* [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian
@ 2020-05-27 13:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2020-05-27 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sami Tolvanen, Kees Cook
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, clang-built-linux
clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack
in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not
pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with
this fails at build time:
clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux'
Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier
and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug
in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work
around existing releases.
Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack")
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index a82441d6dc36..692e1575a6c8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1031,7 +1031,9 @@ config ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK
# Supported by clang >= 7.0
config CC_HAVE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
- def_bool $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18)
+ bool
+ default $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18 -mbig-endian) if CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
+ default $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18 -mlittle-endian) if !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
config SECCOMP
bool "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode"
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian @ 2020-05-27 13:39 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2020-05-27 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sami Tolvanen, Kees Cook Cc: clang-built-linux, linux-arm-kernel, Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with this fails at build time: clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work around existing releases. Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index a82441d6dc36..692e1575a6c8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -1031,7 +1031,9 @@ config ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK # Supported by clang >= 7.0 config CC_HAVE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK - def_bool $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18) + bool + default $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18 -mbig-endian) if CPU_BIG_ENDIAN + default $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18 -mlittle-endian) if !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN config SECCOMP bool "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode" -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian 2020-05-27 13:39 ` Arnd Bergmann @ 2020-05-27 15:24 ` Mark Rutland -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Mark Rutland @ 2020-05-27 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann, Nick Desaulniers, Fangrui Song Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sami Tolvanen, Kees Cook, clang-built-linux, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with > this fails at build time: > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work > around existing releases. > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? Mark. > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index a82441d6dc36..692e1575a6c8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -1031,7 +1031,9 @@ config ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK > > # Supported by clang >= 7.0 > config CC_HAVE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK > - def_bool $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18) > + bool > + default $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18 -mbig-endian) if CPU_BIG_ENDIAN > + default $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18 -mlittle-endian) if !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN > > config SECCOMP > bool "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode" > -- > 2.26.2 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian @ 2020-05-27 15:24 ` Mark Rutland 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Mark Rutland @ 2020-05-27 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann, Nick Desaulniers, Fangrui Song Cc: Kees Cook, Catalin Marinas, linux-kernel, clang-built-linux, Sami Tolvanen, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with > this fails at build time: > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work > around existing releases. > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? Mark. > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index a82441d6dc36..692e1575a6c8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -1031,7 +1031,9 @@ config ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK > > # Supported by clang >= 7.0 > config CC_HAVE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK > - def_bool $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18) > + bool > + default $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18 -mbig-endian) if CPU_BIG_ENDIAN > + default $(cc-option, -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18 -mlittle-endian) if !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN > > config SECCOMP > bool "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode" > -- > 2.26.2 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian 2020-05-27 15:24 ` Mark Rutland @ 2020-05-27 17:28 ` Nick Desaulniers -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Nick Desaulniers @ 2020-05-27 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Rutland Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Fangrui Song, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sami Tolvanen, Kees Cook, clang-built-linux, Linux ARM, LKML On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not > > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with > > this fails at build time: > > > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' > > > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier > > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug > > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work > > around existing releases. > > > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") > > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and > this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. > > Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? Exactly, Fangrui already has a fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80647. Thanks Fangrui! It seems it's easy in the codebase to check the specific ABI, which isn't explicitly LE, rather than use a method that checks the ISA regardless of endianness. