From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Marek Majkowski <marek@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/16] bpf: Introduce SK_LOOKUP program type with a dedicated attach point
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 17:20:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202007051619.xLeMh4zD%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702092416.11961-3-jakub@cloudflare.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12222 bytes --]
Hi Jakub,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on next-20200702]
[cannot apply to bpf-next/master bpf/master net/master vhost/linux-next ipvs/master net-next/master linus/master v5.8-rc3 v5.8-rc2 v5.8-rc1 v5.8-rc3]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jakub-Sitnicki/Run-a-BPF-program-on-socket-lookup/20200702-173127
base: d37d57041350dff35dd17cbdf9aef4011acada38
config: x86_64-randconfig-s021-20200705 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-14) 9.3.0
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.2-3-gfa153962-dirty
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=x86_64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
net/core/filter.c:402:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:405:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:408:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:411:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:414:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:488:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:491:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:494:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:1382:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
net/core/filter.c:1382:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
net/core/filter.c:1382:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
net/core/filter.c:1460:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
net/core/filter.c:1460:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
net/core/filter.c:1460:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
net/core/filter.c:7044:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:7047:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:7050:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:8770:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8777:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8781:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8789:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8793:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xdp_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8804:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8810:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8814:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8820:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8824:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8830:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8834:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8841:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8845:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8851:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8855:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8861:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8864:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8870:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8873:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8879:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8882:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8889:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8892:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8899:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8902:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8908:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:9214:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:9220:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/core/filter.c:9399:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/core/filter.c:9402:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:217:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be16
net/core/filter.c:217:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be16
net/core/filter.c:217:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be16
net/core/filter.c:217:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be16
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:1884:43: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1884:43: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
net/core/filter.c:1884:43: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1887:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1887:36: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old
net/core/filter.c:1887:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1887:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1887:42: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new
net/core/filter.c:1887:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1890:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1890:36: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1890:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1890:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1890:42: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1890:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1935:59: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1935:59: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
net/core/filter.c:1935:59: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1938:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1938:52: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1938:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1938:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1938:58: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1938:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1941:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1941:52: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1941:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1941:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1941:58: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1941:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1987:28: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum @@
net/core/filter.c:1987:28: sparse: expected unsigned long long
net/core/filter.c:1987:28: sparse: got restricted __wsum
net/core/filter.c:2009:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum @@
net/core/filter.c:2009:35: sparse: expected unsigned long long
net/core/filter.c:2009:35: sparse: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum
net/core/filter.c:4730:17: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] spi @@ got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi @@
net/core/filter.c:4730:17: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] spi
net/core/filter.c:4730:17: sparse: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi
net/core/filter.c:4738:33: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4 @@ got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4 @@
net/core/filter.c:4738:33: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4
net/core/filter.c:4738:33: sparse: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 33143 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/16] bpf: Introduce SK_LOOKUP program type with a dedicated attach point
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 17:20:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202007051619.xLeMh4zD%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702092416.11961-3-jakub@cloudflare.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12356 bytes --]
Hi Jakub,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on next-20200702]
[cannot apply to bpf-next/master bpf/master net/master vhost/linux-next ipvs/master net-next/master linus/master v5.8-rc3 v5.8-rc2 v5.8-rc1 v5.8-rc3]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jakub-Sitnicki/Run-a-BPF-program-on-socket-lookup/20200702-173127
base: d37d57041350dff35dd17cbdf9aef4011acada38
config: x86_64-randconfig-s021-20200705 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-14) 9.3.0
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.2-3-gfa153962-dirty
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=x86_64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
net/core/filter.c:402:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:405:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:408:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:411:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:414:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:488:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:491:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:494:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:1382:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
net/core/filter.c:1382:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
net/core/filter.c:1382:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
net/core/filter.c:1460:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
net/core/filter.c:1460:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
net/core/filter.c:1460:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
net/core/filter.c:7044:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:7047:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:7050:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:8770:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8777:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8781:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8789:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8793:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xdp_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8804:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8810:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8814:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8820:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8824:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8830:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8834:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8841:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8845:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8851:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8855:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8861:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8864:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8870:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8873:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8879:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8882:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8889:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8892:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8899:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8902:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8908:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:9214:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:9220:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/core/filter.c:9399:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/core/filter.c:9402:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:217:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be16
net/core/filter.c:217:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be16
net/core/filter.c:217:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be16
net/core/filter.c:217:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be16
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:244:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:1884:43: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1884:43: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
net/core/filter.c:1884:43: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1887:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1887:36: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old
net/core/filter.c:1887:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1887:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1887:42: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new
net/core/filter.c:1887:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1890:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1890:36: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1890:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1890:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1890:42: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1890:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1935:59: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1935:59: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
net/core/filter.c:1935:59: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1938:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1938:52: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1938:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1938:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1938:58: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1938:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1941:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1941:52: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1941:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1941:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1941:58: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1941:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1987:28: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum @@
net/core/filter.c:1987:28: sparse: expected unsigned long long
net/core/filter.c:1987:28: sparse: got restricted __wsum
net/core/filter.c:2009:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum @@
net/core/filter.c:2009:35: sparse: expected unsigned long long
net/core/filter.c:2009:35: sparse: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum
net/core/filter.c:4730:17: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] spi @@ got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi @@
net/core/filter.c:4730:17: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] spi
net/core/filter.c:4730:17: sparse: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi
net/core/filter.c:4738:33: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4 @@ got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4 @@
net/core/filter.c:4738:33: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4
net/core/filter.c:4738:33: sparse: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 33143 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-05 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-02 9:24 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/16] Run a BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/16] bpf, netns: Handle multiple link attachments Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 3:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-09 12:49 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 22:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-10 19:23 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/16] bpf: Introduce SK_LOOKUP program type with a dedicated attach point Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-04 18:42 ` Yonghong Song
2020-07-06 11:44 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-05 9:20 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2020-07-05 9:20 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-05 9:20 ` [RFC PATCH] bpf: sk_lookup_prog_ops can be static kernel test robot
2020-07-05 9:20 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-07 9:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/16] bpf: Introduce SK_LOOKUP program type with a dedicated attach point Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 4:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-09 13:25 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 23:09 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-10 8:55 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/16] inet: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/16] inet: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 10:27 ` Lorenz Bauer
2020-07-02 12:46 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 13:19 ` Lorenz Bauer
2020-07-06 11:24 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-06 12:06 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/16] inet6: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/16] inet6: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/16] udp: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/16] udp: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/16] udp6: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/16] udp6: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 14:51 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-02 14:51 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-03 13:04 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/16] bpf: Sync linux/bpf.h to tools/ Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/16] libbpf: Add support for SK_LOOKUP program type Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 4:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-09 15:51 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 23:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-10 8:37 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-10 18:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-10 19:24 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/16] tools/bpftool: Add name mappings for SK_LOOKUP prog and attach type Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/16] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for bpf_sk_lookup context access Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/16] selftests/bpf: Rename test_sk_lookup_kern.c to test_ref_track_kern.c Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/16] selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 11:01 ` Lorenz Bauer
2020-07-02 12:59 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 4:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-09 15:54 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 11:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/16] Run a BPF program on socket lookup Lorenz Bauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202007051619.xLeMh4zD%lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.