All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
                   ` (34 more replies)
  0 siblings, 35 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Currently bpf is using the memlock rlimit for the memory accounting.
This approach has its downsides and over time has created a significant
amount of problems:

1) The limit is per-user, but because most bpf operations are performed
   as root, the limit has a little value.

2) It's hard to come up with a specific maximum value. Especially because
   the counter is shared with non-bpf users (e.g. memlock() users).
   Any specific value is either too low and creates false failures
   or too high and useless.

3) Charging is not connected to the actual memory allocation. Bpf code
   should manually calculate the estimated cost and precharge the counter,
   and then take care of uncharging, including all fail paths.
   It adds to the code complexity and makes it easy to leak a charge.

4) There is no simple way of getting the current value of the counter.
   We've used drgn for it, but it's far from being convenient.

5) Cryptic -EPERM is returned on exceeding the limit. Libbpf even had
   a function to "explain" this case for users.

In order to overcome these problems let's switch to the memcg-based
memory accounting of bpf objects. With the recent addition of the percpu
memory accounting, now it's possible to provide a comprehensive accounting
of memory used by bpf programs and maps.

This approach has the following advantages:
1) The limit is per-cgroup and hierarchical. It's way more flexible and allows
   a better control over memory usage by different workloads.

2) The actual memory consumption is taken into account. It happens automatically
   on the allocation time if __GFP_ACCOUNT flags is passed. Uncharging is also
   performed automatically on releasing the memory. So the code on the bpf side
   becomes simpler and safer.

3) There is a simple way to get the current value and statistics.

The patchset consists of the following parts:
1) memcg-based accounting for various bpf objects: progs and maps
2) removal of the rlimit-based accounting
3) removal of rlimit adjustments in userspace tools and tests


Roman Gushchin (35):
  bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs
  bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps
  bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps
  bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps
  bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps
  bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps
  bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps
  bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps
  bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer
  bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for socket storage maps
  bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap maps
  bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps
    maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sock_map maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps
  bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs
  bpf: libbpf: cleanup RLIMIT_MEMLOCK usage
  bpf: bpftool: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  bpf: runqslower: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  bpf: selftests: delete bpf_rlimit.h
  bpf: selftests: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  perf: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK

 include/linux/bpf.h                           |  23 ---
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c                         |  30 +---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c                   |  19 +--
 kernel/bpf/core.c                             |  20 +--
 kernel/bpf/cpumap.c                           |  20 +--
 kernel/bpf/devmap.c                           |  23 +--
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          |  33 +---
 kernel/bpf/local_storage.c                    |  38 ++---
 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c                         |  17 +-
 kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c                 |  16 +-
 kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c                  |  12 +-
 kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c                          |  33 ++--
 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c                         |  16 +-
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          | 152 ++----------------
 net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c                     |  23 +--
 net/core/sock_map.c                           |  28 ++--
 net/xdp/xskmap.c                              |  13 +-
 samples/bpf/hbm.c                             |   1 -
 samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c              |  11 --
 samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c                |   2 -
 samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c                    |   2 -
 samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c                    |   2 -
 samples/bpf/spintest_user.c                   |   2 -
 samples/bpf/syscall_tp_user.c                 |   2 -
 samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c              |   5 -
 samples/bpf/test_lru_dist.c                   |   3 -
 samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_user.c            |   9 --
 samples/bpf/test_overhead_user.c              |   2 -
 samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c                |   2 -
 samples/bpf/tracex2_user.c                    |   6 -
 samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c                    |   6 -
 samples/bpf/tracex4_user.c                    |   6 -
 samples/bpf/tracex5_user.c                    |   3 -
 samples/bpf/tracex6_user.c                    |   3 -
 samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c                       |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_user.c            |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_user.c                |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_cpu_user.c           |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c           |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_user.c               |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c            |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdp_rxq_info_user.c               |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c            |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdp_tx_iptunnel_user.c            |   6 -
 samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c                    |   7 -
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c                    |   7 -
 tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c                   |   2 -
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h                      |   2 -
 tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c                       |   2 -
 tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c                      |   1 -
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                      |   3 -
 tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c                |   2 -
 tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c             |  16 --
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        |  31 +---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        |   5 -
 tools/perf/builtin-trace.c                    |  10 --
 tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c               |   6 -
 tools/perf/util/Build                         |   1 -
 tools/perf/util/rlimit.c                      |  29 ----
 tools/perf/util/rlimit.h                      |   6 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c           |  16 --
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h      |  28 ----
 .../selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c       |   1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c        |   1 -
 .../bpf/prog_tests/select_reuseport.c         |   1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c      |   1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_map.c    |   5 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c        |   5 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c        |   1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c       |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c    |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c    |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c       |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_netcnt.c     |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c      |   1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/test_skb_cgroup_id_user.c   |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c       |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c  |   1 -
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_fields.c  |   1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c        |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c    |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c     |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c        |   1 -
 .../bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c       |   1 -
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf_user.c  |   1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c       |   1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   |   1 -
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier_log.c |   2 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdping.c          |   6 -
 tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c   |  20 ---
 91 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 782 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 tools/perf/util/rlimit.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/perf/util/rlimit.h
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h

-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 01/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (33 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Include memory used by bpf programs into the memcg-based accounting.
This includes the memory used by programs itself, auxiliary data
and statistics.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/core.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index bde93344164d..daab8dcafbd4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ void *bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper(const struct sk_buff *skb, int k, uns
 
 struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_extra_flags)
 {
-	gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_extra_flags;
+	gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_extra_flags;
 	struct bpf_prog_aux *aux;
 	struct bpf_prog *fp;
 
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_extra_flag
 	if (fp == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 
-	aux = kzalloc(sizeof(*aux), GFP_KERNEL | gfp_extra_flags);
+	aux = kzalloc(sizeof(*aux), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | gfp_extra_flags);
 	if (aux == NULL) {
 		vfree(fp);
 		return NULL;
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_extra_flag
 
 struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_alloc(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_extra_flags)
 {
-	gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_extra_flags;
+	gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_extra_flags;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;
 	int cpu;
 
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ void bpf_prog_free_linfo(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_realloc(struct bpf_prog *fp_old, unsigned int size,
 				  gfp_t gfp_extra_flags)
 {
-	gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_extra_flags;
+	gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_extra_flags;
 	struct bpf_prog *fp;
 	u32 pages, delta;
 	int ret;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 02/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (32 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

This patch enables memcg-based memory accounting for memory allocated
by __bpf_map_area_alloc(), which is used by most map types for
large allocations.

Following patches in the series will refine the accounting for
some map types.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index ee290b1f2d9e..501b2c071d7b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static void *__bpf_map_area_alloc(u64 size, int numa_node, bool mmapable)
 	 * __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL to avoid such situations.
 	 */
 
-	const gfp_t gfp = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO;
+	const gfp_t gfp = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 	unsigned int flags = 0;
 	unsigned long align = 1;
 	void *area;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 03/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (31 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Include percpu arrays and auxiliary data into the memcg-based memory
accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index 8ff419b632a6..9597fecff8da 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -28,12 +28,12 @@ static void bpf_array_free_percpu(struct bpf_array *array)
 
 static int bpf_array_alloc_percpu(struct bpf_array *array)
 {
+	const gfp_t gfp = GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 	void __percpu *ptr;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < array->map.max_entries; i++) {
-		ptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(array->elem_size, 8,
-					 GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+		ptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(array->elem_size, 8, gfp);
 		if (!ptr) {
 			bpf_array_free_percpu(array);
 			return -ENOMEM;
@@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *prog_array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	struct bpf_array_aux *aux;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 
-	aux = kzalloc(sizeof(*aux), GFP_KERNEL);
+	aux = kzalloc(sizeof(*aux), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!aux)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 04/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (30 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Include metadata and percpu data into the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
index f1c46529929b..74ae9fcbe82e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *cpu_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	    attr->map_flags & ~BPF_F_NUMA_NODE)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	cmap = kzalloc(sizeof(*cmap), GFP_USER);
+	cmap = kzalloc(sizeof(*cmap), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!cmap)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *
 __cpu_map_entry_alloc(struct bpf_cpumap_val *value, u32 cpu, int map_id)
 {
 	int numa, err, i, fd = value->bpf_prog.fd;
-	gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN;
+	gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_NOWARN;
 	struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu;
 	struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq;
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 05/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (29 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Account memory used by cgroup storage maps including the percpu memory
for the percpu flavor of cgroup storage and map metadata.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index 3b2c70197d78..117acb2e80fb 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static int cgroup_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 
 	new = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_storage_buffer) +
 			   map->value_size,
-			   __GFP_ZERO | GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+			   __GFP_ZERO | GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN |
+			   __GFP_ACCOUNT,
 			   map->numa_node);
 	if (!new)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -313,7 +314,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	map = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map),
-			   __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER, numa_node);
+			   __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT, numa_node);
 	if (!map) {
 		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -496,9 +497,9 @@ static size_t bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size(struct bpf_map *map, u32 *pages)
 struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 					enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype)
 {
+	const gfp_t gfp = __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
-	gfp_t flags;
 	size_t size;
 	u32 pages;
 
@@ -511,20 +512,18 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	if (bpf_map_charge_memlock(map, pages))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
 
-	storage = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage),
-			       __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER, map->numa_node);
+	storage = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage), gfp,
+			       map->numa_node);
 	if (!storage)
 		goto enomem;
 
-	flags = __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER;
-
 	if (stype == BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED) {
-		storage->buf = kmalloc_node(size, flags, map->numa_node);
+		storage->buf = kmalloc_node(size, gfp, map->numa_node);
 		if (!storage->buf)
 			goto enomem;
 		check_and_init_map_lock(map, storage->buf->data);
 	} else {
-		storage->percpu_buf = __alloc_percpu_gfp(size, 8, flags);
+		storage->percpu_buf = __alloc_percpu_gfp(size, 8, gfp);
 		if (!storage->percpu_buf)
 			goto enomem;
 	}
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 06/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (28 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Include map metadata and the node size (struct bpf_dtab_netdev) on
element update into the accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
index 10abb06065bb..05bf93088063 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *dev_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
 
-	dtab = kzalloc(sizeof(*dtab), GFP_USER);
+	dtab = kzalloc(sizeof(*dtab), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!dtab)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
@@ -603,7 +603,8 @@ static struct bpf_dtab_netdev *__dev_map_alloc_node(struct net *net,
 	struct bpf_prog *prog = NULL;
 	struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev;
 
