From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> To: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com> Cc: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>, Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>, linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alexandre.torgue@st.com, Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: stm32-dac: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 16:46:13 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200829164613.3be1b2b1@archlinux> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CA+U=DspjGUhXCY7c8P6zOYZsx17ybcU4Kdr52yujmdYOaa1JSQ@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:00:36 +0300 Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:03 PM Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> wrote: > > > > On 8/27/20 10:55 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:03 PM Alexandru Ardelean > > > <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote: > > >> From: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com> > > >> > > >> As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces > > >> it with a local lock. The lock protects against potential races when > > >> reading the CR reg and then updating, so that the state of pm_runtime > > >> is consistent between the two operations. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com> > > >> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> > > >> --- > > > Forgot the changelog here. > > > Apologies. > > > > > > Changelog v1 -> v2: > > > * removed whitespace change for 'common' field > > > * updated comment about the lock usage > > > > Hi Alexandru, > > > > Sorry if I missed it... is there an update on the comment :-) ? > > For a moment there, I thought I didn't. > GMail's threading is confusing. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces > it with a local lock. The lock protects against potential races when > reading the CR reg and then updating, so that the state of pm_runtime > is consistent between the two operations. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think this got confused... see below. > > > > > Best Regards, > > Fabrice > > > > > >> drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c > > >> index 092c796fa3d9..7a8aed476850 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c > > >> @@ -26,9 +26,11 @@ > > >> /** > > >> * struct stm32_dac - private data of DAC driver > > >> * @common: reference to DAC common data > > >> + * @lock: lock to protect the data buffer during regmap ops The original comment was: In this particular case I'm not sure that's what mlock was being used for. I think it's about avoiding races around checking if powered down and actually doing it. And Fabrice's reply: Hi Sergiu, Indeed, purpose is to protect against a race here when reading CR, and updating it via regmap (this also makes the subsequent pm_runtime calls to be balanced based on this). (Side note: there is no data buffer involved for the DAC.) Could you please update the comment ? Thanks, Fabrice > > >> */ > > >> struct stm32_dac { > > >> struct stm32_dac_common *common; > > >> + struct mutex lock; > > >> };
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> To: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com> Cc: alexandre.torgue@st.com, linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>, Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>, Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: stm32-dac: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 16:46:13 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200829164613.3be1b2b1@archlinux> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CA+U=DspjGUhXCY7c8P6zOYZsx17ybcU4Kdr52yujmdYOaa1JSQ@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:00:36 +0300 Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:03 PM Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> wrote: > > > > On 8/27/20 10:55 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:03 PM Alexandru Ardelean > > > <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote: > > >> From: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com> > > >> > > >> As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces > > >> it with a local lock. The lock protects against potential races when > > >> reading the CR reg and then updating, so that the state of pm_runtime > > >> is consistent between the two operations. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com> > > >> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> > > >> --- > > > Forgot the changelog here. > > > Apologies. > > > > > > Changelog v1 -> v2: > > > * removed whitespace change for 'common' field > > > * updated comment about the lock usage > > > > Hi Alexandru, > > > > Sorry if I missed it... is there an update on the comment :-) ? > > For a moment there, I thought I didn't. > GMail's threading is confusing. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces > it with a local lock. The lock protects against potential races when > reading the CR reg and then updating, so that the state of pm_runtime > is consistent between the two operations. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think this got confused... see below. > > > > > Best Regards, > > Fabrice > > > > > >> drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c > > >> index 092c796fa3d9..7a8aed476850 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c > > >> @@ -26,9 +26,11 @@ > > >> /** > > >> * struct stm32_dac - private data of DAC driver > > >> * @common: reference to DAC common data > > >> + * @lock: lock to protect the data buffer during regmap ops The original comment was: In this particular case I'm not sure that's what mlock was being used for. I think it's about avoiding races around checking if powered down and actually doing it. And Fabrice's reply: Hi Sergiu, Indeed, purpose is to protect against a race here when reading CR, and updating it via regmap (this also makes the subsequent pm_runtime calls to be balanced based on this). (Side note: there is no data buffer involved for the DAC.) Could you please update the comment ? Thanks, Fabrice > > >> */ > > >> struct stm32_dac { > > >> struct stm32_dac_common *common; > > >> + struct mutex lock; > > >> }; _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-29 15:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-08-26 6:38 [PATCH] iio: stm32-dac: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-26 6:38 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-26 8:57 ` Fabrice Gasnier 2020-08-26 8:57 ` Fabrice Gasnier 2020-08-26 10:01 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-26 10:01 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-26 12:00 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-27 8:55 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-27 8:55 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-27 9:03 ` Fabrice Gasnier 2020-08-27 9:03 ` Fabrice Gasnier 2020-08-27 10:00 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-27 10:00 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-08-29 15:46 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message] 2020-08-29 15:46 ` Jonathan Cameron 2020-09-02 6:12 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-09-02 6:12 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-09-16 9:23 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-09-16 9:23 ` Alexandru Ardelean 2020-09-16 10:18 ` Fabrice Gasnier 2020-09-16 10:18 ` Fabrice Gasnier 2020-09-16 17:52 ` Jonathan Cameron 2020-09-16 17:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200829164613.3be1b2b1@archlinux \ --to=jic23@kernel.org \ --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \ --cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \ --cc=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \ --cc=fabrice.gasnier@st.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \ --cc=sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.