All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Cc: "Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Nicolas Boichat" <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"Cao Bing Bu" <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Joerg  Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Sj Huang" <sj.huang@mediatek.com>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	matrix.zhu@aliyun.com,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Louis Kuo" <louis.kuo@mediatek.com>,
	"Shengnan Wang (王圣男)" <shengnan.wang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Document OV02A10 bindings
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:16:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901161622.GA32646@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1598970937.4733.21.camel@mhfsdcap03>

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:35:37PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> Hi Tomasz, Sakari,
> 
> Thanks for digging into the imperfections.
> 
> On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 19:06 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> > 
> > Thanks for dressing this into words.
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Hi Dongchun,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:19 PM Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add YAML device tree binding for OV02A10 CMOS image sensor,
> > > > and the relevant MAINTAINERS entries.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml           | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  MAINTAINERS                                        |   7 +
> > > >  2 files changed, 179 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..3a916cc
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > > +# Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc.
> > > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > > +---
> > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml#
> > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > > +
> > > > +title: Omnivision OV02A10 CMOS Sensor Device Tree Bindings
> > > > +
> > > > +maintainers:
> > > > +  - Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> > > > +
> > > > +description: |-
> > > > +  The Omnivision OV02A10 is a low-cost, high performance, 1/5-inch, 2 megapixel
> > > > +  image sensor, which is the latest production derived from Omnivision's CMOS
> > > > +  image sensor technology. Ihis chip supports high frame rate speeds up to 30fps
> > > > +  @ 1600x1200 (UXGA) resolution transferred over a 1-lane MIPI interface. The
> > > > +  sensor output is available via CSI-2 serial data output.
> > > > +
> > > > +properties:
> > > > +  compatible:
> > > > +    const: ovti,ov02a10
> > > > +
> > > > +  reg:
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  clocks:
> > > > +    items:
> > > > +      - description: top mux camtg clock
> > > > +      - description: divider clock
> > > > +
> > > > +  clock-names:
> > > > +    items:
> > > > +      - const: eclk
> > > > +      - const: freq_mux
> > > 
> > > Why do we have two clocks here? Looking at the example suggests that
> > > they may be the clocks of the SoC that the integration was done with.
> > > However, the binding must only define the aspects of the particular
> > > device, i.e. this sensor.
> > > 
> > > I suppose we should only have "eclk" here and it should be described
> > > as "external clock for the sensor".
> > > 
> 
> I cannot agree with you more, it would be fixed in next release.
> 
> > > > +
> > > > +  clock-frequency:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Frequency of the eclk clock in Hertz.
> > > 
> > > nit: maybe Hz?
> > > 
> 
> Both shall be okay, let's use Hz instead, which seems to be more simple.
> 
> > > > +
> > > > +  dovdd-supply:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the regulator used as Digital I/O voltage supply.
> > > > +
> > > > +  avdd-supply:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the regulator used as Analog voltage supply.
> > > > +
> > > > +  dvdd-supply:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the regulator used as Digital core voltage supply.
> > > > +
> > > > +  powerdown-gpios:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Must be the device tree identifier of the GPIO connected to the
> > > > +      PD_PAD pin. This pin is used to place the OV02A10 into standby mode
> > > > +      or shutdown mode. As the line needs to be high for the powerdown mode
> > > > +      to be active, it should be marked GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH.
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  reset-gpios:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Must be the device tree identifier of the GPIO connected to the
> > > > +      RST_PD pin. If specified, it will be asserted during driver probe.
> > > > +      As the line needs to be low for the reset to be active, it should be
> > > > +      marked GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW.
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  rotation:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the sensor's placement.
> > > > +    allOf:
> > > > +      - $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> > > > +      - enum:
> > > > +          - 0    # Sensor Mounted Upright
> > > > +          - 180  # Sensor Mounted Upside Down
> > > > +        default: 0
> > > > +
> > > > +  ovti,mipi-tx-speed:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Indication of MIPI transmission speed select, which is to control D-PHY
> > > > +      timing setting by adjusting MIPI clock voltage to improve the clock
> > > > +      driver capability.
> > > 
> > > The description says that the value adjusts "MIPI clock voltage".
> > > Should the property be renamed to "ovti,mipi-clock-voltage"?
> > > 
> 
> Sure, mipi-clock-voltage seems more clear, perfect naming :-)
> 
> > > > +    allOf:
> > > > +      - $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> > > > +      - enum:
> > > > +          - 0    #  20MHz -  30MHz
> > > > +          - 1    #  30MHz -  50MHz
> > > > +          - 2    #  50MHz -  75MHz
> > > > +          - 3    #  75MHz - 100MHz
> > > > +          - 4    # 100MHz - 130MHz
> > > > +        default: 3
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > I've discussed this on IRC with Sakari. It sounds like this works as
> > > is for us because the driver currently only supports 1 mode, always
> > > running the link at 390 MHz. This won't scale if one intends to add
> > > more modes, because DT can't be expected to be updated when the driver
> > > changes. The two are expected to be separate and backwards compatible.
> > > 
> > > I think we could model this in DT as an array of <link speed, clock
> > > voltage> pairs. Similarly to the OPP bindings [1]. An example to have
> > > all link speeds up to 390 MHz use the value 4:
> > > 
> > > ovti,mipi-clock-voltages = <
> > >               /* KHz         clock voltage unit */
> > >                  390000    4
> > > >;
> > > 
> > > if one wants to select different voltage for different link, they
> > > could do so as well. With the example below, the driver should
> > > configure "3" for link frequencies <= 150 MHz and "4" for > 150 MHz <=
> > > 390 MHz. Link frequencies > 390 MHz should be disallowed.
> > > 
> > > ovti,mipi-clock-voltages = <
> > >               /* KHz         clock voltage unit */
> > >                  150000    3
> > >                  390000    4
> > > >;
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> 
> So now we define the MIPI clock voltage (unit) as one function of link
> frequency?
> 
> For current sensor mode (1600x1200, 390MHz link frequency), we then
> shall always use the value 4 to configure the MIPI transmission speed
> selection (P1:0xA1). Am I correct in thinking that?
> 
> > One more note on my proposal: use the index of the link frequency to access
> > the ovti,mipi-clock-voltages array. That should be more simple for the
> > driver, as the driver is expected to use only link frequencies listed in DT
> > bindings anyway.
> > 
> 
> Good idea! That's exactly what I mean.
> Just submitted one draft change to handle the new property in DT.
> @Sakari @Tomasz please help to review it.
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2387980/1/drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c#883

