All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Mani, Rajmohan" <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
Cc: "Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@infradead.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"Ayman Bagabas" <ayman.bagabas@gmail.com>,
	"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	"Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@intel.com>,
	"Blaž Hrastnik" <blaz@mxxn.io>,
	"Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
	<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Heikki Krogerus" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pmalani@chromium.org" <pmalani@chromium.org>,
	"bleung@chromium.org" <bleung@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: Add Intel Input Output Manager (IOM) driver
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:18:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717061821.GA3237166@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB39632BD9A5A0DF4A9EAB351CF67C0@DM6PR11MB3963.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 06:03:55AM +0000, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Thanks for the reviews.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 12:10 AM
> > To: Mani, Rajmohan <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>; Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy@infradead.org>; Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>; Dmitry Torokhov
> > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>; Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>; Ayman
> > Bagabas <ayman.bagabas@gmail.com>; Masahiro Yamada
> > <masahiroy@kernel.org>; Joseph, Jithu <jithu.joseph@intel.com>; Blaž
> > Hrastnik <blaz@mxxn.io>; Srinivas Pandruvada
> > <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; Heikki Krogerus
> > <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org;
> > pmalani@chromium.org; bleung@chromium.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: Add Intel Input Output Manager (IOM)
> > driver
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 05:33:09PM -0700, Rajmohan Mani wrote:
> > > Input Output Manager (IOM) is part of the Tiger Lake SoC that
> > > configures the Type-C Sub System (TCSS). IOM is a micro controller
> > > that handles Type-C topology, configuration and PM functions of
> > > various Type-C devices connected on the platform.
> > >
> > > This driver helps read relevant information such as Type-C port status
> > > (whether a device is connected to a Type-C port or not) and the
> > > activity type on the Type-C ports (such as USB, Display Port,
> > > Thunderbolt), for consumption by other drivers.
> > >
> > > Currently intel_iom_port_status() API is exported by this driver, that
> > > has information about the Type-C port status and port activity type.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig                |  16 +++
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/Makefile               |   1 +
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c            | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/platform_data/x86/intel_iom.h |  62 +++++++++
> > 
> > Why do you need a .h file for a single .c file that no one else shares this data?
> > Just put it all in the .c file please.
> > 
> 
> The APIs exported by this driver, are used by the caller (Intel PMC USB mux
> control driver), hence the need for header file.
> 
> > >  4 files changed, 212 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c  create mode
> > > 100644 include/linux/platform_data/x86/intel_iom.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> > > b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig index 0581a54cf562..271feddb20ef 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> > > @@ -816,6 +816,22 @@ config INTEL_INT0002_VGPIO
> > >  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> > >  	  be called intel_int0002_vgpio.
> > >
> > > +config INTEL_IOM
> > > +	tristate "Intel Input Output Manager (IOM) driver"
> > > +	depends on ACPI && PCI
> > > +	help
> > > +	  This driver helps read relevant information such as Type-C port
> > > +	  status (whether a device is connected to a Type-C port or not)
> > > +	  and the activity type on the Type-C ports (such as USB, Display
> > > +	  Port, Thunderbolt), for consumption by other drivers.
> > > +
> > > +	  Currently intel_iom_port_status() API is exported by this driver,
> > > +	  that has information about the Type-C port status and port activity
> > > +	  type.
> > > +
> > > +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> > > +	  be called intel_iom.
> > > +
> > >  config INTEL_MENLOW
> > >  	tristate "Thermal Management driver for Intel menlow platform"
> > >  	depends on ACPI_THERMAL
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile
> > > b/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile index 2b85852a1a87..d71e4620a7c6
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile
> > > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ intel_cht_int33fe-objs			:=
> > intel_cht_int33fe_common.o \
> > >  					   intel_cht_int33fe_microb.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_HID_EVENT)		+= intel-hid.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_INT0002_VGPIO)	+= intel_int0002_vgpio.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_IOM)			+= intel_iom.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_MENLOW)		+= intel_menlow.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_OAKTRAIL)		+= intel_oaktrail.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_VBTN)		+= intel-vbtn.o
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c
> > > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..ece0fe720b2d
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/*
> > > + * Intel Core SoC Input Output Manager (IOM) driver.
> > > + *
> > > + * This driver provides access to the Input Output Manager (IOM)
> > > +(that
> > > + * is part of Tiger Lake SoC) registers that can be used to know
> > > +about
> > > + * Type-C Sub System related information (such as Type-C port status,
> > > + * activity type on Type-C ports).
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2020, Intel Corporation
> > > + * Author: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>  */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_data/x86/intel_iom.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define IOM_PORT_STATUS_OFFSET				0x560
> > > +
> > > +struct intel_iom {
> > > +	struct device *dev;
> > > +	void __iomem *regbar;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static struct intel_iom iom_dev;
> > 
> > Why just one?  Why is this static?
> > 
> 
> There is just one IOM device in the system.

