From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> To: jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, info@metux.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, tglx@linutronix.de Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Subject: [PATCH] iio: sca3000: Remove an erroneous 'get_device()' Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 05:52:06 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200506035206.192173-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> (raw) This looks really unusual to have a 'get_device()' hidden in a 'dev_err()' call. Remove it. While at it add a missing \n at the end of the message. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> --- This patch is purely speculative. I've looked a bit arround and see no point for this get_device() but other eyes are welcomed :) --- drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c index 66d768d971e1..6e429072e44a 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int sca3000_read_data(struct sca3000_state *st, st->tx[0] = SCA3000_READ_REG(reg_address_high); ret = spi_sync_transfer(st->us, xfer, ARRAY_SIZE(xfer)); if (ret) { - dev_err(get_device(&st->us->dev), "problem reading register"); + dev_err(&st->us->dev, "problem reading register\n"); return ret; } -- 2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> To: jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, info@metux.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, tglx@linutronix.de Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Subject: [PATCH] iio: sca3000: Remove an erroneous 'get_device()' Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 03:52:06 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200506035206.192173-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> (raw) This looks really unusual to have a 'get_device()' hidden in a 'dev_err()' call. Remove it. While at it add a missing \n at the end of the message. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> --- This patch is purely speculative. I've looked a bit arround and see no point for this get_device() but other eyes are welcomed :) --- drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c index 66d768d971e1..6e429072e44a 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int sca3000_read_data(struct sca3000_state *st, st->tx[0] = SCA3000_READ_REG(reg_address_high); ret = spi_sync_transfer(st->us, xfer, ARRAY_SIZE(xfer)); if (ret) { - dev_err(get_device(&st->us->dev), "problem reading register"); + dev_err(&st->us->dev, "problem reading register\n"); return ret; } -- 2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-06 3:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-05-06 3:52 Christophe JAILLET [this message] 2020-05-06 3:52 ` [PATCH] iio: sca3000: Remove an erroneous 'get_device()' Christophe JAILLET 2020-05-06 10:38 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-05-06 10:38 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-05-06 17:31 ` Marion & Christophe JAILLET 2020-05-06 17:31 ` Marion & Christophe JAILLET 2020-05-08 13:02 ` Jonathan Cameron 2020-05-08 13:02 ` Jonathan Cameron 2020-05-10 9:54 ` Jonathan Cameron 2020-05-10 9:54 ` Jonathan Cameron 2020-05-06 15:30 [PATCH] iio: sca3000: Remove an erroneous get_device() call in sca3000_read_data() Markus Elfring 2020-05-06 15:30 ` Markus Elfring 2020-05-10 9:55 ` Jonathan Cameron 2020-05-10 9:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200506035206.192173-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \ --to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \ --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=info@metux.net \ --cc=jic23@kernel.org \ --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \ --cc=lars@metafoo.de \ --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.