All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Dhaval Shah <dshah@xilinx.com>,
	Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de,
	Rohit Visavalia <rohit.visavalia@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] soc: xilinx: vcu: implement clock provider for output clocks
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 02:42:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202004150220.YLPS5HEg%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414103202.4288-4-m.tretter@pengutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2943 bytes --]

Hi Michael,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next rockchip/for-next keystone/next arm64/for-next/core arm-soc/for-next shawnguo/for-next at91/at91-next v5.7-rc1 next-20200414]
[cannot apply to xlnx/master linux-rpi/for-rpi-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-Tretter/soc-xilinx-vcu-provide-interfaces-for-other-drivers/20200414-235029
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-20200414 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c: In function 'xvcu_reset':
>> drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:540:11: error: 'struct xvcu_device' has no member named 'reset_gpio'
     if (!xvcu->reset_gpio)
              ^~
>> drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:543:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_set_value'; did you mean 'bitmap_set_value8'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 0);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     bitmap_set_value8
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:543:22: error: 'struct xvcu_device' has no member named 'reset_gpio'
     gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 0);
                         ^~
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:545:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'usleep_range'; did you mean 'sort_range'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     usleep_range(60, 120);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
     sort_range
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:546:22: error: 'struct xvcu_device' has no member named 'reset_gpio'
     gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 1);
                         ^~
   At top level:
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:538:13: warning: 'xvcu_reset' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    static void xvcu_reset(struct xvcu_device *xvcu)
                ^~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +540 drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c

   537	
   538	static void xvcu_reset(struct xvcu_device *xvcu)
   539	{
 > 540		if (!xvcu->reset_gpio)
   541			return;
   542	
 > 543		gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 0);
   544		/* min 2 clock cycle of vcu pll_ref, slowest freq is 33.33KHz */
   545		usleep_range(60, 120);
   546		gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 1);
   547		usleep_range(60, 120);
   548	}
   549	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 37290 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dhaval Shah <dshah@xilinx.com>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de,
	Rohit Visavalia <rohit.visavalia@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] soc: xilinx: vcu: implement clock provider for output clocks
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 02:42:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202004150220.YLPS5HEg%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414103202.4288-4-m.tretter@pengutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2943 bytes --]

Hi Michael,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next rockchip/for-next keystone/next arm64/for-next/core arm-soc/for-next shawnguo/for-next at91/at91-next v5.7-rc1 next-20200414]
[cannot apply to xlnx/master linux-rpi/for-rpi-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-Tretter/soc-xilinx-vcu-provide-interfaces-for-other-drivers/20200414-235029
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-20200414 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c: In function 'xvcu_reset':
>> drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:540:11: error: 'struct xvcu_device' has no member named 'reset_gpio'
     if (!xvcu->reset_gpio)
              ^~
>> drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:543:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_set_value'; did you mean 'bitmap_set_value8'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 0);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     bitmap_set_value8
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:543:22: error: 'struct xvcu_device' has no member named 'reset_gpio'
     gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 0);
                         ^~
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:545:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'usleep_range'; did you mean 'sort_range'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     usleep_range(60, 120);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
     sort_range
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:546:22: error: 'struct xvcu_device' has no member named 'reset_gpio'
     gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 1);
                         ^~
   At top level:
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:538:13: warning: 'xvcu_reset' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    static void xvcu_reset(struct xvcu_device *xvcu)
                ^~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +540 drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c

   537	
   538	static void xvcu_reset(struct xvcu_device *xvcu)
   539	{
 > 540		if (!xvcu->reset_gpio)
   541			return;
   542	
 > 543		gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 0);
   544		/* min 2 clock cycle of vcu pll_ref, slowest freq is 33.33KHz */
   545		usleep_range(60, 120);
   546		gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 1);
   547		usleep_range(60, 120);
   548	}
   549	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 37290 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] soc: xilinx: vcu: implement clock provider for output clocks
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 02:42:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202004150220.YLPS5HEg%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414103202.4288-4-m.tretter@pengutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3012 bytes --]

Hi Michael,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next rockchip/for-next keystone/next arm64/for-next/core arm-soc/for-next shawnguo/for-next at91/at91-next v5.7-rc1 next-20200414]
[cannot apply to xlnx/master linux-rpi/for-rpi-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-Tretter/soc-xilinx-vcu-provide-interfaces-for-other-drivers/20200414-235029
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-20200414 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c: In function 'xvcu_reset':
>> drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:540:11: error: 'struct xvcu_device' has no member named 'reset_gpio'
     if (!xvcu->reset_gpio)
              ^~
>> drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:543:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_set_value'; did you mean 'bitmap_set_value8'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 0);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     bitmap_set_value8
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:543:22: error: 'struct xvcu_device' has no member named 'reset_gpio'
     gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 0);
                         ^~
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:545:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'usleep_range'; did you mean 'sort_range'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     usleep_range(60, 120);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
     sort_range
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:546:22: error: 'struct xvcu_device' has no member named 'reset_gpio'
     gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 1);
                         ^~
   At top level:
   drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c:538:13: warning: 'xvcu_reset' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    static void xvcu_reset(struct xvcu_device *xvcu)
                ^~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +540 drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c

   537	
   538	static void xvcu_reset(struct xvcu_device *xvcu)
   539	{
 > 540		if (!xvcu->reset_gpio)
   541			return;
   542	
 > 543		gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 0);
   544		/* min 2 clock cycle of vcu pll_ref, slowest freq is 33.33KHz */
   545		usleep_range(60, 120);
   546		gpiod_set_value(xvcu->reset_gpio, 1);
   547		usleep_range(60, 120);
   548	}
   549	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 37290 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-14 10:31 [PATCH v2 0/6] soc: xilinx: vcu: provide interfaces for other drivers Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:31 ` Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] soc: xilinx: vcu: drop useless success message Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:31   ` Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ARM: dts: define indexes for output clocks Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:31   ` Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] soc: xilinx: vcu: implement clock provider " Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:31   ` Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 18:42   ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2020-04-14 18:42     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-14 18:42     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-14 19:48   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-14 19:48     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-14 19:48     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-15  6:26   ` Michael Tretter
2020-04-15  6:26     ` Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] dt-bindings: soc: xlnx: extract xlnx,vcu-settings to separate binding Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:32   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] dt-bindings: soc: xlnx: extract xlnx, vcu-settings " Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] soc: xilinx: vcu: use vcu-settings syscon registers Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:32   ` Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] soc: xilinx: vcu: add missing register NUM_CORE Michael Tretter
2020-04-14 10:32   ` Michael Tretter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202004150220.YLPS5HEg%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dshah@xilinx.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=m.tretter@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rohit.visavalia@xilinx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.