For today, yes, no need to force yourself to have to change this in the
future.  Just use a normal per-instance variable instead please, if you
really need it.

> > > +
> > > +	/* Prevent this driver from being unloaded while in use */
> > > +	if (!try_module_get(dev->driver->owner)) {
> > 
> > Why are you poking around in a random device's driver's owner?
> > 
> > That's not ok.  And probably totally racy.
> > 
> > Handle module reference counts properly, not like this.
> > 
> 
> Ack. Will use THIS_MODULE here.

No, that is not the answer, and is always wrong to use :(

> > And why does it even matter that you incremented the module reference
> > count?  What is that "protecting" you from?
> > 
>  
> To prevent this driver from being unloaded, while it is being used.

Why does that matter?  Shouldn't normal reference counting and
dependancies be all that you need?

> > > +		put_device(iom_dev.dev);
> > > +		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return &iom_dev;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_iom_get);
> > 
> > Who calls this function?
> > 
> 
> Intel PMC USB mux control driver, in this case.
> The callers are expected to call intel_iom_get() before using the
> intel_iom_port_status(), after which intel_iom_put() can be called
> to release the IOM device instance.

Why not just have a single call if all this driver does is support one
thing.  The reference counting shouldn't be needed at all, right?

> > > +/**
> > > + * intel_iom_put() - Put IOM device instance
> > > + * @iom: IOM device instance
> > > + *
> > > + * This function releases the IOM device instance created using
> > > + * intel_iom_get() and allows the driver to be unloaded.
> > > + *
> > > + * Call intel_iom_put() to release the instance.
> > > + */
> > > +void intel_iom_put(struct intel_iom *iom) {
> > > +	if (!iom)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	module_put(iom->dev->driver->owner);
> > 
> > And if the device doesn't have a driver?  boom :(
> > 
> > Don't do this.
> > 
> 
> Ack. Will use THIS_MODULE here.

Again, no, that will be even more incorrect.

> > > +	put_device(iom->dev);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_iom_put);
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * intel_iom_port_status() - Get status bits for the Type-C port
> > > + * @iom: IOM device instance
> > > + * @port: Type-C port number
> > > + * @status: pointer to receive the status bits
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns 0 on success, error otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +int intel_iom_port_status(struct intel_iom *iom, u8 port, u32
> > > +*status) {
> > > +	void __iomem *reg;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!iom)
> > > +		return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!status || (port > IOM_MAX_PORTS - 1))
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	reg = iom->regbar + IOM_PORT_STATUS_OFFSET + IOM_REG_LEN *
> > port;
> > > +
> > > +	*status = ioread32(reg);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_iom_port_status);
> > 
> > So the whole driver is here just to read, directly from memory, a single
> > 32 bit value?
> 
> Yes.

Ok, then this whole driver could be about 90% smaller and more obvious.
Don't add the reference counting, the static variables and all the other
stuff just to get a 32bit number.

