All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: U-Boot i2c bus num 1 is broken on Nokia N900 (Was: Re: U-Boot is broken on real N900 HW)
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 01:54:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200425235459.bcoskmnux45x4iqs@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200425121132.vnlurfxti6y433pq@pali>

Adding Hannes and Heiko to the loop, please look at this problem.

On Saturday 25 April 2020 14:11:32 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> On Saturday 25 April 2020 07:00:58 Adam Ford wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 6:50 AM Pali Roh?r <pali@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday 25 April 2020 06:36:58 Adam Ford wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 5:42 AM Pali Roh?r <pali@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday 02 April 2020 20:42:31 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday 01 April 2020 12:32:29 Merlijn Wajer wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 01/04/2020 00:42, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wednesday 01 April 2020 00:35:07 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > > > > > >> This patch series contain fixes for Nokia RX-51 board (aka N900).
> > > > > > > >> After these changes it is possible to run U-Boot in qemu emulator again.
> > > > > > > >> And U-Boot can boot kernel image from RAM, eMMC or OneNAND memory without
> > > > > > > >> problem.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But on real Nokia N900 device is U-Boot crashing in reboot loop.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I do not have serial console for Nokia N900 to debug this issue, but
> > > > > > > > seems that it is related to OMAP I2C and OMAP HS MMC code. Problem is
> > > > > > > > that there is no crash and even no error in qemu emulator so I cannot
> > > > > > > > debug this issue.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > First problem is around /* reset lp5523 led */ code in rx51.c. On real
> > > > > > > > N900 device it generates repeating messages:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >   Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > >   Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > When I commented that few lines all these messages disappeared. So
> > > > > > > > problem is with OMAP I2C.
...
> > > > > > > > I remember that somebody had serial jig for Nokia N900, could somebody
> > > > > > > > look at this reboot loop problem?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And any idea how should be OMAP I2C configured in U-Boot to correctly
> > > > > > > > work?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maybe I will try to find some time to git bisect which change broke
> > > > > > > > U-Boot on real N900 hardware.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Took latest u-boot master, applied patches and this is the result on
> > > > > > > serial (first part is NOLO booting, I think that can be ignored) [1].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > U-Boot 2020.04-rc4-00033-g7dbafe0634-dirty (Apr 01 2020 - 12:15:47 +0200)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OMAP3530-HS ES3.1, CPU-OPP2, L3-165MHz, Max CPU Clock 600 MHz
> > > > > > > Nokia RX-51 + LPDDR/OneNAND
> > > > > > > I2C:   ready
> > > > > > > DRAM:  256 MiB
> > > > > > > NAND:  0 Bytes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looks like that something with NAND is broken.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > MMC:   OMAP SD/MMC: 0, OMAP SD/MMC: 1
> > > > > > > In:    vga
> > > > > > > Out:   vga
> > > > > > > Err:   vga
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0100
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > Timed out in wait_for_event: status=0000
> > > > > > > Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured
> > > > > > > i2c_read (addr phase): pads on bus probably not configured (status=0x10)
> > > > > > > i2c_write: timed out writig last byte!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > These i2c errors are caused by
> > > > > >
> > > > > >       /* reset lp5523 led */
> > > > > >       i2c_set_bus_num(1);
> > > > > >       state = 0xff;
> > > > > >       i2c_write(0x32, 0x3d, 1, &state, 1);
> > > > > >       i2c_set_bus_num(0);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there anything which needs to be done to initialize i2c bus 1?
> > > > > > Because this code is working fine on older U-Boot version.
> > > > >
> > > > > Above code worked fine for U-Boot 2013.04, but in git version from
> > > > > January 2015 it prints above error messages.
> > > > >
> > > > > On on internet forums I see these error messages also from other OMAP3
> > > > > board, e.g. beagle board.
> > > > >
> > > > > Has somebody some working OMAP3 board? And can test if it works with
> > > > > recent version of U-Boot? I guess that above i2c problem would happen
> > > > > also on other OMAP3 boards.
> > > >
> > > > There was a conversion a while ago to dm_i2c, and I converted my board
> > > > to support using the device tree during the SPL phase, and whenever I
> > > > am aware any driver has driver model (DM) support, I try to convert my
> > > > board.
> > > >
> > > > I have a DM3730 and the last check I did was 2020.04-rc1, and it was working
> > >
> > > Ok, so it either OMAP3430 specific problem or N900 board specific
> > > problem. N900 does not use driver model.
> > 
> > i have an OMAP3530 which is basically a 3430, and it works too.  I am
> > guessing the issue is unique to the N900 or the fact that it's
> > high-security.  Neither of my boards are HS parts.  They are both GP.
> 
> N900 is HS device, but I guess that should be caused by GP vs HS
> difference. Working i2c bus 0 and non-working i2c bus 1 could not be
> caused by GP vs HS difference. Also I guess that omap hs mmc would be
> same on GP and HS boards.
...
> > > Before calling i2c_write(0x32, ...) I tried to call i2c_probe(0x32) and
> > > it returned error.
> > >
> > > If I tried to call "i2c dev 1" in U-Boot console, I got tons of errors
> > > and basically U-Boot stopped responding.
> > >
> > > So by above observation it looks like I2C bus num 1 does not work, but
> > > I2C bus num 0 works fine.
> > >
> > > Do I need to call i2c_probe(...) before calling i2c_write(...)?
> > >
> > > And is something special needed for initializing omap i2c bus num 1?
> > > Because from my above observation it looks like that something is
> > > missing for bus 1 which in older u-boot version was not needed.