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian @ 2020-05-27 17:28 ` Nick Desaulniers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Nick Desaulniers @ 2020-05-27 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Rutland Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Fangrui Song, Catalin Marinas, LKML, clang-built-linux, Sami Tolvanen, Will Deacon, Linux ARM, Kees Cook On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not > > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with > > this fails at build time: > > > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' > > > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier > > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug > > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work > > around existing releases. > > > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") > > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and > this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. > > Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? Exactly, Fangrui already has a fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80647. Thanks Fangrui! It seems it's easy in the codebase to check the specific ABI, which isn't explicitly LE, rather than use a method that checks the ISA regardless of endianness. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian 2020-05-27 17:28 ` Nick Desaulniers @ 2020-05-27 18:28 ` Arnd Bergmann -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2020-05-27 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Mark Rutland, Fangrui Song, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sami Tolvanen, Kees Cook, clang-built-linux, Linux ARM, LKML On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:28 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > > > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not > > > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with > > > this fails at build time: > > > > > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' > > > > > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier > > > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug > > > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work > > > around existing releases. > > > > > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") > > > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > > > I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and > > this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. > > > > Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? > > Exactly, Fangrui already has a fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80647. > Thanks Fangrui! Ok, great! I had opened the bug first so I could reference it in the commit changelog, it seems the fix came fast than I managed to send out the kernel workaround. Do we still want the kernel workaround anyway to make it work with older clang versions, or do we expect to fall back to not use the integrated assembler for the moment? Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian @ 2020-05-27 18:28 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2020-05-27 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Fangrui Song, Catalin Marinas, LKML, clang-built-linux, Sami Tolvanen, Will Deacon, Linux ARM On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:28 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > > > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not > > > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with > > > this fails at build time: > > > > > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' > > > > > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier > > > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug > > > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work > > > around existing releases. > > > > > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") > > > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > > > I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and > > this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. > > > > Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? > > Exactly, Fangrui already has a fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80647. > Thanks Fangrui! Ok, great! I had opened the bug first so I could reference it in the commit changelog, it seems the fix came fast than I managed to send out the kernel workaround. Do we still want the kernel workaround anyway to make it work with older clang versions, or do we expect to fall back to not use the integrated assembler for the moment? Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian 2020-05-27 18:28 ` Arnd Bergmann @ 2020-05-27 18:35 ` Fangrui Song -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Fangrui Song @ 2020-05-27 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Nick Desaulniers, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sami Tolvanen, Kees Cook, clang-built-linux, Linux ARM, LKML, Tom Stellard On 2020-05-27, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:28 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built >Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack >> > > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not >> > > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with >> > > this fails at build time: >> > > >> > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' >> > > >> > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier >> > > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug >> > > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work >> > > around existing releases. >> > > >> > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") >> > > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 >> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> > >> > I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and >> > this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. >> > >> > Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? >> >> Exactly, Fangrui already has a fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80647. >> Thanks Fangrui! > >Ok, great! I had opened the bug first so I could reference it in the >commit changelog, it seems the fix came fast than I managed to >send out the kernel workaround. > >Do we still want the kernel workaround anyway to make it work >with older clang versions, or do we expect to fall back to not >use the integrated assembler for the moment? > > Arnd We can condition it on `CLANG_VERSION >= 100001` (assuming Tom (CCed) is happy (and there is still time) cherrying pick the two commits https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 to clang 10.0.1) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian @ 2020-05-27 18:35 ` Fangrui Song 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Fangrui Song @ 2020-05-27 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Tom Stellard, Catalin Marinas, Nick Desaulniers, LKML, clang-built-linux, Sami Tolvanen, Will Deacon, Linux ARM On 2020-05-27, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:28 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built >Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack >> > > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not >> > > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with >> > > this fails at build time: >> > > >> > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' >> > > >> > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier >> > > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug >> > > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work >> > > around existing releases. >> > > >> > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") >> > > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 >> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> > >> > I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and >> > this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. >> > >> > Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? >> >> Exactly, Fangrui already has a fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80647. >> Thanks Fangrui! > >Ok, great! I had opened the bug first so I could reference it in the >commit changelog, it seems the fix came fast than I managed to >send out the kernel workaround. > >Do we still want the kernel workaround anyway to make it work >with older clang versions, or do we expect to fall back to not >use the integrated assembler for the moment? > > Arnd We can condition it on `CLANG_VERSION >= 100001` (assuming Tom (CCed) is happy (and there is still time) cherrying pick the two commits https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 to clang 10.0.1) _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian 2020-05-27 18:35 ` Fangrui Song @ 2020-05-27 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2020-05-27 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fangrui Song Cc: Nick Desaulniers, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sami Tolvanen, Kees Cook, clang-built-linux, Linux ARM, LKML, Tom Stellard On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:35 PM 'Fangrui Song' via Clang Built Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > On 2020-05-27, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:28 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built > >Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > >> > > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not > >> > > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with > >> > > this fails at build time: > >> > > > >> > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' > >> > > > >> > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier > >> > > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug > >> > > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work > >> > > around existing releases. > >> > > > >> > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") > >> > > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 > >> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > >> > > >> > I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and > >> > this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. > >> > > >> > Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? > >> > >> Exactly, Fangrui already has a fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80647. > >> Thanks Fangrui! > > > >Ok, great! I had opened the bug first so I could reference it in the > >commit changelog, it seems the fix came fast than I managed to > >send out the kernel workaround. > > > >Do we still want the kernel workaround anyway to make it work > >with older clang versions, or do we expect to fall back to not > >use the integrated assembler for the moment? > > We can condition it on `CLANG_VERSION >= 100001` (assuming Tom (CCed) > is happy (and there is still time) cherrying pick the two commits https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 to clang 10.0.1) Good idea. I assume we will keep requiring fairly recent clang versions for a while now, so chances are that 10.1 or 11.0 becomes the minimum supported version not too far in the future and then the workaround can be dropped again. Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian @ 2020-05-27 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2020-05-27 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fangrui Song Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Tom Stellard, Catalin Marinas, Nick Desaulniers, LKML, clang-built-linux, Sami Tolvanen, Will Deacon, Linux ARM On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:35 PM 'Fangrui Song' via Clang Built Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > On 2020-05-27, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:28 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built > >Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > > clang-11 and earlier do not support -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > >> > > in combination with -mbig-endian, but the Kconfig check does not > >> > > pass the endianess flag, so building a big-endian kernel with > >> > > this fails at build time: > >> > > > >> > > clang: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack' for target 'aarch64_be-unknown-linux' > >> > > > >> > > Change the Kconfig check to let Kconfig figure this out earlier > >> > > and prevent the broken configuration. I assume this is a bug > >> > > in clang that needs to be fixed, but we also have to work > >> > > around existing releases. > >> > > > >> > > Fixes: 5287569a790d ("arm64: Implement Shadow Call Stack") > >> > > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 > >> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > >> > > >> > I suspect this is similar to the patchable-function-entry issue, and > >> > this is an oversight that we'd rather fix toolchain side. > >> > > >> > Nick, Fangrui, thoughts? > >> > >> Exactly, Fangrui already has a fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80647. > >> Thanks Fangrui! > > > >Ok, great! I had opened the bug first so I could reference it in the > >commit changelog, it seems the fix came fast than I managed to > >send out the kernel workaround. > > > >Do we still want the kernel workaround anyway to make it work > >with older clang versions, or do we expect to fall back to not > >use the integrated assembler for the moment? > > We can condition it on `CLANG_VERSION >= 100001` (assuming Tom (CCed) > is happy (and there is still time) cherrying pick the two commits https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 to clang 10.0.1) Good idea. I assume we will keep requiring fairly recent clang versions for a while now, so chances are that 10.1 or 11.0 becomes the minimum supported version not too far in the future and then the workaround can be dropped again. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-27 19:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-05-27 13:39 [PATCH] arm64: disable -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack for big-endian Arnd Bergmann 2020-05-27 13:39 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-05-27 15:24 ` Mark Rutland 2020-05-27 15:24 ` Mark Rutland 2020-05-27 17:28 ` Nick Desaulniers 2020-05-27 17:28 ` Nick Desaulniers 2020-05-27 18:28 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-05-27 18:28 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-05-27 18:35 ` Fangrui Song 2020-05-27 18:35 ` Fangrui Song 2020-05-27 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-05-27 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.