As it is, this feels like an excuse to get paid per lines of code :(

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Mani, Rajmohan" <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
Cc: "Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@infradead.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"Ayman Bagabas" <ayman.bagabas@gmail.com>,
	"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	"Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@intel.com>,
	"Blaž Hrastnik" <blaz@mxxn.io>,
	"Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
	<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Heikki Krogerus" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pmalani@chromium.org" <pmalani@chromium.org>,
	"bleung@chromium.org" <bleung@chromium.o>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: Add Intel Input Output Manager (IOM) driver
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:18:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717061821.GA3237166@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB39632BD9A5A0DF4A9EAB351CF67C0@DM6PR11MB3963.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 06:03:55AM +0000, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Thanks for the reviews.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 12:10 AM
> > To: Mani, Rajmohan <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>; Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy@infradead.org>; Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>; Dmitry Torokhov
> > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>; Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>; Ayman
> > Bagabas <ayman.bagabas@gmail.com>; Masahiro Yamada
> > <masahiroy@kernel.org>; Joseph, Jithu <jithu.joseph@intel.com>; Blaž
> > Hrastnik <blaz@mxxn.io>; Srinivas Pandruvada
> > <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; Heikki Krogerus
> > <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org;
> > pmalani@chromium.org; bleung@chromium.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: Add Intel Input Output Manager (IOM)
> > driver
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 05:33:09PM -0700, Rajmohan Mani wrote:
> > > Input Output Manager (IOM) is part of the Tiger Lake SoC that
> > > configures the Type-C Sub System (TCSS). IOM is a micro controller
> > > that handles Type-C topology, configuration and PM functions of
> > > various Type-C devices connected on the platform.
> > >
> > > This driver helps read relevant information such as Type-C port status
> > > (whether a device is connected to a Type-C port or not) and the
> > > activity type on the Type-C ports (such as USB, Display Port,
> > > Thunderbolt), for consumption by other drivers.
> > >
> > > Currently intel_iom_port_status() API is exported by this driver, that
> > > has information about the Type-C port status and port activity type.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig                |  16 +++
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/Makefile               |   1 +
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c            | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/platform_data/x86/intel_iom.h |  62 +++++++++
> > 
> > Why do you need a .h file for a single .c file that no one else shares this data?
> > Just put it all in the .c file please.
> > 
> 
> The APIs exported by this driver, are used by the caller (Intel PMC USB mux
> control driver), hence the need for header file.
> 
> > >  4 files changed, 212 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c  create mode
> > > 100644 include/linux/platform_data/x86/intel_iom.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> > > b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig index 0581a54cf562..271feddb20ef 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> > > @@ -816,6 +816,22 @@ config INTEL_INT0002_VGPIO
> > >  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> > >  	  be called intel_int0002_vgpio.
> > >
> > > +config INTEL_IOM
> > > +	tristate "Intel Input Output Manager (IOM) driver"
> > > +	depends on ACPI && PCI
> > > +	help
> > > +	  This driver helps read relevant information such as Type-C port
> > > +	  status (whether a device is connected to a Type-C port or not)
> > > +	  and the activity type on the Type-C ports (such as USB, Display
> > > +	  Port, Thunderbolt), for consumption by other drivers.
> > > +
> > > +	  Currently intel_iom_port_status() API is exported by this driver,
> > > +	  that has information about the Type-C port status and port activity
> > > +	  type.
> > > +
> > > +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> > > +	  be called intel_iom.
> > > +
> > >  config INTEL_MENLOW
> > >  	tristate "Thermal Management driver for Intel menlow platform"
> > >  	depends on ACPI_THERMAL
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile
> > > b/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile index 2b85852a1a87..d71e4620a7c6
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile
> > > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ intel_cht_int33fe-objs			:=
> > intel_cht_int33fe_common.o \
> > >  					   intel_cht_int33fe_microb.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_HID_EVENT)		+= intel-hid.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_INT0002_VGPIO)	+= intel_int0002_vgpio.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_IOM)			+= intel_iom.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_MENLOW)		+= intel_menlow.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_OAKTRAIL)		+= intel_oaktrail.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_VBTN)		+= intel-vbtn.o
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c
> > > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..ece0fe720b2d
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_iom.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/*
> > > + * Intel Core SoC Input Output Manager (IOM) driver.
> > > + *
> > > + * This driver provides access to the Input Output Manager (IOM)
> > > +(that
> > > + * is part of Tiger Lake SoC) registers that can be used to know
> > > +about
> > > + * Type-C Sub System related information (such as Type-C port status,
> > > + * activity type on Type-C ports).
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2020, Intel Corporation
> > > + * Author: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>  */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_data/x86/intel_iom.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define IOM_PORT_STATUS_OFFSET				0x560
> > > +
> > > +struct intel_iom {
> > > +	struct device *dev;
> > > +	void __iomem *regbar;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static struct intel_iom iom_dev;
> > 
> > Why just one?  Why is this static?
> > 
> 
> There is just one IOM device in the system.

