All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] arch_topology, cpufreq: constify arch_* cpumasks
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:25:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902132530.GE25462@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200901205549.30096-5-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:55:48PM +0100, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
>
> The passed cpumask arguments to arch_set_freq_scale() and
> arch_freq_counters_available() are only iterated over, so reflect this
> in the prototype. This also allows to pass system cpumasks like
> cpu_online_mask without getting a warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] arch_topology, cpufreq: constify arch_* cpumasks
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:25:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902132530.GE25462@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200901205549.30096-5-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:55:48PM +0100, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
>
> The passed cpumask arguments to arch_set_freq_scale() and
> arch_freq_counters_available() are only iterated over, so reflect this
> in the prototype. This also allows to pass system cpumasks like
> cpu_online_mask without getting a warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-02 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-01 20:55 [PATCH v5 0/5] cpufreq: improve frequency invariance support Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-01 20:55 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-01 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] arch_topology: validate input frequencies to arch_set_freq_scale() Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-01 20:55   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-02 13:32   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-02 13:32     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-01 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-01 20:55   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-02 13:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-02 13:30     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-01 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] cpufreq: report whether cpufreq supports Frequency Invariance (FI) Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-01 20:55   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-02 13:28   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-02 13:28     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-03 13:45     ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-03 13:45       ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-03 14:19       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-03 14:19         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-01 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] arch_topology, cpufreq: constify arch_* cpumasks Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-01 20:55   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-02 13:25   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-09-02 13:25     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-01 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] arch_topology, arm, arm64: define arch_scale_freq_invariant() Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-01 20:55   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-02 13:24   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-02 13:24     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-09-03 13:32 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] cpufreq: improve frequency invariance support Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-03 13:32   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-04  4:38   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-09-04  4:38     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-09-18 17:12     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-09-18 17:12       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200902132530.GE25462@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.