All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	brijesh.singh@amd.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	cohuck@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 16/18] use errp for gmpo kvm_init
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 18:09:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514170808.GS2787@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200514064120.449050-17-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Dave:
  You've got some screwy mail headers here, the qemu-devel@nongnu.-rg is
the best one anmd the pair@us.redhat.com is weird as well.

* David Gibson (david@gibson.dropbear.id.au) wrote:
> ---
>  accel/kvm/kvm-all.c                    |  4 +++-
>  include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h |  2 +-
>  target/i386/sev.c                      | 32 +++++++++++++-------------
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> index 5451728425..392ab02867 100644
> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> @@ -2045,9 +2045,11 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
>      if (ms->gmpo) {
>          GuestMemoryProtectionClass *gmpc =
>              GUEST_MEMORY_PROTECTION_GET_CLASS(ms->gmpo);
> +        Error *local_err = NULL;
>  
> -        ret = gmpc->kvm_init(ms->gmpo);
> +        ret = gmpc->kvm_init(ms->gmpo, &local_err);
>          if (ret < 0) {
> +            error_report_err(local_err);
>              goto err;
>          }
>      }
> diff --git a/include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h b/include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h
> index 7d959b4910..2a88475136 100644
> --- a/include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h
> +++ b/include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ typedef struct GuestMemoryProtection GuestMemoryProtection;
>  typedef struct GuestMemoryProtectionClass {
>      InterfaceClass parent;
>  
> -    int (*kvm_init)(GuestMemoryProtection *);
> +    int (*kvm_init)(GuestMemoryProtection *, Error **);
>      int (*encrypt_data)(GuestMemoryProtection *, uint8_t *, uint64_t);
>  } GuestMemoryProtectionClass;
>  
> diff --git a/target/i386/sev.c b/target/i386/sev.c
> index 2051fae0c1..82f16b2f3b 100644
> --- a/target/i386/sev.c
> +++ b/target/i386/sev.c
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ sev_vm_state_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState state)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo)
> +static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo, Error **errp)
>  {
>      SevGuestState *sev = SEV_GUEST(gmpo);
>      char *devname;
> @@ -633,14 +633,14 @@ static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo)
>      host_cbitpos = ebx & 0x3f;
>  
>      if (host_cbitpos != sev->cbitpos) {
> -        error_report("%s: cbitpos check failed, host '%d' requested '%d'",
> -                     __func__, host_cbitpos, sev->cbitpos);
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: cbitpos check failed, host '%d' requested '%d'",
> +                   __func__, host_cbitpos, sev->cbitpos);
>          goto err;
>      }
>  
>      if (sev->reduced_phys_bits < 1) {
> -        error_report("%s: reduced_phys_bits check failed, it should be >=1,"
> -                     " requested '%d'", __func__, sev->reduced_phys_bits);
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: reduced_phys_bits check failed, it should be >=1,"
> +                   " requested '%d'", __func__, sev->reduced_phys_bits);
>          goto err;
>      }
>  
> @@ -649,20 +649,20 @@ static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo)
>      devname = object_property_get_str(OBJECT(sev), "sev-device", NULL);
>      sev->sev_fd = open(devname, O_RDWR);
>      if (sev->sev_fd < 0) {
> -        error_report("%s: Failed to open %s '%s'", __func__,
> -                     devname, strerror(errno));
> -    }
> -    g_free(devname);
> -    if (sev->sev_fd < 0) {
> +        g_free(devname);
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: Failed to open %s '%s'", __func__,
> +                   devname, strerror(errno));
> +        g_free(devname);

You seem to have double free'd devname - would g_autofree work here?

other than that, looks OK to me.

