All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v27 3/6] drm/i915: Add TGL+ SAGV support
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 16:16:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200506131636.GR6112@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506121210.GA16181@intel.com>

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 03:12:10PM +0300, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 12:12:28PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:31:05AM +0300, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 01:59:11PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 01:22:44PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > > > Starting from TGL we need to have a separate wm0
> > > > > values for SAGV and non-SAGV which affects
> > > > > how calculations are done.
> > > > > 
> > > > > v2: Remove long lines
> > > > > v3: Removed COLOR_PLANE enum references
> > > > > v4, v5, v6: Fixed rebase conflict
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |   8 +-
> > > > >  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |   3 +
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c               | 128 +++++++++++++++++-
> > > > >  3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > > index fd6d63b03489..be5741cb7595 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > > @@ -13961,7 +13961,9 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > > >  		/* Watermarks */
> > > > >  		for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > > > >  			if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > > -						&sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))
> > > > > +						&sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||
> > > > > +			    (level == 0 && skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > > +							       &sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0)))
> > > > >  				continue;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  			drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > > @@ -14016,7 +14018,9 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > > >  		/* Watermarks */
> > > > >  		for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > > > >  			if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > > -						&sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))
> > > > > +						&sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||
> > > > > +			    (level == 0 && skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > > +							       &sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0)))
> > > > >  				continue;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  			drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > > index 9488449e4b94..32cbbf7dddc6 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > > @@ -688,11 +688,14 @@ struct skl_plane_wm {
> > > > >  	struct skl_wm_level wm[8];
> > > > >  	struct skl_wm_level uv_wm[8];
> > > > >  	struct skl_wm_level trans_wm;
> > > > > +	struct skl_wm_level sagv_wm0;
> > > > > +	struct skl_wm_level uv_sagv_wm0;
> > > > 
> > > > As mentioned before uv_wm is not a thing on icl+, so nuke this.
> > > 
> > > This is used in skl_plane_wm_level accessor, which is used for all
> > > platforms, not just icl+. I remember we had agreed that for all platforms
> > > before tgl I simply copy sagv_wm0 values from regular wm0, so that this
> > > behaviour is unified(remember that your comment about memcpy which I changed
> > > to assignment, see skl_compute_sagv_wm). 
> > 
> > I think having that duplicated is just making things more confusing.
> > Also uv_wm is never used by the hardware even on pre-icl, so having
> > the accessor thing use it for the hw programming just doesn't make
> > any sense.
> 
> Problem is that we use it in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb in a few places:
> 
> blocks += wm_level->min_ddb_alloc;
> blocks += wm_uv_level->min_ddb_alloc;

I don't think we should need any accessor in there. If we do
what I suggested earlier, which I think was something like
(can't find the mail anymore unfortunately):

for reverse wm levels {
	blocks = sum(wm[level] blocks for all planes) +
		sum(uv_wm[level] blocks for all planes)
	...
	if (block <= alloc_size)
		break;
}

if (level < 0)
	fail;

blocks_sagv = sum(sagv_wm blocks for all planes)
if (blocks_sagv > blocks && blocks_sagv <= alloc_size) {
    blocks = blocks_sagv;
    use_sagv_wm = true;
} else {
    use_sagv_wm = false;
}
alloc_size -= blocks;

for_each_plane_id() {
	total = use_sagv_wm ? sagv_wm.min_ddb_alloc :
		wm[level].min_ddb_alloc;
	...
}



