All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Cc: <cjia@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <ziye.yang@intel.com>,
	<changpeng.liu@intel.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	<mlevitsk@redhat.com>, <eskultet@redhat.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	<dgilbert@redhat.com>, <jonathan.davies@nutanix.com>,
	<eauger@redhat.com>, <aik@ozlabs.ru>, <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	<felipe@nutanix.com>, <Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com>,
	<shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com>, <Ken.Xue@amd.com>,
	<zhi.a.wang@intel.com>, <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Kernel v19 6/8] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dirty bitmap before unmap
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 23:07:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513230747.0d2f3bc3@x1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589400279-28522-7-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com>

On Thu, 14 May 2020 01:34:37 +0530
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> wrote:

> DMA mapped pages, including those pinned by mdev vendor drivers, might
> get unpinned and unmapped while migration is active and device is still
> running. For example, in pre-copy phase while guest driver could access
> those pages, host device or vendor driver can dirty these mapped pages.
> Such pages should be marked dirty so as to maintain memory consistency
> for a user making use of dirty page tracking.
> 
> To get bitmap during unmap, user should allocate memory for bitmap, set
> size of allocated memory, set page size to be considered for bitmap and
> set flag VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       |  10 ++++
>  2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 469b09185b83..4358be26ff80 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -195,11 +195,15 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
>  static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(struct vfio_dma *dma, size_t pgsize)
>  {
>  	uint64_t npages = dma->size / pgsize;
> +	size_t bitmap_size;
>  
>  	if (npages > DIRTY_BITMAP_PAGES_MAX)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	/* Allocate extra 64 bits which are used for bitmap manipulation */
> +	bitmap_size = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages) + sizeof(u64);
> +
> +	dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!dma->bitmap)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> @@ -979,23 +983,25 @@ static int verify_bitmap_size(uint64_t npages, uint64_t bitmap_size)
>  }
>  
>  static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> -			     struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap)
> +			     struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap,
> +			     struct vfio_bitmap *bitmap)
>  {
> -	uint64_t mask;
>  	struct vfio_dma *dma, *dma_last = NULL;
> -	size_t unmapped = 0;
> -	int ret = 0, retries = 0;
> +	size_t unmapped = 0, pgsize;
> +	int ret = 0, retries = 0, cnt = 0;
> +	unsigned long pgshift, shift = 0, leftover;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>  
> -	mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap)) - 1;
> +	pgshift = __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap);
> +	pgsize = (size_t)1 << pgshift;
>  
> -	if (unmap->iova & mask) {
> +	if (unmap->iova & (pgsize - 1)) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!unmap->size || unmap->size & mask) {
> +	if (!unmap->size || unmap->size & (pgsize - 1)) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
> @@ -1006,9 +1012,15 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
>  
> -	WARN_ON(mask & PAGE_MASK);
> -again:
> +	/* When dirty tracking is enabled, allow only min supported pgsize */
> +	if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> +	    (!iommu->dirty_page_tracking || (bitmap->pgsize != pgsize))) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
>  
> +	WARN_ON((pgsize - 1) & PAGE_MASK);
> +again:
>  	/*
>  	 * vfio-iommu-type1 (v1) - User mappings were coalesced together to
>  	 * avoid tracking individual mappings.  This means that the granularity
> @@ -1046,6 +1058,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto unlock;
>  		}
> +
>  		dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova + unmap->size - 1, 0);
>  		if (dma && dma->iova + dma->size != unmap->iova + unmap->size) {
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -1063,6 +1076,39 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  		if (dma->task->mm != current->mm)
>  			break;
>  
> +		if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> +		    (dma_last != dma)) {
> +			unsigned int nbits = dma->size >> pgshift;
> +			int curr_lcnt = nbits / BITS_PER_LONG;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * mark all pages dirty if all pages are pinned and
> +			 * mapped.
> +			 */
> +			if (dma->iommu_mapped)
> +				bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, nbits);
> +
> +			if (shift) {
> +				bitmap_shift_left(dma->bitmap, dma->bitmap,
> +						  shift, nbits + shift);
> +				bitmap_or(dma->bitmap, dma->bitmap, &leftover,
> +					  shift);
> +				nbits += shift;
> +				curr_lcnt = nbits / BITS_PER_LONG;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (copy_to_user((void __user *)bitmap->data + cnt,
> +				       dma->bitmap, curr_lcnt * sizeof(u64))) {
> +				ret = -EFAULT;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			shift = nbits % BITS_PER_LONG;
> +			if (shift)
> +				leftover = *(u64 *)(dma->bitmap + curr_lcnt);
> +			cnt += curr_lcnt;
> +		}

