* [PATCH v2 02/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev.c
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] powerpc/eeh: Move vf_index out of pci_dn and into eeh_dev Oliver O'Halloran
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Oliver O'Halloran
The only thing in this file is eeh_dev_init() which is allocates and
initialises an eeh_dev based on a pci_dn. This is only ever called from
pci_dn.c so move it into there and remove the file.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
v2: no change
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 6 ----
arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c | 54 ----------------------------------
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 20 +++++++++++++
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index 64487b88c569..8537dd334094 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -293,7 +293,6 @@ void eeh_pe_restore_bars(struct eeh_pe *pe);
const char *eeh_pe_loc_get(struct eeh_pe *pe);
struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe);
-struct eeh_dev *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn);
void eeh_show_enabled(void);
int __init eeh_ops_register(struct eeh_ops *ops);
int __exit eeh_ops_unregister(const char *name);
@@ -339,11 +338,6 @@ static inline bool eeh_enabled(void)
static inline void eeh_show_enabled(void) { }
-static inline void *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn, void *data)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
static inline void eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb) { }
static inline int eeh_check_failure(const volatile void __iomem *token)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
index 244542ae2a91..c5211bdcf1b6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_RTAS_DAEMON) += rtasd.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTAS_FLASH) += rtas_flash.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTAS_PROC) += rtas-proc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_DT_CPU_FTRS) += dt_cpu_ftrs.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_EEH) += eeh.o eeh_pe.o eeh_dev.o eeh_cache.o \
+obj-$(CONFIG_EEH) += eeh.o eeh_pe.o eeh_cache.o \
eeh_driver.o eeh_event.o eeh_sysfs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_TBSYNC) += smp-tbsync.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP) += crash_dump.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 8e159a12f10c..000000000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
-/*
- * The file intends to implement dynamic creation of EEH device, which will
- * be bound with OF node and PCI device simutaneously. The EEH devices would
- * be foundamental information for EEH core components to work proerly. Besides,
- * We have to support multiple situations where dynamic creation of EEH device
- * is required:
- *
- * 1) Before PCI emunation starts, we need create EEH devices according to the
- * PCI sensitive OF nodes.
- * 2) When PCI emunation is done, we need do the binding between PCI device and
- * the associated EEH device.
- * 3) DR (Dynamic Reconfiguration) would create PCI sensitive OF node. EEH device
- * will be created while PCI sensitive OF node is detected from DR.
- * 4) PCI hotplug needs redoing the binding between PCI device and EEH device. If
- * PHB is newly inserted, we also need create EEH devices accordingly.
- *
- * Copyright Benjamin Herrenschmidt & Gavin Shan, IBM Corporation 2012.
- */
-
-#include <linux/export.h>
-#include <linux/gfp.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/pci.h>
-#include <linux/string.h>
-
-#include <asm/pci-bridge.h>
-#include <asm/ppc-pci.h>
-
-/**
- * eeh_dev_init - Create EEH device according to OF node
- * @pdn: PCI device node
- *
- * It will create EEH device according to the given OF node. The function
- * might be called by PCI emunation, DR, PHB hotplug.
- */
-struct eeh_dev *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn)
-{
- struct eeh_dev *edev;
-
- /* Allocate EEH device */
- edev = kzalloc(sizeof(*edev), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!edev)
- return NULL;
-
- /* Associate EEH device with OF node */
- pdn->edev = edev;
- edev->pdn = pdn;
- edev->bdfn = (pdn->busno << 8) | pdn->devfn;
- edev->controller = pdn->phb;
-
- return edev;
-}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
index 4e654df55969..f790a8d06f50 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
@@ -124,6 +124,26 @@ struct pci_dn *pci_get_pdn(struct pci_dev *pdev)
return NULL;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_EEH
+static struct eeh_dev *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn)
+{
+ struct eeh_dev *edev;
+
+ /* Allocate EEH device */
+ edev = kzalloc(sizeof(*edev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!edev)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* Associate EEH device with OF node */
+ pdn->edev = edev;
+ edev->pdn = pdn;
+ edev->bdfn = (pdn->busno << 8) | pdn->devfn;
+ edev->controller = pdn->phb;
+
+ return edev;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_EEH */
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
static struct pci_dn *add_one_sriov_vf_pdn(struct pci_dn *parent,
int vf_index,
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 03/14] powerpc/eeh: Move vf_index out of pci_dn and into eeh_dev
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev.c Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] powerpc/pseries: Stop using pdn->pe_number Oliver O'Halloran
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy, Oliver O'Halloran
Drivers that do not support the PCI error handling callbacks are handled by
tearing down the device and re-probing them. If the device being removed is
a virtual function then we need to know the VF index so it can be removed
using the pci_iov_{add|remove}_virtfn() API.
Currently this is handled by looking up the pci_dn, and using the vf_index
that was stashed there when the pci_dn for the VF was created in
pcibios_sriov_enable(). We would like to eliminate the use of pci_dn
outside of pseries though so we need to provide the generic EEH code with
some other way to find the vf_index.
The easiest thing to do here is move the vf_index field out of pci_dn and
into eeh_dev. Currently pci_dn and eeh_dev are allocated and initialized
together so this is a fairly minimal change in preparation for splitting
pci_dn and eeh_dev in the future.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
v2: Commit message fixup
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 6 ++----
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 7 ++++---
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index 8537dd334094..9c5ba535f6a1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -148,7 +148,10 @@ struct eeh_dev {
struct pci_dn *pdn; /* Associated PCI device node */
struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Associated PCI device */
bool in_error; /* Error flag for edev */
+
+ /* VF specific properties */
struct pci_dev *physfn; /* Associated SRIOV PF */
+ int vf_index; /* Index of this VF */
};
/* "fmt" must be a simple literal string */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
index b92e81b256e5..d2a2a14e56f9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
@@ -202,7 +202,6 @@ struct pci_dn {
#define IODA_INVALID_PE 0xFFFFFFFF
unsigned int pe_number;
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
- int vf_index; /* VF index in the PF */
u16 vfs_expanded; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expanded */
u16 num_vfs; /* number of VFs enabled*/
unsigned int *pe_num_map; /* PE# for the first VF PE or array */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
index 7b048cee767c..b70b9273f45a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static void *eeh_add_virt_device(struct eeh_dev *edev)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
- pci_iov_add_virtfn(edev->physfn, eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev)->vf_index);
+ pci_iov_add_virtfn(edev->physfn, edev->vf_index);
#endif
return NULL;
}
@@ -521,9 +521,7 @@ static void eeh_rmv_device(struct eeh_dev *edev, void *userdata)
if (edev->physfn) {
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
-
- pci_iov_remove_virtfn(edev->physfn, pdn->vf_index);
+ pci_iov_remove_virtfn(edev->physfn, edev->vf_index);
edev->pdev = NULL;
#endif
if (rmv_data)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
index f790a8d06f50..bf11ac8427ac 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@ static struct eeh_dev *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn)
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
static struct pci_dn *add_one_sriov_vf_pdn(struct pci_dn *parent,
- int vf_index,
int busno, int devfn)
{
struct pci_dn *pdn;
@@ -163,7 +162,6 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_sriov_vf_pdn(struct pci_dn *parent,
pdn->parent = parent;
pdn->busno = busno;
pdn->devfn = devfn;
- pdn->vf_index = vf_index;
pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdn->child_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdn->list);
@@ -194,7 +192,7 @@ struct pci_dn *add_sriov_vf_pdns(struct pci_dev *pdev)
for (i = 0; i < pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); i++) {
struct eeh_dev *edev __maybe_unused;
- pdn = add_one_sriov_vf_pdn(parent, i,
+ pdn = add_one_sriov_vf_pdn(parent,
pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, i),
pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, i));
if (!pdn) {
@@ -207,7 +205,10 @@ struct pci_dn *add_sriov_vf_pdns(struct pci_dev *pdev)
/* Create the EEH device for the VF */
edev = eeh_dev_init(pdn);
BUG_ON(!edev);
+
+ /* FIXME: these should probably be populated by the EEH probe */
edev->physfn = pdev;
+ edev->vf_index = i;
#endif /* CONFIG_EEH */
}
return pci_get_pdn(pdev);
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 04/14] powerpc/pseries: Stop using pdn->pe_number
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev.c Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] powerpc/eeh: Move vf_index out of pci_dn and into eeh_dev Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] powerpc/eeh: Kill off eeh_ops->get_pe_addr() Oliver O'Halloran
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy, Oliver O'Halloran
The pci_dn->pe_number field is mainly used to track the IODA PE number of a
device on PowerNV. At some point it grew a user in the pseries SR-IOV
support which muddies the waters a bit, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
v2: no change
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index ace117f99d94..18a2522b9b5e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -52,8 +52,6 @@ void pseries_pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "EEH: Setting up device\n");
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
if (pdev->is_virtfn) {
- struct pci_dn *physfn_pdn;
-
pdn->device_id = pdev->device;
pdn->vendor_id = pdev->vendor;
pdn->class_code = pdev->class;
@@ -63,8 +61,6 @@ void pseries_pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
* completion from platform.
