All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stummala@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix long latency due to discard during umount
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:30:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200408090024.GC20234@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200403171943.GC68460@google.com>

Hi Jaegeuk,

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:19:43AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/01, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:46:55AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > On 03/30, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > > > F2FS already has a default timeout of 5 secs for discards that
> > > > can be issued during umount, but it can take more than the 5 sec
> > > > timeout if the underlying UFS device queue is already full and there
> > > > are no more available free tags to be used. In that case, submit_bio()
> > > > will wait for the already queued discard requests to complete to get
> > > > a free tag, which can potentially take way more than 5 sec.
> > > > 
> > > > Fix this by submitting the discard requests with REQ_NOWAIT
> > > > flags during umount. This will return -EAGAIN for UFS queue/tag full
> > > > scenario without waiting in the context of submit_bio(). The FS can
> > > > then handle these requests by retrying again within the stipulated
> > > > discard timeout period to avoid long latencies.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, Sahitya, but, do we really need to do like this? How about just
> > > controlling # of outstanding discarding bios in __issue_discard_cmd()?
> > 
> > Do you mean something like this?
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 1a62b27..860dd43 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ static void __init_discard_policy(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >         } else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) {
> >                 dpolicy->io_aware = false;
> >         } else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT) {
> > -               dpolicy->max_requests = UINT_MAX;
> > +               dpolicy->max_requests = 30;
> 
> Can we use max queue depth of the block device?

I think it should be limited to 8 or 16 as Chao suggested, so that we can have
better control on the given timeout value? Thoughts?

