* [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag()
@ 2020-06-02 6:17 Dongli Zhang
2020-06-02 6:46 ` Ming Lei
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dongli Zhang @ 2020-06-02 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block; +Cc: axboe, hare, dwagner, ming.lei, linux-kernel
When scheduler is set, we hit below page fault when we offline cpu.
[ 1061.007725] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000040
[ 1061.008710] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 1061.009492] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 1061.010241] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 1061.010614] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[ 1061.011130] CPU: 0 PID: 122 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7+ #2'
... ...
[ 1061.013760] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
[ 1061.014446] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_put_tag+0xf/0x30
... ...
[ 1061.017726] RSP: 0018:ffffa5c18037fc70 EFLAGS: 00010287
[ 1061.018475] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa5c18037fcf0 RCX: 0000000000000004
[ 1061.019507] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff911535dc1180
... ...
[ 1061.028454] Call Trace:
[ 1061.029307] blk_mq_get_tag+0x26e/0x280
[ 1061.029866] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
[ 1061.030378] blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x99/0x110
[ 1061.031009] blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x107/0x5e0
[ 1061.031672] ? elv_rb_del+0x1a/0x30
[ 1061.032178] blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0xe2/0x130
[ 1061.032844] __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xcc/0x150
[ 1061.033638] blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2b/0x50
[ 1061.034239] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x75/0x110
[ 1061.034867] process_one_work+0x15c/0x370
[ 1061.035450] worker_thread+0x44/0x3d0
[ 1061.035980] kthread+0xf3/0x130
[ 1061.036440] ? max_active_store+0x80/0x80
[ 1061.037018] ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
[ 1061.037554] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[ 1061.038073] Modules linked in:
[ 1061.038543] CR2: 0000000000000040
[ 1061.038962] ---[ end trace d20e1df7d028e69f ]---
This is because blk_mq_get_driver_tag() would be used to allocate tag once
scheduler (e.g., mq-deadline) is set. However, in order to handle
BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag(), we need to set data->ctx for
blk_mq_put_tag().
Fixes: bf0beec0607db3c6 ("blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline")
Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
---
This is based on for-next because currently the pull request for v5.8 is
not picked by mainline.
block/blk-mq.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9a36ac1c1fa1..8bf6c06a86c1 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1056,6 +1056,7 @@ bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq)
{
struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
.q = rq->q,
+ .ctx = rq->mq_ctx,
.hctx = rq->mq_hctx,
.flags = BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT,
.cmd_flags = rq->cmd_flags,
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag()
2020-06-02 6:17 [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag() Dongli Zhang
@ 2020-06-02 6:46 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-02 7:51 ` Daniel Wagner
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2020-06-02 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dongli Zhang; +Cc: linux-block, axboe, hare, dwagner, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 11:17:49PM -0700, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> When scheduler is set, we hit below page fault when we offline cpu.
>
> [ 1061.007725] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000040
> [ 1061.008710] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 1061.009492] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 1061.010241] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [ 1061.010614] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [ 1061.011130] CPU: 0 PID: 122 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7+ #2'
> ... ...
> [ 1061.013760] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
> [ 1061.014446] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_put_tag+0xf/0x30
> ... ...
> [ 1061.017726] RSP: 0018:ffffa5c18037fc70 EFLAGS: 00010287
> [ 1061.018475] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa5c18037fcf0 RCX: 0000000000000004
> [ 1061.019507] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff911535dc1180
> ... ...
> [ 1061.028454] Call Trace:
> [ 1061.029307] blk_mq_get_tag+0x26e/0x280
> [ 1061.029866] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
> [ 1061.030378] blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x99/0x110
> [ 1061.031009] blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x107/0x5e0
> [ 1061.031672] ? elv_rb_del+0x1a/0x30
> [ 1061.032178] blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0xe2/0x130
> [ 1061.032844] __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xcc/0x150
> [ 1061.033638] blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2b/0x50
> [ 1061.034239] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x75/0x110
> [ 1061.034867] process_one_work+0x15c/0x370
> [ 1061.035450] worker_thread+0x44/0x3d0
> [ 1061.035980] kthread+0xf3/0x130
> [ 1061.036440] ? max_active_store+0x80/0x80
> [ 1061.037018] ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
> [ 1061.037554] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> [ 1061.038073] Modules linked in:
> [ 1061.038543] CR2: 0000000000000040
> [ 1061.038962] ---[ end trace d20e1df7d028e69f ]---
>
> This is because blk_mq_get_driver_tag() would be used to allocate tag once
> scheduler (e.g., mq-deadline) is set. However, in order to handle
> BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag(), we need to set data->ctx for
> blk_mq_put_tag().
