* [PATCH][next] drm/i915: fix incorrect return of an error status
@ 2020-05-18 17:09 ` Colin King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2020-05-18 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie,
Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä,
Stanislav Lisovskiy, intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Currently when a call to intel_atomic_get_dbuf_state fails the
error value being returns is a potentially uninitialized value
in variable ret. Fix this by returning the error value of
new_dbuf_state.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar value")
Fixes: 3cf43cdc63fb ("drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a21e36ed1a77..762a5184fc69 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5917,7 +5917,7 @@ skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
new_dbuf_state = intel_atomic_get_dbuf_state(state);
if (IS_ERR(new_dbuf_state))
- return ret;
+ return PTR_ERR(new_dbuf_state);
old_dbuf_state = intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH][next] drm/i915: fix incorrect return of an error status
@ 2020-05-18 17:09 ` Colin King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2020-05-18 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie,
Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä,
Stanislav Lisovskiy, intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Currently when a call to intel_atomic_get_dbuf_state fails the
error value being returns is a potentially uninitialized value
in variable ret. Fix this by returning the error value of
new_dbuf_state.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar value")
Fixes: 3cf43cdc63fb ("drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a21e36ed1a77..762a5184fc69 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5917,7 +5917,7 @@ skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
new_dbuf_state = intel_atomic_get_dbuf_state(state);
if (IS_ERR(new_dbuf_state))
- return ret;
+ return PTR_ERR(new_dbuf_state);
old_dbuf_state = intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH][next] drm/i915: fix incorrect return of an error status
@ 2020-05-18 17:09 ` Colin King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2020-05-18 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie,
Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä,
Stanislav Lisovskiy, intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Currently when a call to intel_atomic_get_dbuf_state fails the
error value being returns is a potentially uninitialized value
in variable ret. Fix this by returning the error value of
new_dbuf_state.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar value")
Fixes: 3cf43cdc63fb ("drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a21e36ed1a77..762a5184fc69 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5917,7 +5917,7 @@ skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
new_dbuf_state = intel_atomic_get_dbuf_state(state);
if (IS_ERR(new_dbuf_state))
- return ret;
+ return PTR_ERR(new_dbuf_state);
old_dbuf_state = intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm/i915: fix incorrect return of an error status
@ 2020-05-18 17:09 ` Colin King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2020-05-18 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie,
Daniel Vetter, Ville Syrjälä,
Stanislav Lisovskiy, intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Currently when a call to intel_atomic_get_dbuf_state fails the
error value being returns is a potentially uninitialized value
in variable ret. Fix this by returning the error value of
new_dbuf_state.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar value")
Fixes: 3cf43cdc63fb ("drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a21e36ed1a77..762a5184fc69 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5917,7 +5917,7 @@ skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
new_dbuf_state = intel_atomic_get_dbuf_state(state);
if (IS_ERR(new_dbuf_state))
- return ret;
+ return PTR_ERR(new_dbuf_state);
old_dbuf_state = intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: fix incorrect return of an error status
2020-05-18 17:09 ` Colin King
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2020-05-18 20:29 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-05-18 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin King; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: fix incorrect return of an error status
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77368/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Applying: drm/i915: fix incorrect return of an error status
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
No changes -- Patch already applied.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-18 20:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-18 17:09 [PATCH][next] drm/i915: fix incorrect return of an error status Colin King
2020-05-18 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Colin King
2020-05-18 17:09 ` Colin King
2020-05-18 17:09 ` Colin King
2020-05-18 20:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.