Thanks,

> 
> >                 dpolicy->io_aware = false;
> >                 /* we need to issue all to keep CP_TRIMMED_FLAG */
> >                 dpolicy->granularity = 1;
> > @@ -1470,12 +1470,14 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >         struct list_head *pend_list;
> >         struct discard_cmd *dc, *tmp;
> >         struct blk_plug plug;
> > -       int i, issued = 0;
> > +       int i, issued;
> >         bool io_interrupted = false;
> > 
> >         if (dpolicy->timeout != 0)
> >                 f2fs_update_time(sbi, dpolicy->timeout);
> > 
> > +retry:
> > +       issued = 0;
> >         for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> >                 if (dpolicy->timeout != 0 &&
> >                                 f2fs_time_over(sbi, dpolicy->timeout))
> > @@ -1522,6 +1524,11 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >                         break;
> >         }
> > 
> > +       if (dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT && issued) {
> > +               __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy);
> > +               goto retry;
> > +       }
> > +
> >         if (!issued && io_interrupted)
> >                 issued = -1;
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > v3:
> > > > -Handle the regression reported by Chao with v2.
> > > > -simplify the logic to split the dc with multiple bios incase any bio returns
> > > >  EAGAIN and retry those new dc within 5 sec timeout.
> > > > 
> > > >  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > index fb3e531..55d18c7 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > @@ -1029,13 +1029,16 @@ static void f2fs_submit_discard_endio(struct bio *bio)
> > > >  	struct discard_cmd *dc = (struct discard_cmd *)bio->bi_private;
> > > >  	unsigned long flags;
> > > >  
> > > > -	dc->error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
> > > > -
> > > >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > > +	if (!dc->error)
> > > > +		dc->error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
> > > > +
> > > >  	dc->bio_ref--;
> > > > -	if (!dc->bio_ref && dc->state == D_SUBMIT) {
> > > > -		dc->state = D_DONE;
> > > > -		complete_all(&dc->wait);
> > > > +	if (!dc->bio_ref) {
> > > > +		if (dc->error || dc->state == D_SUBMIT) {
> > > > +			dc->state = D_DONE;
> > > > +			complete_all(&dc->wait);
> > > > +		}
> > > >  	}
> > > >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > >  	bio_put(bio);
> > > > @@ -1124,10 +1127,13 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  	struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> > > >  	struct list_head *wait_list = (dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) ?
> > > >  					&(dcc->fstrim_list) : &(dcc->wait_list);
> > > > -	int flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0;
> > > > +	int flag;
> > > >  	block_t lstart, start, len, total_len;
> > > >  	int err = 0;
> > > >  
> > > > +	flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0;
> > > > +	flag |= dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT ? REQ_NOWAIT : 0;
> > > > +
> > > >  	if (dc->state != D_PREP)
> > > >  		return 0;
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1192,10 +1198,6 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  		dc->bio_ref++;
> > > >  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > >  
> > > > -		atomic_inc(&dcc->queued_discard);
> > > > -		dc->queued++;
> > > > -		list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list);
> > > > -
> > > >  		/* sanity check on discard range */
> > > >  		__check_sit_bitmap(sbi, lstart, lstart + len);
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1203,6 +1205,29 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  		bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
> > > >  		bio->bi_opf |= flag;
> > > >  		submit_bio(bio);
> > > > +		if (flag & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> > > > +			if (dc->error == -EAGAIN) {
> > > > +				spin_lock_irqsave(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > > +				dc->len -= len;
> > > > +				if (!dc->len) {
> > > > +					dc->len = total_len;
> > > > +					dc->state = D_PREP;
> > > > +					reinit_completion(&dc->wait);
> > > > +				} else {
> > > > +					dcc->undiscard_blks -= total_len;
> > > > +					if (dc->state == D_PARTIAL)
> > > > +						dc->state = D_SUBMIT;
> > > > +				}
> > > > +				err = dc->error;
> > > > +				dc->error = 0;
> > > > +				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > > +				break;
> > > > +			}
> > > > +		}
> > > > +
> > > > +		atomic_inc(&dcc->queued_discard);
> > > > +		dc->queued++;
> > > > +		list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list);
> > > >  
> > > >  		atomic_inc(&dcc->issued_discard);
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1214,8 +1239,9 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  		len = total_len;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (!err && len)
> > > > -		__update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lstart, start, len);
> > > > +	if ((!err || err == -EAGAIN) && total_len && dc->start != start)
> > > > +		__update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lstart, start,
> > > > +					total_len);
> > > >  	return err;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1470,12 +1496,15 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  	struct list_head *pend_list;
> > > >  	struct discard_cmd *dc, *tmp;
> > > >  	struct blk_plug plug;
> > > > -	int i, issued = 0;
> > > > +	int i, err, issued = 0;
> > > >  	bool io_interrupted = false;
> > > > +	bool retry;
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (dpolicy->timeout != 0)
> > > >  		f2fs_update_time(sbi, dpolicy->timeout);
> > > >  
> > > > +retry:
> > > > +	retry = false;
> > > >  	for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > > >  		if (dpolicy->timeout != 0 &&
> > > >  				f2fs_time_over(sbi, dpolicy->timeout))
> > > > @@ -1509,7 +1538,12 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  				break;
> > > >  			}
> > > >  
> > > > -			__submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> > > > +			err = __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> > > > +			if (err == -EAGAIN) {
> > > > +				congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC,
> > > > +						DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT);
> > > > +				retry = true;
> > > > +			}
> > > >  
> > > >  			if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> > > >  				break;
> > > > @@ -1522,6 +1556,9 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  			break;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > +	if (retry)
> > > > +		goto retry;
> > > > +
> > > >  	if (!issued && io_interrupted)
> > > >  		issued = -1;
> > > >  
> > > > -- 
> > > > Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> > > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
> > 
> > -- 
> > --
> > Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

-- 
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-08  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-30  6:45 [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix long latency due to discard during umount Sahitya Tummala
2020-03-30  8:57 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-30  9:58 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-31 18:46 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-03-31 18:46   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-01  9:22   ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-04-01  9:22     ` [f2fs-dev] " Sahitya Tummala
2020-04-02  9:32     ` Chao Yu
2020-04-02  9:32       ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-04-03 17:19     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-03 17:19       ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-08  9:00       ` Sahitya Tummala [this message]
2020-04-09  2:29         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-09  2:29           ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-09 11:47           ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-04-13 16:52             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-13 16:52               ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-14 17:45               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-14 17:45                 ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200408090024.GC20234@codeaurora.org \
    --to=stummala@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.