*/
pdn->last_allow_rc = 0;
- physfn_pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev->physfn);
- pdn->pe_number = physfn_pdn->pe_num_map[pdn->vf_index];
}
#endif
pseries_eeh_init_edev(pdn);
@@ -772,8 +768,8 @@ int pseries_send_allow_unfreeze(struct pci_dn *pdn,
static int pseries_call_allow_unfreeze(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
+ int cur_vfs = 0, rc = 0, vf_index, bus, devfn, vf_pe_num;
struct pci_dn *pdn, *tmp, *parent, *physfn_pdn;
- int cur_vfs = 0, rc = 0, vf_index, bus, devfn;
u16 *vf_pe_array;
vf_pe_array = kzalloc(RTAS_DATA_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -806,8 +802,10 @@ static int pseries_call_allow_unfreeze(struct eeh_dev *edev)
}
} else {
pdn = pci_get_pdn(edev->pdev);
- vf_pe_array[0] = cpu_to_be16(pdn->pe_number);
physfn_pdn = pci_get_pdn(edev->physfn);
+
+ vf_pe_num = physfn_pdn->pe_num_map[edev->vf_index];
+ vf_pe_array[0] = cpu_to_be16(vf_pe_num);
rc = pseries_send_allow_unfreeze(physfn_pdn,
vf_pe_array, 1);
pdn->last_allow_rc = rc;
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 05/14] powerpc/eeh: Kill off eeh_ops->get_pe_addr()
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] powerpc/pseries: Stop using pdn->pe_number Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove VF config space restoration Oliver O'Halloran
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy, Oliver O'Halloran
This is used in precisely one place which is in pseries specific platform
code. There's no need to have the callback in eeh_ops since the platform
chooses the EEH PE addresses anyway. The PowerNV implementation has always
been a stub too so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
v2: Made "buid" in pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr() an unsigned long to match
the pci_controller type.
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 -
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 13 ------------
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 22 ++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index 9c5ba535f6a1..d619012281bd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -220,7 +220,6 @@ struct eeh_ops {
int (*init)(void);
struct eeh_dev *(*probe)(struct pci_dev *pdev);
int (*set_option)(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option);
- int (*get_pe_addr)(struct eeh_pe *pe);
int (*get_state)(struct eeh_pe *pe, int *delay);
int (*reset)(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option);
int (*get_log)(struct eeh_pe *pe, int severity, char *drv_log, unsigned long len);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
index 79409e005fcd..bcd0515d8f79 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
@@ -535,18 +535,6 @@ static int pnv_eeh_set_option(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option)
return 0;
}
-/**
- * pnv_eeh_get_pe_addr - Retrieve PE address
- * @pe: EEH PE
- *
- * Retrieve the PE address according to the given tranditional
- * PCI BDF (Bus/Device/Function) address.
- */
-static int pnv_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct eeh_pe *pe)
-{
- return pe->addr;
-}
-
static void pnv_eeh_get_phb_diag(struct eeh_pe *pe)
{
struct pnv_phb *phb = pe->phb->private_data;
@@ -1670,7 +1658,6 @@ static struct eeh_ops pnv_eeh_ops = {
.init = pnv_eeh_init,
.probe = pnv_eeh_probe,
.set_option = pnv_eeh_set_option,
- .get_pe_addr = pnv_eeh_get_pe_addr,
.get_state = pnv_eeh_get_state,
.reset = pnv_eeh_reset,
.get_log = pnv_eeh_get_log,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index 18a2522b9b5e..bcc72b9a5309 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
#include <asm/ppc-pci.h>
#include <asm/rtas.h>
+static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct pci_dn *pdn);
+
/* RTAS tokens */
static int ibm_set_eeh_option;
static int ibm_set_slot_reset;
@@ -301,7 +303,7 @@ void pseries_eeh_init_edev(struct pci_dn *pdn)
eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "EEH failed to enable on device (code %d)\n", ret);
} else {
/* Retrieve PE address */
- edev->pe_config_addr = eeh_ops->get_pe_addr(&pe);
+ edev->pe_config_addr = pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(pdn);
pe.addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
/* Some older systems (Power4) allow the ibm,set-eeh-option
@@ -431,8 +433,10 @@ static int pseries_eeh_set_option(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option)
* It's notable that zero'ed return value means invalid PE config
* address.
*/
-static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct eeh_pe *pe)
+static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct pci_dn *pdn)
{
+ int config_addr = rtas_config_addr(pdn->busno, pdn->devfn, 0);
+ unsigned long buid = pdn->phb->buid;
int ret = 0;
int rets[3];
@@ -443,18 +447,16 @@ static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct eeh_pe *pe)
* meaningless.
*/
ret = rtas_call(ibm_get_config_addr_info2, 4, 2, rets,
- pe->config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
- BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid), 1);
+ config_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), 1);
if (ret || (rets[0] == 0))
return 0;
/* Retrieve the associated PE config address */
ret = rtas_call(ibm_get_config_addr_info2, 4, 2, rets,
- pe->config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
- BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid), 0);
+ config_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), 0);
if (ret) {
pr_warn("%s: Failed to get address for PHB#%x-PE#%x\n",
- __func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->config_addr);
+ __func__, pdn->phb->global_number, config_addr);
return 0;
}
@@ -463,11 +465,10 @@ static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct eeh_pe *pe)
if (ibm_get_config_addr_info != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
ret = rtas_call(ibm_get_config_addr_info, 4, 2, rets,
- pe->config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
- BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid), 0);
+ config_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), 0);
if (ret) {
pr_warn("%s: Failed to get address for PHB#%x-PE#%x\n",
- __func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->config_addr);
+ __func__, pdn->phb->global_number, config_addr);
return 0;
}
@@ -839,7 +840,6 @@ static struct eeh_ops pseries_eeh_ops = {
.init = pseries_eeh_init,
.probe = pseries_eeh_probe,
.set_option = pseries_eeh_set_option,
- .get_pe_addr = pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr,
.get_state = pseries_eeh_get_state,
.reset = pseries_eeh_reset,
.get_log = pseries_eeh_get_log,
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 06/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove VF config space restoration
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] powerpc/eeh: Kill off eeh_ops->get_pe_addr() Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->restore_config() Oliver O'Halloran
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy, Oliver O'Halloran
There's a bunch of strange things about this code. First up is that none of
the fields being written to are functional for a VF. The SR-IOV
specification lists then as "Reserved, but OS should preserve" so writing
new values to them doesn't do anything and is clearly wrong from a
correctness perspective.
However, since VFs are designed to be managed by the OS there is an
argument to be made that we should be saving and restoring some parts of
config space. We already sort of do that by saving the first 64 bytes of
config space in the eeh_dev (see eeh_dev->config_space[]). This is
inadequate since it doesn't even consider saving and restoring the PCI
capability structures. However, this is a problem with EEH in general and
that needs to be fixed for non-VF devices too.