-	dev = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*dev), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+	dev = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*dev),
+			   GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
 			   dtab->map.numa_node);
 	if (!dev)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 07/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (27 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Include percpu objects and the size of map metadata into the
accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index 024276787055..9d0432170812 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -263,10 +263,11 @@ static int prealloc_init(struct bpf_htab *htab)
 		goto skip_percpu_elems;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
+		const gfp_t gfp = GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 		u32 size = round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
 		void __percpu *pptr;
 
-		pptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(size, 8, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+		pptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(size, 8, gfp);
 		if (!pptr)
 			goto free_elems;
 		htab_elem_set_ptr(get_htab_elem(htab, i), htab->map.key_size,
@@ -321,7 +322,7 @@ static int alloc_extra_elems(struct bpf_htab *htab)
 	int cpu;
 
 	pptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(sizeof(struct htab_elem *), 8,
-				  GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+				  GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!pptr)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -424,7 +425,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	u64 cost;
 	int err;
 
-	htab = kzalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER);
+	htab = kzalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!htab)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
@@ -827,6 +828,7 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
 					 bool percpu, bool onallcpus,
 					 struct htab_elem *old_elem)
 {
+	const gfp_t gfp = GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 	u32 size = htab->map.value_size;
 	bool prealloc = htab_is_prealloc(htab);
 	struct htab_elem *l_new, **pl_new;
@@ -859,8 +861,7 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
 				l_new = ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
 				goto dec_count;
 			}
-		l_new = kmalloc_node(htab->elem_size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
-				     htab->map.numa_node);
+		l_new = kmalloc_node(htab->elem_size, gfp, htab->map.numa_node);
 		if (!l_new) {
 			l_new = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 			goto dec_count;
@@ -876,8 +877,7 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
 			pptr = htab_elem_get_ptr(l_new, key_size);
 		} else {
 			/* alloc_percpu zero-fills */
-			pptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(size, 8,
-						  GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+			pptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(size, 8, gfp);
 			if (!pptr) {
 				kfree(l_new);
 				l_new = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 08/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
                   ` (26 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Include lpm trie and lpm trie node objects into the memcg-based memory
accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
index 44474bf3ab7a..d85e0fc2cafc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static struct lpm_trie_node *lpm_trie_node_alloc(const struct lpm_trie *trie,
 	if (value)
 		size += trie->map.value_size;
 
-	node = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+	node = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
 			    trie->map.numa_node);
 	if (!node)
 		return NULL;
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *trie_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	    attr->value_size > LPM_VAL_SIZE_MAX)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	trie = kzalloc(sizeof(*trie), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	trie = kzalloc(sizeof(*trie), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!trie)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 09/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (25 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Enable the memcg-based memory accounting for the memory used by
the bpf ringbuffer.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
index 002f8a5c9e51..e8e2c39cbdc9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ struct bpf_ringbuf_hdr {
 
 static struct bpf_ringbuf *bpf_ringbuf_area_alloc(size_t data_sz, int numa_node)
 {
-	const gfp_t flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN |
-			    __GFP_ZERO;
+	const gfp_t flags = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
+			    __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO;
 	int nr_meta_pages = RINGBUF_PGOFF + RINGBUF_POS_PAGES;
 	int nr_data_pages = data_sz >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	int nr_pages = nr_meta_pages + nr_data_pages;
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ static struct bpf_ringbuf *bpf_ringbuf_area_alloc(size_t data_sz, int numa_node)
 	 */
 	array_size = (nr_meta_pages + 2 * nr_data_pages) * sizeof(*pages);
 	if (array_size > PAGE_SIZE)
-		pages = vmalloc_node(array_size, numa_node);
+		pages = __vmalloc_node(array_size, 1, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT,
+				       numa_node, __builtin_return_address(0));
 	else
 		pages = kmalloc_node(array_size, flags, numa_node);
 	if (!pages)
@@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *ringbuf_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
 #endif
 
-	rb_map = kzalloc(sizeof(*rb_map), GFP_USER);
+	rb_map = kzalloc(sizeof(*rb_map), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!rb_map)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 10/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for socket storage maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (24 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Account memory used by the socket storage.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index eafcd15e7dfd..fbcd03cd00d3 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ static struct bpf_sk_storage_elem *selem_alloc(struct bpf_sk_storage_map *smap,
 	if (charge_omem && omem_charge(sk, smap->elem_size))
 		return NULL;
 
-	selem = kzalloc(smap->elem_size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	selem = kzalloc(smap->elem_size,
+			GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (selem) {
 		if (value)
 			memcpy(SDATA(selem)->data, value, smap->map.value_size);
@@ -337,7 +338,8 @@ static int sk_storage_alloc(struct sock *sk,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	sk_storage = kzalloc(sizeof(*sk_storage), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	sk_storage = kzalloc(sizeof(*sk_storage),
+			     GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!sk_storage) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto uncharge;
@@ -677,7 +679,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_sk_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	u64 cost;
 	int ret;
 
-	smap = kzalloc(sizeof(*smap), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	smap = kzalloc(sizeof(*smap), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!smap)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&smap->map, attr);
@@ -695,7 +697,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_sk_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	}
 
 	smap->buckets = kvcalloc(sizeof(*smap->buckets), nbuckets,
-				 GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+				 GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!smap->buckets) {
 		bpf_map_charge_finish(&smap->map.memory);
 		kfree(smap);
@@ -1024,7 +1026,7 @@ bpf_sk_storage_diag_alloc(const struct nlattr *nla_stgs)
 	}
 
 	diag = kzalloc(sizeof(*diag) + sizeof(diag->maps[0]) * nr_maps,
-		       GFP_KERNEL);
+		       GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!diag)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 11/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (23 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Include sockmap internal metadata into the memcg-based memory
accounting. Also include the memory allocated on updating an element.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 net/core/sock_map.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index 119f52a99dc1..bc797adca44c 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *sock_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	    attr->map_flags & ~SOCK_CREATE_FLAG_MASK)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	stab = kzalloc(sizeof(*stab), GFP_USER);
+	stab = kzalloc(sizeof(*stab), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!stab)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
@@ -829,7 +829,8 @@ static struct bpf_shtab_elem *sock_hash_alloc_elem(struct bpf_shtab *htab,
 		}
 	}
 
-	new = kmalloc_node(htab->elem_size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+	new = kmalloc_node(htab->elem_size,
+			   GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
 			   htab->map.numa_node);
 	if (!new) {
 		atomic_dec(&htab->count);
@@ -1011,7 +1012,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *sock_hash_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (attr->key_size > MAX_BPF_STACK)
 		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
 
-	htab = kzalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER);
+	htab = kzalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!htab)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 12/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (22 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Extend xskmap memory accounting to include the memory taken by
the xsk_map_node structure.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 net/xdp/xskmap.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/xdp/xskmap.c b/net/xdp/xskmap.c
index 8367adbbe9df..e574b22defe5 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xskmap.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xskmap.c
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ static struct xsk_map_node *xsk_map_node_alloc(struct xsk_map *map,
 	struct xsk_map_node *node;
 	int err;
 
-	node = kzalloc(sizeof(*node), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	node = kzalloc(sizeof(*node),
+		       GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!node)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 13/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (21 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 24 ++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index 9597fecff8da..41581c38b31d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -75,11 +75,10 @@ int array_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
 static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	bool percpu = attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY;
-	int ret, numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
+	int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 	u32 elem_size, index_mask, max_entries;
 	bool bypass_spec_v1 = bpf_bypass_spec_v1();
-	u64 cost, array_size, mask64;
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
+	u64 array_size, mask64;
 	struct bpf_array *array;
 
 	elem_size = round_up(attr->value_size, 8);
@@ -120,44 +119,29 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* make sure there is no u32 overflow later in round_up() */
-	cost = array_size;
-	if (percpu)
-		cost += (u64)attr->max_entries * elem_size * num_possible_cpus();
-
-	ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, cost);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ERR_PTR(ret);
-
 	/* allocate all map elements and zero-initialize them */
 	if (attr->map_flags & BPF_F_MMAPABLE) {
 		void *data;
 
 		/* kmalloc'ed memory can't be mmap'ed, use explicit vmalloc */
 		data = bpf_map_area_mmapable_alloc(array_size, numa_node);
-		if (!data) {
-			bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+		if (!data)
 			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-		}
 		array = data + PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct bpf_array))
 			- offsetof(struct bpf_array, value);
 	} else {
 		array = bpf_map_area_alloc(array_size, numa_node);
 	}
-	if (!array) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!array)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
 	array->index_mask = index_mask;
 	array->map.bypass_spec_v1 = bypass_spec_v1;
 
 	/* copy mandatory map attributes */
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&array->map, attr);
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&array->map.memory, &mem);
 	array->elem_size = elem_size;
 
 	if (percpu && bpf_array_alloc_percpu(array)) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&array->map.memory);
 		bpf_map_area_free(array);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 14/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 19 +++----------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 969c5d47f81f..22bfa236683b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -550,12 +550,10 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
 static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	const struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
-	size_t map_total_size, st_map_size;
+	size_t st_map_size;
 	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
 	const struct btf_type *t, *vt;
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
-	int err;
 
 	if (!bpf_capable())
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
@@ -575,20 +573,11 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		 * struct bpf_struct_ops_tcp_congestions_ops
 		 */
 		(vt->size - sizeof(struct bpf_struct_ops_value));
-	map_total_size = st_map_size +
-		/* uvalue */
-		sizeof(vt->size) +
-		/* struct bpf_progs **progs */
-		 btf_type_vlen(t) * sizeof(struct bpf_prog *);
-	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, map_total_size);
-	if (err < 0)
-		return ERR_PTR(err);
 
 	st_map = bpf_map_area_alloc(st_map_size, NUMA_NO_NODE);
-	if (!st_map) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!st_map)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
+
 	st_map->st_ops = st_ops;
 	map = &st_map->map;
 