>
> Fixes: bf0beec0607db3c6 ("blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline")
> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is based on for-next because currently the pull request for v5.8 is
> not picked by mainline.
>
> block/blk-mq.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 9a36ac1c1fa1..8bf6c06a86c1 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1056,6 +1056,7 @@ bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq)
> {
> struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
> .q = rq->q,
> + .ctx = rq->mq_ctx,
> .hctx = rq->mq_hctx,
> .flags = BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT,
> .cmd_flags = rq->cmd_flags,
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
--
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag()
2020-06-02 6:17 [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag() Dongli Zhang
2020-06-02 6:46 ` Ming Lei
@ 2020-06-02 7:51 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-06-02 8:01 ` Bob Liu
2020-06-03 11:59 ` John Garry
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Wagner @ 2020-06-02 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dongli Zhang; +Cc: linux-block, axboe, hare, ming.lei, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 11:17:49PM -0700, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> When scheduler is set, we hit below page fault when we offline cpu.
>
> [ 1061.007725] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000040
> [ 1061.008710] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 1061.009492] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 1061.010241] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [ 1061.010614] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [ 1061.011130] CPU: 0 PID: 122 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7+ #2'
> ... ...
> [ 1061.013760] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
> [ 1061.014446] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_put_tag+0xf/0x30
> ... ...
> [ 1061.017726] RSP: 0018:ffffa5c18037fc70 EFLAGS: 00010287
> [ 1061.018475] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa5c18037fcf0 RCX: 0000000000000004
> [ 1061.019507] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff911535dc1180
> ... ...
> [ 1061.028454] Call Trace:
> [ 1061.029307] blk_mq_get_tag+0x26e/0x280
> [ 1061.029866] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
> [ 1061.030378] blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x99/0x110
> [ 1061.031009] blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x107/0x5e0
> [ 1061.031672] ? elv_rb_del+0x1a/0x30
> [ 1061.032178] blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0xe2/0x130
> [ 1061.032844] __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xcc/0x150
> [ 1061.033638] blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2b/0x50
> [ 1061.034239] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x75/0x110
> [ 1061.034867] process_one_work+0x15c/0x370
> [ 1061.035450] worker_thread+0x44/0x3d0
> [ 1061.035980] kthread+0xf3/0x130
> [ 1061.036440] ? max_active_store+0x80/0x80
> [ 1061.037018] ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
> [ 1061.037554] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> [ 1061.038073] Modules linked in:
> [ 1061.038543] CR2: 0000000000000040
> [ 1061.038962] ---[ end trace d20e1df7d028e69f ]---
>
> This is because blk_mq_get_driver_tag() would be used to allocate tag once
> scheduler (e.g., mq-deadline) is set. However, in order to handle
> BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag(), we need to set data->ctx for
> blk_mq_put_tag().
>
> Fixes: bf0beec0607db3c6 ("blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline")
> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag()
2020-06-02 6:17 [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag() Dongli Zhang
2020-06-02 6:46 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-02 7:51 ` Daniel Wagner
@ 2020-06-02 8:01 ` Bob Liu
2020-06-03 11:59 ` John Garry
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bob Liu @ 2020-06-02 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dongli Zhang, linux-block; +Cc: axboe, hare, dwagner, ming.lei, linux-kernel
On 6/2/20 2:17 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> When scheduler is set, we hit below page fault when we offline cpu.
>
> [ 1061.007725] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000040
> [ 1061.008710] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 1061.009492] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 1061.010241] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [ 1061.010614] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [ 1061.011130] CPU: 0 PID: 122 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7+ #2'
> ... ...
