All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Allen <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@gmx.com>,
	Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:33:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202008111427.D00FCCF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMdWSJQKHAWY1P297b9koOLd8sVtezEYEyWGtymN1YeY27M6A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:16:15PM +0530, Allen wrote:
> Here's the series re-based on top of 5.8
> https://github.com/allenpais/tasklets/tree/V3

Great!

> Let me know how you would want these to be reviewed.

Was a Coccinelle script used for any of these conversions? I wonder if
it'd be easier to do a single treewide patch for the more mechanical
changes.

And, actually, I still think the "prepare" patches should just be
collapsed into the actual "covert" patches -- there are only a few.

After those, yeah, I think getting these sent to their respective
maintainers is the next step.

> Also, I was thinking if removing tasklets completely could be a task
> on KSPP wiki. If yes, I did like to take ownership of that task. I have a
> couple of ideas in mind, which could be discussed in a separate email.

Sure! I will add it to the tracker. Here's for the refactoring:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/30

and here's for the removal:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/94

if you can added details/examples of how they should be removed, that'd
help other folks too, if they wanted to jump in. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Allen <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@gmx.com>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:33:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202008111427.D00FCCF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMdWSJQKHAWY1P297b9koOLd8sVtezEYEyWGtymN1YeY27M6A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:16:15PM +0530, Allen wrote:
> Here's the series re-based on top of 5.8
> https://github.com/allenpais/tasklets/tree/V3

Great!

> Let me know how you would want these to be reviewed.

Was a Coccinelle script used for any of these conversions? I wonder if
it'd be easier to do a single treewide patch for the more mechanical
changes.

And, actually, I still think the "prepare" patches should just be
collapsed into the actual "covert" patches -- there are only a few.

After those, yeah, I think getting these sent to their respective
maintainers is the next step.

> Also, I was thinking if removing tasklets completely could be a task
> on KSPP wiki. If yes, I did like to take ownership of that task. I have a
> couple of ideas in mind, which could be discussed in a separate email.

Sure! I will add it to the tracker. Here's for the refactoring:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/30

and here's for the removal:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/94

if you can added details/examples of how they should be removed, that'd
help other folks too, if they wanted to jump in. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Allen <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@gmx.com>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:33:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202008111427.D00FCCF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMdWSJQKHAWY1P297b9koOLd8sVtezEYEyWGtymN1YeY27M6A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:16:15PM +0530, Allen wrote:
> Here's the series re-based on top of 5.8
> https://github.com/allenpais/tasklets/tree/V3

Great!

> Let me know how you would want these to be reviewed.

Was a Coccinelle script used for any of these conversions? I wonder if
it'd be easier to do a single treewide patch for the more mechanical
changes.

And, actually, I still think the "prepare" patches should just be
collapsed into the actual "covert" patches -- there are only a few.

After those, yeah, I think getting these sent to their respective
maintainers is the next step.

> Also, I was thinking if removing tasklets completely could be a task
> on KSPP wiki. If yes, I did like to take ownership of that task. I have a
> couple of ideas in mind, which could be discussed in a separate email.

Sure! I will add it to the tracker. Here's for the refactoring:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/30

and here's for the removal:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/94

if you can added details/examples of how they should be removed, that'd
help other folks too, if they wanted to jump in. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16  3:08 [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb: gadget: udc: Avoid tasklet passing a global Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  7:28   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16  7:28     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16  7:28     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16 19:41     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:41       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:41       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-31  9:20   ` Felipe Balbi
2020-07-31  9:20     ` Felipe Balbi
2020-07-31  9:20     ` Felipe Balbi
2020-07-16  3:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] treewide: Replace DECLARE_TASKLET() with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD() Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  7:30   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16  7:30     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16  7:30     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16 11:29   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-16 11:29     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-16 11:29     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-16 19:15     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:15       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:15       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] tasklet: Introduce new initialization API Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  7:30   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16  7:30     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16  7:30     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16 15:37   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-16 15:37     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-16 15:37     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-16 19:22     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:22       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:22       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  7:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-16  7:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-16  7:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-16  8:15   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-07-16  8:15     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-07-16  8:15     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-07-16 19:24     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:24       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:24       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:14   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:14     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:14     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 20:48     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-07-16 20:48       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-07-16 20:48       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-07-16 21:24       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 21:24         ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 21:24         ` Kees Cook
2020-07-30  7:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-30  7:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-30  7:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-30 18:14   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-30 18:14     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-30 18:14     ` Kees Cook
2020-08-03  8:46     ` Allen
2020-08-03  8:46       ` Allen
2020-08-03  8:46       ` Allen
2020-08-03  8:46       ` Allen
2020-08-11 12:16       ` Allen
2020-08-11 12:16         ` Allen
2020-08-11 12:16         ` Allen
2020-08-11 12:16         ` Allen
2020-08-11 21:33       ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-08-11 21:33         ` Kees Cook
2020-08-11 21:33         ` Kees Cook
2020-08-12  6:21         ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-12  6:21           ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-12  6:21           ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-12 11:32           ` Allen
2020-08-12 11:32             ` Allen
2020-08-12 11:32             ` Allen
2020-08-12 11:32             ` Allen
2020-08-12 12:31         ` Allen
2020-08-12 12:31           ` Allen
2020-08-12 12:31           ` Allen
2020-08-12 12:31           ` Allen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202008111427.D00FCCF@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oscar.carter@gmx.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=romain.perier@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.