@@ -599,14 +588,12 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	st_map->image = bpf_jit_alloc_exec(PAGE_SIZE);
 	if (!st_map->uvalue || !st_map->progs || !st_map->image) {
 		bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map);
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
 	mutex_init(&st_map->lock);
 	set_vm_flush_reset_perms(st_map->image);
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(map, attr);
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&map->memory, &mem);
 
 	return map;
 }
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 15/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 16 +---------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
index 74ae9fcbe82e..50f3444a3301 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
@@ -86,8 +86,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *cpu_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	u32 value_size = attr->value_size;
 	struct bpf_cpu_map *cmap;
 	int err = -ENOMEM;
-	u64 cost;
-	int ret;
 
 	if (!bpf_capable())
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
@@ -111,26 +109,14 @@ static struct bpf_map *cpu_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		goto free_cmap;
 	}
 
-	/* make sure page count doesn't overflow */
-	cost = (u64) cmap->map.max_entries * sizeof(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *);
-
-	/* Notice returns -EPERM on if map size is larger than memlock limit */
-	ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&cmap->map.memory, cost);
-	if (ret) {
-		err = ret;
-		goto free_cmap;
-	}
-
 	/* Alloc array for possible remote "destination" CPUs */
 	cmap->cpu_map = bpf_map_area_alloc(cmap->map.max_entries *
 					   sizeof(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *),
 					   cmap->map.numa_node);
 	if (!cmap->cpu_map)
-		goto free_charge;
+		goto free_cmap;
 
 	return &cmap->map;
-free_charge:
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&cmap->map.memory);
 free_cmap:
 	kfree(cmap);
 	return ERR_PTR(err);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 16/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 21 +--------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index 117acb2e80fb..5f29a420849c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -288,8 +288,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map;
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
-	int ret;
 
 	if (attr->key_size != sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key) &&
 	    attr->key_size != sizeof(__u64))
@@ -309,18 +307,10 @@ static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		/* max_entries is not used and enforced to be 0 */
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map));
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ERR_PTR(ret);
-
 	map = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map),
 			   __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT, numa_node);
-	if (!map) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!map)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
-
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&map->map.memory, &mem);
 
 	/* copy mandatory map attributes */
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&map->map, attr);
@@ -509,9 +499,6 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 
 	size = bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size(map, &pages);
 
-	if (bpf_map_charge_memlock(map, pages))
-		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
-
 	storage = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage), gfp,
 			       map->numa_node);
 	if (!storage)
@@ -533,7 +520,6 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	return storage;
 
 enomem:
-	bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(map, pages);
 	kfree(storage);
 	return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 }
@@ -560,16 +546,11 @@ void bpf_cgroup_storage_free(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage)
 {
 	enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
-	u32 pages;
 
 	if (!storage)
 		return;
 
 	map = &storage->map->map;
-
-	bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size(map, &pages);
-	bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(map, pages);
-
 	stype = cgroup_storage_type(map);
 	if (stype == BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED)
 		call_rcu(&storage->rcu, free_shared_cgroup_storage_rcu);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 17/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 18 ++----------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
index 05bf93088063..8148c7260a54 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
@@ -109,8 +109,6 @@ static inline struct hlist_head *dev_map_index_hash(struct bpf_dtab *dtab,
 static int dev_map_init_map(struct bpf_dtab *dtab, union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	u32 valsize = attr->value_size;
-	u64 cost = 0;
-	int err;
 
 	/* check sanity of attributes. 2 value sizes supported:
 	 * 4 bytes: ifindex
@@ -135,21 +133,13 @@ static int dev_map_init_map(struct bpf_dtab *dtab, union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 		if (!dtab->n_buckets) /* Overflow check */
 			return -EINVAL;
-		cost += (u64) sizeof(struct hlist_head) * dtab->n_buckets;
-	} else {
-		cost += (u64) dtab->map.max_entries * sizeof(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *);
 	}
 
-	/* if map size is larger than memlock limit, reject it */
-	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&dtab->map.memory, cost);
-	if (err)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH) {
 		dtab->dev_index_head = dev_map_create_hash(dtab->n_buckets,
 							   dtab->map.numa_node);
 		if (!dtab->dev_index_head)
-			goto free_charge;
+			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		spin_lock_init(&dtab->index_lock);
 	} else {
@@ -157,14 +147,10 @@ static int dev_map_init_map(struct bpf_dtab *dtab, union bpf_attr *attr)
 						      sizeof(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *),
 						      dtab->map.numa_node);
 		if (!dtab->netdev_map)
-			goto free_charge;
+			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-
-free_charge:
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&dtab->map.memory);
-	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
 static struct bpf_map *dev_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 18/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 19 +------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index 9d0432170812..9372b559b4e7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -422,7 +422,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	bool percpu_lru = (attr->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU);
 	bool prealloc = !(attr->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
 	struct bpf_htab *htab;
-	u64 cost;
 	int err;
 
 	htab = kzalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
@@ -459,26 +458,12 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	    htab->n_buckets > U32_MAX / sizeof(struct bucket))
 		goto free_htab;
 
-	cost = (u64) htab->n_buckets * sizeof(struct bucket) +
-	       (u64) htab->elem_size * htab->map.max_entries;
-
-	if (percpu)
-		cost += (u64) round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8) *
-			num_possible_cpus() * htab->map.max_entries;
-	else
-	       cost += (u64) htab->elem_size * num_possible_cpus();
-
-	/* if map size is larger than memlock limit, reject it */
-	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&htab->map.memory, cost);
-	if (err)
-		goto free_htab;
-
 	err = -ENOMEM;
 	htab->buckets = bpf_map_area_alloc(htab->n_buckets *
 					   sizeof(struct bucket),
 					   htab->map.numa_node);
 	if (!htab->buckets)
-		goto free_charge;
+		goto free_htab;
 
 	if (htab->map.map_flags & BPF_F_ZERO_SEED)
 		htab->hashrnd = 0;
@@ -508,8 +493,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	prealloc_destroy(htab);
 free_buckets:
 	bpf_map_area_free(htab->buckets);
-free_charge:
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&htab->map.memory);
 free_htab:
 	kfree(htab);
 	return ERR_PTR(err);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 19/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 13 -------------
 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
index d85e0fc2cafc..c747f0835eb1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -540,8 +540,6 @@ static int trie_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key)
 static struct bpf_map *trie_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	struct lpm_trie *trie;
-	u64 cost = sizeof(*trie), cost_per_node;
-	int ret;
 
 	if (!bpf_capable())
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
@@ -567,20 +565,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *trie_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 			  offsetof(struct bpf_lpm_trie_key, data);
 	trie->max_prefixlen = trie->data_size * 8;
 
-	cost_per_node = sizeof(struct lpm_trie_node) +
-			attr->value_size + trie->data_size;
-	cost += (u64) attr->max_entries * cost_per_node;
-
-	ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&trie->map.memory, cost);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_err;
-
 	spin_lock_init(&trie->lock);
 
 	return &trie->map;
-out_err:
-	kfree(trie);
-	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
 
 static void trie_free(struct bpf_map *map)
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 20/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c | 16 ++++------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c b/kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c
index 44184f82916a..92e73c35a34a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c
@@ -66,29 +66,21 @@ static int queue_stack_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 static struct bpf_map *queue_stack_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
-	int ret, numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem = {0};
+	int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 	struct bpf_queue_stack *qs;
-	u64 size, queue_size, cost;
+	u64 size, queue_size;
 
 	size = (u64) attr->max_entries + 1;
-	cost = queue_size = sizeof(*qs) + size * attr->value_size;
-
-	ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, cost);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+	queue_size = sizeof(*qs) + size * attr->value_size;
 
 	qs = bpf_map_area_alloc(queue_size, numa_node);
-	if (!qs) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!qs)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
 
 	memset(qs, 0, sizeof(*qs));
 
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&qs->map, attr);
 
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&qs->map.memory, &mem);
 	qs->size = size;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&qs->lock);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 21/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c b/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c
index 90b29c5b1da7..9d0161fdfec7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c
@@ -150,9 +150,8 @@ static void reuseport_array_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 
 static struct bpf_map *reuseport_array_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
-	int err, numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
+	int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 	struct reuseport_array *array;
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
 	u64 array_size;
 
 	if (!bpf_capable())
@@ -161,20 +160,13 @@ static struct bpf_map *reuseport_array_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	array_size = sizeof(*array);
 	array_size += (u64)attr->max_entries * sizeof(struct sock *);
 
-	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, array_size);
-	if (err)
-		return ERR_PTR(err);
-
 	/* allocate all map elements and zero-initialize them */
 	array = bpf_map_area_alloc(array_size, numa_node);
-	if (!array) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!array)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
 
 	/* copy mandatory map attributes */
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&array->map, attr);
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&array->map.memory, &mem);
 
 	return &array->map;
 }
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sock_map maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

bpf_ringbuf_alloc() can't return anything except ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM)
and a valid pointer, so to simplify the code make it return NULL
in the first case. This allows to drop a couple of lines in
ringbuf_map_alloc() and also makes it look similar to other memory
allocating function like kmalloc().

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c | 24 ++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
index e8e2c39cbdc9..e687b798d097 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ struct bpf_ringbuf {
 
 struct bpf_ringbuf_map {
 	struct bpf_map map;
-	struct bpf_map_memory memory;
 	struct bpf_ringbuf *rb;
 };
 
@@ -135,7 +134,7 @@ static struct bpf_ringbuf *bpf_ringbuf_alloc(size_t data_sz, int numa_node)
 
 	rb = bpf_ringbuf_area_alloc(data_sz, numa_node);
 	if (!rb)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		return NULL;
 
 	spin_lock_init(&rb->spinlock);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&rb->waitq);
@@ -151,8 +150,6 @@ static struct bpf_ringbuf *bpf_ringbuf_alloc(size_t data_sz, int numa_node)
 static struct bpf_map *ringbuf_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	struct bpf_ringbuf_map *rb_map;
-	u64 cost;
-	int err;
 
 	if (attr->map_flags & ~RINGBUF_CREATE_FLAG_MASK)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
@@ -174,26 +171,13 @@ static struct bpf_map *ringbuf_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&rb_map->map, attr);
 
