* [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
@ 2020-01-19 21:52 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2020-01-19 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd; +Cc: linux-kernel, Richard Weinberger
Orphans are allowed to point to deleted inodes.
So -ENOENT is not a fatal error.
Reported-by: Кочетков Максим <fido_max@inbox.ru>
Reported-and-tested-by: "Christian Berger" <Christian.Berger@de.bosch.com>
Fixes: ee1438ce5dc4 ("ubifs: Check link count of inodes when killing orphans.")
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
---
fs/ubifs/orphan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
index 54d6db61106f..2645917360b9 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
@@ -688,14 +688,14 @@ static int do_kill_orphans(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
ino_key_init(c, &key1, inum);
err = ubifs_tnc_lookup(c, &key1, ino);
- if (err)
+ if (err && err != -ENOENT)
goto out_free;
/*
* Check whether an inode can really get deleted.
* linkat() with O_TMPFILE allows rebirth of an inode.
*/
- if (ino->nlink == 0) {
+ if (err == 0 && ino->nlink == 0) {
dbg_rcvry("deleting orphaned inode %lu",
(unsigned long)inum);
--
2.16.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
@ 2020-01-19 21:52 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2020-01-19 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd; +Cc: Richard Weinberger, linux-kernel
Orphans are allowed to point to deleted inodes.
So -ENOENT is not a fatal error.
Reported-by: Кочетков Максим <fido_max@inbox.ru>
Reported-and-tested-by: "Christian Berger" <Christian.Berger@de.bosch.com>
Fixes: ee1438ce5dc4 ("ubifs: Check link count of inodes when killing orphans.")
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
---
fs/ubifs/orphan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
index 54d6db61106f..2645917360b9 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
@@ -688,14 +688,14 @@ static int do_kill_orphans(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
ino_key_init(c, &key1, inum);
err = ubifs_tnc_lookup(c, &key1, ino);
- if (err)
+ if (err && err != -ENOENT)
goto out_free;
/*
* Check whether an inode can really get deleted.
* linkat() with O_TMPFILE allows rebirth of an inode.
*/
- if (ino->nlink == 0) {
+ if (err == 0 && ino->nlink == 0) {
dbg_rcvry("deleting orphaned inode %lu",
(unsigned long)inum);
--
2.16.4
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
2020-01-19 21:52 ` Richard Weinberger
@ 2020-04-29 14:56 ` John Ogness
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: John Ogness @ 2020-04-29 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-kernel
Hi Richard,
Could you CC this patch to stable? It fixes a serious problem that I am
seeing on real devices (i.e. Linux not being able to mount its root
filesystem after a power cut). Thanks.
John Ogness
On 2020-01-19, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
> Orphans are allowed to point to deleted inodes.
> So -ENOENT is not a fatal error.
>
> Reported-by: Кочетков Максим <fido_max@inbox.ru>
> Reported-and-tested-by: "Christian Berger" <Christian.Berger@de.bosch.com>
> Fixes: ee1438ce5dc4 ("ubifs: Check link count of inodes when killing orphans.")
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/orphan.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
> index 54d6db61106f..2645917360b9 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
> @@ -688,14 +688,14 @@ static int do_kill_orphans(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
>
> ino_key_init(c, &key1, inum);
> err = ubifs_tnc_lookup(c, &key1, ino);
> - if (err)
> + if (err && err != -ENOENT)
> goto out_free;
>
> /*
> * Check whether an inode can really get deleted.
> * linkat() with O_TMPFILE allows rebirth of an inode.
> */
> - if (ino->nlink == 0) {
> + if (err == 0 && ino->nlink == 0) {
> dbg_rcvry("deleting orphaned inode %lu",
> (unsigned long)inum);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
@ 2020-04-29 14:56 ` John Ogness
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: John Ogness @ 2020-04-29 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-kernel
Hi Richard,
Could you CC this patch to stable? It fixes a serious problem that I am
seeing on real devices (i.e. Linux not being able to mount its root
filesystem after a power cut). Thanks.
John Ogness
On 2020-01-19, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
> Orphans are allowed to point to deleted inodes.
> So -ENOENT is not a fatal error.
>
> Reported-by: Кочетков Максим <fido_max@inbox.ru>
> Reported-and-tested-by: "Christian Berger" <Christian.Berger@de.bosch.com>
> Fixes: ee1438ce5dc4 ("ubifs: Check link count of inodes when killing orphans.")
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/orphan.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
> index 54d6db61106f..2645917360b9 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
> @@ -688,14 +688,14 @@ static int do_kill_orphans(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
>
> ino_key_init(c, &key1, inum);
> err = ubifs_tnc_lookup(c, &key1, ino);
> - if (err)
> + if (err && err != -ENOENT)
> goto out_free;
>
> /*
> * Check whether an inode can really get deleted.
