[PATCH] net/amd: Remove the extra blank lines

[PATCH] net/amd: Remove the extra blank lines

[Tang Bin]

Remove the extra blank lines in the file au1000_eth.c

Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/amd/au1000_eth.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/au1000_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/au1000_eth.c
index 75e9074d8..7988e7df1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/au1000_eth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/au1000_eth.c
@@ -243,7 +243,6 @@ MODULE_VERSION(DRV_VERSION);
  * ps: make sure the used irqs are configured properly in the board
  * specific irq-map
  */
-
 static void au1000_enable_mac(struct net_device *dev, int force_reset)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -558,7 +557,6 @@ static int au1000_mii_probe(struct net_device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-
 /*
  * Buffer allocation/deallocation routines. The buffer descriptor returned
  * has the virtual and dma address of a buffer suitable for
@@ -608,7 +606,6 @@ static void au1000_reset_mac_unlocked(struct net_device *dev)
 	}
 
 	aup->mac_enabled = 0;
-
 }
 
 static void au1000_reset_mac(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -649,7 +646,6 @@ au1000_setup_hw_rings(struct au1000_private *aup, void __iomem *tx_base)
 /*
  * ethtool operations
  */
-
 static void
 au1000_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
 {
@@ -682,7 +678,6 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops au1000_ethtool_ops = {
 	.set_link_ksettings = phy_ethtool_set_link_ksettings,
 };
 
-
 /*
  * Initialize the interface.
  *
-- 
2.20.1.windows.1

Re: [PATCH] net/amd: Remove the extra blank lines

[David Miller]

Please put these patches into a proper, numbered, patch series with
an appropriate header posting.

Some of these patches do not apply cleanly to the net-next tree, which
is where these changes should be targetted.  Please respin.

Thank you.

Re: [PATCH] net/amd: Remove the extra blank lines

[Tang Bin]

Hi David:

On 2020/5/20 6:42, David Miller wrote:
> Please put these patches into a proper, numbered, patch series with
> an appropriate header posting.
Whether you mean the patches should be like this: [PATCH 0/5].........?
>
> Some of these patches do not apply cleanly to the net-next tree, which
> is where these changes should be targetted.  Please respin.

Can you tell me which one is useless, I will drop and not put it in the 
patches set.

Thanks,

Tang Bin