There's no real reason to keep around this around so delete it.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
v2: no changes
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 59 --------------------
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 20 ++-----
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 26 +--------
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index d619012281bd..c7d5a234bb51 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -314,7 +314,6 @@ int eeh_pe_reset(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option, bool include_passed);
int eeh_pe_configure(struct eeh_pe *pe);
int eeh_pe_inject_err(struct eeh_pe *pe, int type, int func,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long mask);
-int eeh_restore_vf_config(struct pci_dn *pdn);
/**
* EEH_POSSIBLE_ERROR() -- test for possible MMIO failure.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
index 859f76020256..a4df6f6de0bd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
@@ -742,65 +742,6 @@ static void eeh_restore_dev_state(struct eeh_dev *edev, void *userdata)
pci_restore_state(pdev);
}
-int eeh_restore_vf_config(struct pci_dn *pdn)
-{
- struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
- u32 devctl, cmd, cap2, aer_capctl;
- int old_mps;
-
- if (edev->pcie_cap) {
- /* Restore MPS */
- old_mps = (ffs(pdn->mps) - 8) << 5;
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
- 2, &devctl);
- devctl &= ~PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD;
- devctl |= old_mps;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
- 2, devctl);
-
- /* Disable Completion Timeout if possible */
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2,
- 4, &cap2);
- if (cap2 & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_COMP_TMOUT_DIS) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn,
- edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
- 4, &cap2);
- cap2 |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_COMP_TMOUT_DIS;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn,
- edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
- 4, cap2);
- }
- }
-
- /* Enable SERR and parity checking */
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, PCI_COMMAND, 2, &cmd);
- cmd |= (PCI_COMMAND_PARITY | PCI_COMMAND_SERR);
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, PCI_COMMAND, 2, cmd);
-
- /* Enable report various errors */
- if (edev->pcie_cap) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
- 2, &devctl);
- devctl &= ~PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_CERE;
- devctl |= (PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_NFERE |
- PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_FERE |
- PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_URRE);
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
- 2, devctl);
- }
-
- /* Enable ECRC generation and check */
- if (edev->pcie_cap && edev->aer_cap) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_CAP,
- 4, &aer_capctl);
- aer_capctl |= (PCI_ERR_CAP_ECRC_GENE | PCI_ERR_CAP_ECRC_CHKE);
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_CAP,
- 4, aer_capctl);
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/**
* pcibios_set_pcie_reset_state - Set PCI-E reset state
* @dev: pci device struct
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
index bcd0515d8f79..8f3a7611efc1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
@@ -1629,20 +1629,12 @@ static int pnv_eeh_restore_config(struct pci_dn *pdn)
if (!edev)
return -EEXIST;
- /*
- * We have to restore the PCI config space after reset since the
- * firmware can't see SRIOV VFs.
- *
- * FIXME: The MPS, error routing rules, timeout setting are worthy
- * to be exported by firmware in extendible way.
- */
- if (edev->physfn) {
- ret = eeh_restore_vf_config(pdn);
- } else {
- phb = pdn->phb->private_data;
- ret = opal_pci_reinit(phb->opal_id,
- OPAL_REINIT_PCI_DEV, config_addr);
- }
+ if (edev->physfn)
+ return 0;
+
+ phb = edev->controller->private_data;
+ ret = opal_pci_reinit(phb->opal_id,
+ OPAL_REINIT_PCI_DEV, edev->bdfn);
if (ret) {
pr_warn("%s: Can't reinit PCI dev 0x%x (%lld)\n",
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index bcc72b9a5309..39cdf447dfa6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -718,30 +718,6 @@ static int pseries_eeh_write_config(struct pci_dn *pdn, int where, int size, u32
return rtas_write_config(pdn, where, size, val);
}
-static int pseries_eeh_restore_config(struct pci_dn *pdn)
-{
- struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
- s64 ret = 0;
-
- if (!edev)
- return -EEXIST;
-
- /*
- * FIXME: The MPS, error routing rules, timeout setting are worthy
- * to be exported by firmware in extendible way.
- */
- if (edev->physfn)
- ret = eeh_restore_vf_config(pdn);
-
- if (ret) {
- pr_warn("%s: Can't reinit PCI dev 0x%x (%lld)\n",
- __func__, edev->pe_config_addr, ret);
- return -EIO;
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
int pseries_send_allow_unfreeze(struct pci_dn *pdn,
u16 *vf_pe_array, int cur_vfs)
@@ -848,7 +824,7 @@ static struct eeh_ops pseries_eeh_ops = {
.read_config = pseries_eeh_read_config,
.write_config = pseries_eeh_write_config,
.next_error = NULL,
- .restore_config = pseries_eeh_restore_config,
+ .restore_config = NULL, /* NB: configure_bridge() does this */
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
.notify_resume = pseries_notify_resume
#endif
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 07/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->restore_config()
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove VF config space restoration Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->resume_notify() Oliver O'Halloran
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Oliver O'Halloran
Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference
a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
v2: no changes
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 5 ++---
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 6 ++----
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 6 ++----
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index c7d5a234bb51..70a686d731f6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ struct eeh_ops {
int (*read_config)(struct pci_dn *pdn, int where, int size, u32 *val);
int (*write_config)(struct pci_dn *pdn, int where, int size, u32 val);
int (*next_error)(struct eeh_pe **pe);
- int (*restore_config)(struct pci_dn *pdn);
+ int (*restore_config)(struct eeh_dev *edev);
int (*notify_resume)(struct pci_dn *pdn);
};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
index a4df6f6de0bd..1cef0f4bb2d5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
@@ -726,7 +726,6 @@ static void eeh_disable_and_save_dev_state(struct eeh_dev *edev,
static void eeh_restore_dev_state(struct eeh_dev *edev, void *userdata)
{
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
struct pci_dev *pdev = eeh_dev_to_pci_dev(edev);
struct pci_dev *dev = userdata;
@@ -734,8 +733,8 @@ static void eeh_restore_dev_state(struct eeh_dev *edev, void *userdata)
return;
/* Apply customization from firmware */
- if (pdn && eeh_ops->restore_config)
- eeh_ops->restore_config(pdn);
+ if (eeh_ops->restore_config)
+ eeh_ops->restore_config(edev);
/* The caller should restore state for the specified device */
if (pdev != dev)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
index 177852e39a25..d71493f66917 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
@@ -843,16 +843,14 @@ static void eeh_restore_device_bars(struct eeh_dev *edev)
*/
static void eeh_restore_one_device_bars(struct eeh_dev *edev, void *flag)
{
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
-
/* Do special restore for bridges */
if (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_BRIDGE)
eeh_restore_bridge_bars(edev);
else
eeh_restore_device_bars(edev);
- if (eeh_ops->restore_config && pdn)
- eeh_ops->restore_config(pdn);
+ if (eeh_ops->restore_config)
+ eeh_ops->restore_config(edev);
}
/**
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
index 8f3a7611efc1..a41e67f674e6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
@@ -1619,12 +1619,10 @@ static int pnv_eeh_next_error(struct eeh_pe **pe)
return ret;
}
-static int pnv_eeh_restore_config(struct pci_dn *pdn)
+static int pnv_eeh_restore_config(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
- struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
struct pnv_phb *phb;
s64 ret = 0;
- int config_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | (pdn->devfn);
if (!edev)
return -EEXIST;
@@ -1638,7 +1636,7 @@ static int pnv_eeh_restore_config(struct pci_dn *pdn)
if (ret) {
pr_warn("%s: Can't reinit PCI dev 0x%x (%lld)\n",
- __func__, config_addr, ret);
+ __func__, edev->bdfn, ret);
return -EIO;
}
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->resume_notify()
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->restore_config() Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->{read|write}_config() Oliver O'Halloran
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Oliver O'Halloran
Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference
a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
v2: no changes
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_sysfs.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 4 +---
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index 70a686d731f6..8045cede0df9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ struct eeh_ops {
int (*write_config)(struct pci_dn *pdn, int where, int size, u32 val);
int (*next_error)(struct eeh_pe **pe);
int (*restore_config)(struct eeh_dev *edev);
- int (*notify_resume)(struct pci_dn *pdn);
+ int (*notify_resume)(struct eeh_dev *edev);
};
extern int eeh_subsystem_flags;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
index b70b9273f45a..b84d3cb2532e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
@@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ static enum pci_ers_result eeh_report_resume(struct eeh_dev *edev,
pci_uevent_ers(edev->pdev, PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED);
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
- if (eeh_ops->notify_resume && eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev))
- eeh_ops->notify_resume(eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev));
+ if (eeh_ops->notify_resume)
+ eeh_ops->notify_resume(edev);
#endif
return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_sysfs.c
index 4fb0f1e1017a..429620da73ba 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_sysfs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_sysfs.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static ssize_t eeh_notify_resume_store(struct device *dev,
if (!edev || !edev->pe || !eeh_ops->notify_resume)
return -ENODEV;
- if (eeh_ops->notify_resume(pci_get_pdn(pdev)))
+ if (eeh_ops->notify_resume(edev))
return -EIO;
return count;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index 39cdf447dfa6..426227ddee32 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -793,10 +793,8 @@ static int pseries_call_allow_unfreeze(struct eeh_dev *edev)
return rc;
}
-static int pseries_notify_resume(struct pci_dn *pdn)
+static int pseries_notify_resume(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
- struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
-
if (!edev)
return -EEXIST;
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 09/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->{read|write}_config()
