All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] staging: wlan-ng: Remove repeated words in comments
@ 2020-08-03  2:20 Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente @ 2020-08-03  2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, devel; +Cc: Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente

Remove duplicate words in comments at prism2mib and prism2sta files.

Signed-off-by: Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente <igormtorrente@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c
index 7d7d77b04255..875812a391c9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int prism2mgmt_mibset_mibget(struct wlandevice *wlandev, void *msgp)
 	/*
 	 ** Determine if this is a "mibget" or a "mibset".  If this is a
 	 ** "mibget", then make sure that the MIB may be read.  Otherwise,
-	 ** this is a "mibset" so make make sure that the MIB may be written.
+	 ** this is a "mibset" so make sure that the MIB may be written.
 	 */
 
 	isget = (msg->msgcode == DIDMSG_DOT11REQ_MIBGET);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c
index 8f25496188aa..e6dcb687e7a1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ u32 prism2sta_ifstate(struct wlandevice *wlandev, u32 ifstate)
 		case WLAN_MSD_FWLOAD:
 			wlandev->msdstate = WLAN_MSD_RUNNING_PENDING;
 			/* Initialize the device+driver for full
-			 * operation. Note that this might me an FWLOAD to
+			 * operation. Note that this might me an FWLOAD
 			 * to RUNNING transition so we must not do a chip
 			 * or board level reset.  Note that on failure,
 			 * the MSD state is set to HWPRESENT because we
@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ void prism2sta_processing_defer(struct work_struct *data)
 		 * we get back in range.  We should block transmits and
 		 * receives in this state.  Do we need an indication here?
 		 * Probably not since a polling user-mode element would
-		 * get this status from from p2PortStatus(FD40). What about
+		 * get this status from p2PortStatus(FD40). What about
 		 * p80211?
 		 * Response:
 		 * Block Transmits, Ignore receives of data frames
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-08-03  2:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-03  2:20 [PATCH] staging: wlan-ng: Remove repeated words in comments Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.