From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, Jones Desougi <jones.desougi+netfilter@gmail.com>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: use the proper gfp flags in the audit_log_nfcfg() calls Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:25:57 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200703202557.tm6o33uignjpmepa@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw) In-Reply-To: <159378341669.5956.13490174029711421419.stgit@sifl> On 2020-07-03 09:36, Paul Moore wrote: > Commit 142240398e50 ("audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg") > incorrectly passed gfp flags to audit_log_nfcfg() which were not > consistent with the calling function, this commit fixes that. > > Fixes: 142240398e50 ("audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg") > Reported-by: Jones Desougi <jones.desougi+netfilter@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Looks good to me. For what it's worth: Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> > --- > net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c > index f7ff91479647..886e64291f41 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c > @@ -5953,7 +5953,7 @@ static int nf_tables_dump_obj(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb) > goto cont; > > if (reset) { > - char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, > + char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_ATOMIC, > "%s:%llu;?:0", > table->name, > table->handle); > @@ -5962,7 +5962,7 @@ static int nf_tables_dump_obj(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb) > family, > obj->handle, > AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET, > - GFP_KERNEL); > + GFP_ATOMIC); > kfree(buf); > } > > @@ -6084,7 +6084,7 @@ static int nf_tables_getobj(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, > family, > obj->handle, > AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET, > - GFP_KERNEL); > + GFP_ATOMIC); > kfree(buf); > } > > @@ -6172,7 +6172,7 @@ void nft_obj_notify(struct net *net, const struct nft_table *table, > event == NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ ? > AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_REGISTER : > AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_UNREGISTER, > - GFP_KERNEL); > + gfp); > kfree(buf); > > if (!report && > - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada IRC: rgb, SunRaycer Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jones Desougi <jones.desougi+netfilter@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: use the proper gfp flags in the audit_log_nfcfg() calls Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:25:57 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200703202557.tm6o33uignjpmepa@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw) In-Reply-To: <159378341669.5956.13490174029711421419.stgit@sifl> On 2020-07-03 09:36, Paul Moore wrote: > Commit 142240398e50 ("audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg") > incorrectly passed gfp flags to audit_log_nfcfg() which were not > consistent with the calling function, this commit fixes that. > > Fixes: 142240398e50 ("audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg") > Reported-by: Jones Desougi <jones.desougi+netfilter@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Looks good to me. For what it's worth: Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> > --- > net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c > index f7ff91479647..886e64291f41 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c > @@ -5953,7 +5953,7 @@ static int nf_tables_dump_obj(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb) > goto cont; > > if (reset) { > - char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, > + char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_ATOMIC, > "%s:%llu;?:0", > table->name, > table->handle); > @@ -5962,7 +5962,7 @@ static int nf_tables_dump_obj(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb) > family, > obj->handle, > AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET, > - GFP_KERNEL); > + GFP_ATOMIC); > kfree(buf); > } > > @@ -6084,7 +6084,7 @@ static int nf_tables_getobj(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, > family, > obj->handle, > AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET, > - GFP_KERNEL); > + GFP_ATOMIC); > kfree(buf); > } > > @@ -6172,7 +6172,7 @@ void nft_obj_notify(struct net *net, const struct nft_table *table, > event == NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ ? > AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_REGISTER : > AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_UNREGISTER, > - GFP_KERNEL); > + gfp); > kfree(buf); > > if (!report && > - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada IRC: rgb, SunRaycer Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635 -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 20:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-07-03 13:36 [PATCH] audit: use the proper gfp flags in the audit_log_nfcfg() calls Paul Moore 2020-07-03 13:36 ` Paul Moore 2020-07-03 20:25 ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message] 2020-07-03 20:25 ` Richard Guy Briggs 2020-07-08 22:27 ` Paul Moore 2020-07-08 22:27 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200703202557.tm6o33uignjpmepa@madcap2.tricolour.ca \ --to=rgb@redhat.com \ --cc=jones.desougi+netfilter@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \ --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.