipe, id, set),
> +				  tmp);
> +	}

I'd maybe reset the index back to 0 here and disable the auto-increment
bit.

> +}
> +
>  static void skl_pfit_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> index adb1225a3480..88f3c77f6806 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> @@ -587,6 +587,8 @@ void intel_crtc_arm_fifo_underrun(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  u16 skl_scaler_calc_phase(int sub, int scale, bool chroma_center);
>  int skl_update_scaler_crtc(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  void skl_scaler_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state);
> +void skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +					      enum pipe pipe, int id, int set);
>  void ilk_pfit_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state);
>  u32 glk_plane_color_ctl(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> -- 
> 2.23.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Cc: daniels@collabora.com, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/display: Add Nearest-neighbor based integer scaling support
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:41:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323144137.GU13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200319102103.28895-5-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:51:02PM +0530, Pankaj Bharadiya wrote:
> Integer scaling (IS) is a nearest-neighbor upscaling technique that
> simply scales up the existing pixels by an integer
> (i.e., whole number) multiplier.Nearest-neighbor (NN) interpolation
> works by filling in the missing color values in the upscaled image
> with that of the coordinate-mapped nearest source pixel value.
> 
> Both IS and NN preserve the clarity of the original image. Integer
> scaling is particularly useful for pixel art games that rely on
> sharp, blocky images to deliver their distinctive look.
> 
> Introduce skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter() function which
> configures the scaler filter coefficients to enable nearest-neighbor
> filtering.
> 
> Bspec: 49247
> 
> changes since v1:
> * Rearrange skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter() to iterate the
>   registers directly instead of the phases and taps (Ville)
> 
> changes since RFC:
> * Refine the skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter() logic (Ville)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  2 +
>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 8f23c4d51c33..791dd908aa89 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -6237,6 +6237,78 @@ void skl_scaler_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
>  		skl_detach_scaler(crtc, i);
>  }
>  
> +static int skl_coef_tap(int i)
> +{
> +	return i % 7;
> +}
> +
> +static u16 skl_nearest_filter_coef(int t)
> +{
> +	return t == 3 ? 0x0800 : 0x3000;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + *  Theory behind setting nearest-neighbor integer scaling:
> + *
> + *  17 phase of 7 taps requires 119 coefficients in 60 dwords per set.
> + *  The letter represents the filter tap (D is the center tap) and the number
> + *  represents the coefficient set for a phase (0-16).
> + *
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |Index value | Data value coeffient 1 | Data value coeffient 2 |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   00h      |          B0            |          A0            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   01h      |          D0            |          C0            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   02h      |          F0            |          E0            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   03h      |          A1            |          G0            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   04h      |          C1            |          B1            |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   ...      |          ...           |          ...           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   38h      |          B16           |          A16           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   39h      |          D16           |          C16           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   3Ah      |          F16           |          C16           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *         |   3Bh      |        Reserved        |          G16           |
> + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> + *
> + *  To enable nearest-neighbor scaling:  program scaler coefficents with
> + *  the center tap (Dxx) values set to 1 and all other values set to 0 as per
> + *  SCALER_COEFFICIENT_FORMAT
> + *
> + */
> +
> +void skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +					      enum pipe pipe, int id, int set)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/*enable the index auto increment.*/

Pointless comment, and also misformatted.

> +	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv,
> +			  SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set),
> +			  PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 17 * 7; i += 2) {
> +		u32 tmp;
> +		int t;
> +
> +		t = skl_coef_tap(i);
> +		tmp = skl_nearest_filter_coef(t);
> +
> +		t = skl_coef_tap(i+1);
> +		tmp |= skl_nearest_filter_coef(t)<<16;

Missing spaces.

> +
> +		intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET(pipe, id, set),
> +				  tmp);
> +	}

I'd maybe reset the index back to 0 here and disable the auto-increment
bit.

> +}
> +
>  static void skl_pfit_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> index adb1225a3480..88f3c77f6806 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> @@ -587,6 +587,8 @@ void intel_crtc_arm_fifo_underrun(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  u16 skl_scaler_calc_phase(int sub, int scale, bool chroma_center);
>  int skl_update_scaler_crtc(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  void skl_scaler_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state);
> +void skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +					      enum pipe pipe, int id, int set);
>  void ilk_pfit_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state);
>  u32 glk_plane_color_ctl(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> -- 
> 2.23.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-23 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19 10:20 [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce drm scaling filter property Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-19 10:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-19 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm: Introduce plane and CRTC scaling filter properties Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-19 10:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-23 14:21   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-23 14:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-24 14:22     ` Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-03-24 14:22       ` [Intel-gfx] " Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-03-19 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/drm-kms.rst: Add plane and CRTC scaling filter property documentation Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-19 10:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-19 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Introduce scaling filter related registers and bit fields Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-19 10:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-23 14:39   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-23 14:39     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-24 14:36     ` Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-03-24 14:36       ` [Intel-gfx] " Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-03-24 16:43       ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-24 16:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-19 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/display: Add Nearest-neighbor based integer scaling support Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-19 10:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-23 14:41   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-03-23 14:41     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-19 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: Enable scaling filter for plane and CRTC Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-19 10:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-03-23 14:47   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-23 14:47     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-24 15:32     ` Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-03-24 15:32       ` [Intel-gfx] " Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-03-24 16:46       ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-24 16:46         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-26 15:15         ` Bharadiya,Pankaj
2020-03-26 15:15           ` [Intel-gfx] " Bharadiya,Pankaj
2020-03-26 15:36           ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-26 15:36             ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-19 10:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce drm scaling filter property (rev3) Patchwork
2020-03-19 11:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-19 13:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200323144137.GU13686@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniels@collabora.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sameer.lattannavar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.