-	cost = sizeof(struct bpf_ringbuf_map) +
-	       sizeof(struct bpf_ringbuf) +
-	       attr->max_entries;
-	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&rb_map->map.memory, cost);
-	if (err)
-		goto err_free_map;
-
 	rb_map->rb = bpf_ringbuf_alloc(attr->max_entries, rb_map->map.numa_node);
-	if (IS_ERR(rb_map->rb)) {
-		err = PTR_ERR(rb_map->rb);
-		goto err_uncharge;
+	if (!rb_map->rb) {
+		kfree(rb_map);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
 	return &rb_map->map;
-
-err_uncharge:
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&rb_map->map.memory);
-err_free_map:
-	kfree(rb_map);
-	return ERR_PTR(err);
 }
 
 static void bpf_ringbuf_free(struct bpf_ringbuf *rb)
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 23/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sock_map maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (21 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for sock_map maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 net/core/sock_map.c | 21 ++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index bc797adca44c..066aff088d20 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -26,8 +26,6 @@ struct bpf_stab {
 static struct bpf_map *sock_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	struct bpf_stab *stab;
-	u64 cost;
-	int err;
 
 	if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
@@ -45,22 +43,15 @@ static struct bpf_map *sock_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&stab->map, attr);
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&stab->lock);
 
-	/* Make sure page count doesn't overflow. */
-	cost = (u64) stab->map.max_entries * sizeof(struct sock *);
-	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&stab->map.memory, cost);
-	if (err)
-		goto free_stab;
-
 	stab->sks = bpf_map_area_alloc(stab->map.max_entries *
 				       sizeof(struct sock *),
 				       stab->map.numa_node);
-	if (stab->sks)
-		return &stab->map;
-	err = -ENOMEM;
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&stab->map.memory);
-free_stab:
-	kfree(stab);
-	return ERR_PTR(err);
+	if (!stab->sks) {
+		kfree(stab);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+
+	return &stab->map;
 }
 
 int sock_map_get_from_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 24/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (22 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sock_map maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:03 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 25/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 16 +++-------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 5beb2f8c23da..9ac0f405beef 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *stack_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	u32 value_size = attr->value_size;
 	struct bpf_stack_map *smap;
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
 	u64 cost, n_buckets;
 	int err;
 
@@ -119,15 +118,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *stack_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 	cost = n_buckets * sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket *) + sizeof(*smap);
 	cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket));
-	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, cost);
-	if (err)
-		return ERR_PTR(err);
-
 	smap = bpf_map_area_alloc(cost, bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr));
-	if (!smap) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!smap)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
 
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&smap->map, attr);
 	smap->map.value_size = value_size;
@@ -135,20 +128,17 @@ static struct bpf_map *stack_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 	err = get_callchain_buffers(sysctl_perf_event_max_stack);
 	if (err)
-		goto free_charge;
+		goto free_smap;
 
 	err = prealloc_elems_and_freelist(smap);
 	if (err)
 		goto put_buffers;
 
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&smap->map.memory, &mem);
-
 	return &smap->map;
 
 put_buffers:
 	put_callchain_buffers();
-free_charge:
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+free_smap:
 	bpf_map_area_free(smap);
 	return ERR_PTR(err);
 }
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 25/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (23 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 26/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 11 -----------
 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index fbcd03cd00d3..c0a35b6368af 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -676,8 +676,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_sk_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	struct bpf_sk_storage_map *smap;
 	unsigned int i;
 	u32 nbuckets;
-	u64 cost;
-	int ret;
 
 	smap = kzalloc(sizeof(*smap), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!smap)
@@ -688,18 +686,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_sk_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	/* Use at least 2 buckets, select_bucket() is undefined behavior with 1 bucket */
 	nbuckets = max_t(u32, 2, nbuckets);
 	smap->bucket_log = ilog2(nbuckets);
-	cost = sizeof(*smap->buckets) * nbuckets + sizeof(*smap);
-
-	ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&smap->map.memory, cost);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		kfree(smap);
-		return ERR_PTR(ret);
-	}
-
 	smap->buckets = kvcalloc(sizeof(*smap->buckets), nbuckets,
 				 GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!smap->buckets) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&smap->map.memory);
 		kfree(smap);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 26/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (24 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 25/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 27/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 net/xdp/xskmap.c | 10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xdp/xskmap.c b/net/xdp/xskmap.c
index e574b22defe5..0366013f13c6 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xskmap.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xskmap.c
@@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ static void xsk_map_sock_delete(struct xdp_sock *xs,
 
 static struct bpf_map *xsk_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
 	int err, numa_node;
 	struct xsk_map *m;
 	u64 size;
@@ -90,18 +89,11 @@ static struct bpf_map *xsk_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 	size = struct_size(m, xsk_map, attr->max_entries);
 
-	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, size);
-	if (err < 0)
-		return ERR_PTR(err);
-
 	m = bpf_map_area_alloc(size, numa_node);
-	if (!m) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!m)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
 
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&m->map, attr);
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&m->map.memory, &mem);
 	spin_lock_init(&m->lock);
 
 	return &m->map;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 27/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (25 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 26/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  4:10   ` kernel test robot
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 28/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 1 reply; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Remove rlimit-based accounting infrastructure code, which is not used
anymore.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h                           | 12 ----
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          | 64 +------------------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c        |  5 --
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 8357be349133..055c693d9928 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -112,11 +112,6 @@ struct bpf_map_ops {
 	const struct bpf_iter_seq_info *iter_seq_info;
 };
 
-struct bpf_map_memory {
-	u32 pages;
-	struct user_struct *user;
-};
-
 struct bpf_map {
 	/* The first two cachelines with read-mostly members of which some
 	 * are also accessed in fast-path (e.g. ops, max_entries).
@@ -137,7 +132,6 @@ struct bpf_map {
 	u32 btf_key_type_id;
 	u32 btf_value_type_id;
 	struct btf *btf;
-	struct bpf_map_memory memory;
 	char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
 	u32 btf_vmlinux_value_type_id;
 	bool bypass_spec_v1;
@@ -1117,12 +1111,6 @@ void bpf_map_inc_with_uref(struct bpf_map *map);
 struct bpf_map * __must_check bpf_map_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_map *map);
 void bpf_map_put_with_uref(struct bpf_map *map);
 void bpf_map_put(struct bpf_map *map);
-int bpf_map_charge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map, u32 pages);
-void bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map, u32 pages);
-int bpf_map_charge_init(struct bpf_map_memory *mem, u64 size);
-void bpf_map_charge_finish(struct bpf_map_memory *mem);
-void bpf_map_charge_move(struct bpf_map_memory *dst,
-			 struct bpf_map_memory *src);
 void *bpf_map_area_alloc(u64 size, int numa_node);
 void *bpf_map_area_mmapable_alloc(u64 size, int numa_node);
 void bpf_map_area_free(void *base);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 501b2c071d7b..ae51e2363cc1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -354,60 +354,6 @@ static void bpf_uncharge_memlock(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
 		atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
 }
 
-int bpf_map_charge_init(struct bpf_map_memory *mem, u64 size)
-{
-	u32 pages = round_up(size, PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-	struct user_struct *user;
-	int ret;
-
-	if (size >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
-		return -E2BIG;
-
-	user = get_current_user();
-	ret = bpf_charge_memlock(user, pages);
-	if (ret) {
-		free_uid(user);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	mem->pages = pages;
-	mem->user = user;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-void bpf_map_charge_finish(struct bpf_map_memory *mem)
-{
-	bpf_uncharge_memlock(mem->user, mem->pages);
-	free_uid(mem->user);
-}
-
-void bpf_map_charge_move(struct bpf_map_memory *dst,
-			 struct bpf_map_memory *src)
-{
-	*dst = *src;
-
-	/* Make sure src will not be used for the redundant uncharging. */
-	memset(src, 0, sizeof(struct bpf_map_memory));
-}
-
-int bpf_map_charge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map, u32 pages)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = bpf_charge_memlock(map->memory.user, pages);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-	map->memory.pages += pages;
-	return ret;
-}
-
-void bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map, u32 pages)
-{
-	bpf_uncharge_memlock(map->memory.user, pages);
-	map->memory.pages -= pages;
-}
-
 static int bpf_map_alloc_id(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
 	int id;
@@ -456,13 +402,10 @@ void bpf_map_free_id(struct bpf_map *map, bool do_idr_lock)
 static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work);
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
 
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&mem, &map->memory);
 	security_bpf_map_free(map);
 	/* implementation dependent freeing */
 	map->ops->map_free(map);
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
 }
 
 static void bpf_map_put_uref(struct bpf_map *map)
@@ -541,7 +484,7 @@ static void bpf_map_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *filp)
 		   "value_size:\t%u\n"
 		   "max_entries:\t%u\n"
 		   "map_flags:\t%#x\n"
-		   "memlock:\t%llu\n"
+		   "memlock:\t%llu\n" /* deprecated */
 		   "map_id:\t%u\n"
 		   "frozen:\t%u\n",
 		   map->map_type,
@@ -549,7 +492,7 @@ static void bpf_map_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *filp)
 		   map->value_size,
 		   map->max_entries,
 		   map->map_flags,
-		   map->memory.pages * 1ULL << PAGE_SHIFT,
+		   0LLU,
 		   map->id,
 		   READ_ONCE(map->frozen));
 	if (type) {
@@ -790,7 +733,6 @@ static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf,
 static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	int f_flags;
 	int err;
@@ -887,9 +829,7 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	security_bpf_map_free(map);
 free_map:
 	btf_put(map->btf);
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&mem, &map->memory);
 	map->ops->map_free(map);
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
 	return err;
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
index 473665cac67e..49d1dcaf7999 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
@@ -26,17 +26,12 @@ __u32 g_line = 0;
 		return 0;	\
 })
 
-struct bpf_map_memory {
-	__u32 pages;
-} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
-
 struct bpf_map {
 	enum bpf_map_type map_type;
 	__u32 key_size;
 	__u32 value_size;
 	__u32 max_entries;
 	__u32 id;
-	struct bpf_map_memory memory;
 } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
 
 static inline int check_bpf_map_fields(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 key_size,
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 28/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (26 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 27/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 29/35] bpf: libbpf: cleanup RLIMIT_MEMLOCK usage Roman Gushchin
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs. It has been
replaced with memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h  | 11 ------
 kernel/bpf/core.c    | 12 ++-----
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 86 ++++++--------------------------------------
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 055c693d9928..0c443468200e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1095,8 +1095,6 @@ void bpf_prog_sub(struct bpf_prog *prog, int i);
 void bpf_prog_inc(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 struct bpf_prog * __must_check bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog);
-int __bpf_prog_charge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages);
-void __bpf_prog_uncharge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages);
 void __bpf_free_used_maps(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux,
 			  struct bpf_map **used_maps, u32 len);
 