Dave

>          goto err;
>      }
> +    g_free(devname);
>  
>      ret = sev_platform_ioctl(sev->sev_fd, SEV_PLATFORM_STATUS, &status,
>                               &fw_error);
>      if (ret) {
> -        error_report("%s: failed to get platform status ret=%d "
> -                     "fw_error='%d: %s'", __func__, ret, fw_error,
> -                     fw_error_to_str(fw_error));
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: failed to get platform status ret=%d "
> +                   "fw_error='%d: %s'", __func__, ret, fw_error,
> +                   fw_error_to_str(fw_error));
>          goto err;
>      }
>      sev->build_id = status.build;
> @@ -672,14 +672,14 @@ static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo)
>      trace_kvm_sev_init();
>      ret = sev_ioctl(sev->sev_fd, KVM_SEV_INIT, NULL, &fw_error);
>      if (ret) {
> -        error_report("%s: failed to initialize ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'",
> -                     __func__, ret, fw_error, fw_error_to_str(fw_error));
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: failed to initialize ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'",
> +                   __func__, ret, fw_error, fw_error_to_str(fw_error));
>          goto err;
>      }
>  
>      ret = sev_launch_start(sev);
>      if (ret) {
> -        error_report("%s: failed to create encryption context", __func__);
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: failed to create encryption context", __func__);
>          goto err;
>      }
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	cohuck@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 16/18] use errp for gmpo kvm_init
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 18:09:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514170808.GS2787@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200514064120.449050-17-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Dave:
  You've got some screwy mail headers here, the qemu-devel@nongnu.-rg is
the best one anmd the pair@us.redhat.com is weird as well.

* David Gibson (david@gibson.dropbear.id.au) wrote:
> ---
>  accel/kvm/kvm-all.c                    |  4 +++-
>  include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h |  2 +-
>  target/i386/sev.c                      | 32 +++++++++++++-------------
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> index 5451728425..392ab02867 100644
> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> @@ -2045,9 +2045,11 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
>      if (ms->gmpo) {
>          GuestMemoryProtectionClass *gmpc =
>              GUEST_MEMORY_PROTECTION_GET_CLASS(ms->gmpo);
> +        Error *local_err = NULL;
>  
> -        ret = gmpc->kvm_init(ms->gmpo);
> +        ret = gmpc->kvm_init(ms->gmpo, &local_err);
>          if (ret < 0) {
> +            error_report_err(local_err);
>              goto err;
>          }
>      }
> diff --git a/include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h b/include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h
> index 7d959b4910..2a88475136 100644
> --- a/include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h
> +++ b/include/exec/guest-memory-protection.h
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ typedef struct GuestMemoryProtection GuestMemoryProtection;
>  typedef struct GuestMemoryProtectionClass {
>      InterfaceClass parent;
>  
> -    int (*kvm_init)(GuestMemoryProtection *);
> +    int (*kvm_init)(GuestMemoryProtection *, Error **);
>      int (*encrypt_data)(GuestMemoryProtection *, uint8_t *, uint64_t);
>  } GuestMemoryProtectionClass;
>  
> diff --git a/target/i386/sev.c b/target/i386/sev.c
> index 2051fae0c1..82f16b2f3b 100644
> --- a/target/i386/sev.c
> +++ b/target/i386/sev.c
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ sev_vm_state_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState state)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo)
> +static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo, Error **errp)
>  {
>      SevGuestState *sev = SEV_GUEST(gmpo);
>      char *devname;
> @@ -633,14 +633,14 @@ static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo)
>      host_cbitpos = ebx & 0x3f;
>  
>      if (host_cbitpos != sev->cbitpos) {
> -        error_report("%s: cbitpos check failed, host '%d' requested '%d'",
> -                     __func__, host_cbitpos, sev->cbitpos);
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: cbitpos check failed, host '%d' requested '%d'",
> +                   __func__, host_cbitpos, sev->cbitpos);
>          goto err;
>      }
>  
>      if (sev->reduced_phys_bits < 1) {
> -        error_report("%s: reduced_phys_bits check failed, it should be >=1,"
> -                     " requested '%d'", __func__, sev->reduced_phys_bits);
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: reduced_phys_bits check failed, it should be >=1,"
> +                   " requested '%d'", __func__, sev->reduced_phys_bits);
>          goto err;
>      }
>  
> @@ -649,20 +649,20 @@ static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo)
>      devname = object_property_get_str(OBJECT(sev), "sev-device", NULL);
>      sev->sev_fd = open(devname, O_RDWR);
>      if (sev->sev_fd < 0) {
> -        error_report("%s: Failed to open %s '%s'", __func__,
> -                     devname, strerror(errno));
> -    }
> -    g_free(devname);
> -    if (sev->sev_fd < 0) {
> +        g_free(devname);
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: Failed to open %s '%s'", __func__,
> +                   devname, strerror(errno));
> +        g_free(devname);