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->resume_notify() Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove spurious use of pci_dn in eeh_dump_dev_log Oliver O'Halloran
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Oliver O'Halloran
Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference
a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
v2: no change
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 4 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 22 +++++----
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 47 +++++++++-----------
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 43 ++++++++++--------
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 16 ++++---
5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index 8045cede0df9..d16d5b59dd22 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ struct eeh_ops {
int (*configure_bridge)(struct eeh_pe *pe);
int (*err_inject)(struct eeh_pe *pe, int type, int func,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long mask);
- int (*read_config)(struct pci_dn *pdn, int where, int size, u32 *val);
- int (*write_config)(struct pci_dn *pdn, int where, int size, u32 val);
+ int (*read_config)(struct eeh_dev *edev, int where, int size, u32 *val);
+ int (*write_config)(struct eeh_dev *edev, int where, int size, u32 val);
int (*next_error)(struct eeh_pe **pe);
int (*restore_config)(struct eeh_dev *edev);
int (*notify_resume)(struct eeh_dev *edev);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
index 1cef0f4bb2d5..1a12c8bdf61e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
@@ -185,21 +185,21 @@ static size_t eeh_dump_dev_log(struct eeh_dev *edev, char *buf, size_t len)
pdn->phb->global_number, pdn->busno,
PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &cfg);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &cfg);
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "dev/vend:%08x\n", cfg);
pr_warn("EEH: PCI device/vendor: %08x\n", cfg);
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, PCI_COMMAND, 4, &cfg);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, PCI_COMMAND, 4, &cfg);
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "cmd/stat:%x\n", cfg);
pr_warn("EEH: PCI cmd/status register: %08x\n", cfg);
/* Gather bridge-specific registers */
if (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_BRIDGE) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, PCI_SEC_STATUS, 2, &cfg);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, PCI_SEC_STATUS, 2, &cfg);
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "sec stat:%x\n", cfg);
pr_warn("EEH: Bridge secondary status: %04x\n", cfg);
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, &cfg);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, &cfg);
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "brdg ctl:%x\n", cfg);
pr_warn("EEH: Bridge control: %04x\n", cfg);
}
@@ -207,11 +207,11 @@ static size_t eeh_dump_dev_log(struct eeh_dev *edev, char *buf, size_t len)
/* Dump out the PCI-X command and status regs */
cap = edev->pcix_cap;
if (cap) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap, 4, &cfg);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap, 4, &cfg);
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "pcix-cmd:%x\n", cfg);
pr_warn("EEH: PCI-X cmd: %08x\n", cfg);
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap+4, 4, &cfg);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap+4, 4, &cfg);
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "pcix-stat:%x\n", cfg);
pr_warn("EEH: PCI-X status: %08x\n", cfg);
}
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static size_t eeh_dump_dev_log(struct eeh_dev *edev, char *buf, size_t len)
pr_warn("EEH: PCI-E capabilities and status follow:\n");
for (i=0; i<=8; i++) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap+4*i, 4, &cfg);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap+4*i, 4, &cfg);
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "%02x:%x\n", 4*i, cfg);
if ((i % 4) == 0) {
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static size_t eeh_dump_dev_log(struct eeh_dev *edev, char *buf, size_t len)
pr_warn("EEH: PCI-E AER capability register set follows:\n");
for (i=0; i<=13; i++) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap+4*i, 4, &cfg);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap+4*i, 4, &cfg);
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "%02x:%x\n", 4*i, cfg);
if ((i % 4) == 0) {
@@ -917,15 +917,13 @@ int eeh_pe_reset_full(struct eeh_pe *pe, bool include_passed)
*/
void eeh_save_bars(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
- struct pci_dn *pdn;
int i;
- pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
- if (!pdn)
+ if (!edev)
return;
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, i * 4, 4, &edev->config_space[i]);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, i * 4, 4, &edev->config_space[i]);
/*
* For PCI bridges including root port, we need enable bus
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
index d71493f66917..f20fb0ee6aec 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
@@ -698,7 +698,6 @@ void eeh_pe_state_clear(struct eeh_pe *root, int state, bool include_passed)
*/
static void eeh_bridge_check_link(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
int cap;
uint32_t val;
int timeout = 0;
@@ -714,32 +713,32 @@ static void eeh_bridge_check_link(struct eeh_dev *edev)
/* Check slot status */
cap = edev->pcie_cap;
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, 2, &val);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, 2, &val);
if (!(val & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS)) {
eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "No card in the slot (0x%04x) !\n", val);
return;
}
/* Check power status if we have the capability */
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, 2, &val);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, 2, &val);
if (val & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PCP) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, 2, &val);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, 2, &val);
if (val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC) {
eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "In power-off state, power it on ...\n");
val &= ~(PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC | PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC);
val |= (0x0100 & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC);
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, 2, val);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, 2, val);
msleep(2 * 1000);
}
}
/* Enable link */
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, 2, &val);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, 2, &val);
val &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LD;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, 2, val);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, 2, val);
/* Check link */
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, 4, &val);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, 4, &val);
if (!(val & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC)) {
eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "No link reporting capability (0x%08x) \n", val);
msleep(1000);
@@ -752,7 +751,7 @@ static void eeh_bridge_check_link(struct eeh_dev *edev)
msleep(20);
timeout += 20;
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, 2, &val);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, 2, &val);
if (val & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA)
break;
}
@@ -769,7 +768,6 @@ static void eeh_bridge_check_link(struct eeh_dev *edev)
static void eeh_restore_bridge_bars(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
int i;
/*
@@ -777,20 +775,20 @@ static void eeh_restore_bridge_bars(struct eeh_dev *edev)
* Bus numbers and windows: 0x18 - 0x30
*/
for (i = 4; i < 13; i++)
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, i*4, 4, edev->config_space[i]);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, i*4, 4, edev->config_space[i]);
/* Rom: 0x38 */
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, 14*4, 4, edev->config_space[14]);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, 14*4, 4, edev->config_space[14]);
/* Cache line & Latency timer: 0xC 0xD */
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 1,
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 1,
SAVED_BYTE(PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE));
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, 1,
- SAVED_BYTE(PCI_LATENCY_TIMER));
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, 1,
+ SAVED_BYTE(PCI_LATENCY_TIMER));
/* Max latency, min grant, interrupt ping and line: 0x3C */
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, 15*4, 4, edev->config_space[15]);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, 15*4, 4, edev->config_space[15]);
/* PCI Command: 0x4 */
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, PCI_COMMAND, 4, edev->config_space[1] |
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, PCI_COMMAND, 4, edev->config_space[1] |
PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER);
/* Check the PCIe link is ready */
@@ -799,28 +797,27 @@ static void eeh_restore_bridge_bars(struct eeh_dev *edev)
static void eeh_restore_device_bars(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
int i;
u32 cmd;
for (i = 4; i < 10; i++)
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, i*4, 4, edev->config_space[i]);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, i*4, 4, edev->config_space[i]);
/* 12 == Expansion ROM Address */
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, 12*4, 4, edev->config_space[12]);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, 12*4, 4, edev->config_space[12]);
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 1,
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 1,
SAVED_BYTE(PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE));
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, 1,
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, 1,
SAVED_BYTE(PCI_LATENCY_TIMER));
/* max latency, min grant, interrupt pin and line */
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, 15*4, 4, edev->config_space[15]);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, 15*4, 4, edev->config_space[15]);
/*
* Restore PERR & SERR bits, some devices require it,
* don't touch the other command bits
*/
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, PCI_COMMAND, 4, &cmd);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, PCI_COMMAND, 4, &cmd);
if (edev->config_space[1] & PCI_COMMAND_PARITY)
cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_PARITY;
else
@@ -829,7 +826,7 @@ static void eeh_restore_device_bars(struct eeh_dev *edev)
cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_SERR;
else
cmd &= ~PCI_COMMAND_SERR;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, PCI_COMMAND, 4, cmd);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, PCI_COMMAND, 4, cmd);
}
/**
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
index a41e67f674e6..c9f2f454d053 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
@@ -838,32 +838,32 @@ static int __pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
case EEH_RESET_HOT:
/* Don't report linkDown event */
if (aer) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
4, &ctrl);