> * linkat() with O_TMPFILE allows rebirth of an inode.
> */
> - if (ino->nlink == 0) {
> + if (err == 0 && ino->nlink == 0) {
> dbg_rcvry("deleting orphaned inode %lu",
> (unsigned long)inum);
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
2020-04-29 14:56 ` John Ogness
@ 2020-04-29 15:03 ` Richard Weinberger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2020-04-29 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Ogness; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-kernel
Hello John,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> An: "richard" <richard@nod.at>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. April 2020 16:56:31
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
> Hi Richard,
>
> Could you CC this patch to stable? It fixes a serious problem that I am
> seeing on real devices (i.e. Linux not being able to mount its root
> filesystem after a power cut). Thanks.
It has a Fixes-Tag, so it should make it into stable.
Thanks,
//richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
@ 2020-04-29 15:03 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2020-04-29 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Ogness; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-kernel
Hello John,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> An: "richard" <richard@nod.at>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. April 2020 16:56:31
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
> Hi Richard,
>
> Could you CC this patch to stable? It fixes a serious problem that I am
> seeing on real devices (i.e. Linux not being able to mount its root
> filesystem after a power cut). Thanks.
It has a Fixes-Tag, so it should make it into stable.
Thanks,
//richard
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Please queue ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans() for stable (was: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans())
2020-04-29 14:56 ` John Ogness
@ 2020-04-29 18:51 ` Richard Weinberger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2020-04-29 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-kernel, John Ogness
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> An: "richard" <richard@nod.at>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. April 2020 16:56:31
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
> Hi Richard,
>
> Could you CC this patch to stable? It fixes a serious problem that I am
> seeing on real devices (i.e. Linux not being able to mount its root
> filesystem after a power cut). Thanks.
Just checked again, better ask stable maintainers. :-)
Stable maintainers, can you please make sure this patch will make it
into stable?
The upstream commit is:
4ab25ac8b2b5 ("ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()")
I always thought havings a Fixes-Tag is enough to make sure it will
get picked up. Isn't this the case?
Thanks,
//richard
> John Ogness
>
> On 2020-01-19, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
>> Orphans are allowed to point to deleted inodes.
>> So -ENOENT is not a fatal error.
>>
>> Reported-by: Кочетков Максим <fido_max@inbox.ru>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: "Christian Berger" <Christian.Berger@de.bosch.com>
>> Fixes: ee1438ce5dc4 ("ubifs: Check link count of inodes when killing orphans.")
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>> ---
>> fs/ubifs/orphan.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
>> index 54d6db61106f..2645917360b9 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
>> @@ -688,14 +688,14 @@ static int do_kill_orphans(struct ubifs_info *c, struct
>> ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
>>
>> ino_key_init(c, &key1, inum);
>> err = ubifs_tnc_lookup(c, &key1, ino);
>> - if (err)
>> + if (err && err != -ENOENT)
>> goto out_free;
>>
>> /*
>> * Check whether an inode can really get deleted.
>> * linkat() with O_TMPFILE allows rebirth of an inode.
>> */
>> - if (ino->nlink == 0) {
>> + if (err == 0 && ino->nlink == 0) {
>> dbg_rcvry("deleting orphaned inode %lu",
> > (unsigned long)inum);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Please queue ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans() for stable (was: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans())
@ 2020-04-29 18:51 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2020-04-29 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-kernel, John Ogness
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> An: "richard" <richard@nod.at>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. April 2020 16:56:31
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
> Hi Richard,
>
> Could you CC this patch to stable? It fixes a serious problem that I am
> seeing on real devices (i.e. Linux not being able to mount its root
> filesystem after a power cut). Thanks.
Just checked again, better ask stable maintainers. :-)
Stable maintainers, can you please make sure this patch will make it
into stable?
The upstream commit is:
4ab25ac8b2b5 ("ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()")
I always thought havings a Fixes-Tag is enough to make sure it will
get picked up. Isn't this the case?
Thanks,
//richard
> John Ogness
>
> On 2020-01-19, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
>> Orphans are allowed to point to deleted inodes.
>> So -ENOENT is not a fatal error.
>>
>> Reported-by: Кочетков Максим <fido_max@inbox.ru>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: "Christian Berger" <Christian.Berger@de.bosch.com>
>> Fixes: ee1438ce5dc4 ("ubifs: Check link count of inodes when killing orphans.")
