All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@gmx.com>
Cc: Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>,
	"John B . Wyatt IV" <jbwyatt4@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Use fls instead of for loop in vnt_update_top_rates
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:10:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420121059.GC2659@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200419100921.5421-1-oscar.carter@gmx.com>

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Oscar Carter wrote:
> -	for (i = RATE_11M;; i--) {
> -		if (priv->basic_rates & (u16)(1 << i)) {
> -			top_cck = i;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -		if (i == RATE_1M)
> -			break;
> -	}
> +	pos = fls(priv->basic_rates & GENMASK(RATE_54M, RATE_6M));
> +	priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate = pos ? pos-- : RATE_24M;
                                          ^^^^^
Argh...  Come on.  I don't want to have to break out the C standard to
see if this is defined behavior and where the sequence points are.  A
pre-op would be clear but the most clear thing is to write it like this:

	priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate = pos ? (pos - 1) : RATE_24M;


> 
> -	priv->top_cck_basic_rate = top_cck;
> +	pos = fls(priv->basic_rates & GENMASK(RATE_11M, RATE_1M));
> +	priv->top_cck_basic_rate = pos ? pos-- : RATE_1M;
                                         ^^^^^
Same.

regards,
dan carpenter


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@gmx.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	"John B . Wyatt IV" <jbwyatt4@gmail.com>,
	Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Use fls instead of for loop in vnt_update_top_rates
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:10:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420121059.GC2659@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200419100921.5421-1-oscar.carter@gmx.com>

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Oscar Carter wrote:
> -	for (i = RATE_11M;; i--) {
> -		if (priv->basic_rates & (u16)(1 << i)) {
> -			top_cck = i;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -		if (i == RATE_1M)
> -			break;
> -	}
> +	pos = fls(priv->basic_rates & GENMASK(RATE_54M, RATE_6M));
> +	priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate = pos ? pos-- : RATE_24M;
                                          ^^^^^
Argh...  Come on.  I don't want to have to break out the C standard to
see if this is defined behavior and where the sequence points are.  A
pre-op would be clear but the most clear thing is to write it like this:

	priv->top_ofdm_basic_rate = pos ? (pos - 1) : RATE_24M;


> 
> -	priv->top_cck_basic_rate = top_cck;
> +	pos = fls(priv->basic_rates & GENMASK(RATE_11M, RATE_1M));
> +	priv->top_cck_basic_rate = pos ? pos-- : RATE_1M;
                                         ^^^^^
Same.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-19 10:09 [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Use fls instead of for loop in vnt_update_top_rates Oscar Carter
2020-04-19 10:09 ` Oscar Carter
2020-04-20 12:10 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-04-20 12:10   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-04-20 15:02   ` Oscar Carter
2020-04-20 15:02     ` Oscar Carter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200420121059.GC2659@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=forest@alittletooquiet.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jbwyatt4@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oscar.carter@gmx.com \
    --cc=tvboxspy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.