I don't think this works.  Let's say for example we have separate
single page mappings at 4K and 12K (both dirty) and the user asked to
unmap the range 0 - 16K.  We find the mapping at 4K, shift is zero, cnt
is zero, so we copy the bitmap with the zero bit set to the user
buffer.  We're already wrong because we've just indicated the page at
zero is dirty and there isn't a page at zero.  shift now becomes 1 and
leftover is a bitmap with bit zero set.

We move on to the next page @12K.  We shift this bitmap by 1.  We OR in
our leftover and again copy out to the user buffer.  We end up with a
user bitmap with bits zero and one set, when we should have had bits 1
and 3 set, we're essentially coalescing the mappings.

As I see it, shift needs to be calculated as the offset from the start
of the user requested unmap buffer and I think an easier approach to
handle the leftover bits preceding the shift is to copy it back out of
the user buffer.

For example, shift should be:

((dma->iova - unmap->iova) >> pgshift) % BITS_PER_LONG

This would give us a shift of 1 and 3 respectively for our mappings,
which is correct.

Since our shifts are non-zero, we then need to collect the preceding
leftovers, which is always going to be:

copy_from_user(&leftover, bitmap->data +
		((dma->iova - unmap->iova) >> pgshift) / BITS_PER_LONG,
		sizeof(leftover));

I don't think the curr_lcnt calculation for the copy-out is correct
either, mappings are not required to be a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG
pages, so we're truncating the size.

So we have:

bit_offset = (dma->iova - unmap->iova) >> pgshift;
copy_offset = bit_offset / BITS_PER_LONG;
shift = bit_offset % BITS_PER_LONG;

if (shift) {
	bitmap_shift_left(dma->bitmap, dma->bitmap, shift, nbits + shift);
	if (copy_from_user(&leftover, bitmap->data + copy_offset, sizeof(leftover))) {
		ret = -EFAULT;
		break;
	}
	bitmap_or(dma->bitmap, dma->bitmap, &leftover, shift);
}

if (copy_to_user(bitmap->data + copy_offset, dma->bitmap,
		roundup(nbits + shift, BITS_PER_LONG)/BITS_PER_BYTE)) {
	ret = -EFAULT;
	break;
}

Also this all needs to come after the below check of the pfn_list and
call to the blocking notifier or else we're just wasting time because
we'll need to do it all again anyway.


> +
>  		if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list)) {
>  			struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap nb_unmap;
>  
> @@ -1093,6 +1139,13 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  		vfio_remove_dma(iommu, dma);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!ret && (unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> +	    shift) {
> +		if (copy_to_user((void __user *)bitmap->data + cnt, &leftover,
> +				 sizeof(leftover)))
> +			ret = -EFAULT;
> +	}

This is unnecessary with the algorithm I propose.

> +
>  unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>  
> @@ -2426,17 +2479,40 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  
>  	} else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA) {
>  		struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap unmap;
> -		long ret;
> +		struct vfio_bitmap bitmap = { 0 };
> +		int ret;
>  
>  		minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap, size);
>  
>  		if (copy_from_user(&unmap, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>  			return -EFAULT;
>  
> -		if (unmap.argsz < minsz || unmap.flags)
> +		if (unmap.argsz < minsz ||
> +		    unmap.flags & ~VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> -		ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap);
> +		if (unmap.flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) {
> +			unsigned long pgshift;
> +
> +			if (unmap.argsz < (minsz + sizeof(bitmap)))
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +
> +			if (copy_from_user(&bitmap,
> +					   (void __user *)(arg + minsz),
> +					   sizeof(bitmap)))
> +				return -EFAULT;
> +
> +			if (!access_ok((void __user *)bitmap.data, bitmap.size))
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +
> +			pgshift = __ffs(bitmap.pgsize);
> +			ret = verify_bitmap_size(unmap.size >> pgshift,
> +						 bitmap.size);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap, &bitmap);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 5f359c63f5ef..e3cbf8b78623 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -1048,12 +1048,22 @@ struct vfio_bitmap {
>   * field.  No guarantee is made to the user that arbitrary unmaps of iova
>   * or size different from those used in the original mapping call will
>   * succeed.
> + * VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP should be set to get dirty bitmap
> + * before unmapping IO virtual addresses. When this flag is set, user must
> + * provide data[] as structure vfio_bitmap. User must allocate memory to get
> + * bitmap and must set size of allocated memory in vfio_bitmap.size field.
> + * A bit in bitmap represents one page of user provided page size in 'pgsize',
> + * consecutively starting from iova offset. Bit set indicates page at that
> + * offset from iova is dirty. Bitmap of pages in the range of unmapped size is
> + * returned in vfio_bitmap.data