For today, yes, no need to force yourself to have to change this in the
future.  Just use a normal per-instance variable instead please, if you
really need it.

> > > +
> > > +	/* Prevent this driver from being unloaded while in use */
> > > +	if (!try_module_get(dev->driver->owner)) {
> > 
> > Why are you poking around in a random device's driver's owner?
> > 
> > That's not ok.  And probably totally racy.
> > 
> > Handle module reference counts properly, not like this.
> > 
> 
> Ack. Will use THIS_MODULE here.

No, that is not the answer, and is always wrong to use :(

> > And why does it even matter that you incremented the module reference
> > count?  What is that "protecting" you from?
> > 
>  
> To prevent this driver from being unloaded, while it is being used.

Why does that matter?  Shouldn't normal reference counting and
dependancies be all that you need?

> > > +		put_device(iom_dev.dev);
> > > +		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return &iom_dev;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_iom_get);
> > 
> > Who calls this function?
> > 
> 
> Intel PMC USB mux control driver, in this case.
> The callers are expected to call intel_iom_get() before using the
> intel_iom_port_status(), after which intel_iom_put() can be called
> to release the IOM device instance.

Why not just have a single call if all this driver does is support one
thing.  The reference counting shouldn't be needed at all, right?

> > > +/**
> > > + * intel_iom_put() - Put IOM device instance
> > > + * @iom: IOM device instance
> > > + *
> > > + * This function releases the IOM device instance created using
> > > + * intel_iom_get() and allows the driver to be unloaded.
> > > + *
> > > + * Call intel_iom_put() to release the instance.
> > > + */
> > > +void intel_iom_put(struct intel_iom *iom) {
> > > +	if (!iom)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	module_put(iom->dev->driver->owner);
> > 
> > And if the device doesn't have a driver?  boom :(
> > 
> > Don't do this.
> > 
> 
> Ack. Will use THIS_MODULE here.

Again, no, that will be even more incorrect.

> > > +	put_device(iom->dev);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_iom_put);
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * intel_iom_port_status() - Get status bits for the Type-C port
> > > + * @iom: IOM device instance
> > > + * @port: Type-C port number
> > > + * @status: pointer to receive the status bits
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns 0 on success, error otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +int intel_iom_port_status(struct intel_iom *iom, u8 port, u32
> > > +*status) {
> > > +	void __iomem *reg;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!iom)
> > > +		return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!status || (port > IOM_MAX_PORTS - 1))
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	reg = iom->regbar + IOM_PORT_STATUS_OFFSET + IOM_REG_LEN *
> > port;
> > > +
> > > +	*status = ioread32(reg);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_iom_port_status);
> > 
> > So the whole driver is here just to read, directly from memory, a single
> > 32 bit value?
> 
> Yes.

Ok, then this whole driver could be about 90% smaller and more obvious.
Don't add the reference counting, the static variables and all the other
stuff just to get a 32bit number.

As it is, this feels like an excuse to get paid per lines of code :(

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-17  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16  0:33 [PATCH 0/2] Add Intel Input Output Manager driver Rajmohan Mani
2020-07-16  0:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: Add Intel Input Output Manager (IOM) driver Rajmohan Mani
2020-07-16  7:09   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-17  6:03     ` Mani, Rajmohan
2020-07-17  6:03       ` Mani, Rajmohan
2020-07-17  6:18       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-07-17  6:18         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-24  5:15         ` Mani, Rajmohan
2020-07-24  5:15           ` Mani, Rajmohan
2020-07-16  0:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Check the port status before connect Rajmohan Mani
2020-07-16  7:05   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-17  6:04     ` Mani, Rajmohan
2020-07-17  6:04       ` Mani, Rajmohan
2020-07-17  6:19       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-17  6:19         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200717061821.GA3237166@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ayman.bagabas@gmail.com \
    --cc=blaz@mxxn.io \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmalani@chromium.org \
    --cc=rajmohan.mani@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.