Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64

[Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:57:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > [REQUEST]
> > 
> > Would it be possible for the patches that have already received Acked-by's in
> > this series to be accepted and applied to the tree? I lost an Acked-by (in
> > intel-panel.c) because it had a merge conflict with a new change that came in
> > after I rebased to tip. I wasn't sure earlier about accepting single patches as
> > opposed to the entire series en masse, but this event has got me thinking.
> 
> Has there been a positive maintainer review of patch 11 at any point in
> the thread (most of the people you are asking to commit patches have
> not been able to see the discussion about the actual feature these
> patches are preparing for)?

Yes. Uwe had this to say [1] about a previous patchset (v5) of patch 11
which is essentially unchanged in this patchset save the dropping of the
pwm_capture change.

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg11536.html

Thank you.

Guru Das.