> 
> then those plane data rates:
> 
> rate = plane_data_rate[plane_id];
> extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
>       DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate, total_data_rate));
> total[plane_id] = wm_level->min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> alloc_size -= extra;
> total_data_rate -= rate;
> 
> if (total_data_rate == 0)
> 	break;
> 
> rate = uv_plane_data_rate[plane_id];
> extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
>       DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate, total_data_rate));
> 
> uv_total[plane_id] = wm_uv_level->min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> 
> So if I remove this wm_uv from skl_plane_wm_level accessor,
> the logic in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb will obvisouly change?
> 
> 
> Stan
> 
> 
> > 
> > For the compute side I think all we should really need is
> > something like:
> > 
> > tgl_compute_sagv_wm()
> > {
> > 	skl_compute_wm_level(sagv_wm0, latency + whatever);
> > }
> > 
> > skl_build_plane_wm_single()
> > {
> > 	...
> > 	skl_compute_transition_wm();
> > +	if (gen >= 12)
> > +		tgl_compute_sagv_wm();
> > }
> > 
> > And for the progamming side we should just pick the right
> > wm0 based on the crtc_state->use_sagv_wm or whatever flag.
> > 
> > > 
> > > So if I remove it and this is called for pre-icl platforms, guess this would still
> > > need wm_uv data?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Stan
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >  	bool is_planar;
> > > > >  };
> > > > >  
> > > > >  struct skl_pipe_wm {
> > > > >  	struct skl_plane_wm planes[I915_MAX_PLANES];
> > > > > +	bool can_sagv;
> > > > 
> > > > I would call it use_sagv_wm or somesuch to make it actually clear what
> > > > it does.
> > > > 
> > > > >  };
> > > > >  
> > > > >  enum vlv_wm_level {
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > > index c7d726a656b2..1b9925b6672c 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > > @@ -3871,6 +3871,9 @@ static bool icl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > > >  	return intel_crtc_can_enable_sagv(crtc_state);
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +static bool
> > > > > +tgl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > > > > +
> > > > >  bool intel_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	if (bw_state->active_pipes && !is_power_of_2(bw_state->active_pipes))
> > > > > @@ -3884,7 +3887,7 @@ static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> > > > >  	int ret;
> > > > >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > > > > -	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > > > > +	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > > > >  	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> > > > >  	const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> > > > >  	int i;
> > > > > @@ -3899,7 +3902,9 @@ static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > >  
> > > > >  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> > > > >  
> > > > > -		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > > > > +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)
> > > > > +			can_sagv = tgl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(new_crtc_state);
> > > > > +		else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > > > >  			can_sagv = icl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(new_crtc_state);
> > > > >  		else
> > > > >  			can_sagv = skl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(new_crtc_state);
> > > > > @@ -3921,6 +3926,24 @@ static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > >  			return ret;
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  
> > > > > +	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > > > > +					 new_crtc_state, i) {
> > > > > +		struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &new_crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		/*
> > > > > +		 * Due to drm limitation at commit state, when
> > > > > +		 * changes are written the whole atomic state is
> > > > > +		 * zeroed away => which prevents from using it,
> > > > > +		 * so just sticking it into pipe wm state for
> > > > > +		 * keeping it simple - anyway this is related to wm.
> > > > > +		 * Proper way in ideal universe would be of course not
> > > > > +		 * to lose parent atomic state object from child crtc_state,
> > > > > +		 * and stick to OOP programming principles, which had been
> > > > > +		 * scientifically proven to work.
> > > > 
> > > > Seems like random ramblings. I'd just nuke the comment.
> > > > 
> > > > > +		 */
> > > > > +		pipe_wm->can_sagv = intel_can_enable_sagv(new_bw_state);
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  	if (intel_can_enable_sagv(new_bw_state) != intel_can_enable_sagv(old_bw_state)) {
> > > > >  		ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> > > > >  		if (ret)
> > > > > @@ -4664,12 +4687,39 @@ skl_plane_wm_level(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > > >  		   int level,
> > > > >  		   int color_plane)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > -	const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> > > > > -		&crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> > > > > +	const struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;
> > > > > +	const struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (!level) {
> > > > > +		if (pipe_wm->can_sagv)
> > > > > +			return color_plane == 0 ? &wm->sagv_wm0 : &wm->uv_sagv_wm0;
> > > > > +	}
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	return color_plane == 0 ? &wm->wm[level] : &wm->uv_wm[level];
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +static bool
> > > > > +tgl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > > > > +	enum plane_id plane_id;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
> > > > > +		return true;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> > > > > +		const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
> > > > > +			&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
> > > > > +		const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> > > > > +			&crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		if (skl_ddb_entry_size(plane_alloc) < wm->sagv_wm0.min_ddb_alloc)
> > > > > +			return false;
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	return true;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static int
> > > > >  skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > @@ -5251,10 +5301,17 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > > >  static void
> > > > >  skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > > >  		      const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
> > > > > -		      struct skl_wm_level *levels)
> > > > > +		      struct skl_plane_wm *plane_wm,
> > > > > +		      int color_plane)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> > > > >  	int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv);
> > > > > +	/*
> > > > > +	 * Check which kind of plane is it and based on that calculate
> > > > > +	 * correspondent WM levels.
> > > > > +	 */
> > > > > +	struct skl_wm_level *levels = color_plane == 1 ?
> > > > > +				      plane_wm->uv_wm : plane_wm->wm;
> > > > >  	struct skl_wm_level *result_prev = &levels[0];
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > > > > @@ -5268,6 +5325,40 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +static void skl_compute_sagv_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > > > +				const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
> > > > > +				struct skl_plane_wm *plane_wm,