> [ 1061.013760] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
> [ 1061.014446] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_put_tag+0xf/0x30
> ... ...
> [ 1061.017726] RSP: 0018:ffffa5c18037fc70 EFLAGS: 00010287
> [ 1061.018475] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa5c18037fcf0 RCX: 0000000000000004
> [ 1061.019507] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff911535dc1180
> ... ...
> [ 1061.028454] Call Trace:
> [ 1061.029307] blk_mq_get_tag+0x26e/0x280
> [ 1061.029866] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
> [ 1061.030378] blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x99/0x110
> [ 1061.031009] blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x107/0x5e0
> [ 1061.031672] ? elv_rb_del+0x1a/0x30
> [ 1061.032178] blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0xe2/0x130
> [ 1061.032844] __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xcc/0x150
> [ 1061.033638] blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2b/0x50
> [ 1061.034239] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x75/0x110
> [ 1061.034867] process_one_work+0x15c/0x370
> [ 1061.035450] worker_thread+0x44/0x3d0
> [ 1061.035980] kthread+0xf3/0x130
> [ 1061.036440] ? max_active_store+0x80/0x80
> [ 1061.037018] ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
> [ 1061.037554] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> [ 1061.038073] Modules linked in:
> [ 1061.038543] CR2: 0000000000000040
> [ 1061.038962] ---[ end trace d20e1df7d028e69f ]---
>
> This is because blk_mq_get_driver_tag() would be used to allocate tag once
> scheduler (e.g., mq-deadline) is set. However, in order to handle
> BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag(), we need to set data->ctx for
> blk_mq_put_tag().
>
> Fixes: bf0beec0607db3c6 ("blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline")
> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is based on for-next because currently the pull request for v5.8 is
> not picked by mainline.
>
> block/blk-mq.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 9a36ac1c1fa1..8bf6c06a86c1 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1056,6 +1056,7 @@ bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq)
> {
> struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
> .q = rq->q,
> + .ctx = rq->mq_ctx,
> .hctx = rq->mq_hctx,
> .flags = BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT,
> .cmd_flags = rq->cmd_flags,
>
Nice catch!
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag()
2020-06-02 6:17 [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag() Dongli Zhang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-02 8:01 ` Bob Liu
@ 2020-06-03 11:59 ` John Garry
2020-06-03 16:23 ` Dongli Zhang
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Garry @ 2020-06-03 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dongli Zhang, linux-block
Cc: axboe, hare, dwagner, ming.lei, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig
On 02/06/2020 07:17, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> When scheduler is set, we hit below page fault when we offline cpu.
>
> [ 1061.007725] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000040
> [ 1061.008710] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 1061.009492] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 1061.010241] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [ 1061.010614] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [ 1061.011130] CPU: 0 PID: 122 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7+ #2'
> ... ...
> [ 1061.013760] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
> [ 1061.014446] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_put_tag+0xf/0x30
> ... ...
> [ 1061.017726] RSP: 0018:ffffa5c18037fc70 EFLAGS: 00010287
> [ 1061.018475] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa5c18037fcf0 RCX: 0000000000000004
> [ 1061.019507] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff911535dc1180
> ... ...
> [ 1061.028454] Call Trace:
> [ 1061.029307] blk_mq_get_tag+0x26e/0x280
> [ 1061.029866] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
> [ 1061.030378] blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x99/0x110
> [ 1061.031009] blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x107/0x5e0
> [ 1061.031672] ? elv_rb_del+0x1a/0x30
> [ 1061.032178] blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0xe2/0x130
> [ 1061.032844] __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xcc/0x150
> [ 1061.033638] blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2b/0x50
> [ 1061.034239] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x75/0x110
> [ 1061.034867] process_one_work+0x15c/0x370
> [ 1061.035450] worker_thread+0x44/0x3d0
> [ 1061.035980] kthread+0xf3/0x130
> [ 1061.036440] ? max_active_store+0x80/0x80
> [ 1061.037018] ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
> [ 1061.037554] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> [ 1061.038073] Modules linked in:
> [ 1061.038543] CR2: 0000000000000040
> [ 1061.038962] ---[ end trace d20e1df7d028e69f ]---
>
> This is because blk_mq_get_driver_tag() would be used to allocate tag once
> scheduler (e.g., mq-deadline) is set.