Please send it to the list.

-- 
Sakari Ailus

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nicolas Boichat" <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	"Shengnan Wang (王圣男)" <shengnan.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"Louis Kuo" <louis.kuo@mediatek.com>,
	"Sj Huang" <sj.huang@mediatek.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"Cao Bing Bu" <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
	matrix.zhu@aliyun.com,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Joerg  Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Document OV02A10 bindings
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:16:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901161622.GA32646@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1598970937.4733.21.camel@mhfsdcap03>

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:35:37PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> Hi Tomasz, Sakari,
> 
> Thanks for digging into the imperfections.
> 
> On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 19:06 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> > 
> > Thanks for dressing this into words.
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Hi Dongchun,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:19 PM Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add YAML device tree binding for OV02A10 CMOS image sensor,
> > > > and the relevant MAINTAINERS entries.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml           | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  MAINTAINERS                                        |   7 +
> > > >  2 files changed, 179 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..3a916cc
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > > +# Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc.
> > > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > > +---
> > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml#
> > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > > +
> > > > +title: Omnivision OV02A10 CMOS Sensor Device Tree Bindings
> > > > +
> > > > +maintainers:
> > > > +  - Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> > > > +
> > > > +description: |-
> > > > +  The Omnivision OV02A10 is a low-cost, high performance, 1/5-inch, 2 megapixel
> > > > +  image sensor, which is the latest production derived from Omnivision's CMOS
> > > > +  image sensor technology. Ihis chip supports high frame rate speeds up to 30fps
> > > > +  @ 1600x1200 (UXGA) resolution transferred over a 1-lane MIPI interface. The
> > > > +  sensor output is available via CSI-2 serial data output.
> > > > +
> > > > +properties:
> > > > +  compatible:
> > > > +    const: ovti,ov02a10
> > > > +
> > > > +  reg:
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  clocks:
> > > > +    items:
> > > > +      - description: top mux camtg clock
> > > > +      - description: divider clock
> > > > +
> > > > +  clock-names:
> > > > +    items:
> > > > +      - const: eclk
> > > > +      - const: freq_mux
> > > 
> > > Why do we have two clocks here? Looking at the example suggests that
> > > they may be the clocks of the SoC that the integration was done with.
> > > However, the binding must only define the aspects of the particular
> > > device, i.e. this sensor.
> > > 
> > > I suppose we should only have "eclk" here and it should be described
> > > as "external clock for the sensor".
> > > 
> 
> I cannot agree with you more, it would be fixed in next release.
> 
> > > > +
> > > > +  clock-frequency:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Frequency of the eclk clock in Hertz.
> > > 
> > > nit: maybe Hz?
> > > 
> 
> Both shall be okay, let's use Hz instead, which seems to be more simple.
> 
> > > > +
> > > > +  dovdd-supply:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the regulator used as Digital I/O voltage supply.
> > > > +
> > > > +  avdd-supply:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the regulator used as Analog voltage supply.
> > > > +
> > > > +  dvdd-supply:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the regulator used as Digital core voltage supply.
> > > > +