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>> ---
>> fs/ubifs/orphan.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
>> index 54d6db61106f..2645917360b9 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
>> @@ -688,14 +688,14 @@ static int do_kill_orphans(struct ubifs_info *c, struct
>> ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
>>
>> ino_key_init(c, &key1, inum);
>> err = ubifs_tnc_lookup(c, &key1, ino);
>> - if (err)
>> + if (err && err != -ENOENT)
>> goto out_free;
>>
>> /*
>> * Check whether an inode can really get deleted.
>> * linkat() with O_TMPFILE allows rebirth of an inode.
>> */
>> - if (ino->nlink == 0) {
>> + if (err == 0 && ino->nlink == 0) {
>> dbg_rcvry("deleting orphaned inode %lu",
> > (unsigned long)inum);
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Please queue ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans() for stable (was: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans())
2020-04-29 18:51 ` Richard Weinberger
@ 2020-04-30 7:11 ` Greg KH
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2020-04-30 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: stable, linux-mtd, linux-kernel, John Ogness
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:51:06PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> > An: "richard" <richard@nod.at>
> > CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. April 2020 16:56:31
> > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
>
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Could you CC this patch to stable? It fixes a serious problem that I am
> > seeing on real devices (i.e. Linux not being able to mount its root
> > filesystem after a power cut). Thanks.
>
> Just checked again, better ask stable maintainers. :-)
>
> Stable maintainers, can you please make sure this patch will make it
> into stable?
> The upstream commit is:
> 4ab25ac8b2b5 ("ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()")
>
> I always thought havings a Fixes-Tag is enough to make sure it will
> get picked up. Isn't this the case?
No it is not, please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
Our scripts are doing better to dig out stuff where maintainers mess up
and forget to put the cc: stable tag, but you can never rely on it.
Please stick with the above rules that have been there for 15+ years :)
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Please queue ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans() for stable (was: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans())
@ 2020-04-30 7:11 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2020-04-30 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: John Ogness, linux-mtd, linux-kernel, stable
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:51:06PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> > An: "richard" <richard@nod.at>
> > CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. April 2020 16:56:31
> > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()
>
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Could you CC this patch to stable? It fixes a serious problem that I am
> > seeing on real devices (i.e. Linux not being able to mount its root
> > filesystem after a power cut). Thanks.
>
> Just checked again, better ask stable maintainers. :-)
>
> Stable maintainers, can you please make sure this patch will make it
> into stable?
> The upstream commit is:
> 4ab25ac8b2b5 ("ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()")
>
> I always thought havings a Fixes-Tag is enough to make sure it will
> get picked up. Isn't this the case?
No it is not, please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
Our scripts are doing better to dig out stuff where maintainers mess up
and forget to put the cc: stable tag, but you can never rely on it.
Please stick with the above rules that have been there for 15+ years :)
thanks,
greg k-h
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Please queue ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans() for stable (was: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans())
2020-04-30 7:11 ` Greg KH
@ 2020-04-30 7:41 ` Richard Weinberger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2020-04-30 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: stable, linux-mtd, linux-kernel, John Ogness
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> I always thought havings a Fixes-Tag is enough to make sure it will
>> get picked up. Isn't this the case?
>
> No it is not, please read:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> for how to do this properly.
>
> Our scripts are doing better to dig out stuff where maintainers mess up
> and forget to put the cc: stable tag, but you can never rely on it.
> Please stick with the above rules that have been there for 15+ years :)
Sir, yes, sir.
Thanks,
//richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Please queue ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans() for stable (was: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans())
@ 2020-04-30 7:41 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2020-04-30 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: John Ogness, linux-mtd, linux-kernel, stable
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> I always thought havings a Fixes-Tag is enough to make sure it will
>> get picked up. Isn't this the case?
>
> No it is not, please read:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> for how to do this properly.
>
> Our scripts are doing better to dig out stuff where maintainers mess up
> and forget to put the cc: stable tag, but you can never rely on it.
> Please stick with the above rules that have been there for 15+ years :)
Sir, yes, sir.
Thanks,
//richard
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-30 7:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-19 21:52 [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans() Richard Weinberger
2020-01-19 21:52 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-04-29 14:56 ` John Ogness
2020-04-29 14:56 ` John Ogness
2020-04-29 15:03 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-04-29 15:03 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-04-29 18:51 ` Please queue ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans() for stable (was: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix ubifs_tnc_lookup() usage in do_kill_orphans()) Richard Weinberger
2020-04-29 18:51 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-04-30 7:11 ` Greg KH
2020-04-30 7:11 ` Greg KH
2020-04-30 7:41 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-04-30 7:41 ` Richard Weinberger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.