Now I was able to find commit which is causing above i2c problems:
"Check if pads/pull-ups of bus are properly configured"

It is d5243359e1afc957acd373dbbde1cf6c70ee5485:

    OMAP24xx I2C: Add support for set-speed
    
    Adds support for set-speed on the OMAP24xx I2C Adapter.
    
    Changes to omap24_i2c_write(...) for polling ARDY Bit from IRQ-Status.
    Otherwise on a subsequent call the transfer of last byte from the
    predecessor is aborted and therefore lost. For exmaple when
    i2c_write(...) is followed by a i2c_setspeed(...) (which has to
    deactivate and activate master for changing psc,...).
    
    Minor cosmetical changes.
    
    Signed-off-by: Hannes Petermaier <oe5hpm@oevsv.at>
    Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>

U-Boot version prior this command does not report those i2c errors.

Hannes, any idea how your patch could broke omap i2c i2c bus num 1 on
Nokia N900?

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-25 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-31 22:35 [PATCH 00/11] Fixes for Nokia RX-51 Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 01/11] Nokia RX-51: Update my email address Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 02/11] Nokia RX-51: Add README.nokia_rx51 file to MAINTAINERS Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 03/11] Nokia RX-51: Move comment about CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE to correct place Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 04/11] Nokia RX-51: Move code from defconfig back to C header file Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 05/11] Nokia RX-51: Revert back onenand defitions Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 06/11] Nokia RX-51: Remove PART* macros Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 07/11] Nokia RX-51: Remember setup_console_atag option Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 08/11] Nokia RX-51: Enable CONFIG_CONSOLE_MUX Pali Rohár
2020-04-14 10:19   ` Lokesh Vutla
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 09/11] Nokia RX-51: Disable some unused features to decrease size of u-boot binary Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 10/11] Nokia RX-51: Update README.nokia_rx51 Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 11/11] Nokia RX-51: Add automated test for running RX-51 build in qemu Pali Rohár
2020-04-14 10:40   ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-21 14:55     ` Lokesh Vutla
2020-04-21 17:36       ` Simon Glass
2020-04-21 20:12         ` Tom Rini
2020-04-21 20:37           ` Simon Glass
2020-04-21 20:46             ` Tom Rini
2020-04-21 20:49               ` Simon Glass
2020-04-21 20:51                 ` Tom Rini
2020-04-21 21:34                   ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-21 23:24                     ` Tom Rini
2020-04-23  7:34                       ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-23 12:24                         ` Tom Rini
2020-04-23 17:48                           ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-25  9:00                             ` [PATCH v2] " Pali Rohár
2020-04-27  8:40                               ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-27 18:00                               ` Tom Rini
2020-04-28  7:37                                 ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-08 12:52                                   ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-08 13:10                                     ` Tom Rini
2020-05-09 16:28                                       ` Lokesh Vutla
2020-05-09 16:35                                         ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-09 20:56                                           ` Tom Rini
2020-05-14 22:41                                             ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-15  0:01                                               ` Tom Rini
2020-05-15  7:33                                                 ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-15 13:20                                                   ` Tom Rini
2020-05-15 13:46                                                     ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-15 13:48                                                       ` Tom Rini
2020-05-15 13:51                                                         ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-15 13:53                                                           ` Tom Rini
2020-05-15 13:58                                                             ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-15 14:16                                                               ` Tom Rini