I tried mq-deadline and I did not see this. Anyway else special or
specific about your test?
However, I see other issues for that (setting the scheduler), that being
scsi timeouts when I start running IO and hotplugging CPUs. I should
have tested the scheduler != none previously for "blk-mq: improvement
CPU hotplug (simplified version) " series ...
I'll check Ming's patch "[PATCH] blk-mq: don't fail driver tag
allocation because of inactive hctx" for that.
Thanks,
John
However, in order to handle
> BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag(), we need to set data->ctx for
> blk_mq_put_tag().
>
> Fixes: bf0beec0607db3c6 ("blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline")
> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is based on for-next because currently the pull request for v5.8 is
> not picked by mainline.
>
> block/blk-mq.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 9a36ac1c1fa1..8bf6c06a86c1 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1056,6 +1056,7 @@ bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq)
> {
> struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
> .q = rq->q,
> + .ctx = rq->mq_ctx,
> .hctx = rq->mq_hctx,
> .flags = BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT,
> .cmd_flags = rq->cmd_flags,
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag()
2020-06-03 11:59 ` John Garry
@ 2020-06-03 16:23 ` Dongli Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dongli Zhang @ 2020-06-03 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Garry, linux-block
Cc: axboe, hare, dwagner, ming.lei, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig
Hi John,
On 6/3/20 4:59 AM, John Garry wrote:
> On 02/06/2020 07:17, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>> When scheduler is set, we hit below page fault when we offline cpu.
>>
>> [ 1061.007725] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000040
>> [ 1061.008710] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>> [ 1061.009492] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>> [ 1061.010241] PGD 0 P4D 0
>> [ 1061.010614] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
>> [ 1061.011130] CPU: 0 PID: 122 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7+ #2'
>> ... ...
>> [ 1061.013760] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
>> [ 1061.014446] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_put_tag+0xf/0x30
>> ... ...
>> [ 1061.017726] RSP: 0018:ffffa5c18037fc70 EFLAGS: 00010287
>> [ 1061.018475] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa5c18037fcf0 RCX: 0000000000000004
>> [ 1061.019507] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff911535dc1180
>> ... ...
>> [ 1061.028454] Call Trace:
>> [ 1061.029307] blk_mq_get_tag+0x26e/0x280
>> [ 1061.029866] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
>> [ 1061.030378] blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x99/0x110
>> [ 1061.031009] blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x107/0x5e0
>> [ 1061.031672] ? elv_rb_del+0x1a/0x30
>> [ 1061.032178] blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0xe2/0x130
>> [ 1061.032844] __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xcc/0x150
>> [ 1061.033638] blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2b/0x50
>> [ 1061.034239] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x75/0x110
>> [ 1061.034867] process_one_work+0x15c/0x370
>> [ 1061.035450] worker_thread+0x44/0x3d0
>> [ 1061.035980] kthread+0xf3/0x130
>> [ 1061.036440] ? max_active_store+0x80/0x80
>> [ 1061.037018] ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
>> [ 1061.037554] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>> [ 1061.038073] Modules linked in:
>> [ 1061.038543] CR2: 0000000000000040
>> [ 1061.038962] ---[ end trace d20e1df7d028e69f ]---
>>
>> This is because blk_mq_get_driver_tag() would be used to allocate tag once
>> scheduler (e.g., mq-deadline) is set.
>
> I tried mq-deadline and I did not see this. Anyway else special or specific
> about your test?
>
I think you just hit the issue as mentioned in another thread.
To reproduce the issue reproduce to hit the condition that:
1. blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline() BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE with the barrier ...
... while ...
2. blk_mq_get_tag() gets the tag but BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE is already set.
Therefore, it would put the tag to release it.
Dongli Zhang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-03 16:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-02 6:17 [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag() Dongli Zhang
2020-06-02 6:46 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-02 7:51 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-06-02 8:01 ` Bob Liu
2020-06-03 11:59 ` John Garry
2020-06-03 16:23 ` Dongli Zhang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.