* invalid user 123456-fsgqa
@ 2020-06-04 13:37 Aurélien Aptel
2020-06-05 16:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-06-08 2:07 ` Zorro Lang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aurélien Aptel @ 2020-06-04 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fstests
Hi,
Some tests require a second user named 123456-fsgqa
(generic/{381,383,597,598}) but that username is invalid on some Linux
systems (SUSE distros at least) where a username cannot start with a
digit.
Would it be ok to send a patch to change that second user to "fsgqa2"?
Cheers,
--
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: invalid user 123456-fsgqa
2020-06-04 13:37 invalid user 123456-fsgqa Aurélien Aptel
@ 2020-06-05 16:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-06-08 2:07 ` Zorro Lang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2020-06-05 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aurélien Aptel; +Cc: fstests
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 03:37:18PM +0200, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some tests require a second user named 123456-fsgqa
> (generic/{381,383,597,598}) but that username is invalid on some Linux
> systems (SUSE distros at least) where a username cannot start with a
> digit.
>
> Would it be ok to send a patch to change that second user to "fsgqa2"?
Does it break generic/381 or generic/383? Those look like regression
tests for broken behavior when usernames start with digits.
This sounds more like something to _notrun the test from a _require*
check.
--D
> Cheers,
> --
> Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
> GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: invalid user 123456-fsgqa
2020-06-04 13:37 invalid user 123456-fsgqa Aurélien Aptel
2020-06-05 16:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2020-06-08 2:07 ` Zorro Lang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zorro Lang @ 2020-06-08 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aurélien Aptel; +Cc: fstests
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 03:37:18PM +0200, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some tests require a second user named 123456-fsgqa
> (generic/{381,383,597,598}) but that username is invalid on some Linux
> systems (SUSE distros at least) where a username cannot start with a
> digit.
>
> Would it be ok to send a patch to change that second user to "fsgqa2"?
No.
For g/381 and g/383, the 123456-fsgqa is necessary, they test xfs_quota with
user/group name beginning with digits, they're known bug coverage. If you system
can't create a user name likes 123456-fsgqa, just skip that. I think if your
system doesn't have 123456-fsgqa, the g/381 and g/383 will _notrun automatically,
right?
I don't learn about g/597,598(Eric might know that), if some other cases just
need another user name, you can have fsgqa2 or anyother names. But please update
README, if you change that.
Thanks,
Zorro
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
> GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-08 1:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-04 13:37 invalid user 123456-fsgqa Aurélien Aptel
2020-06-05 16:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-06-08 2:07 ` Zorro Lang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.