ctrl |= PCI_ERR_UNC_SURPDN;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
4, ctrl);
}
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, &ctrl);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, &ctrl);
ctrl |= PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_BUS_RESET;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, ctrl);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, ctrl);
msleep(EEH_PE_RST_HOLD_TIME);
break;
case EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE:
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, &ctrl);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, &ctrl);
ctrl &= ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_BUS_RESET;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, ctrl);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2, ctrl);
msleep(EEH_PE_RST_SETTLE_TIME);
/* Continue reporting linkDown event */
if (aer) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
4, &ctrl);
ctrl &= ~PCI_ERR_UNC_SURPDN;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK,
4, ctrl);
}
@@ -932,11 +932,12 @@ void pnv_pci_reset_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev)
static void pnv_eeh_wait_for_pending(struct pci_dn *pdn, const char *type,
int pos, u16 mask)
{
+ struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn->edev;
int i, status = 0;
/* Wait for Transaction Pending bit to be cleared */
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, pos, 2, &status);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, pos, 2, &status);
if (!(status & mask))
return;
@@ -957,7 +958,7 @@ static int pnv_eeh_do_flr(struct pci_dn *pdn, int option)
if (WARN_ON(!edev->pcie_cap))
return -ENOTTY;
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, 4, ®);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, 4, ®);
if (!(reg & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_FLR))
return -ENOTTY;
@@ -967,18 +968,18 @@ static int pnv_eeh_do_flr(struct pci_dn *pdn, int option)
pnv_eeh_wait_for_pending(pdn, "",
edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVSTA,
PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_TRPND);
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
4, ®);
reg |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_BCR_FLR;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
4, reg);
msleep(EEH_PE_RST_HOLD_TIME);
break;
case EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE:
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
4, ®);
reg &= ~PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_BCR_FLR;
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
4, reg);
msleep(EEH_PE_RST_SETTLE_TIME);
break;
@@ -995,7 +996,7 @@ static int pnv_eeh_do_af_flr(struct pci_dn *pdn, int option)
if (WARN_ON(!edev->af_cap))
return -ENOTTY;
- eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CAP, 1, &cap);
+ eeh_ops->read_config(edev, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CAP, 1, &cap);
if (!(cap & PCI_AF_CAP_TP) || !(cap & PCI_AF_CAP_FLR))
return -ENOTTY;
@@ -1010,12 +1011,12 @@ static int pnv_eeh_do_af_flr(struct pci_dn *pdn, int option)
pnv_eeh_wait_for_pending(pdn, "AF",
edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL,
PCI_AF_STATUS_TP << 8);
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL,
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL,
1, PCI_AF_CTRL_FLR);
msleep(EEH_PE_RST_HOLD_TIME);
break;
case EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE:
- eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL, 1, 0);
+ eeh_ops->write_config(edev, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL, 1, 0);
msleep(EEH_PE_RST_SETTLE_TIME);
break;
}
@@ -1249,9 +1250,11 @@ static inline bool pnv_eeh_cfg_blocked(struct pci_dn *pdn)
return false;
}
-static int pnv_eeh_read_config(struct pci_dn *pdn,
+static int pnv_eeh_read_config(struct eeh_dev *edev,
int where, int size, u32 *val)
{
+ struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
+
if (!pdn)
return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
@@ -1263,9 +1266,11 @@ static int pnv_eeh_read_config(struct pci_dn *pdn,
return pnv_pci_cfg_read(pdn, where, size, val);
}
-static int pnv_eeh_write_config(struct pci_dn *pdn,
+static int pnv_eeh_write_config(struct eeh_dev *edev,
int where, int size, u32 val)
{
+ struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
+
if (!pdn)
return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index 426227ddee32..b981332db873 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -692,29 +692,33 @@ static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct eeh_pe *pe)
/**
* pseries_eeh_read_config - Read PCI config space
- * @pdn: PCI device node
- * @where: PCI address
+ * @edev: EEH device handle
+ * @where: PCI config space offset
* @size: size to read
* @val: return value
*
* Read config space from the speicifed device
*/
-static int pseries_eeh_read_config(struct pci_dn *pdn, int where, int size, u32 *val)
+static int pseries_eeh_read_config(struct eeh_dev *edev, int where, int size, u32 *val)
{
+ struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
+
return rtas_read_config(pdn, where, size, val);
}
/**
* pseries_eeh_write_config - Write PCI config space
- * @pdn: PCI device node
- * @where: PCI address
+ * @edev: EEH device handle
+ * @where: PCI config space offset
* @size: size to write
* @val: value to be written
*
* Write config space to the specified device
*/
-static int pseries_eeh_write_config(struct pci_dn *pdn, int where, int size, u32 val)
+static int pseries_eeh_write_config(struct eeh_dev *edev, int where, int size, u32 val)
{
+ struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
+
return rtas_write_config(pdn, where, size, val);
}
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 10/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove spurious use of pci_dn in eeh_dump_dev_log
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->{read|write}_config() Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove class code field from edev Oliver O'Halloran
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Oliver O'Halloran
Retrieve the domain, bus, device, and function numbers from the edev.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
v2: no change
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 14 ++++----------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
index 1a12c8bdf61e..f203ffc5c57d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
@@ -167,23 +167,17 @@ void eeh_show_enabled(void)
*/
static size_t eeh_dump_dev_log(struct eeh_dev *edev, char *buf, size_t len)
{
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
u32 cfg;
int cap, i;
int n = 0, l = 0;
char buffer[128];
- if (!pdn) {
- pr_warn("EEH: Note: No error log for absent device.\n");
- return 0;
- }
-
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "%04x:%02x:%02x.%01x\n",
- pdn->phb->global_number, pdn->busno,
- PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
+ edev->pe->phb->global_number, edev->bdfn >> 8,
+ PCI_SLOT(edev->bdfn), PCI_FUNC(edev->bdfn));
pr_warn("EEH: of node=%04x:%02x:%02x.%01x\n",
- pdn->phb->global_number, pdn->busno,
- PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
+ edev->pe->phb->global_number, edev->bdfn >> 8,
+ PCI_SLOT(edev->bdfn), PCI_FUNC(edev->bdfn));
eeh_ops->read_config(edev, PCI_VENDOR_ID, 4, &cfg);
n += scnprintf(buf+n, len-n, "dev/vend:%08x\n", cfg);
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 11/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove class code field from edev
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove spurious use of pci_dn in eeh_dump_dev_log Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] powerpc/eeh: Rename eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe() Oliver O'Halloran
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Oliver O'Halloran
The edev->class_code field is never referenced anywhere except for the
platform specific probe functions. The same information is available in
the pci_dev for PowerNV and in the pci_dn on pseries so we can remove
the field.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
v2: no changes
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 -
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 5 ++---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 3 +--
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index d16d5b59dd22..0d99aad8d9b7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ static inline bool eeh_pe_passed(struct eeh_pe *pe)
struct eeh_dev {
int mode; /* EEH mode */
- int class_code; /* Class code of the device */
int bdfn; /* bdfn of device (for cfg ops) */
struct pci_controller *controller;
int pe_config_addr; /* PE config address */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
index c9f2f454d053..7cbb03a97a61 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
@@ -372,19 +372,18 @@ static struct eeh_dev *pnv_eeh_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
}
/* Skip for PCI-ISA bridge */
- if ((pdn->class_code >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_ISA)
+ if ((pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_ISA)
return NULL;
eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "Probing device\n");
/* Initialize eeh device */
- edev->class_code = pdn->class_code;
edev->mode &= 0xFFFFFF00;
edev->pcix_cap = pnv_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
edev->pcie_cap = pnv_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
edev->af_cap = pnv_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_AF);
edev->aer_cap = pnv_eeh_find_ecap(pdn, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR);
- if ((edev->class_code >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI) {
+ if ((pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI) {
edev->mode |= EEH_DEV_BRIDGE;
if (edev->pcie_cap) {
pnv_pci_cfg_read(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_FLAGS,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index b981332db873..67931fe5f341 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -273,12 +273,11 @@ void pseries_eeh_init_edev(struct pci_dn *pdn)
* correctly reflects that current device is root port
* or PCIe switch downstream port.
*/
- edev->class_code = pdn->class_code;
edev->pcix_cap = pseries_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
edev->pcie_cap = pseries_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
edev->aer_cap = pseries_eeh_find_ecap(pdn, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR);
edev->mode &= 0xFFFFFF00;
- if ((edev->class_code >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI) {
+ if ((pdn->class_code >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI) {
edev->mode |= EEH_DEV_BRIDGE;
if (edev->pcie_cap) {
rtas_read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_FLAGS,
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 12/14] powerpc/eeh: Rename eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe()
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove class code field from edev Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] powerpc/eeh: Drop pdn use in eeh_pe_tree_insert() Oliver O'Halloran
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Oliver O'Halloran
The naming of eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe() doesn't really reflect
what they actually do. If the PE referred to be edev->pe_config_addr
already exists under that PHB then the edev is added to that PE. However,
if the PE doesn't exist the a new one is created for the edev.