You seem to have double free'd devname - would g_autofree work here?

other than that, looks OK to me.

Dave

>          goto err;
>      }
> +    g_free(devname);
>  
>      ret = sev_platform_ioctl(sev->sev_fd, SEV_PLATFORM_STATUS, &status,
>                               &fw_error);
>      if (ret) {
> -        error_report("%s: failed to get platform status ret=%d "
> -                     "fw_error='%d: %s'", __func__, ret, fw_error,
> -                     fw_error_to_str(fw_error));
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: failed to get platform status ret=%d "
> +                   "fw_error='%d: %s'", __func__, ret, fw_error,
> +                   fw_error_to_str(fw_error));
>          goto err;
>      }
>      sev->build_id = status.build;
> @@ -672,14 +672,14 @@ static int sev_kvm_init(GuestMemoryProtection *gmpo)
>      trace_kvm_sev_init();
>      ret = sev_ioctl(sev->sev_fd, KVM_SEV_INIT, NULL, &fw_error);
>      if (ret) {
> -        error_report("%s: failed to initialize ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'",
> -                     __func__, ret, fw_error, fw_error_to_str(fw_error));
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: failed to initialize ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'",
> +                   __func__, ret, fw_error, fw_error_to_str(fw_error));
>          goto err;
>      }
>  
>      ret = sev_launch_start(sev);
>      if (ret) {
> -        error_report("%s: failed to create encryption context", __func__);
> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: failed to create encryption context", __func__);
>          goto err;
>      }
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-14 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-14  6:41 [RFC 00/18] Refactor configuration of guest memory protection David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 01/18] target/i386: sev: Remove unused QSevGuestInfoClass David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 02/18] target/i386: sev: Move local structure definitions into .c file David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 03/18] target/i386: sev: Rename QSevGuestInfo David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 04/18] target/i386: sev: Embed SEVState in SevGuestState David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 05/18] target/i386: sev: Partial cleanup to sev_state global David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 06/18] target/i386: sev: Remove redundant cbitpos and reduced_phys_bits fields David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 07/18] target/i386: sev: Remove redundant policy field David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 08/18] target/i386: sev: Remove redundant handle field David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 09/18] target/i386: sev: Unify SEVState and SevGuestState David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 10/18] guest memory protection: Add guest memory protection interface David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 11/18] guest memory protection: Handle memory encrption via interface David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 12/18] guest memory protection: Perform KVM init " David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 13/18] guest memory protection: Move side effect out of machine_set_memory_encryption() David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 14/18] guest memory protection: Rework the "memory-encryption" property David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 15/18] guest memory protection: Decouple kvm_memcrypt_*() helpers from KVM David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 16/18] use errp for gmpo kvm_init David Gibson
2020-05-14 17:09   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2020-05-14 17:09     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-05-15  0:14     ` David Gibson
2020-05-15  0:14       ` David Gibson
2020-05-15  0:20     ` David Gibson
2020-05-15  0:20       ` David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 17/18] spapr: Added PEF based guest memory protection David Gibson
2020-05-14  6:41 ` [RFC 18/18] guest memory protection: Alter virtio default properties for protected guests David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200514170808.GS2787@work-vm \
    --to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.