This needs to specify a user zero'd bitmap if we're only going to fill
it sparsely.  Thanks,

Alex

>   */
>  struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap {
>  	__u32	argsz;
>  	__u32	flags;
> +#define VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP (1 << 0)
>  	__u64	iova;				/* IO virtual address */
>  	__u64	size;				/* Size of mapping (bytes) */
> +	__u8    data[];
>  };
>  
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 14)


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Cc: Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	yi.l.liu@intel.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	eskultet@redhat.com, ziye.yang@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	cohuck@redhat.com, shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com,
	dgilbert@redhat.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com, mlevitsk@redhat.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, eauger@redhat.com,
	felipe@nutanix.com, jonathan.davies@nutanix.com,
	yan.y.zhao@intel.com, changpeng.liu@intel.com, Ken.Xue@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Kernel v19 6/8] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dirty bitmap before unmap
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 23:07:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513230747.0d2f3bc3@x1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589400279-28522-7-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com>

On Thu, 14 May 2020 01:34:37 +0530
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> wrote:

> DMA mapped pages, including those pinned by mdev vendor drivers, might
> get unpinned and unmapped while migration is active and device is still
> running. For example, in pre-copy phase while guest driver could access
> those pages, host device or vendor driver can dirty these mapped pages.
> Such pages should be marked dirty so as to maintain memory consistency
> for a user making use of dirty page tracking.
> 
> To get bitmap during unmap, user should allocate memory for bitmap, set
> size of allocated memory, set page size to be considered for bitmap and
> set flag VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       |  10 ++++
>  2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 469b09185b83..4358be26ff80 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -195,11 +195,15 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
>  static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(struct vfio_dma *dma, size_t pgsize)
>  {
>  	uint64_t npages = dma->size / pgsize;
> +	size_t bitmap_size;
>  
>  	if (npages > DIRTY_BITMAP_PAGES_MAX)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	/* Allocate extra 64 bits which are used for bitmap manipulation */
> +	bitmap_size = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages) + sizeof(u64);
> +
> +	dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!dma->bitmap)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> @@ -979,23 +983,25 @@ static int verify_bitmap_size(uint64_t npages, uint64_t bitmap_size)
>  }
>  
>  static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> -			     struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap)
> +			     struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap,
> +			     struct vfio_bitmap *bitmap)
>  {
> -	uint64_t mask;
>  	struct vfio_dma *dma, *dma_last = NULL;
> -	size_t unmapped = 0;
> -	int ret = 0, retries = 0;
> +	size_t unmapped = 0, pgsize;
> +	int ret = 0, retries = 0, cnt = 0;
> +	unsigned long pgshift, shift = 0, leftover;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>  
> -	mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap)) - 1;
> +	pgshift = __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap);
> +	pgsize = (size_t)1 << pgshift;
>  
> -	if (unmap->iova & mask) {
> +	if (unmap->iova & (pgsize - 1)) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!unmap->size || unmap->size & mask) {
> +	if (!unmap->size || unmap->size & (pgsize - 1)) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
> @@ -1006,9 +1012,15 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
>  
> -	WARN_ON(mask & PAGE_MASK);
> -again:
> +	/* When dirty tracking is enabled, allow only min supported pgsize */
> +	if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> +	    (!iommu->dirty_page_tracking || (bitmap->pgsize != pgsize))) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
>  
> +	WARN_ON((pgsize - 1) & PAGE_MASK);
> +again:
>  	/*
>  	 * vfio-iommu-type1 (v1) - User mappings were coalesced together to
>  	 * avoid tracking individual mappings.  This means that the granularity
> @@ -1046,6 +1058,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto unlock;
>  		}
> +
>  		dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova + unmap->size - 1, 0);
>  		if (dma && dma->iova + dma->size != unmap->iova + unmap->size) {
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -1063,6 +1076,39 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  		if (dma->task->mm != current->mm)
>  			break;
>  
> +		if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> +		    (dma_last != dma)) {
> +			unsigned int nbits = dma->size >> pgshift;
> +			int curr_lcnt = nbits / BITS_PER_LONG;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * mark all pages dirty if all pages are pinned and
> +			 * mapped.
> +			 */
> +			if (dma->iommu_mapped)
> +				bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, nbits);
> +
> +			if (shift) {
> +				bitmap_shift_left(dma->bitmap, dma->bitmap,
> +						  shift, nbits + shift);
> +				bitmap_or(dma->bitmap, dma->bitmap, &leftover,
> +					  shift);
> +				nbits += shift;
> +				curr_lcnt = nbits / BITS_PER_LONG;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (copy_to_user((void __user *)bitmap->data + cnt,
> +				       dma->bitmap, curr_lcnt * sizeof(u64))) {
> +				ret = -EFAULT;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			shift = nbits % BITS_PER_LONG;
> +			if (shift)
> +				leftover = *(u64 *)(dma->bitmap + curr_lcnt);
> +			cnt += curr_lcnt;
> +		}

