All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at,
	anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com,
	yzaikin@google.com, davidgow@google.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
	frowand.list@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	monstr@monstr.eu, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	paulus@samba.org, chris@zankel.net, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	logang@deltatee.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] kunit: create a centralized executor to dispatch all KUnit tests
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:52:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006261442.5C245709@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626210917.358969-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:09:05PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> This patchset adds a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than
> relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately along
> with a couple of new features that depend on it.

So, the new section looks fine to me (modulo the INIT_DATA change). The
plumbing to start the tests, though, I think is redundant. Why not just
add a sysctl that starts all known tests?

That way you don't need the plumbing into init/main.c, and you can have
a mode where builtin tests can be started on a fully booted system too.

i.e. boot with "sysctl.kernel.kunit=start" or when fully booted with
"echo start > /proc/sys/kernel/kunit"

And instead of the kunit-specific halt/reboot stuff, how about moving
/proc/sysrq-trigger into /proc/sys instead? Then you (or anything) could
do:

sysctl.kernel.kunit=start sysctl.kernel.sysrq-trigger=b

-- 
Kees Cook

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, will@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com,
	anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	richard@nod.at, rppt@linux.ibm.com, yzaikin@google.com,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, arnd@arndb.de, jdike@addtoit.com,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	davidgow@google.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	chris@zankel.net, monstr@monstr.eu, sboyd@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mcgrof@kernel.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, logang@deltatee.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] kunit: create a centralized executor to dispatch all KUnit tests
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:52:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006261442.5C245709@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626210917.358969-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:09:05PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> This patchset adds a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than
> relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately along
> with a couple of new features that depend on it.

So, the new section looks fine to me (modulo the INIT_DATA change). The
plumbing to start the tests, though, I think is redundant. Why not just
add a sysctl that starts all known tests?

That way you don't need the plumbing into init/main.c, and you can have
a mode where builtin tests can be started on a fully booted system too.

i.e. boot with "sysctl.kernel.kunit=start" or when fully booted with
"echo start > /proc/sys/kernel/kunit"

And instead of the kunit-specific halt/reboot stuff, how about moving
/proc/sysrq-trigger into /proc/sys instead? Then you (or anything) could
do:

sysctl.kernel.kunit=start sysctl.kernel.sysrq-trigger=b

-- 
Kees Cook

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, will@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com,
	anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	richard@nod.at, rppt@linux.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	yzaikin@google.com, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	jdike@addtoit.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davidgow@google.com,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, chris@zankel.net, monstr@monstr.eu,
	sboyd@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org,
	alan.maguire@oracle.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, logang@deltatee.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] kunit: create a centralized executor to dispatch all KUnit tests
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:52:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006261442.5C245709@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626210917.358969-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:09:05PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> This patchset adds a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than
> relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately along
> with a couple of new features that depend on it.

So, the new section looks fine to me (modulo the INIT_DATA change). The
plumbing to start the tests, though, I think is redundant. Why not just
add a sysctl that starts all known tests?

That way you don't need the plumbing into init/main.c, and you can have
a mode where builtin tests can be started on a fully booted system too.

i.e. boot with "sysctl.kernel.kunit=start" or when fully booted with
"echo start > /proc/sys/kernel/kunit"

And instead of the kunit-specific halt/reboot stuff, how about moving
/proc/sysrq-trigger into /proc/sys instead? Then you (or anything) could
do:

sysctl.kernel.kunit=start sysctl.kernel.sysrq-trigger=b

-- 
Kees Cook

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-26 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 113+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-26 21:09 [PATCH v5 00/12] kunit: create a centralized executor to dispatch all KUnit tests Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] vmlinux.lds.h: add linker section for KUnit test suites Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:20   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:20     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:20     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:22     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:22       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:22       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:22       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:22       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-07-08  4:31       ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-08  4:31         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-08  4:31         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-08  4:31         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-08  4:31         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-08  4:31         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-08-04 20:03         ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:03           ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:03           ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:03           ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:03           ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:03           ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] arch: arm64: " Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:20   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:20     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:20     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:23     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:23       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:23       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:23       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:23       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] arch: microblaze: " Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] arch: powerpc: " Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] arch: um: " Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] arch: xtensa: " Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:30   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:30     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:30     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:29   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:29     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:29     ` Kees Cook
2020-08-04 20:06     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:06       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:06       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:06       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:06       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:06       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] init: main: add KUnit to kernel init Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:33   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:33     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:33     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-08  4:38   ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-08  4:38     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-08  4:38     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-08  4:38     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP format Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:35   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:35     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:35     ` Kees Cook
2020-08-04 20:10     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:10       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:10       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:10       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:10       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:10       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] kunit: Add 'kunit_shutdown' option Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:40   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:40     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:40     ` Kees Cook
2020-08-04 20:18     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:18       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:18       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:18       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:18       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:18       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] Documentation: Add kunit_shutdown to kernel-parameters.txt Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] Documentation: kunit: add a brief blurb about kunit_test_suite Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:09   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-06-26 21:52 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-26 21:52   ` [PATCH v5 00/12] kunit: create a centralized executor to dispatch all KUnit tests Kees Cook
2020-06-26 21:52   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-04 20:01   ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:01     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:01     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:01     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:01     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-08-04 20:01     ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202006261442.5C245709@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yzaikin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.