All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CLANG_LTO=y
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 17:08:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200706160820.GC10992@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630173734.14057-19-will@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:37:34PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> When building with LTO, there is an increased risk of the compiler
> converting an address dependency headed by a READ_ONCE() invocation
> into a control dependency and consequently allowing for harmful
> reordering by the CPU.
> 
> Ensure that such transformations are harmless by overriding the generic
> READ_ONCE() definition with one that provides acquire semantics when
> building with LTO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h   | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile   |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..515e360b01a1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_RWONCE_H
> +#define __ASM_RWONCE_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CLANG_LTO
> +
> +#include <linux/compiler_types.h>
> +#include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
> +
> +#ifndef BUILD_VDSO
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AS_HAS_LDAPR
> +#define __LOAD_RCPC(sfx, regs...)					\
> +	ALTERNATIVE(							\
> +		"ldar"	#sfx "\t" #regs,				\

^ Should this be here?  It seems that READ_ONCE() will actually read
twice... even if that doesn't actually conflict with the required
semantics of READ_ONCE(), it looks odd.

Making a direct link between LTO and the memory model also seems highly
spurious (as discussed in the other subthread) so can we have a comment
explaining the reasoning?

> +		".arch_extension rcpc\n"				\
> +		"ldapr"	#sfx "\t" #regs,				\
> +	ARM64_HAS_LDAPR)
> +#else
> +#define __LOAD_RCPC(sfx, regs...)	"ldar" #sfx "\t" #regs
> +#endif /* CONFIG_AS_HAS_LDAPR */

[...]

Cheers
---Dave

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Nick
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CLANG_LTO=y
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 17:08:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200706160820.GC10992@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630173734.14057-19-will@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:37:34PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> When building with LTO, there is an increased risk of the compiler
> converting an address dependency headed by a READ_ONCE() invocation
> into a control dependency and consequently allowing for harmful
> reordering by the CPU.
> 
> Ensure that such transformations are harmless by overriding the generic
> READ_ONCE() definition with one that provides acquire semantics when
> building with LTO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h   | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile   |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..515e360b01a1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_RWONCE_H
> +#define __ASM_RWONCE_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CLANG_LTO
> +
> +#include <linux/compiler_types.h>
> +#include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
> +
> +#ifndef BUILD_VDSO
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AS_HAS_LDAPR
> +#define __LOAD_RCPC(sfx, regs...)					\
> +	ALTERNATIVE(							\
> +		"ldar"	#sfx "\t" #regs,				\

^ Should this be here?  It seems that READ_ONCE() will actually read
twice... even if that doesn't actually conflict with the required
semantics of READ_ONCE(), it looks odd.

Making a direct link between LTO and the memory model also seems highly
spurious (as discussed in the other subthread) so can we have a comment
explaining the reasoning?

> +		".arch_extension rcpc\n"				\
> +		"ldapr"	#sfx "\t" #regs,				\
> +	ARM64_HAS_LDAPR)
> +#else
> +#define __LOAD_RCPC(sfx, regs...)	"ldar" #sfx "\t" #regs
> +#endif /* CONFIG_AS_HAS_LDAPR */

[...]

Cheers
---Dave

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CLANG_LTO=y
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 17:08:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200706160820.GC10992@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630173734.14057-19-will@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:37:34PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> When building with LTO, there is an increased risk of the compiler
> converting an address dependency headed by a READ_ONCE() invocation
> into a control dependency and consequently allowing for harmful
> reordering by the CPU.
> 
> Ensure that such transformations are harmless by overriding the generic
> READ_ONCE() definition with one that provides acquire semantics when
> building with LTO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h   | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile   |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..515e360b01a1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_RWONCE_H
> +#define __ASM_RWONCE_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CLANG_LTO
> +
> +#include <linux/compiler_types.h>
> +#include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
> +
> +#ifndef BUILD_VDSO
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AS_HAS_LDAPR
> +#define __LOAD_RCPC(sfx, regs...)					\
> +	ALTERNATIVE(							\
> +		"ldar"	#sfx "\t" #regs,				\

^ Should this be here?  It seems that READ_ONCE() will actually read
twice... even if that doesn't actually conflict with the required
semantics of READ_ONCE(), it looks odd.