@@ -1380,15 +1378,6 @@ bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
 }
 
-static inline int __bpf_prog_charge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void __bpf_prog_uncharge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
-}
-
 static inline int bpf_obj_get_user(const char __user *pathname, int flags)
 {
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index daab8dcafbd4..23b8ff109ac8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -219,23 +219,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_realloc(struct bpf_prog *fp_old, unsigned int size,
 {
 	gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_extra_flags;
 	struct bpf_prog *fp;
-	u32 pages, delta;
-	int ret;
+	u32 pages;
 
 	size = round_up(size, PAGE_SIZE);
 	pages = size / PAGE_SIZE;
 	if (pages <= fp_old->pages)
 		return fp_old;
 
-	delta = pages - fp_old->pages;
-	ret = __bpf_prog_charge(fp_old->aux->user, delta);
-	if (ret)
-		return NULL;
-
 	fp = __vmalloc(size, gfp_flags);
-	if (fp == NULL) {
-		__bpf_prog_uncharge(fp_old->aux->user, delta);
-	} else {
+	if (fp) {
 		memcpy(fp, fp_old, fp_old->pages * PAGE_SIZE);
 		fp->pages = pages;
 		fp->aux->prog = fp;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index ae51e2363cc1..7f0bf60f5218 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -337,23 +337,6 @@ void bpf_map_init_from_attr(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr)
 	map->numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 }
 
-static int bpf_charge_memlock(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
-	unsigned long memlock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-
-	if (atomic_long_add_return(pages, &user->locked_vm) > memlock_limit) {
-		atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
-		return -EPERM;
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void bpf_uncharge_memlock(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
-	if (user)
-		atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
-}
-
 static int bpf_map_alloc_id(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
 	int id;
@@ -1563,51 +1546,6 @@ static void bpf_audit_prog(const struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned int op)
 	audit_log_end(ab);
 }
 
-int __bpf_prog_charge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
-	unsigned long memlock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-	unsigned long user_bufs;
-
-	if (user) {
-		user_bufs = atomic_long_add_return(pages, &user->locked_vm);
-		if (user_bufs > memlock_limit) {
-			atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
-			return -EPERM;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-void __bpf_prog_uncharge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
-	if (user)
-		atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
-}
-
-static int bpf_prog_charge_memlock(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
-	struct user_struct *user = get_current_user();
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = __bpf_prog_charge(user, prog->pages);
-	if (ret) {
-		free_uid(user);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	prog->aux->user = user;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void bpf_prog_uncharge_memlock(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
-	struct user_struct *user = prog->aux->user;
-
-	__bpf_prog_uncharge(user, prog->pages);
-	free_uid(user);
-}
-
 static int bpf_prog_alloc_id(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	int id;
@@ -1657,7 +1595,7 @@ static void __bpf_prog_put_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 
 	kvfree(aux->func_info);
 	kfree(aux->func_info_aux);
-	bpf_prog_uncharge_memlock(aux->prog);
+	free_uid(aux->user);
 	security_bpf_prog_free(aux);
 	bpf_prog_free(aux->prog);
 }
@@ -2090,7 +2028,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 		tgt_prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->attach_prog_fd);
 		if (IS_ERR(tgt_prog)) {
 			err = PTR_ERR(tgt_prog);
-			goto free_prog_nouncharge;
+			goto free_prog;
 		}
 		prog->aux->linked_prog = tgt_prog;
 	}
@@ -2099,18 +2037,15 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 
 	err = security_bpf_prog_alloc(prog->aux);
 	if (err)
-		goto free_prog_nouncharge;
-
-	err = bpf_prog_charge_memlock(prog);
-	if (err)
-		goto free_prog_sec;
+		goto free_prog;
 
+	prog->aux->user = get_current_user();
 	prog->len = attr->insn_cnt;
 
 	err = -EFAULT;
 	if (copy_from_user(prog->insns, u64_to_user_ptr(attr->insns),
 			   bpf_prog_insn_size(prog)) != 0)
-		goto free_prog;
+		goto free_prog_sec;
 
 	prog->orig_prog = NULL;
 	prog->jited = 0;
@@ -2121,19 +2056,19 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 	if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux)) {
 		err = bpf_prog_offload_init(prog, attr);
 		if (err)
-			goto free_prog;
+			goto free_prog_sec;
 	}
 
 	/* find program type: socket_filter vs tracing_filter */
 	err = find_prog_type(type, prog);
 	if (err < 0)
-		goto free_prog;
+		goto free_prog_sec;
 
 	prog->aux->load_time = ktime_get_boottime_ns();
 	err = bpf_obj_name_cpy(prog->aux->name, attr->prog_name,
 			       sizeof(attr->prog_name));
 	if (err < 0)
-		goto free_prog;
+		goto free_prog_sec;
 
 	/* run eBPF verifier */
 	err = bpf_check(&prog, attr, uattr);
@@ -2178,11 +2113,10 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 	 */
 	__bpf_prog_put_noref(prog, prog->aux->func_cnt);
 	return err;
-free_prog:
-	bpf_prog_uncharge_memlock(prog);
 free_prog_sec:
+	free_uid(prog->aux->user);
 	security_bpf_prog_free(prog->aux);
-free_prog_nouncharge:
+free_prog:
 	bpf_prog_free(prog);
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 29/35] bpf: libbpf: cleanup RLIMIT_MEMLOCK usage
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (27 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 28/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 30/35] bpf: bpftool: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

As bpf is not using memlock rlimit for memory accounting anymore,
let's remove the related code from libbpf.

Bpf operations can't fail because of exceeding the limit anymore.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 31 +------------------------------
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h |  5 -----
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index e51479d60285..841060f5cee3 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -112,32 +112,6 @@ void libbpf_print(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *format, ...)
 	va_end(args);
 }
 
-static void pr_perm_msg(int err)
-{
-	struct rlimit limit;
-	char buf[100];
-
-	if (err != -EPERM || geteuid() != 0)
-		return;
-
-	err = getrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &limit);
-	if (err)
-		return;
-
-	if (limit.rlim_cur == RLIM_INFINITY)
-		return;
-
-	if (limit.rlim_cur < 1024)
-		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%zu bytes", (size_t)limit.rlim_cur);
-	else if (limit.rlim_cur < 1024*1024)
-		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%.1f KiB", (double)limit.rlim_cur / 1024);
-	else
-		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%.1f MiB", (double)limit.rlim_cur / (1024*1024));
-
-	pr_warn("permission error while running as root; try raising 'ulimit -l'? current value: %s\n",
-		buf);
-}
-
 #define STRERR_BUFSIZE  128
 
 /* Copied from tools/perf/util/util.h */
@@ -3420,8 +3394,7 @@ bpf_object__probe_loading(struct bpf_object *obj)
 		cp = libbpf_strerror_r(ret, errmsg, sizeof(errmsg));
 		pr_warn("Error in %s():%s(%d). Couldn't load trivial BPF "
 			"program. Make sure your kernel supports BPF "
-			"(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y) and/or that RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is "
-			"set to big enough value.\n", __func__, cp, ret);
+			"(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y)", __func__, cp, ret);
 		return -ret;
 	}
 	close(ret);
@@ -3918,7 +3891,6 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj)
 err_out:
 	cp = libbpf_strerror_r(err, errmsg, sizeof(errmsg));
 	pr_warn("map '%s': failed to create: %s(%d)\n", map->name, cp, err);
-	pr_perm_msg(err);
 	for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
 		zclose(obj->maps[j].fd);
 	return err;
@@ -5419,7 +5391,6 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt,
 	ret = -errno;
 	cp = libbpf_strerror_r(errno, errmsg, sizeof(errmsg));
 	pr_warn("load bpf program failed: %s\n", cp);
-	pr_perm_msg(ret);
 
 	if (log_buf && log_buf[0] != '\0') {
 		ret = -LIBBPF_ERRNO__VERIFY;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index c6813791fa7e..8d2f1194cb02 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -610,11 +610,6 @@ bpf_prog_linfo__lfind(const struct bpf_prog_linfo *prog_linfo,
 
 /*
  * Probe for supported system features
- *
- * Note that running many of these probes in a short amount of time can cause
- * the kernel to reach the maximal size of lockable memory allowed for the
- * user, causing subsequent probes to fail. In this case, the caller may want
- * to adjust that limit with setrlimit().
  */
 LIBBPF_API bool bpf_probe_prog_type(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 				    __u32 ifindex);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 30/35] bpf: bpftool: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (28 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 29/35] bpf: libbpf: cleanup RLIMIT_MEMLOCK usage Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 31/35] bpf: runqslower: don't " Roman Gushchin
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Since bpf stopped using memlock rlimit to limit the memory usage,
there is no more reason for bpftool to alter its own limits.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c     | 7 -------
 tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c    | 2 --
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h       | 2 --
 tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c        | 2 --
 tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c       | 1 -
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c       | 3 ---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c | 2 --
 7 files changed, 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index 65303664417e..01b87e8c3040 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -109,13 +109,6 @@ static bool is_bpffs(char *path)
 	return (unsigned long)st_fs.f_type == BPF_FS_MAGIC;
 }
 
-void set_max_rlimit(void)
-{
-	struct rlimit rinf = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
-
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rinf);
-}
-
 static int
 mnt_fs(const char *target, const char *type, char *buff, size_t bufflen)
 {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
index 1cd75807673e..2d6c6bff934e 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
@@ -885,8 +885,6 @@ static int do_probe(int argc, char **argv)
 	__u32 ifindex = 0;
 	char *ifname;
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
-
 	while (argc) {
 		if (is_prefix(*argv, "kernel")) {
 			if (target != COMPONENT_UNSPEC) {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index e3a79b5a9960..0a3bd1ff14da 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -95,8 +95,6 @@ int detect_common_prefix(const char *arg, ...);
 void fprint_hex(FILE *f, void *arg, unsigned int n, const char *sep);
 void usage(void) __noreturn;
 