> > > > > +				int color_plane)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> > > > > +	struct skl_wm_level *sagv_wm = color_plane == 1 ?
> > > > > +				&plane_wm->uv_sagv_wm0 : &plane_wm->sagv_wm0;
> > > > > +	struct skl_wm_level *levels = color_plane == 1 ?
> > > > > +				plane_wm->uv_wm : plane_wm->wm;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	/*
> > > > > +	 * For Gen12 if it is an L0 we need to also
> > > > > +	 * consider sagv_block_time when calculating
> > > > > +	 * L0 watermark - we will need that when making
> > > > > +	 * a decision whether enable SAGV or not.
> > > > > +	 * For older gens we agreed to copy L0 value for
> > > > > +	 * compatibility.
> > > > > +	 */
> > > > > +	if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)) {
> > > > > +		u32 latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0];
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		latency += dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;
> > > > > +		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, 0, latency,
> > > > > +				     wm_params, &levels[0],
> > > > > +				     sagv_wm);
> > > > > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%d L0 blocks required for SAGV vs %d for non-SAGV\n",
> > > > > +			      sagv_wm->min_ddb_alloc, levels[0].min_ddb_alloc);
> > > > > +	} else {
> > > > > +		/* Since all members are POD */
> > > > > +		*sagv_wm = levels[0];
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static void skl_compute_transition_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > > >  				      const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> > > > >  				      struct skl_plane_wm *wm)
> > > > > @@ -5344,7 +5435,8 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_single(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > >  		return ret;
> > > > >  
> > > > > -	skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm->wm);
> > > > > +	skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm, 0);
> > > > > +	skl_compute_sagv_wm(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm, 0);
> > > > >  	skl_compute_transition_wm(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm);
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	return 0;
> > > > > @@ -5366,7 +5458,8 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_uv(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > >  		return ret;
> > > > >  
> > > > > -	skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm->uv_wm);
> > > > > +	skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm, 1);
> > > > > +	skl_compute_sagv_wm(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm, 1);
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	return 0;
> > > > >  }
> > > > > @@ -5751,6 +5844,12 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > >  				    enast(new_wm->wm[7].ignore_lines), new_wm->wm[7].plane_res_l,
> > > > >  				    enast(new_wm->trans_wm.ignore_lines), new_wm->trans_wm.plane_res_l);
> > > > >  
> > > > > +			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > > +				    "[PLANE:%d:%s] sagv wm0 lines %4d -> %4d\n",
> > > > > +				    plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,
> > > > > +				    old_wm->sagv_wm0.plane_res_l,
> > > > > +				    new_wm->sagv_wm0.plane_res_l);
> > > > > +
> > > > >  			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > >  				    "[PLANE:%d:%s]  blocks %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d"
> > > > >  				    " -> %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d\n",
> > > > > @@ -5766,6 +5865,12 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > >  				    new_wm->wm[6].plane_res_b, new_wm->wm[7].plane_res_b,
> > > > >  				    new_wm->trans_wm.plane_res_b);
> > > > >  
> > > > > +			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > > +				    "[PLANE:%d:%s] sagv wm0 blocks %4d -> %4d\n",
> > > > > +				    plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,
> > > > > +				    old_wm->sagv_wm0.plane_res_b,
> > > > > +				    new_wm->sagv_wm0.plane_res_b);
> > > > > +
> > > > >  			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > >  				    "[PLANE:%d:%s] min_ddb %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d"
> > > > >  				    " -> %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d\n",
> > > > > @@ -5780,6 +5885,12 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > >  				    new_wm->wm[4].min_ddb_alloc, new_wm->wm[5].min_ddb_alloc,
> > > > >  				    new_wm->wm[6].min_ddb_alloc, new_wm->wm[7].min_ddb_alloc,
> > > > >  				    new_wm->trans_wm.min_ddb_alloc);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > > +				    "[PLANE:%d:%s] sagv wm0 min ddb %4d -> %4d\n",
> > > > > +				    plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,
> > > > > +				    old_wm->sagv_wm0.min_ddb_alloc,
> > > > > +				    new_wm->sagv_wm0.min_ddb_alloc);
> > > > >  		}
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  }
> > > > > @@ -6072,6 +6183,9 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > > >  			skl_wm_level_from_reg_val(val, &wm->wm[level]);
> > > > >  		}
> > > > >  
> > > > > +		memcpy(&wm->sagv_wm0, &wm->wm[0],
> > > > > +		       sizeof(struct skl_wm_level));
> > > > > +
> > > > >  		if (plane_id != PLANE_CURSOR)
> > > > >  			val = I915_READ(PLANE_WM_TRANS(pipe, plane_id));
> > > > >  		else
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > > Intel
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-05 10:22 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v27 0/6] SAGV support for Gen12+ Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-05 10:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v27 1/6] drm/i915: Introduce skl_plane_wm_level accessor Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-05 10:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v27 2/6] drm/i915: Separate icl and skl SAGV checking Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-05 10:42   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-05-05 11:01     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-05-05 20:37       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-06  7:31         ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-05-06  7:55     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-06  8:08       ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-05-06  8:43         ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-06  9:15           ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-05-05 10:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v27 3/6] drm/i915: Add TGL+ SAGV support Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-05 10:59   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-05-06  8:31     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-06  9:12       ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-05-06 12:12         ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-06 13:16           ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-05-06 13:42             ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-05 10:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v27 4/6] drm/i915: Added required new PCode commands Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-05 11:04   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-05-05 10:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v27 5/6] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-05 10:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v27 6/6] drm/i915: Enable SAGV support for Gen12 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-05 13:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev35) Patchwork
2020-05-06  1:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200506131636.GR6112@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.