From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rafael@kernel.org, jeyu@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, keescook@chromium.org, paul@paul-moore.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, eparis@parisplace.org, nayna@linux.ibm.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, scott.branden@broadcom.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] security: add symbol namespace for reading file data Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 18:09:36 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200513160936.GC1362525@kroah.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87k11fonbk.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:40:31AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> writes: > > > Certain symbols are not meant to be used by everybody, the security > > helpers for reading files directly is one such case. Use a symbol > > namespace for them. > > > > This will prevent abuse of use of these symbols in places they were > > not inteded to be used, and provides an easy way to audit where these > > types of operations happen as a whole. > > Why not just remove the ability for the firmware loader to be a module? I agree, it's been a mess of build options to try to keep alive over time. > Is there some important use case that requires the firmware loader > to be a module? I don't think so anymore. > We already compile the code in by default. So it is probably just > easier to remove the modular support all together. Which would allow > the export of the security hooks to be removed as well. Agreed. thanks, greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: rafael@kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>, paul@paul-moore.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, keescook@chromium.org, scott.branden@broadcom.com, selinux@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, eparis@parisplace.org, tglx@linutronix.de, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jeyu@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] security: add symbol namespace for reading file data Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 18:09:36 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200513160936.GC1362525@kroah.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87k11fonbk.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:40:31AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> writes: > > > Certain symbols are not meant to be used by everybody, the security > > helpers for reading files directly is one such case. Use a symbol > > namespace for them. > > > > This will prevent abuse of use of these symbols in places they were > > not inteded to be used, and provides an easy way to audit where these > > types of operations happen as a whole. > > Why not just remove the ability for the firmware loader to be a module? I agree, it's been a mess of build options to try to keep alive over time. > Is there some important use case that requires the firmware loader > to be a module? I don't think so anymore. > We already compile the code in by default. So it is probably just > easier to remove the modular support all together. Which would allow > the export of the security hooks to be removed as well. Agreed. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 16:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-05-13 15:21 [PATCH 0/3] fs: reduce export usage of kerne_read*() calls Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 15:21 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 15:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs: unexport kernel_read_file() Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 15:21 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 15:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] security: add symbol namespace for reading file data Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 15:21 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 15:40 ` Eric W. Biederman 2020-05-13 15:40 ` Eric W. Biederman 2020-05-13 16:09 ` Greg KH [this message] 2020-05-13 16:09 ` Greg KH 2020-05-13 16:16 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 16:16 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 16:26 ` Greg KH 2020-05-13 16:26 ` Greg KH 2020-05-13 18:07 ` Josh Triplett 2020-05-13 18:07 ` Josh Triplett 2020-05-13 15:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs: move kernel_read*() calls to its own symbol namespace Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 15:21 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-13 16:08 ` Greg KH 2020-05-13 16:08 ` Greg KH 2020-05-13 18:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] fs: reduce export usage of kerne_read*() calls Christoph Hellwig 2020-05-13 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-05-15 21:29 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-15 21:29 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-18 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-05-18 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-05-18 12:37 ` Mimi Zohar 2020-05-18 12:37 ` Mimi Zohar 2020-05-18 15:21 ` Kees Cook 2020-05-18 15:21 ` Kees Cook 2020-07-29 1:20 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-29 1:20 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-05-22 22:24 ` Scott Branden 2020-05-22 22:24 ` Scott Branden 2020-05-22 23:04 ` Kees Cook 2020-05-22 23:04 ` Kees Cook 2020-05-22 23:25 ` Scott Branden 2020-05-22 23:25 ` Scott Branden 2020-05-24 2:52 ` Mimi Zohar 2020-05-24 2:52 ` Mimi Zohar 2020-06-05 18:15 ` Scott Branden 2020-06-05 18:15 ` Scott Branden 2020-06-05 18:37 ` Mimi Zohar 2020-06-05 18:37 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200513160936.GC1362525@kroah.com \ --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \ --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \ --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \ --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \ --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \ --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \ --cc=jmorris@namei.org \ --cc=keescook@chromium.org \ --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \ --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \ --cc=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=scott.branden@broadcom.com \ --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \ --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.