Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: qlge: fix else after return or break

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"supporter:QLOGIC QLGE 10Gb ETHERNET DRIVER" 
	<GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>,
	"open list:QLOGIC QLGE 10Gb ETHERNET DRIVER"
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: qlge: fix else after return or break
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:34:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626083436.GG2549@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200625215755.70329-3-coiby.xu@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 05:57:55AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> @@ -1404,11 +1403,10 @@ static void ql_dump_cam_entries(struct ql_adapter *qdev)
>  			pr_err("%s: Failed read of mac index register\n",
>  			       __func__);
>  			return;
                        ^^^^^^
> -		} else {
> -			if (value[0])
> -				pr_err("%s: MCAST index %d CAM Lookup Lower = 0x%.08x:%.08x\n",
> -				       qdev->ndev->name, i, value[1], value[0]);
>  		}
> +		if (value[0])
> +			pr_err("%s: MCAST index %d CAM Lookup Lower = 0x%.08x:%.08x\n",
> +			       qdev->ndev->name, i, value[1], value[0]);
>  	}
>  	ql_sem_unlock(qdev, SEM_MAC_ADDR_MASK);
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  }
> @@ -1427,11 +1425,10 @@ void ql_dump_routing_entries(struct ql_adapter *qdev)
>  			pr_err("%s: Failed read of routing index register\n",
>  			       __func__);
>  			return;
                        ^^^^^^

> -		} else {
> -			if (value)
> -				pr_err("%s: Routing Mask %d = 0x%.08x\n",
> -				       qdev->ndev->name, i, value);
>  		}
> +		if (value)
> +			pr_err("%s: Routing Mask %d = 0x%.08x\n",
> +			       qdev->ndev->name, i, value);
>  	}
>  	ql_sem_unlock(qdev, SEM_RT_IDX_MASK);
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  }

This is not caused by your patch, but in these two functions we return
without dropping the lock.  There may be other places as well, but these
are the two I can see without leaving my email client.

Do you think you could fix that before we forget?  Just change the
return to a break to fix the bug.

regards,
dan carpenter