All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sean.wang@mediatek.com
Cc: jslaby@suse.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, sr@denx.de, arnd@arndb.de,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, tthayer@opensource.altera.com,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Liu <steven.liu@mediatek.com>,
	Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tty: serial: don't do termios for BTIF
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 13:10:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200505111028.GA114206@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422180900.GA3454664@kroah.com>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:09:00PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:02:08AM +0800, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Bluetooth Interface (BTIF) is designed dedicatedly for MediaTek SOC with
> > BT in order to be instead of the UART interface between BT module and Host
> > CPU, and not exported to user space to access.
> > 
> > As the UART design, BTIF will be an APB slave and can transmit or receive
> > data by MCU access, but doesn't provide termios function like baudrate and
> > flow control setup.
> 
> Why does it matter?  If the connection isn't exported to userspace, who
> would run those termios functions on the port?

Dropping from my patch queues due to a lack of response, please address
this question when you resend this.

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sean.wang@mediatek.com
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	Steven Liu <steven.liu@mediatek.com>,
	arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	tthayer@opensource.altera.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	jslaby@suse.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, sr@denx.de,
	mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tty: serial: don't do termios for BTIF
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 13:10:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200505111028.GA114206@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422180900.GA3454664@kroah.com>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:09:00PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:02:08AM +0800, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Bluetooth Interface (BTIF) is designed dedicatedly for MediaTek SOC with
> > BT in order to be instead of the UART interface between BT module and Host
> > CPU, and not exported to user space to access.
> > 
> > As the UART design, BTIF will be an APB slave and can transmit or receive
> > data by MCU access, but doesn't provide termios function like baudrate and
> > flow control setup.
> 
> Why does it matter?  If the connection isn't exported to userspace, who
> would run those termios functions on the port?

Dropping from my patch queues due to a lack of response, please address
this question when you resend this.

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sean.wang@mediatek.com
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	Steven Liu <steven.liu@mediatek.com>,
	arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	tthayer@opensource.altera.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	jslaby@suse.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, sr@denx.de,
	mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tty: serial: don't do termios for BTIF
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 13:10:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200505111028.GA114206@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422180900.GA3454664@kroah.com>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:09:00PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:02:08AM +0800, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Bluetooth Interface (BTIF) is designed dedicatedly for MediaTek SOC with
> > BT in order to be instead of the UART interface between BT module and Host
> > CPU, and not exported to user space to access.
> > 
> > As the UART design, BTIF will be an APB slave and can transmit or receive
> > data by MCU access, but doesn't provide termios function like baudrate and
> > flow control setup.
> 
> Why does it matter?  If the connection isn't exported to userspace, who
> would run those termios functions on the port?

Dropping from my patch queues due to a lack of response, please address
this question when you resend this.

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-05 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-22 18:02 [PATCH v3] tty: serial: don't do termios for BTIF sean.wang
2020-04-22 18:02 ` sean.wang
2020-04-22 18:02 ` sean.wang
2020-04-22 18:09 ` Greg KH
2020-04-22 18:09   ` Greg KH
2020-04-22 18:09   ` Greg KH
2020-05-05 11:10   ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-05-05 11:10     ` Greg KH
2020-05-05 11:10     ` Greg KH
2020-06-17  3:50   ` sean.wang
2020-06-17  3:50     ` sean.wang
2020-06-17  3:50     ` sean.wang
2020-04-22 19:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-22 19:20   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-22 19:20   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-17  3:58   ` sean.wang
2020-06-17  3:58     ` sean.wang
2020-06-17  3:58     ` sean.wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200505111028.GA114206@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=steven.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tthayer@opensource.altera.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.