From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] powerpc/pmem/of_pmem: Update of_pmem to use the new barrier instruction.
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 22:46:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202005312249.xCyVwSwD%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529052820.151651-6-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Hi "Aneesh,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on linux-nvdimm/libnvdimm-for-next scottwood/next v5.7-rc7]
[cannot apply to next-20200529]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/Support-new-pmem-flush-and-sync-instructions-for-POWER/20200531-062841
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc-ppc6xx_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h:12,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/early_32.c:11:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h: In function 'arch_pmem_flush_barrier':
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h:126:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_has_feature'; did you mean 'mmu_has_feature'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
126 | if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| mmu_has_feature
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputhreads.h:7,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h:12,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h:17,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/early_32.c:11:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h: At top level:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h:49:20: error: conflicting types for 'cpu_has_feature'
49 | static inline bool cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h:12,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/early_32.c:11:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h:126:6: note: previous implicit declaration of 'cpu_has_feature' was here
126 | if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +/cpu_has_feature +49 arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h
c812c7d8f1470a Aneesh Kumar K.V 2016-07-23 38
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 39 if (CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS & feature)
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 40 return true;
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 41
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 42 if (!(CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE & feature))
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 43 return false;
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 44
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 45 i = __builtin_ctzl(feature);
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 46 return static_branch_likely(&cpu_feature_keys[i]);
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 47 }
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 48 #else
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 @49 static inline bool cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature)
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 50 {
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 51 return early_cpu_has_feature(feature);
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 52 }
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 53 #endif
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 54
:::::: The code at line 49 was first introduced by commit
:::::: b92a226e528423b8d249dd09bb450d53361fbfcb powerpc: Move cpu_has_feature() to a separate file
:::::: TO: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
:::::: CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
oohall@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] powerpc/pmem/of_pmem: Update of_pmem to use the new barrier instruction.
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 22:46:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202005312249.xCyVwSwD%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529052820.151651-6-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4053 bytes --]
Hi "Aneesh,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on linux-nvdimm/libnvdimm-for-next scottwood/next v5.7-rc7]
[cannot apply to next-20200529]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/Support-new-pmem-flush-and-sync-instructions-for-POWER/20200531-062841
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc-ppc6xx_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h:12,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/early_32.c:11:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h: In function 'arch_pmem_flush_barrier':
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h:126:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_has_feature'; did you mean 'mmu_has_feature'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
126 | if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| mmu_has_feature
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputhreads.h:7,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h:12,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h:17,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/early_32.c:11:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h: At top level:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h:49:20: error: conflicting types for 'cpu_has_feature'
49 | static inline bool cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h:12,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/early_32.c:11:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h:126:6: note: previous implicit declaration of 'cpu_has_feature' was here
126 | if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +/cpu_has_feature +49 arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h
c812c7d8f1470a Aneesh Kumar K.V 2016-07-23 38
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 39 if (CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS & feature)
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 40 return true;
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 41
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 42 if (!(CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE & feature))
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 43 return false;
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 44
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 45 i = __builtin_ctzl(feature);
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 46 return static_branch_likely(&cpu_feature_keys[i]);
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 47 }
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 48 #else
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 @49 static inline bool cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature)
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 50 {
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 51 return early_cpu_has_feature(feature);
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 52 }
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 53 #endif
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 54
:::::: The code at line 49 was first introduced by commit
:::::: b92a226e528423b8d249dd09bb450d53361fbfcb powerpc: Move cpu_has_feature() to a separate file
:::::: TO: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
:::::: CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31557 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] powerpc/pmem/of_pmem: Update of_pmem to use the new barrier instruction.
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 22:46:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202005312249.xCyVwSwD%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529052820.151651-6-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4132 bytes --]
Hi "Aneesh,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on linux-nvdimm/libnvdimm-for-next scottwood/next v5.7-rc7]
[cannot apply to next-20200529]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/Support-new-pmem-flush-and-sync-instructions-for-POWER/20200531-062841
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc-ppc6xx_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h:12,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/early_32.c:11:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h: In function 'arch_pmem_flush_barrier':
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h:126:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_has_feature'; did you mean 'mmu_has_feature'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
126 | if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| mmu_has_feature
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputhreads.h:7,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h:12,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h:17,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/early_32.c:11:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h: At top level:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h:49:20: error: conflicting types for 'cpu_has_feature'
49 | static inline bool cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h:12,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/early_32.c:11:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h:126:6: note: previous implicit declaration of 'cpu_has_feature' was here
126 | if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +/cpu_has_feature +49 arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h
c812c7d8f1470a Aneesh Kumar K.V 2016-07-23 38
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 39 if (CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS & feature)
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 40 return true;
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 41
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 42 if (!(CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE & feature))
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 43 return false;
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 44
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 45 i = __builtin_ctzl(feature);
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 46 return static_branch_likely(&cpu_feature_keys[i]);
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 47 }
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 48 #else
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 @49 static inline bool cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature)
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 50 {
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 51 return early_cpu_has_feature(feature);
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 52 }
4db7327194dba0 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 53 #endif
b92a226e528423 Kevin Hao 2016-07-23 54
:::::: The code at line 49 was first introduced by commit
:::::: b92a226e528423b8d249dd09bb450d53361fbfcb powerpc: Move cpu_has_feature() to a separate file
:::::: TO: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
:::::: CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31557 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-31 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 5:28 [PATCH v4 0/8] Support new pmem flush and sync instructions for POWER Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] powerpc/pmem: Restrict papr_scm to P8 and above Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] powerpc/pmem: Add new instructions for persistent storage and sync Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] powerpc/pmem: Add flush routines using new pmem store and sync instruction Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] libnvdimm/nvdimm/flush: Allow architecture to override the flush barrier Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] powerpc/pmem/of_pmem: Update of_pmem to use the new barrier instruction Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-31 14:46 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2020-05-31 14:46 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-31 14:46 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-29 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] powerpc/pmem: Avoid the barrier in flush routines Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] powerpc/book3s/pmem: Add WARN_ONCE to catch the wrong usage of pmem flush functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] powerpc/pmem: Initialize pmem device on newer hardware Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-05-29 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202005312249.xCyVwSwD%lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.