2020-05-15 17:40                                                                 ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-15 18:34                                                                   ` Tom Rini
2020-05-17 12:31                                                                     ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-17 12:38                                                                       ` [PATCH v3] " Pali Rohár
2020-05-26  9:18                                                                         ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-26  9:22                                                                           ` Lokesh Vutla
2020-05-26  9:32                                                                             ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-26  9:33                                                                               ` Lokesh Vutla
2020-04-21 21:03               ` [PATCH 11/11] " Pali Rohár
2020-04-21 20:53             ` Pali Rohár
2020-03-31 22:42 ` U-Boot is broken on real N900 HW (Was: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Fixes for Nokia RX-51) Pali Rohár
     [not found]   ` <3c7dda52-10b3-e8c3-a382-785c80f124e7@wizzup.org>
2020-04-02 18:42     ` U-Boot is broken on real N900 HW Pali Rohár
2020-04-25 10:42       ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-25 11:36         ` Adam Ford
2020-04-25 11:50           ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-25 12:00             ` Adam Ford
2020-04-25 12:11               ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-25 23:54                 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2020-04-27  7:03                   ` U-Boot i2c bus num 1 is broken on Nokia N900 (Was: Re: U-Boot is broken on real N900 HW) Heiko Schocher
2020-10-26 21:48                     ` U-Boot i2c bus num 1 is broken on Nokia N900 Pali Rohár
2020-10-28  5:42                       ` Heiko Schocher
2020-10-28 10:46                         ` Pali Rohár
2020-10-29  7:51                         ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2020-10-29  9:32                           ` Heiko Schocher
2020-10-29  9:36                             ` Pali Rohár
2020-10-30  7:00                             ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2020-10-30  7:24                               ` Heiko Schocher
2020-10-31 11:47                                 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2020-11-02  7:13                                   ` Heiko Schocher
2020-04-25 12:07             ` U-Boot is broken on real N900 HW Pali Rohár
2020-04-25 13:19               ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-25 13:48                 ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-25 21:26             ` Bisected: mmc cause reboot loops on N900 (Was: Re: U-Boot is broken on real N900 HW) Pali Rohár
2020-04-25 22:20               ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-25 22:29                 ` Bisected: omap_hsmmc 3.3V IO voltage incompatible with N900 (Was: Re: Bisected: mmc cause reboot loops on N900) Pali Rohár
2020-05-07 13:40                   ` Faiz Abbas
2020-05-07 15:19                     ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-26 17:49                       ` Pali Rohár
2020-06-12 13:03                         ` Pali Rohár
2020-07-01  8:32                           ` Pali Rohár
2020-07-01  8:51                             ` Faiz Abbas
2020-05-03 21:31                 ` Bisected: mmc cause reboot loops on N900 Pali Rohár
2020-04-26 17:13               ` Bisected: mmc cause reboot loops on N900 (Was: Re: U-Boot is broken on real N900 HW) Pavel Machek
2020-04-06 20:12   ` U-Boot is broken on real N900 HW (Was: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Fixes for Nokia RX-51) Pavel Machek
2020-04-06 22:27     ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-13 10:41 ` [PATCH 00/11] Fixes for Nokia RX-51 Pali Rohár
2020-04-14 10:23   ` Lokesh Vutla
2020-04-14 10:31     ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-14 10:44       ` Lokesh Vutla
2020-04-14 11:17         ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-14 11:51           ` Lokesh Vutla
2020-04-14 12:01             ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-16 21:57               ` Pali Rohár
2020-04-20  8:12                 ` Lokesh Vutla
2020-04-20 23:21                   ` Pali Rohár
2020-05-11 12:47     ` Lokesh Vutla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200425235459.bcoskmnux45x4iqs@pali \
    --to=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.