I don't think this works.  Let's say for example we have separate
single page mappings at 4K and 12K (both dirty) and the user asked to
unmap the range 0 - 16K.  We find the mapping at 4K, shift is zero, cnt
is zero, so we copy the bitmap with the zero bit set to the user
buffer.  We're already wrong because we've just indicated the page at
zero is dirty and there isn't a page at zero.  shift now becomes 1 and
leftover is a bitmap with bit zero set.

We move on to the next page @12K.  We shift this bitmap by 1.  We OR in
our leftover and again copy out to the user buffer.  We end up with a
user bitmap with bits zero and one set, when we should have had bits 1
and 3 set, we're essentially coalescing the mappings.

As I see it, shift needs to be calculated as the offset from the start
of the user requested unmap buffer and I think an easier approach to
handle the leftover bits preceding the shift is to copy it back out of
the user buffer.

For example, shift should be:

((dma->iova - unmap->iova) >> pgshift) % BITS_PER_LONG

This would give us a shift of 1 and 3 respectively for our mappings,
which is correct.

Since our shifts are non-zero, we then need to collect the preceding
leftovers, which is always going to be:

copy_from_user(&leftover, bitmap->data +
		((dma->iova - unmap->iova) >> pgshift) / BITS_PER_LONG,
		sizeof(leftover));

I don't think the curr_lcnt calculation for the copy-out is correct
either, mappings are not required to be a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG
pages, so we're truncating the size.

So we have:

bit_offset = (dma->iova - unmap->iova) >> pgshift;
copy_offset = bit_offset / BITS_PER_LONG;
shift = bit_offset % BITS_PER_LONG;

if (shift) {
	bitmap_shift_left(dma->bitmap, dma->bitmap, shift, nbits + shift);
	if (copy_from_user(&leftover, bitmap->data + copy_offset, sizeof(leftover))) {
		ret = -EFAULT;
		break;
	}
	bitmap_or(dma->bitmap, dma->bitmap, &leftover, shift);
}

if (copy_to_user(bitmap->data + copy_offset, dma->bitmap,
		roundup(nbits + shift, BITS_PER_LONG)/BITS_PER_BYTE)) {
	ret = -EFAULT;
	break;
}

Also this all needs to come after the below check of the pfn_list and
call to the blocking notifier or else we're just wasting time because
we'll need to do it all again anyway.