> > > > +  powerdown-gpios:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Must be the device tree identifier of the GPIO connected to the
> > > > +      PD_PAD pin. This pin is used to place the OV02A10 into standby mode
> > > > +      or shutdown mode. As the line needs to be high for the powerdown mode
> > > > +      to be active, it should be marked GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH.
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  reset-gpios:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Must be the device tree identifier of the GPIO connected to the
> > > > +      RST_PD pin. If specified, it will be asserted during driver probe.
> > > > +      As the line needs to be low for the reset to be active, it should be
> > > > +      marked GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW.
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  rotation:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the sensor's placement.
> > > > +    allOf:
> > > > +      - $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> > > > +      - enum:
> > > > +          - 0    # Sensor Mounted Upright
> > > > +          - 180  # Sensor Mounted Upside Down
> > > > +        default: 0
> > > > +
> > > > +  ovti,mipi-tx-speed:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Indication of MIPI transmission speed select, which is to control D-PHY
> > > > +      timing setting by adjusting MIPI clock voltage to improve the clock
> > > > +      driver capability.
> > > 
> > > The description says that the value adjusts "MIPI clock voltage".
> > > Should the property be renamed to "ovti,mipi-clock-voltage"?
> > > 
> 
> Sure, mipi-clock-voltage seems more clear, perfect naming :-)
> 
> > > > +    allOf:
> > > > +      - $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> > > > +      - enum:
> > > > +          - 0    #  20MHz -  30MHz
> > > > +          - 1    #  30MHz -  50MHz
> > > > +          - 2    #  50MHz -  75MHz
> > > > +          - 3    #  75MHz - 100MHz
> > > > +          - 4    # 100MHz - 130MHz
> > > > +        default: 3
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > I've discussed this on IRC with Sakari. It sounds like this works as
> > > is for us because the driver currently only supports 1 mode, always
> > > running the link at 390 MHz. This won't scale if one intends to add
> > > more modes, because DT can't be expected to be updated when the driver
> > > changes. The two are expected to be separate and backwards compatible.
> > > 
> > > I think we could model this in DT as an array of <link speed, clock
> > > voltage> pairs. Similarly to the OPP bindings [1]. An example to have
> > > all link speeds up to 390 MHz use the value 4:
> > > 
> > > ovti,mipi-clock-voltages = <
> > >               /* KHz         clock voltage unit */
> > >                  390000    4
> > > >;
> > > 
> > > if one wants to select different voltage for different link, they
> > > could do so as well. With the example below, the driver should
> > > configure "3" for link frequencies <= 150 MHz and "4" for > 150 MHz <=
> > > 390 MHz. Link frequencies > 390 MHz should be disallowed.
> > > 
> > > ovti,mipi-clock-voltages = <
> > >               /* KHz         clock voltage unit */
> > >                  150000    3
> > >                  390000    4
> > > >;
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> 
> So now we define the MIPI clock voltage (unit) as one function of link
> frequency?
> 
> For current sensor mode (1600x1200, 390MHz link frequency), we then
> shall always use the value 4 to configure the MIPI transmission speed
> selection (P1:0xA1). Am I correct in thinking that?
> 
> > One more note on my proposal: use the index of the link frequency to access
> > the ovti,mipi-clock-voltages array. That should be more simple for the
> > driver, as the driver is expected to use only link frequencies listed in DT
> > bindings anyway.
> > 
> 
> Good idea! That's exactly what I mean.
> Just submitted one draft change to handle the new property in DT.
> @Sakari @Tomasz please help to review it.
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2387980/1/drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c#883

Please send it to the list.