The bulk of the implementation of eeh_add_to_parent_pe() covers that
second case. Similarly, most of eeh_remove_from_parent_pe() is
determining when it's safe to delete a PE.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
v2: no changes
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 8 ++++----
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 8 ++++----
7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index 0d99aad8d9b7..df9462230e75 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -283,8 +283,8 @@ struct eeh_pe *eeh_phb_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb);
struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_next(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct eeh_pe *root);
struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb,
int pe_no, int config_addr);
-int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev);
-int eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev);
+int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev);
+int eeh_pe_tree_remove(struct eeh_dev *edev);
void eeh_pe_update_time_stamp(struct eeh_pe *pe);
void *eeh_pe_traverse(struct eeh_pe *root,
eeh_pe_traverse_func fn, void *flag);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
index f203ffc5c57d..94682382fc8c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ void eeh_probe_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
* FIXME: HEY MA, LOOK AT ME, NO LOCKING!
*/
if (edev->pdev && edev->pdev != dev) {
- eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev);
+ eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev);
eeh_addr_cache_rmv_dev(edev->pdev);
eeh_sysfs_remove_device(edev->pdev);
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ void eeh_remove_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
edev->in_error = false;
dev->dev.archdata.edev = NULL;
if (!(edev->pe->state & EEH_PE_KEEP))
- eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev);
+ eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev);
else
edev->mode |= EEH_DEV_DISCONNECTED;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
index b84d3cb2532e..4197e4559f65 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static void *eeh_pe_detach_dev(struct eeh_pe *pe, void *userdata)
continue;
edev->mode &= ~(EEH_DEV_DISCONNECTED | EEH_DEV_IRQ_DISABLED);
- eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev);
+ eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev);
}
return NULL;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
index f20fb0ee6aec..97bf09db2ecd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev)
}
/**
- * eeh_add_to_parent_pe - Add EEH device to parent PE
+ * eeh_pe_tree_insert - Add EEH device to parent PE
* @edev: EEH device
*
* Add EEH device to the parent PE. If the parent PE already
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev)
* we have to create new PE to hold the EEH device and the new
* PE will be linked to its parent PE as well.
*/
-int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
+int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent;
struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
}
/**
- * eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe - Remove one EEH device from the associated PE
+ * eeh_pe_tree_remove - Remove one EEH device from the associated PE
* @edev: EEH device
*
* The PE hierarchy tree might be changed when doing PCI hotplug.
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
* during EEH recovery. So we have to call the function remove the
* corresponding PE accordingly if necessary.
*/
-int eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
+int eeh_pe_tree_remove(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent, *child;
bool keep, recover;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
index bf11ac8427ac..e99b7c547d7e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ void remove_sriov_vf_pdns(struct pci_dev *pdev)
* have a configured PE.
*/
if (edev->pe)
- eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev);
+ eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev);
pdn->edev = NULL;
kfree(edev);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
index 7cbb03a97a61..8c9fca773692 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static struct eeh_dev *pnv_eeh_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
edev->pe_config_addr = phb->ioda.pe_rmap[config_addr];
/* Create PE */
- ret = eeh_add_to_parent_pe(edev);
+ ret = eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev);
if (ret) {
eeh_edev_warn(edev, "Failed to add device to PE (code %d)\n", ret);
return NULL;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index 67931fe5f341..88639b65daa3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ void pseries_pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
edev->pe_config_addr = (pdn->busno << 16) | (pdn->devfn << 8);
- eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev); /* Remove as it is adding to bus pe */
- eeh_add_to_parent_pe(edev); /* Add as VF PE type */
+ eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev); /* Remove as it is adding to bus pe */
+ eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev); /* Add as VF PE type */
}
#endif
eeh_probe_device(pdev);
@@ -315,14 +315,14 @@ void pseries_eeh_init_edev(struct pci_dn *pdn)
if (enable) {
eeh_add_flag(EEH_ENABLED);
- eeh_add_to_parent_pe(edev);
+ eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev);
} else if (pdn->parent && pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn->parent) &&
(pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn->parent))->pe) {
/* This device doesn't support EEH, but it may have an
* EEH parent, in which case we mark it as supported.
*/
edev->pe_config_addr = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn->parent)->pe_config_addr;
- eeh_add_to_parent_pe(edev);
+ eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev);
}
eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "EEH is %s on device (code %d)\n",
(enable ? "enabled" : "unsupported"), ret);
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 13/14] powerpc/eeh: Drop pdn use in eeh_pe_tree_insert()
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] powerpc/eeh: Rename eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe() Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platform Oliver O'Halloran
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Oliver O'Halloran
This is mostly just to make the subsequent diffs less noisy. No functional
changes.
One thing that needs calling out is the removal of the "config_addr"
variable and replacing it with edev->bdfn. The contents of edev->bdfn are
the same, however it's worth pointing out that what RTAS calls a
"config_addr" isn't the same as the bdfn. The config_addr is supposed to
be: <bus><devfn><reg> with each field being an 8 bit number. Various parts
of the EEH code use BDFN and "config_addr" as interchangeable quantities
even though they aren't really.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
v2: no changes
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
index 97bf09db2ecd..898205829a8f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
@@ -366,9 +366,8 @@ static struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev)
*/
int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
+ struct pci_controller *hose = edev->controller;
struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent;
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
- int config_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | (pdn->devfn);
/* Check if the PE number is valid */
if (!eeh_has_flag(EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO) && !edev->pe_config_addr) {
@@ -382,7 +381,7 @@ int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
* PE should be composed of PCI bus and its subordinate
* components.
*/
- pe = eeh_pe_get(pdn->phb, edev->pe_config_addr, config_addr);
+ pe = eeh_pe_get(hose, edev->pe_config_addr, edev->bdfn);
if (pe) {
if (pe->type & EEH_PE_INVALID) {
list_add_tail(&edev->entry, &pe->edevs);
@@ -416,15 +415,15 @@ int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
/* Create a new EEH PE */
if (edev->physfn)
- pe = eeh_pe_alloc(pdn->phb, EEH_PE_VF);
+ pe = eeh_pe_alloc(hose, EEH_PE_VF);
else
- pe = eeh_pe_alloc(pdn->phb, EEH_PE_DEVICE);
+ pe = eeh_pe_alloc(hose, EEH_PE_DEVICE);
if (!pe) {
pr_err("%s: out of memory!\n", __func__);
return -ENOMEM;
}
pe->addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
- pe->config_addr = config_addr;
+ pe->config_addr = edev->bdfn;
/*
* Put the new EEH PE into hierarchy tree. If the parent
@@ -434,10 +433,10 @@ int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
*/
parent = eeh_pe_get_parent(edev);
if (!parent) {
- parent = eeh_phb_pe_get(pdn->phb);
+ parent = eeh_phb_pe_get(hose);
if (!parent) {
pr_err("%s: No PHB PE is found (PHB Domain=%d)\n",
- __func__, pdn->phb->global_number);
+ __func__, hose->global_number);
edev->pe = NULL;
kfree(pe);
return -EEXIST;
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platform
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] powerpc/eeh: Drop pdn use in eeh_pe_tree_insert() Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-22 4:26 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-24 5:01 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-07-24 5:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-07-27 7:26 ` Michael Ellerman
14 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy, Oliver O'Halloran
The EEH core has a concept of a "PE tree" to support PowerNV. The PE tree
follows the PCI bus structures because a reset asserted on an upstream
bridge will be propagated to the downstream bridges. On pseries there's a
1-1 correspondence between what the guest sees are a PHB and a PE so the
"tree" is really just a single node.
Current the EEH core is reponsible for setting up this PE tree which it
does by traversing the pci_dn tree. The structure of the pci_dn tree
matches the bus tree on PowerNV which leads to the PE tree being "correct"
this setup method doesn't make a whole lot of sense and it's actively
confusing for the pseries case where it doesn't really do anything.
We want to remove the dependence on pci_dn anyway so this patch move
choosing where to insert a new PE into the platform code rather than
being part of the generic EEH code. For PowerNV this simplifies the
tree building logic and removes the use of pci_dn. For pseries we
keep the existing logic. I'm not really convinced it does anything
due to the 1-1 PE-to-PHB correspondence so every device under that
PHB should be in the same PE, but I'd rather not remove it entirely
until we've had a chance to look at it more deeply.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
v2: Reworked pseries PE setup slightly. NOT DONE YET. mostly done needs test
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 70 ++++++--------------
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 27 +++++++-
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 66 +++++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index df9462230e75..187c23324d96 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ struct eeh_pe *eeh_phb_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb);
struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_next(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct eeh_pe *root);
struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb,
int pe_no, int config_addr);
-int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev);
+int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev, struct eeh_pe *new_pe_parent);
int eeh_pe_tree_remove(struct eeh_dev *edev);
void eeh_pe_update_time_stamp(struct eeh_pe *pe);
void *eeh_pe_traverse(struct eeh_pe *root,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
index 898205829a8f..ea2f8b362d18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
@@ -318,53 +318,20 @@ struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb,
return pe;
}
-/**
- * eeh_pe_get_parent - Retrieve the parent PE
- * @edev: EEH device
- *
- * The whole PEs existing in the system are organized as hierarchy
- * tree. The function is used to retrieve the parent PE according
- * to the parent EEH device.