Making a direct link between LTO and the memory model also seems highly
spurious (as discussed in the other subthread) so can we have a comment
explaining the reasoning?

> +		".arch_extension rcpc\n"				\
> +		"ldapr"	#sfx "\t" #regs,				\
> +	ARM64_HAS_LDAPR)
> +#else
> +#define __LOAD_RCPC(sfx, regs...)	"ldar" #sfx "\t" #regs
> +#endif /* CONFIG_AS_HAS_LDAPR */

[...]

Cheers
---Dave

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-06 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 200+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-30 17:37 [PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 01/18] tools: bpf: Use local copy of headers including uapi/linux/filter.h Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 16:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-07-01 16:38     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-07-01 16:38     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-07-01 16:38     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE definitions out into rwonce.h Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE " Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE " Will Deacon
2020-06-30 19:11   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:11     ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE " Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:11     ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE " Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:16     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:16       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:16       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 11:33       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 11:33         ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE " Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 11:33         ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE " Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 03/18] asm/rwonce: Allow __READ_ONCE to be overridden by the architecture Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 04/18] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  9:32   ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-02  9:32     ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-02  9:32     ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-02  9:32     ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-02  9:48     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  9:48       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  9:48       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  9:48       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 10:08       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 10:08         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 10:08         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 11:18         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 11:18           ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 11:18           ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 11:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 11:39             ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 11:39             ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 14:43   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 14:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 14:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 14:55     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 14:55       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 14:55       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 15:07       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 15:07         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 15:07         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 05/18] asm/rwonce: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() invocation Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 06/18] vhost: Remove redundant use of read_barrier_depends() barrier Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 07/18] alpha: Replace smp_read_barrier_depends() usage with smp_[r]mb() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 08/18] locking/barriers: Remove definitions for [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 09/18] Documentation/barriers: Remove references to [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 10/18] Documentation/barriers/kokr: " Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 11/18] tools/memory-model: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from informal doc Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 12/18] include/linux: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comments Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 13/18] checkpatch: Remove checks relating to [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 14/18] arm64: Reduce the number of header files pulled into vmlinux.lds.S Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 15/18] arm64: alternatives: Split up alternative.h Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 16/18] arm64: cpufeatures: Add capability for LDAPR instruction Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 17/18] arm64: alternatives: Remove READ_ONCE() usage during patch operation Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 18/18] arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CLANG_LTO=y Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 19:25   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:25     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:25     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:19     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:19       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:19       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:59       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:47   ` Marco Elver
2020-06-30 19:47     ` Marco Elver
2020-06-30 19:47     ` Marco Elver
2020-06-30 20:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 20:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 20:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 22:57     ` Sami Tolvanen
2020-06-30 22:57       ` Sami Tolvanen
2020-06-30 22:57       ` Sami Tolvanen
2020-07-01 10:25       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:25         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:25         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:24     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:24       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:24       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 17:07   ` Dave P Martin
2020-07-01 17:07     ` Dave P Martin
2020-07-01 17:07     ` Dave P Martin
2020-07-02  7:23     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  7:23       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  7:23       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 16:00       ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:00         ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:00         ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:34         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 16:34           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 16:34           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 17:05           ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 17:05             ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 17:05             ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 17:05             ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 17:36             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 17:36               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 17:36               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 17:36               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 10:29               ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:29                 ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:29                 ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:29                 ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 22:51                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 22:51                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 22:51                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 22:51                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 23:01                   ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-07 23:01                     ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-08  7:15                     ` Marco Elver
2020-07-08  7:15                       ` Marco Elver
2020-07-08  7:15                       ` Marco Elver
2020-07-08  9:16                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08  9:16                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08  9:16                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08 18:20                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-08 18:20                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-08 18:20                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 18:35         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 18:35           ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 18:35           ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 19:23           ` Marco Elver
2020-07-06 19:23             ` Marco Elver
2020-07-06 19:23             ` Marco Elver
2020-07-06 19:42             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 19:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 19:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 19:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 16:08   ` Dave Martin [this message]
2020-07-06 16:08     ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:08     ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 18:35     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 18:35       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 18:35       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-07 10:10       ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:10         ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:10         ` Dave Martin
2020-07-01  7:38 ` [PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE() Josh Triplett
2020-07-01  7:38   ` Josh Triplett
2020-07-01  7:38   ` Josh Triplett
2020-07-01  7:38   ` Josh Triplett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200706160820.GC10992@arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.