-- 
Sakari Ailus

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nicolas Boichat" <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	"Shengnan Wang (王圣男)" <shengnan.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"Louis Kuo" <louis.kuo@mediatek.com>,
	"Sj Huang" <sj.huang@mediatek.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"Cao Bing Bu" <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
	matrix.zhu@aliyun.com,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Joerg  Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Document OV02A10 bindings
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:16:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901161622.GA32646@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1598970937.4733.21.camel@mhfsdcap03>

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:35:37PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> Hi Tomasz, Sakari,
> 
> Thanks for digging into the imperfections.
> 
> On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 19:06 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> > 
> > Thanks for dressing this into words.
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Hi Dongchun,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:19 PM Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add YAML device tree binding for OV02A10 CMOS image sensor,
> > > > and the relevant MAINTAINERS entries.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml           | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  MAINTAINERS                                        |   7 +
> > > >  2 files changed, 179 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..3a916cc
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > > +# Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc.
> > > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > > +---
> > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml#
> > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > > +
> > > > +title: Omnivision OV02A10 CMOS Sensor Device Tree Bindings
> > > > +
> > > > +maintainers:
> > > > +  - Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> > > > +
> > > > +description: |-
> > > > +  The Omnivision OV02A10 is a low-cost, high performance, 1/5-inch, 2 megapixel
> > > > +  image sensor, which is the latest production derived from Omnivision's CMOS
> > > > +  image sensor technology. Ihis chip supports high frame rate speeds up to 30fps
> > > > +  @ 1600x1200 (UXGA) resolution transferred over a 1-lane MIPI interface. The
> > > > +  sensor output is available via CSI-2 serial data output.
> > > > +
> > > > +properties:
> > > > +  compatible:
> > > > +    const: ovti,ov02a10
> > > > +
> > > > +  reg:
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  clocks:
> > > > +    items:
> > > > +      - description: top mux camtg clock
> > > > +      - description: divider clock
> > > > +
> > > > +  clock-names:
> > > > +    items:
> > > > +      - const: eclk
> > > > +      - const: freq_mux
> > > 
> > > Why do we have two clocks here? Looking at the example suggests that
> > > they may be the clocks of the SoC that the integration was done with.
> > > However, the binding must only define the aspects of the particular
> > > device, i.e. this sensor.
> > > 
> > > I suppose we should only have "eclk" here and it should be described
> > > as "external clock for the sensor".
> > > 
> 
> I cannot agree with you more, it would be fixed in next release.
> 
> > > > +
> > > > +  clock-frequency:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Frequency of the eclk clock in Hertz.
> > > 
> > > nit: maybe Hz?
> > > 
> 
> Both shall be okay, let's use Hz instead, which seems to be more simple.
> 
> > > > +
> > > > +  dovdd-supply:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the regulator used as Digital I/O voltage supply.
> > > > +
> > > > +  avdd-supply:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the regulator used as Analog voltage supply.
> > > > +
> > > > +  dvdd-supply:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the regulator used as Digital core voltage supply.
> > > > +
> > > > +  powerdown-gpios:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Must be the device tree identifier of the GPIO connected to the
> > > > +      PD_PAD pin. This pin is used to place the OV02A10 into standby mode
> > > > +      or shutdown mode. As the line needs to be high for the powerdown mode
> > > > +      to be active, it should be marked GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH.
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  reset-gpios:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Must be the device tree identifier of the GPIO connected to the
> > > > +      RST_PD pin. If specified, it will be asserted during driver probe.
> > > > +      As the line needs to be low for the reset to be active, it should be
> > > > +      marked GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW.
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  rotation:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Definition of the sensor's placement.