- */
-static struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev)
-{
- struct eeh_dev *parent;
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
-
- /*
- * It might have the case for the indirect parent
- * EEH device already having associated PE, but
- * the direct parent EEH device doesn't have yet.
- */
- if (edev->physfn)
- pdn = pci_get_pdn(edev->physfn);
- else
- pdn = pdn ? pdn->parent : NULL;
- while (pdn) {
- /* We're poking out of PCI territory */
- parent = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
- if (!parent)
- return NULL;
-
- if (parent->pe)
- return parent->pe;
-
- pdn = pdn->parent;
- }
-
- return NULL;
-}
-
/**
* eeh_pe_tree_insert - Add EEH device to parent PE
* @edev: EEH device
+ * @new_pe_parent: PE to create additional PEs under
*
- * Add EEH device to the parent PE. If the parent PE already
- * exists, the PE type will be changed to EEH_PE_BUS. Otherwise,
- * we have to create new PE to hold the EEH device and the new
- * PE will be linked to its parent PE as well.
+ * Add EEH device to the PE in edev->pe_config_addr. If a PE already
+ * exists with that address then @edev is added to that PE. Otherwise
+ * a new PE is created and inserted into the PE tree as a child of
+ * @new_pe_parent.
+ *
+ * If @new_pe_parent is NULL then the new PE will be inserted under
+ * directly under the the PHB.
*/
-int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
+int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev, struct eeh_pe *new_pe_parent)
{
struct pci_controller *hose = edev->controller;
struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent;
@@ -399,7 +366,7 @@ int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
}
eeh_edev_dbg(edev,
- "Added to device PE (parent: PE#%x)\n",
+ "Added to existing PE (parent: PE#%x)\n",
pe->parent->addr);
} else {
/* Mark the PE as type of PCI bus */
@@ -431,10 +398,9 @@ int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
* to PHB directly. Otherwise, we have to associate the
* PE with its parent.
*/
- parent = eeh_pe_get_parent(edev);
- if (!parent) {
- parent = eeh_phb_pe_get(hose);
- if (!parent) {
+ if (!new_pe_parent) {
+ new_pe_parent = eeh_phb_pe_get(hose);
+ if (!new_pe_parent) {
pr_err("%s: No PHB PE is found (PHB Domain=%d)\n",
__func__, hose->global_number);
edev->pe = NULL;
@@ -442,17 +408,19 @@ int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
return -EEXIST;
}
}
- pe->parent = parent;
+
+ /* link new PE into the tree */
+ pe->parent = new_pe_parent;
+ list_add_tail(&pe->child, &new_pe_parent->child_list);
/*
* Put the newly created PE into the child list and
* link the EEH device accordingly.
*/
- list_add_tail(&pe->child, &parent->child_list);
list_add_tail(&edev->entry, &pe->edevs);
edev->pe = pe;
- eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "Added to device PE (parent: PE#%x)\n",
- pe->parent->addr);
+ eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "Added to new (parent: PE#%x)\n",
+ new_pe_parent->addr);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
index 8c9fca773692..9af8c3b98853 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
@@ -338,6 +338,28 @@ static int pnv_eeh_find_ecap(struct pci_dn *pdn, int cap)
return 0;
}
+static struct eeh_pe *pnv_eeh_get_upstream_pe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ struct pci_controller *hose = pdev->bus->sysdata;
+ struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
+ struct pci_dev *parent = pdev->bus->self;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
+ /* for VFs we use the PF's PE as the upstream PE */
+ if (pdev->is_virtfn)
+ parent = pdev->physfn;
+#endif
+
+ /* otherwise use the PE of our parent bridge */
+ if (parent) {
+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *ioda_pe = pnv_ioda_get_pe(parent);
+
+ return eeh_pe_get(phb->hose, ioda_pe->pe_number, 0);
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/**
* pnv_eeh_probe - Do probe on PCI device
* @pdev: pci_dev to probe
@@ -350,6 +372,7 @@ static struct eeh_dev *pnv_eeh_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
struct pci_controller *hose = pdn->phb;
struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
+ struct eeh_pe *upstream_pe;
uint32_t pcie_flags;
int ret;
int config_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | (pdn->devfn);
@@ -398,8 +421,10 @@ static struct eeh_dev *pnv_eeh_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
edev->pe_config_addr = phb->ioda.pe_rmap[config_addr];
+ upstream_pe = pnv_eeh_get_upstream_pe(pdev);
+
/* Create PE */
- ret = eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev);
+ ret = eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev, upstream_pe);
if (ret) {
eeh_edev_warn(edev, "Failed to add device to PE (code %d)\n", ret);
return NULL;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index 88639b65daa3..8169f3e996fc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -68,11 +68,16 @@ void pseries_pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
pseries_eeh_init_edev(pdn);
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
if (pdev->is_virtfn) {
+ /*
+ * FIXME: This really should be handled by choosing the right
+ * parent PE in in pseries_eeh_init_edev().
+ */
+ struct eeh_pe *physfn_pe = pci_dev_to_eeh_dev(pdev->physfn)->pe;
struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
edev->pe_config_addr = (pdn->busno << 16) | (pdn->devfn << 8);
eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev); /* Remove as it is adding to bus pe */
- eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev); /* Add as VF PE type */
+ eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev, physfn_pe); /* Add as VF PE type */
}
#endif
eeh_probe_device(pdev);
@@ -218,6 +223,43 @@ static int pseries_eeh_find_ecap(struct pci_dn *pdn, int cap)
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * pseries_eeh_pe_get_parent - Retrieve the parent PE
+ * @edev: EEH device
+ *
+ * The whole PEs existing in the system are organized as hierarchy
+ * tree. The function is used to retrieve the parent PE according
+ * to the parent EEH device.
+ */
+static struct eeh_pe *pseries_eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev)
+{
+ struct eeh_dev *parent;
+ struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
+
+ /*
+ * It might have the case for the indirect parent
+ * EEH device already having associated PE, but
+ * the direct parent EEH device doesn't have yet.
+ */
+ if (edev->physfn)
+ pdn = pci_get_pdn(edev->physfn);
+ else
+ pdn = pdn ? pdn->parent : NULL;
+ while (pdn) {
+ /* We're poking out of PCI territory */
+ parent = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
+ if (!parent)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (parent->pe)
+ return parent->pe;
+
+ pdn = pdn->parent;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/**
* pseries_eeh_init_edev - initialise the eeh_dev and eeh_pe for a pci_dn
*
@@ -301,6 +343,8 @@ void pseries_eeh_init_edev(struct pci_dn *pdn)
if (ret) {
eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "EEH failed to enable on device (code %d)\n", ret);
} else {
+ struct eeh_pe *parent;
+
/* Retrieve PE address */
edev->pe_config_addr = pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(pdn);
pe.addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
@@ -313,16 +357,18 @@ void pseries_eeh_init_edev(struct pci_dn *pdn)
if (ret > 0 && ret != EEH_STATE_NOT_SUPPORT)
enable = 1;
- if (enable) {
+ /* This device doesn't support EEH, but it may have an
+ * EEH parent. In this case any error on the device will
+ * freeze the PE of it's upstream bridge, so added it to
+ * the upstream PE.
+ */
+ parent = pseries_eeh_pe_get_parent(edev);
+ if (parent && !enable)
+ edev->pe_config_addr = parent->addr;
+
+ if (enable || parent) {
eeh_add_flag(EEH_ENABLED);
- eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev);
- } else if (pdn->parent && pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn->parent) &&
- (pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn->parent))->pe) {
- /* This device doesn't support EEH, but it may have an
- * EEH parent, in which case we mark it as supported.
- */
- edev->pe_config_addr = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn->parent)->pe_config_addr;
- eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev);
+ eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev, parent);
}
eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "EEH is %s on device (code %d)\n",
(enable ? "enabled" : "unsupported"), ret);
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platform
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platform Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-24 5:01 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-07-24 5:06 ` Oliver O'Halloran
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2020-07-24 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver O'Halloran, linuxppc-dev
On 22/07/2020 14:26, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> The EEH core has a concept of a "PE tree" to support PowerNV. The PE tree
> follows the PCI bus structures because a reset asserted on an upstream
> bridge will be propagated to the downstream bridges. On pseries there's a
> 1-1 correspondence between what the guest sees are a PHB and a PE so the
> "tree" is really just a single node.