-void set_max_rlimit(void);
-
 int mount_tracefs(const char *target);
 
 struct pinned_obj_table {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
index 3a27d31a1856..f08b9e707511 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
@@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static int do_create(int argc, char **argv)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
-
 	fd = bpf_create_map_xattr(&attr);
 	if (fd < 0) {
 		p_err("map create failed: %s", strerror(errno));
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
index e3b116325403..4c559a8ae4e8 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ int build_obj_refs_table(struct obj_refs_table *table, enum bpf_obj_type type)
 	libbpf_print_fn_t default_print;
 
 	hash_init(table->table);
-	set_max_rlimit();
 
 	skel = pid_iter_bpf__open();
 	if (!skel) {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index 3e6ecc6332e2..40e50db60332 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -1291,8 +1291,6 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
 		}
 	}
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
-
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(file, &open_opts);
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj)) {
 		p_err("failed to open object file");
@@ -1833,7 +1831,6 @@ static int do_profile(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
 	err = profiler_bpf__load(profile_obj);
 	if (err) {
 		p_err("failed to load profile_obj");
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
index b58b91f62ffb..0915e1e9b7c0 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
@@ -498,8 +498,6 @@ static int do_register(int argc, char **argv)
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj))
 		return -1;
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
-
 	load_attr.obj = obj;
 	if (verifier_logs)
 		/* log_level1 + log_level2 + stats, but not stable UAPI */
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 31/35] bpf: runqslower: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (29 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 30/35] bpf: bpftool: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 32/35] bpf: selftests: delete bpf_rlimit.h Roman Gushchin
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Since bpf is not using memlock rlimit for memory accounting,
there are no more reasons to bump the limit.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c | 16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c b/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c
index d89715844952..a3380b53ce0c 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c
@@ -88,16 +88,6 @@ int libbpf_print_fn(enum libbpf_print_level level,
 	return vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
 }
 
-static int bump_memlock_rlimit(void)
-{
-	struct rlimit rlim_new = {
-		.rlim_cur	= RLIM_INFINITY,
-		.rlim_max	= RLIM_INFINITY,
-	};
-
-	return setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new);
-}
-
 void handle_event(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 data_sz)
 {
 	const struct event *e = data;
@@ -134,12 +124,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_fn);
 
-	err = bump_memlock_rlimit();
-	if (err) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "failed to increase rlimit: %d", err);
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	obj = runqslower_bpf__open();
 	if (!obj) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "failed to open and/or load BPF object\n");
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 32/35] bpf: selftests: delete bpf_rlimit.h
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (30 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 31/35] bpf: runqslower: don't " Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 33/35] bpf: selftests: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

As rlimit-based memory accounting is not used by bpf anymore,
there are no more reasons to play with memlock rlimit.

Delete bpf_rlimit.h which contained a code to bump the limit.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 samples/bpf/hbm.c                             |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h      | 28 -------------------
 .../selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c       |  1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c        |  1 -
 .../bpf/prog_tests/select_reuseport.c         |  1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c      |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c        |  1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c       |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c    |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c    |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c       |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_netcnt.c     |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c      |  1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/test_skb_cgroup_id_user.c   |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c       |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c  |  1 -
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_fields.c  |  1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c        |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c    |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c     |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c        |  1 -
 .../bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c       |  1 -
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf_user.c  |  1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c       |  1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   |  1 -
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier_log.c |  2 --
 27 files changed, 55 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h

diff --git a/samples/bpf/hbm.c b/samples/bpf/hbm.c
index 7d7153777678..e4b38ceb20a7 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/hbm.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/hbm.c
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@
 #include <getopt.h>
 
 #include "bpf_load.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 #include "hbm.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 9dac9b30f8ef..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-#include <sys/resource.h>
-#include <stdio.h>
-
-static  __attribute__((constructor)) void bpf_rlimit_ctor(void)
-{
-	struct rlimit rlim_old, rlim_new = {
-		.rlim_cur	= RLIM_INFINITY,
-		.rlim_max	= RLIM_INFINITY,
-	};
-
-	getrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_old);
-	/* For the sake of running the test cases, we temporarily
-	 * set rlimit to infinity in order for kernel to focus on
-	 * errors from actual test cases and not getting noise
-	 * from hitting memlock limits. The limit is on per-process
-	 * basis and not a global one, hence destructor not really
-	 * needed here.
-	 */
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new) < 0) {
-		perror("Unable to lift memlock rlimit");
-		/* Trying out lower limit, but expect potential test
-		 * case failures from this!
-		 */
-		rlim_new.rlim_cur = rlim_old.rlim_cur + (1UL << 20);
-		rlim_new.rlim_max = rlim_old.rlim_max + (1UL << 20);
-		setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new);
-	}
-}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c
index 3fd83b9dc1bf..75818141f318 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "flow_dissector_load.h"
 
 const char *cfg_pin_path = "/sys/fs/bpf/flow_dissector";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c
index e8da7b39158d..597bc70286f2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 
 #define CHECK(condition, tag, format...) ({		\
 	int __ret = !!(condition);			\
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/select_reuseport.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/select_reuseport.c
index 821b4146b7b6..520c8de8ee03 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/select_reuseport.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/select_reuseport.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
 #include <netinet/in.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 
 #include "test_progs.h"
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
index 9bbd2b2b7630..9d3faf6cf92d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 
 #include "test_progs.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 #include "network_helpers.h"
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c
index 305fae8f80a9..e4b7bd9e3abf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 #include <bpf/btf.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 #include "test_btf.h"
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
index 655729004391..0bde741ad84c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <sys/sysinfo.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
 char bpf_log_buf[BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE];
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c
index d850fb9076b5..4d6df9d99d50 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 
 #define DEV_CGROUP_PROG "./dev_cgroup.o"
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
index 006be3963977..ec595b5135e2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 
 #include "bpf_util.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 
 struct tlpm_node {
 	struct tlpm_node *next;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c
index 6a5349f9eb14..76748ff51de8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
 #include "bpf_util.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "../../../include/linux/filter.h"
 
 #define LOCAL_FREE_TARGET	(128)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index 754cf611723e..350fee74a6b3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
 #include "bpf_util.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "test_maps.h"
 
 #ifndef ENOTSUPP
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_netcnt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_netcnt.c
index c1da5404454a..7a3e07b4627d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_netcnt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_netcnt.c
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "netcnt_common.h"
 
 #define BPF_PROG "./netcnt_prog.o"
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index b1e4dadacd9b..406716d305dc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
 #define _GNU_SOURCE
 #include "test_progs.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include <argp.h>
 #include <pthread.h>
 #include <sched.h>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_skb_cgroup_id_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_skb_cgroup_id_user.c
index 356351c0ac28..8155e2c1d6ce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_skb_cgroup_id_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_skb_cgroup_id_user.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
 #define CGROUP_PATH		"/skb_cgroup_test"
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
index 52bf14955797..cd1ebce8b1a7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 #include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 
 #define CG_PATH		"/foo"
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c
index 0358814c67dc..7b8cd4fafb3d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 
 #ifndef ENOTSUPP
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_fields.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_fields.c
index f0fc103261a4..8ffdda96aeb6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_fields.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_fields.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 
 enum bpf_addr_array_idx {
 	ADDR_SRV_IDX,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c
index 15653b0e26eb..998efb7158b7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
 #define CG_PATH			"/foo"
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
index 78789b27e573..7094b93f44ec 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
 #include "bpf_util.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
 int running;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c
index d196e2a4a6e0..b5fd51efb4c7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
 #include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c
index 6272c784ca2a..bcbf14dd00e1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 
 #include "../../../include/linux/filter.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 
 static struct bpf_insn prog[BPF_MAXINSNS];
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c
index b9e991d43155..894eb0710d6f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
 static int start_server(const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t len)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf_user.c
index 3ae127620463..100393afeb12 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf_user.c
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c
index f9765ddf0761..9d14fedd47e4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 78a6bae56ea6..7c5e005c237f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
 #  define CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS 1
 # endif
 #endif
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_rand.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 #include "test_btf.h"
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier_log.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier_log.c
index 8d6918c3b4a2..4bca0a7344cc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier_log.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier_log.c
@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@
 
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
-
 #define LOG_SIZE (1 << 20)
 
 #define err(str...)	printf("ERROR: " str)
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 33/35] bpf: selftests: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (31 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 32/35] bpf: selftests: delete bpf_rlimit.h Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 34/35] bpf: samples: do not " Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 35/35] perf: don't " Roman Gushchin
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Since bpf is not using memlock rlimit for memory accounting,
there are no more reasons to bump the limit.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c           | 16 ---------------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_map.c    |  5 ++---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdping.c          |  6 ------
 tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c   | 20 -------------------
 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
index 944ad4721c83..f66610541c8a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
@@ -29,25 +29,9 @@ static int libbpf_print_fn(enum libbpf_print_level level,
 	return vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
 }
 
-static int bump_memlock_rlimit(void)
-{
-	struct rlimit rlim_new = {
-		.rlim_cur	= RLIM_INFINITY,
-		.rlim_max	= RLIM_INFINITY,
-	};
-
-	return setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new);
-}
-
 void setup_libbpf()
 {
-	int err;
-
 	libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_fn);
-
-	err = bump_memlock_rlimit();
-	if (err)
-		fprintf(stderr, "failed to increase RLIMIT_MEMLOCK: %d", err);
 }
 
 void hits_drops_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_map.c
index 08651b23edba..5fe76df58dd4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_map.c
@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ int dump_bpf_map(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map *ctx)
 	}
 
 	if (seq_num == 0)
-		BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "      id   refcnt  usercnt  locked_vm\n");
+		BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "      id   refcnt  usercnt\n");
 
 	BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%8u %8ld %8ld %10lu\n", map->id, map->refcnt.counter,
-		       map->usercnt.counter,
-		       map->memory.user->locked_vm.counter);
+		       map->usercnt.counter);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdping.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdping.c
index 842d9155d36c..488021169171 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdping.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdping.c
@@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	__u32 mode_flags = XDP_FLAGS_DRV_MODE | XDP_FLAGS_SKB_MODE;
 	struct addrinfo *a, hints = { .ai_family = AF_INET };
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	__u16 count = XDPING_DEFAULT_COUNT;
 	struct pinginfo pinginfo = { 0 };
 	const char *optstr = "c:I:NsS";
@@ -166,11 +165,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		freeaddrinfo(a);
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 
 	if (bpf_prog_load(filename, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd)) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c
index b5277106df1f..88709898bae5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c
@@ -437,26 +437,6 @@ void enable_fastopen(void)
 	}
 }
 
-static struct rlimit rlim_old;
-
-static  __attribute__((constructor)) void main_ctor(void)
-{
-	getrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_old);
-
-	if (rlim_old.rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY) {
-		struct rlimit rlim_new;
-
-		rlim_new.rlim_cur = rlim_old.rlim_cur + (1UL << 20);
-		rlim_new.rlim_max = rlim_old.rlim_max + (1UL << 20);
-		setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new);
-	}
-}
-
-static __attribute__((destructor)) void main_dtor(void)
-{
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_old);
-}
-
 int main(void)
 {
 	fprintf(stderr, "---- IPv4 UDP ----\n");
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 34/35] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (32 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 33/35] bpf: selftests: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 35/35] perf: don't " Roman Gushchin
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Since bpf is not using rlimit memlock for the memory accounting
and control, do not change the limit in sample applications.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c    | 11 -----------
 samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c      |  2 --
 samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c          |  2 --
 samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c          |  2 --
 samples/bpf/spintest_user.c         |  2 --
 samples/bpf/syscall_tp_user.c       |  2 --
 samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c    |  5 -----
 samples/bpf/test_lru_dist.c         |  3 ---
 samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_user.c  |  9 ---------
 samples/bpf/test_overhead_user.c    |  2 --
 samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c      |  2 --
 samples/bpf/tracex2_user.c          |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c          |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/tracex4_user.c          |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/tracex5_user.c          |  3 ---
 samples/bpf/tracex6_user.c          |  3 ---
 samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c             |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_user.c  |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_user.c      |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_cpu_user.c |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_user.c     |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c  |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdp_rxq_info_user.c     |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c  |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdp_tx_iptunnel_user.c  |  6 ------
 samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c          |  7 -------
 27 files changed, 133 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c
index 8b13230b4c46..4c198bc55beb 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c
@@ -421,20 +421,9 @@ static void fixup_map(struct bpf_object *obj)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
-	int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
-	struct bpf_link *links[8];
-	struct bpf_program *prog;
-	struct bpf_object *obj;
-	struct bpf_map *map;
 	char filename[256];
 	int i = 0;
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	if (argc > 1)
 		test_flags = atoi(argv[1]) ? : test_flags;
 
diff --git a/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c b/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c
index 51c7da5341cc..9e51dd011a2a 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c
@@ -95,12 +95,10 @@ static void int_exit(int sig)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	char filename[256];
 	int delay = 1;
 
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
 
 	signal(SIGINT, int_exit);
 	signal(SIGTERM, int_exit);
diff --git a/samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c b/samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c
index af925a5afd1d..bafa567b840c 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ struct pair {
 
 int main(int ac, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	int map_fd, prog_fd;
 	char filename[256];
@@ -24,7 +23,6 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
 	FILE *f;
 
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
 
 	if (bpf_prog_load(filename, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
 			  &obj, &prog_fd))
diff --git a/samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c b/samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c
index 4dbee7427d47..6ee7b7a4b9b7 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ struct pair {
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	int i, sock, key, fd, main_prog_fd, jmp_table_fd, hash_map_fd;
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	char filename[256];
@@ -34,7 +33,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	FILE *f;
 
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
 
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(filename, NULL);
 	if (libbpf_get_error(obj)) {
diff --git a/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c b/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c
index fb430ea2ef51..458f1439e670 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c
@@ -11,14 +11,12 @@
 
 int main(int ac, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	long key, next_key, value;
 	char filename[256];
 	struct ksym *sym;
 	int i;
 
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
 
 	if (load_kallsyms()) {
 		printf("failed to process /proc/kallsyms\n");
diff --git a/samples/bpf/syscall_tp_user.c b/samples/bpf/syscall_tp_user.c
index 57014bab7cbe..caa3891ee774 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/syscall_tp_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/syscall_tp_user.c
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static int test(char *filename, int num_progs)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	int opt, num_progs = 1;
 	char filename[256];
 
@@ -101,7 +100,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 
 	return test(filename, num_progs);
diff --git a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
index ff2e9c1c7266..e2c1cacb781c 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
@@ -290,16 +290,11 @@ static int test_debug_fs_uprobe(char *binary_path, long offset, bool is_return)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {1024*1024, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	extern char __executable_start;
 	char filename[256], buf[256];
 	__u64 uprobe_file_offset;
 
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
 
 	if (load_kallsyms()) {
 		printf("failed to process /proc/kallsyms\n");
diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_lru_dist.c b/samples/bpf/test_lru_dist.c
index b313dba4111b..c92c5c06b965 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_lru_dist.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_lru_dist.c
@@ -489,7 +489,6 @@ static void test_parallel_lru_loss(int map_type, int map_flags, int nr_tasks)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	int map_flags[] = {0, BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU};
 	const char *dist_file;
 	int nr_tasks = 1;
@@ -508,8 +507,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	setbuf(stdout, NULL);
 
-	assert(!setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r));
-
 	srand(time(NULL));
 
 	nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_user.c b/samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_user.c
index 98656de56b83..0e65753a157a 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_user.c
@@ -114,17 +114,8 @@ static void test_map_in_map(void)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
-	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
-	struct bpf_program *prog;
-	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	char filename[256];
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(filename, NULL);
 	if (libbpf_get_error(obj)) {
diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_overhead_user.c b/samples/bpf/test_overhead_user.c
index 94f74112a20e..c100fd46cd8a 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_overhead_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_overhead_user.c
@@ -125,12 +125,10 @@ static void unload_progs(void)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	char filename[256];
 	int num_cpu = 8;
 	int test_flags = ~0;
 
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
 
 	if (argc > 1)
 		test_flags = atoi(argv[1]) ? : test_flags;
diff --git a/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c b/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
index ac1ba368195c..9664749bf618 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
@@ -294,13 +294,11 @@ static void test_bpf_perf_event(void)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_object *obj = NULL;
 	char filename[256];
 	int error = 1;
 
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
 
 	signal(SIGINT, err_exit);
 	signal(SIGTERM, err_exit);
diff --git a/samples/bpf/tracex2_user.c b/samples/bpf/tracex2_user.c
index 3e36b3e4e3ef..1626d51dfffd 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/tracex2_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/tracex2_user.c
@@ -116,7 +116,6 @@ static void int_exit(int sig)
 
 int main(int ac, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {1024*1024, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	long key, next_key, value;
 	struct bpf_link *links[2];
 	struct bpf_program *prog;
@@ -125,11 +124,6 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
 	int i, j = 0;
 	FILE *f;
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(filename, NULL);
 	if (libbpf_get_error(obj)) {
diff --git a/samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c b/samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c
index 70e987775c15..33e16ba39f25 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c
@@ -107,7 +107,6 @@ static void print_hist(int fd)
 
 int main(int ac, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {1024*1024, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_link *links[2];
 	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
@@ -127,11 +126,6 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(filename, NULL);
 	if (libbpf_get_error(obj)) {
diff --git a/samples/bpf/tracex4_user.c b/samples/bpf/tracex4_user.c
index e8faf8f184ae..cea399424bca 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/tracex4_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/tracex4_user.c
@@ -48,18 +48,12 @@ static void print_old_objects(int fd)
 
 int main(int ac, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_link *links[2];
 	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	char filename[256];
 	int map_fd, i, j = 0;
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, RLIM_INFINITY)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(filename, NULL);
 	if (libbpf_get_error(obj)) {
diff --git a/samples/bpf/tracex5_user.c b/samples/bpf/tracex5_user.c
index 98dad57a96c4..1549fa3ec65c 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/tracex5_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/tracex5_user.c
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ static void install_accept_all_seccomp(void)
 
 int main(int ac, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
 	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
@@ -43,8 +42,6 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
 	const char *title;
 	FILE *f;
 
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
-
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(filename, NULL);
 	if (libbpf_get_error(obj)) {
diff --git a/samples/bpf/tracex6_user.c b/samples/bpf/tracex6_user.c
index 33df9784775d..28296f40c133 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/tracex6_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/tracex6_user.c
@@ -175,15 +175,12 @@ static void test_bpf_perf_event(void)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_link *links[2];
 	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	char filename[256];
 	int i = 0;
 
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
-
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(filename, NULL);
 	if (libbpf_get_error(obj)) {
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c
index c447ad9e3a1d..116e39f6b666 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c
@@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static void usage(const char *prog)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -117,11 +116,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	ifindex = if_nametoindex(argv[optind]);
 	if (!ifindex) {
 		perror("if_nametoindex");
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_user.c
index ba482dc3da33..a70b094c8ec5 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_user.c
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static void usage(const char *cmd)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -143,11 +142,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, RLIM_INFINITY)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	if (!ifindex) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "Invalid ifname\n");
 		return 1;
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_user.c
index ef53b93db573..25e6a24f8d7b 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_user.c
@@ -645,7 +645,6 @@ static void print_bpf_prog_info(void)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	int longindex = 0, opt;
 	int ret = EXIT_SUCCESS;
 	char bpf_obj_file[256];
@@ -676,11 +675,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return EXIT_FAILURE;
-	}
-
 	if (load_bpf_file(bpf_obj_file)) {
 		printf("ERROR - bpf_log_buf: %s", bpf_log_buf);
 		return EXIT_FAILURE;
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_cpu_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_cpu_user.c
index 004c0622c913..6773027b2a89 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_cpu_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_cpu_user.c
@@ -779,7 +779,6 @@ static int load_cpumap_prog(char *file_name, char *prog_name,
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {10 * 1024 * 1024, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	char *prog_name = "xdp_cpu_map5_lb_hash_ip_pairs";
 	char *mprog_filename = "xdp_redirect_kern.o";
 	char *redir_interface = NULL, *redir_map = NULL;
@@ -818,11 +817,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 	prog_load_attr.file = filename;
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	if (bpf_prog_load_xattr(&prog_load_attr, &obj, &prog_fd))
 		return EXIT_FAIL;
 
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c
index 35e16dee613e..31131b6e7782 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_map_user.c
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ static void usage(const char *prog)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -135,11 +134,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	ifindex_in = if_nametoindex(argv[optind]);
 	if (!ifindex_in)
 		ifindex_in = strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 0);
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_user.c
index 9ca2bf457cda..41d705c3a1f7 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_user.c
@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ static void usage(const char *prog)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -136,11 +135,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	ifindex_in = if_nametoindex(argv[optind]);
 	if (!ifindex_in)
 		ifindex_in = strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 0);
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c
index c2da1b51ff95..b5f03cb17a3c 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c
@@ -625,7 +625,6 @@ static void usage(const char *prog)
 
 int main(int ac, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -670,11 +669,6 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	if (bpf_prog_load_xattr(&prog_load_attr, &obj, &prog_fd))
 		return 1;
 
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_rxq_info_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_rxq_info_user.c
index caa4e7ffcfc7..74a2926eba08 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_rxq_info_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_rxq_info_user.c
@@ -450,7 +450,6 @@ static void stats_poll(int interval, int action, __u32 cfg_opt)
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	__u32 cfg_options= NO_TOUCH ; /* Default: Don't touch packet memory */
-	struct rlimit r = {10 * 1024 * 1024, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -474,11 +473,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 	prog_load_attr.file = filename;
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	if (bpf_prog_load_xattr(&prog_load_attr, &obj, &prog_fd))
 		return EXIT_FAIL;
 
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c
index 991ef6f0880b..551c6839f593 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c
@@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static void usage(const char *prog)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -144,11 +143,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
 	prog_load_attr.file = filename;
 
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_tx_iptunnel_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_tx_iptunnel_user.c
index a419bee151a8..1d4f305d02aa 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_tx_iptunnel_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_tx_iptunnel_user.c
@@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	int min_port = 0, max_port = 0, vip2tnl_map_fd;
 	const char *optstr = "i:a:p:s:d:m:T:P:FSNh";
 	unsigned char opt_flags[256] = {};
@@ -254,11 +253,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, RLIM_INFINITY)");
-		return 1;
-	}
-
 	if (!ifindex) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "Invalid ifname\n");
 		return 1;
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
index 19c679456a0e..b3bd60433546 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
@@ -1216,7 +1216,6 @@ static void enter_xsks_into_map(struct bpf_object *obj)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	bool rx = false, tx = false;
 	struct xsk_umem_info *umem;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
@@ -1226,12 +1225,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	parse_command_line(argc, argv);
 
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) \"%s\"\n",
-			strerror(errno));
-		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
-	}
-
 	if (opt_num_xsks > 1)
 		load_xdp_program(argv, &obj);
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 35/35] perf: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
  2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
                   ` (33 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 34/35] bpf: samples: do not " Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
  34 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2020-07-25  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	linux-kernel, Roman Gushchin

Since bpf stopped using memlock rlimit to limit the memory usage,
there is no more reason for perf to alter its own limit.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-trace.c      | 10 ----------
 tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c |  6 ------
 tools/perf/util/Build           |  1 -
 tools/perf/util/rlimit.c        | 29 -----------------------------
 tools/perf/util/rlimit.h        |  6 ------
 5 files changed, 52 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 tools/perf/util/rlimit.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/perf/util/rlimit.h

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
index 4cbb64edc998..3d6a98a12537 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #include <api/fs/tracing_path.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include "util/bpf_map.h"
-#include "util/rlimit.h"
 #include "builtin.h"
 #include "util/cgroup.h"
 #include "util/color.h"
@@ -4838,15 +4837,6 @@ int cmd_trace(int argc, const char **argv)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Parsing .perfconfig may entail creating a BPF event, that may need
-	 * to create BPF maps, so bump RLIM_MEMLOCK as the default 64K setting
-	 * is too small. This affects just this process, not touching the
-	 * global setting. If it fails we'll get something in 'perf trace -v'
-	 * to help diagnose the problem.
-	 */
-	rlimit__bump_memlock();
-
 	err = perf_config(trace__config, &trace);
 	if (err)
 		goto out;
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
index da5b6cc23f25..e4efbba8202b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
 #include <subcmd/parse-options.h>
 #include "string2.h"
 #include "symbol.h"
-#include "util/rlimit.h"
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <subcmd/exec-cmd.h>
@@ -794,11 +793,6 @@ int cmd_test(int argc, const char **argv)
 
 	if (skip != NULL)
 		skiplist = intlist__new(skip);
-	/*
-	 * Tests that create BPF maps, for instance, need more than the 64K
-	 * default:
-	 */
-	rlimit__bump_memlock();
 
 	return __cmd_test(argc, argv, skiplist);
 }
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index 8d18380ecd10..4902cd3b3b58 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ perf-y += parse-events.o
 perf-y += perf_regs.o
 perf-y += path.o
 perf-y += print_binary.o
-perf-y += rlimit.o
 perf-y += argv_split.o
 perf-y += rbtree.o
 perf-y += libstring.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/rlimit.c b/tools/perf/util/rlimit.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 13521d392a22..000000000000
--- a/tools/perf/util/rlimit.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1 */
-
-#include "util/debug.h"
-#include "util/rlimit.h"
-#include <sys/time.h>
-#include <sys/resource.h>
-
-/*
- * Bump the memlock so that we can get bpf maps of a reasonable size,
- * like the ones used with 'perf trace' and with 'perf test bpf',
- * improve this to some specific request if needed.
- */
-void rlimit__bump_memlock(void)
-{
-	struct rlimit rlim;
-
-	if (getrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim) == 0) {
-		rlim.rlim_cur *= 4;
-		rlim.rlim_max *= 4;
-
-		if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim) < 0) {
-			rlim.rlim_cur /= 2;
-			rlim.rlim_max /= 2;
-
-			if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim) < 0)
-				pr_debug("Couldn't bump rlimit(MEMLOCK), failures may take place when creating BPF maps, etc\n");
-		}
-	}
-}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/rlimit.h b/tools/perf/util/rlimit.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 9f59d8e710a3..000000000000
--- a/tools/perf/util/rlimit.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-#ifndef __PERF_RLIMIT_H_
-#define __PERF_RLIMIT_H_
-/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1 */
-
-void rlimit__bump_memlock(void);
-#endif // __PERF_RLIMIT_H_
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 27/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps
  2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 27/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
@ 2020-07-25  4:10   ` kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-07-25  4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6625 bytes --]

Hi Roman,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Roman-Gushchin/bpf-switch-to-memcg-based-memory-accounting/20200725-080940
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: i386-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-14) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make W=1 ARCH=i386 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/core/sock_map.c: In function 'sock_hash_alloc':
>> net/core/sock_map.c:1027:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'bpf_map_charge_init'; did you mean 'bpf_map_free_id'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    1027 |  err = bpf_map_charge_init(&htab->map.memory, cost);
         |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |        bpf_map_free_id
>> net/core/sock_map.c:1027:38: error: 'struct bpf_map' has no member named 'memory'
    1027 |  err = bpf_map_charge_init(&htab->map.memory, cost);
         |                                      ^
>> net/core/sock_map.c:1035:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'bpf_map_charge_finish' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    1035 |   bpf_map_charge_finish(&htab->map.memory);
         |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   net/core/sock_map.c:1035:35: error: 'struct bpf_map' has no member named 'memory'
    1035 |   bpf_map_charge_finish(&htab->map.memory);
         |                                   ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +1027 net/core/sock_map.c

604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   988  
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   989  static struct bpf_map *sock_hash_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   990  {
032a6b3565489a Andrey Ignatov  2020-06-19   991  	struct bpf_shtab *htab;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   992  	int i, err;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   993  	u64 cost;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   994  
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   995  	if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   996  		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   997  	if (attr->max_entries == 0 ||
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13   998  	    attr->key_size    == 0 ||
c1cdf65da060a8 Jakub Sitnicki  2020-02-18   999  	    (attr->value_size != sizeof(u32) &&
c1cdf65da060a8 Jakub Sitnicki  2020-02-18  1000  	     attr->value_size != sizeof(u64)) ||
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1001  	    attr->map_flags & ~SOCK_CREATE_FLAG_MASK)
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1002  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1003  	if (attr->key_size > MAX_BPF_STACK)
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1004  		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1005  
ed406bfdb34a82 Roman Gushchin  2020-07-24  1006  	htab = kzalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1007  	if (!htab)
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1008  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1009  
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1010  	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&htab->map, attr);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1011  
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1012  	htab->buckets_num = roundup_pow_of_two(htab->map.max_entries);
032a6b3565489a Andrey Ignatov  2020-06-19  1013  	htab->elem_size = sizeof(struct bpf_shtab_elem) +
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1014  			  round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1015  	if (htab->buckets_num == 0 ||
032a6b3565489a Andrey Ignatov  2020-06-19  1016  	    htab->buckets_num > U32_MAX / sizeof(struct bpf_shtab_bucket)) {
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1017  		err = -EINVAL;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1018  		goto free_htab;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1019  	}
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1020  
032a6b3565489a Andrey Ignatov  2020-06-19  1021  	cost = (u64) htab->buckets_num * sizeof(struct bpf_shtab_bucket) +
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1022  	       (u64) htab->elem_size * htab->map.max_entries;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1023  	if (cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE) {
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1024  		err = -EINVAL;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1025  		goto free_htab;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1026  	}
60e5ca8a64bad8 Andrey Ignatov  2020-06-11 @1027  	err = bpf_map_charge_init(&htab->map.memory, cost);
60e5ca8a64bad8 Andrey Ignatov  2020-06-11  1028  	if (err)
60e5ca8a64bad8 Andrey Ignatov  2020-06-11  1029  		goto free_htab;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1030  
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1031  	htab->buckets = bpf_map_area_alloc(htab->buckets_num *
032a6b3565489a Andrey Ignatov  2020-06-19  1032  					   sizeof(struct bpf_shtab_bucket),
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1033  					   htab->map.numa_node);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1034  	if (!htab->buckets) {
60e5ca8a64bad8 Andrey Ignatov  2020-06-11 @1035  		bpf_map_charge_finish(&htab->map.memory);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1036  		err = -ENOMEM;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1037  		goto free_htab;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1038  	}
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1039  
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1040  	for (i = 0; i < htab->buckets_num; i++) {
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1041  		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&htab->buckets[i].head);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1042  		raw_spin_lock_init(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1043  	}
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1044  
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1045  	return &htab->map;
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1046  free_htab:
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1047  	kfree(htab);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1048  	return ERR_PTR(err);
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1049  }
604326b41a6fb9 Daniel Borkmann 2018-10-13  1050  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 74143 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-25  4:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-25  0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sock_map maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 25/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 26/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 27/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  4:10   ` kernel test robot
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 28/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 29/35] bpf: libbpf: cleanup RLIMIT_MEMLOCK usage Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 30/35] bpf: bpftool: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 31/35] bpf: runqslower: don't " Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 32/35] bpf: selftests: delete bpf_rlimit.h Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 33/35] bpf: selftests: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 34/35] bpf: samples: do not " Roman Gushchin
2020-07-25  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next 35/35] perf: don't " Roman Gushchin

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.