> > > > +    allOf:
> > > > +      - $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> > > > +      - enum:
> > > > +          - 0    # Sensor Mounted Upright
> > > > +          - 180  # Sensor Mounted Upside Down
> > > > +        default: 0
> > > > +
> > > > +  ovti,mipi-tx-speed:
> > > > +    description:
> > > > +      Indication of MIPI transmission speed select, which is to control D-PHY
> > > > +      timing setting by adjusting MIPI clock voltage to improve the clock
> > > > +      driver capability.
> > > 
> > > The description says that the value adjusts "MIPI clock voltage".
> > > Should the property be renamed to "ovti,mipi-clock-voltage"?
> > > 
> 
> Sure, mipi-clock-voltage seems more clear, perfect naming :-)
> 
> > > > +    allOf:
> > > > +      - $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> > > > +      - enum:
> > > > +          - 0    #  20MHz -  30MHz
> > > > +          - 1    #  30MHz -  50MHz
> > > > +          - 2    #  50MHz -  75MHz
> > > > +          - 3    #  75MHz - 100MHz
> > > > +          - 4    # 100MHz - 130MHz
> > > > +        default: 3
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > I've discussed this on IRC with Sakari. It sounds like this works as
> > > is for us because the driver currently only supports 1 mode, always
> > > running the link at 390 MHz. This won't scale if one intends to add
> > > more modes, because DT can't be expected to be updated when the driver
> > > changes. The two are expected to be separate and backwards compatible.
> > > 
> > > I think we could model this in DT as an array of <link speed, clock
> > > voltage> pairs. Similarly to the OPP bindings [1]. An example to have
> > > all link speeds up to 390 MHz use the value 4:
> > > 
> > > ovti,mipi-clock-voltages = <
> > >               /* KHz         clock voltage unit */
> > >                  390000    4
> > > >;
> > > 
> > > if one wants to select different voltage for different link, they
> > > could do so as well. With the example below, the driver should
> > > configure "3" for link frequencies <= 150 MHz and "4" for > 150 MHz <=
> > > 390 MHz. Link frequencies > 390 MHz should be disallowed.
> > > 
> > > ovti,mipi-clock-voltages = <
> > >               /* KHz         clock voltage unit */
> > >                  150000    3
> > >                  390000    4
> > > >;
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> 
> So now we define the MIPI clock voltage (unit) as one function of link
> frequency?
> 
> For current sensor mode (1600x1200, 390MHz link frequency), we then
> shall always use the value 4 to configure the MIPI transmission speed
> selection (P1:0xA1). Am I correct in thinking that?
> 
> > One more note on my proposal: use the index of the link frequency to access
> > the ovti,mipi-clock-voltages array. That should be more simple for the
> > driver, as the driver is expected to use only link frequencies listed in DT
> > bindings anyway.
> > 
> 
> Good idea! That's exactly what I mean.
> Just submitted one draft change to handle the new property in DT.
> @Sakari @Tomasz please help to review it.
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2387980/1/drivers/media/i2c/ov02a10.c#883

Please send it to the list.

-- 
Sakari Ailus

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-01 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-10 10:18 [PATCH v13 0/2] media: i2c: Add support for OV02A10 sensor Dongchun Zhu
2020-07-10 10:18 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-07-10 10:18 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-07-10 10:18 ` [PATCH v13 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Document OV02A10 bindings Dongchun Zhu
2020-07-10 10:18   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-07-10 10:18   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-08-31 11:44   ` Tomasz Figa
2020-08-31 11:44     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-08-31 11:44     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-08-31 16:06     ` Sakari Ailus
2020-08-31 16:06       ` Sakari Ailus
2020-08-31 16:06       ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-01 14:35       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-09-01 14:35         ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-09-01 14:35         ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-09-01 16:16         ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2020-09-01 16:16           ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-01 16:16           ` Sakari Ailus
2020-07-10 10:18 ` [PATCH v13 2/2] media: i2c: Add OV02A10 image sensor driver Dongchun Zhu
2020-07-10 10:18   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-07-10 10:18   ` Dongchun Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200901161622.GA32646@paasikivi.fi.intel.com \
    --to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=louis.kuo@mediatek.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matrix.zhu@aliyun.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shengnan.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.