>
> Current the EEH core is reponsible for setting up this PE tree which it
> does by traversing the pci_dn tree. The structure of the pci_dn tree
> matches the bus tree on PowerNV which leads to the PE tree being "correct"
> this setup method doesn't make a whole lot of sense and it's actively
> confusing for the pseries case where it doesn't really do anything.
>
> We want to remove the dependence on pci_dn anyway so this patch move
> choosing where to insert a new PE into the platform code rather than
> being part of the generic EEH code. For PowerNV this simplifies the
> tree building logic and removes the use of pci_dn. For pseries we
> keep the existing logic. I'm not really convinced it does anything
> due to the 1-1 PE-to-PHB correspondence so every device under that
> PHB should be in the same PE, but I'd rather not remove it entirely
> until we've had a chance to look at it more deeply.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> ---
> v2: Reworked pseries PE setup slightly. NOT DONE YET. mostly done needs test
So far it was looking good and now this :)
When is it going to be done? Is this the broken stuff you mentioned
elsewhere?
--
Alexey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platform
2020-07-24 5:01 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
@ 2020-07-24 5:06 ` Oliver O'Halloran
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2020-07-24 5:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 3:01 PM Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/07/2020 14:26, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> > The EEH core has a concept of a "PE tree" to support PowerNV. The PE tree
> > follows the PCI bus structures because a reset asserted on an upstream
> > bridge will be propagated to the downstream bridges. On pseries there's a
> > 1-1 correspondence between what the guest sees are a PHB and a PE so the
> > "tree" is really just a single node.
> >
> > Current the EEH core is reponsible for setting up this PE tree which it
> > does by traversing the pci_dn tree. The structure of the pci_dn tree
> > matches the bus tree on PowerNV which leads to the PE tree being "correct"
> > this setup method doesn't make a whole lot of sense and it's actively
> > confusing for the pseries case where it doesn't really do anything.
> >
> > We want to remove the dependence on pci_dn anyway so this patch move
> > choosing where to insert a new PE into the platform code rather than
> > being part of the generic EEH code. For PowerNV this simplifies the
> > tree building logic and removes the use of pci_dn. For pseries we
> > keep the existing logic. I'm not really convinced it does anything
> > due to the 1-1 PE-to-PHB correspondence so every device under that
> > PHB should be in the same PE, but I'd rather not remove it entirely
> > until we've had a chance to look at it more deeply.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> > ---
> > v2: Reworked pseries PE setup slightly. NOT DONE YET. mostly done needs test
>
> So far it was looking good and now this :)
>
> When is it going to be done? Is this the broken stuff you mentioned
> elsewhere?
I am a dumb.
I put those in there to remind myself what I have / haven't done when
respinning a series. I added that before I tested it and forgot to
remove the comment.
>
>
> --
> Alexey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-22 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platform Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2020-07-24 5:05 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-07-27 7:26 ` Michael Ellerman
14 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy @ 2020-07-24 5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver O'Halloran, linuxppc-dev
On 22/07/2020 14:26, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite
> the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures.
The "eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic" name does not suggest anything really but
the comment does.
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> Replace it with direct
> calls to eeh_phb_pe_create() since that does what it says on the tin
> and removes a layer of indirection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Added sub prototype of eeh_phb_pe_create() for the !CONFIG_EEH case.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c | 13 -------------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c | 4 ++--
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> index 964a54292b36..64487b88c569 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> @@ -294,7 +294,6 @@ const char *eeh_pe_loc_get(struct eeh_pe *pe);
> struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe);
>
> struct eeh_dev *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn);
> -void eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb);
> void eeh_show_enabled(void);
> int __init eeh_ops_register(struct eeh_ops *ops);
> int __exit eeh_ops_unregister(const char *name);
> @@ -370,6 +369,8 @@ void pseries_eeh_init_edev_recursive(struct pci_dn *pdn);
> #else
> static inline void pseries_eeh_add_device_early(struct pci_dn *pdn) { }
> static inline void pseries_eeh_add_device_tree_early(struct pci_dn *pdn) { }
> +
> +static inline int eeh_phb_pe_create(struct pci_controller *phb) { return 0; }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> index d407981dec76..859f76020256 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static int eeh_init(void)
>
> /* Initialize PHB PEs */
> list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node)
> - eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic(hose);
> + eeh_phb_pe_create(hose);
>
> eeh_addr_cache_init();
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c
> index 7370185c7a05..8e159a12f10c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c
> @@ -52,16 +52,3 @@ struct eeh_dev *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn)
>
> return edev;
> }
> -
> -/**
> - * eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic - Create EEH devices for devices included in PHB
> - * @phb: PHB
> - *
> - * Scan the PHB OF node and its child association, then create the
> - * EEH devices accordingly
> - */
> -void eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb)
> -{
> - /* EEH PE for PHB */
> - eeh_phb_pe_create(phb);
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c
> index 71a3f97dc988..f89376ff633e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c
> @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ static int of_pci_phb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> /* Init pci_dn data structures */
> pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(phb);
>
> - /* Create EEH PEs for the PHB */
> - eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic(phb);
> + /* Create EEH PE for the PHB */
> + eeh_phb_pe_create(phb);
>
> /* Scan the bus */
> pcibios_scan_phb(phb);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c
> index b3a38f5a6b68..f9ae17e8a0f4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct pci_controller *init_phb_dynamic(struct device_node *dn)
> pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(phb);
>
> /* Create EEH devices for the PHB */
> - eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic(phb);
> + eeh_phb_pe_create(phb);
>
> if (dn->child)
> pseries_eeh_init_edev_recursive(PCI_DN(dn));
>
--
Alexey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()
2020-07-22 4:26 [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Oliver O'Halloran
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-24 5:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() Alexey Kardashevskiy
@ 2020-07-27 7:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-27 10:53 ` Michael Ellerman
14 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-27 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev, Oliver O'Halloran
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:26:15 +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite
> the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures. Replace it with direct
> calls to eeh_phb_pe_create() since that does what it says on the tin
> and removes a layer of indirection.
Applied to powerpc/next.
[01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/475028efc708880e16e61cc4cbbc00af784cb39b
[02/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev.c
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/d74ee8e9d12e2071014ecec96a1ce2744f77639d
[03/14] powerpc/eeh: Move vf_index out of pci_dn and into eeh_dev
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/dffa91539e80355402c0716a91af17fc8ddd1abf
[04/14] powerpc/pseries: Stop using pdn->pe_number
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/c408ce9075b8e1533f30fd3a113b75fb745f722f
[05/14] powerpc/eeh: Kill off eeh_ops->get_pe_addr()
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a40db934312cb2a4bef16b3edc962bc8c7f6462f
[06/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove VF config space restoration
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/21b43bd59c7838825b94eea288333affb53dd399
[07/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->restore_config()
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/0c2c76523c04ac184c7d7bbb8756f603375b7fc4
[08/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->resume_notify()
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/8225d543dc0170e5b61af8559af07ec4f26f0bd6
[09/14] powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->{read|write}_config()
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/17d2a4870467bc8e8966304c08980571da943558
[10/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove spurious use of pci_dn in eeh_dump_dev_log
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1a303d8844d082ef58ff5fc3005b99621a3263ba
[11/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove class code field from edev
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/768a42845b9ecdb28ba1991e17088b7eeb23a3eb
[12/14] powerpc/eeh: Rename eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe()
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/d923ab7a96fcc2b46aac9b2fc38ffdca72436fd1
[13/14] powerpc/eeh: Drop pdn use in eeh_pe_tree_insert()
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/31595ae5aece519be5faa2e2013278ce45894d26
[14/14] powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platform
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a131bfc69bc868083a6c7f9b5dad1331902a3534
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()
2020-07-27 7:26 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2020-07-27 10:53 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-27 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev, Oliver O'Halloran
Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:26:15 +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
>> This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite
>> the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures. Replace it with direct
>> calls to eeh_phb_pe_create() since that does what it says on the tin
>> and removes a layer of indirection.
>
> Applied to powerpc/next.
>
> [01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/475028efc708880e16e61cc4cbbc00af784cb39b
Something weird happened with the "thanks" script. Pretty sure I applied v3.
I think I applied this version previously and the script just matched
the subjects?
Anyway, ignore this mail.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread