All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] pwm: img: call pm_runtime_put in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case
@ 2020-06-01  7:11 Navid Emamdoost
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Navid Emamdoost @ 2020-06-01  7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, Uwe Kleine-König, linux-pwm, linux-kernel
  Cc: emamd001, wu000273, kjlu, smccaman, Navid Emamdoost

Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
value call appropriate put.

Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
index c9e57bd109fb..599a0f66a384 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
@@ -129,8 +129,10 @@ static int img_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(timebase * duty_ns, period_ns);
 
 	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
-	if (ret < 0)
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(chip->dev);
 		return ret;
+	}
 
 	val = img_pwm_readl(pwm_chip, PWM_CTRL_CFG);
 	val &= ~(PWM_CTRL_CFG_DIV_MASK << PWM_CTRL_CFG_DIV_SHIFT(pwm->hwpwm));
@@ -331,8 +333,10 @@ static int img_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret < 0)
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
 		return ret;
+	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < pwm_chip->chip.npwm; i++) {
 		val = img_pwm_readl(pwm_chip, PWM_CTRL_CFG);
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pwm: img: call pm_runtime_put in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case
@ 2020-06-01  8:37 ` Markus Elfring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2020-06-01  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Navid Emamdoost, Thierry Reding, Uwe Kleine-König, linux-pwm
  Cc: Navid Emamdoost, Kangjie Lu, Qiushi Wu, Stephen McCamant,
	Dinghao Liu, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

> Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
> is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
> value call appropriate put.

* I suggest to adjust the word “usage_count” in this change description.

* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?

Regards,
Markus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pwm: img: call pm_runtime_put in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case
@ 2020-06-01  8:37 ` Markus Elfring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2020-06-01  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Navid Emamdoost, Thierry Reding, Uwe Kleine-König, linux-pwm
  Cc: Navid Emamdoost, Kangjie Lu, Qiushi Wu, Stephen McCamant,
	Dinghao Liu, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

> Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
> is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
> value call appropriate put.

* I suggest to adjust the word “usage_count” in this change description.

* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?

Regards,
Markus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-01  8:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-01  7:11 [PATCH] pwm: img: call pm_runtime_put in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case Navid Emamdoost
2020-06-01  8:37 Markus Elfring
2020-06-01  8:37 ` Markus Elfring

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.