> +
>  		if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list)) {
>  			struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap nb_unmap;
>  
> @@ -1093,6 +1139,13 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  		vfio_remove_dma(iommu, dma);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!ret && (unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> +	    shift) {
> +		if (copy_to_user((void __user *)bitmap->data + cnt, &leftover,
> +				 sizeof(leftover)))
> +			ret = -EFAULT;
> +	}

This is unnecessary with the algorithm I propose.

> +
>  unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>  
> @@ -2426,17 +2479,40 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  
>  	} else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA) {
>  		struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap unmap;
> -		long ret;
> +		struct vfio_bitmap bitmap = { 0 };
> +		int ret;
>  
>  		minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap, size);
>  
>  		if (copy_from_user(&unmap, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>  			return -EFAULT;
>  
> -		if (unmap.argsz < minsz || unmap.flags)
> +		if (unmap.argsz < minsz ||
> +		    unmap.flags & ~VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> -		ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap);
> +		if (unmap.flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) {
> +			unsigned long pgshift;
> +
> +			if (unmap.argsz < (minsz + sizeof(bitmap)))
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +
> +			if (copy_from_user(&bitmap,
> +					   (void __user *)(arg + minsz),
> +					   sizeof(bitmap)))
> +				return -EFAULT;
> +
> +			if (!access_ok((void __user *)bitmap.data, bitmap.size))
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +
> +			pgshift = __ffs(bitmap.pgsize);
> +			ret = verify_bitmap_size(unmap.size >> pgshift,
> +						 bitmap.size);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap, &bitmap);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 5f359c63f5ef..e3cbf8b78623 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -1048,12 +1048,22 @@ struct vfio_bitmap {
>   * field.  No guarantee is made to the user that arbitrary unmaps of iova
>   * or size different from those used in the original mapping call will
>   * succeed.
> + * VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP should be set to get dirty bitmap
> + * before unmapping IO virtual addresses. When this flag is set, user must
> + * provide data[] as structure vfio_bitmap. User must allocate memory to get
> + * bitmap and must set size of allocated memory in vfio_bitmap.size field.
> + * A bit in bitmap represents one page of user provided page size in 'pgsize',
> + * consecutively starting from iova offset. Bit set indicates page at that
> + * offset from iova is dirty. Bitmap of pages in the range of unmapped size is
> + * returned in vfio_bitmap.data

This needs to specify a user zero'd bitmap if we're only going to fill
it sparsely.  Thanks,

Alex

>   */
>  struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap {
>  	__u32	argsz;
>  	__u32	flags;
> +#define VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP (1 << 0)
>  	__u64	iova;				/* IO virtual address */
>  	__u64	size;				/* Size of mapping (bytes) */
> +	__u8    data[];
>  };
>  
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 14)



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-14  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13 20:04 [PATCH Kernel v19 0/8] Add UAPIs to support migration for VFIO devices Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04 ` [PATCH Kernel v19 1/8] vfio: UAPI for migration interface for device state Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04   ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04 ` [PATCH Kernel v19 2/8] vfio iommu: Remove atomicity of ref_count of pinned pages Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04   ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04 ` [PATCH Kernel v19 3/8] vfio iommu: Cache pgsize_bitmap in struct vfio_iommu Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04   ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04 ` [PATCH Kernel v19 4/8] vfio iommu: Add ioctl definition for dirty pages tracking Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04   ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04 ` [PATCH Kernel v19 5/8] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl " Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04   ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14  5:02   ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-14  5:02     ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-14 12:33     ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 12:33       ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 13:32       ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-14 13:32         ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-13 20:04 ` [PATCH Kernel v19 6/8] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dirty bitmap before unmap Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04   ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14  5:07   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2020-05-14  5:07     ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-14  5:32     ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14  5:32       ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 13:22       ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-14 13:22         ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-13 20:04 ` [PATCH Kernel v19 7/8] vfio iommu: Add migration capability to report supported features Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04   ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14  5:01   ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-14  5:01     ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-14 11:55     ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 11:55       ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-14 13:39       ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-14 13:39         ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-13 20:04 ` [PATCH Kernel v19 8/8] vfio: Selective dirty page tracking if IOMMU backed device pins pages Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-13 20:04   ` Kirti Wankhede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200513230747.0d2f3bc3@x1.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=Ken.Xue@amd.com \
    --cc=Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eauger@redhat.com \
    --cc=eskultet@redhat.com \
    --cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
    --cc=jonathan.davies@nutanix.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=ziye.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.