All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 12/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Remove _sdei_event_register()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 23:04:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922130423.10173-13-gshan@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922130423.10173-1-gshan@redhat.com>

The function _sdei_event_register() is called by sdei_event_register()
and sdei_device_thaw() as the following functional call chain shows.
_sdei_event_register() covers the shared and private events, but
sdei_device_thaw() only covers the shared events. So the logic to
cover the private events in _sdei_event_register() isn't needed by
sdei_device_thaw().

Similarly, sdei_reregister_event_llocked() covers the shared and
private events in the regard of reenablement. The logic to cover
the private events isn't needed by sdei_device_thaw() either.

   sdei_event_register          sdei_device_thaw
      _sdei_event_register         sdei_reregister_shared
                                      sdei_reregister_event_llocked
                                         _sdei_event_register

This removes _sdei_event_register() and sdei_reregister_event_llocked().
Their logic is moved to sdei_event_register() and sdei_reregister_shared().
This shouldn't cause any logical changes.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c | 77 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
index cf1a37b40e24..361d142ad2a8 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
@@ -577,25 +577,6 @@ static void _local_event_register(void *data)
 	sdei_cross_call_return(arg, err);
 }
 
-static int _sdei_event_register(struct sdei_event *event)
-{
-	int err;
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sdei_events_lock);
-
-	if (event->type == SDEI_EVENT_TYPE_SHARED)
-		return sdei_api_event_register(event->event_num,
-					       sdei_entry_point,
-					       event->registered,
-					       SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_ANY, 0);
-
-	err = sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_register, event);
-	if (err)
-		sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_unregister, event);
-
-	return err;
-}
-
 int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
 {
 	int err;
@@ -618,7 +599,17 @@ int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
 	}
 
 	cpus_read_lock();
-	err = _sdei_event_register(event);
+	if (event->type == SDEI_EVENT_TYPE_SHARED) {
+		err = sdei_api_event_register(event->event_num,
+					      sdei_entry_point,
+					      event->registered,
+					      SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_ANY, 0);
+	} else {
+		err = sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_register, event);
+		if (err)
+			sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_unregister, event);
+	}
+
 	if (err) {
 		sdei_event_destroy(event);
 		pr_warn("Failed to register event %u: %d\n", event_num, err);
@@ -635,33 +626,6 @@ int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int sdei_reregister_event_llocked(struct sdei_event *event)
-{
-	int err;
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sdei_events_lock);
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sdei_list_lock);
-
-	err = _sdei_event_register(event);
-	if (err) {
-		pr_err("Failed to re-register event %u\n", event->event_num);
-		sdei_event_destroy_llocked(event);
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	if (event->reenable) {
-		if (event->type == SDEI_EVENT_TYPE_SHARED)
-			err = sdei_api_event_enable(event->event_num);
-		else
-			err = sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_enable, event);
-	}
-
-	if (err)
-		pr_err("Failed to re-enable event %u\n", event->event_num);
-
-	return err;
-}
-
 static int sdei_reregister_shared(void)
 {
 	int err = 0;
@@ -674,9 +638,24 @@ static int sdei_reregister_shared(void)
 			continue;
 
 		if (event->reregister) {
-			err = sdei_reregister_event_llocked(event);
-			if (err)
+			err = sdei_api_event_register(event->event_num,
+					sdei_entry_point, event->registered,
+					SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_ANY, 0);
+			if (err) {
+				pr_err("Failed to re-register event %u\n",
+				       event->event_num);
+				sdei_event_destroy_llocked(event);
 				break;
+			}
+		}
+
+		if (event->reenable) {
+			err = sdei_api_event_enable(event->event_num);
+			if (err) {
+				pr_err("Failed to re-enable event %u\n",
+				       event->event_num);
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&sdei_list_lock);
-- 
2.23.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	shan.gavin@gmail.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 12/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Remove _sdei_event_register()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 23:04:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922130423.10173-13-gshan@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922130423.10173-1-gshan@redhat.com>

The function _sdei_event_register() is called by sdei_event_register()
and sdei_device_thaw() as the following functional call chain shows.
_sdei_event_register() covers the shared and private events, but
sdei_device_thaw() only covers the shared events. So the logic to
cover the private events in _sdei_event_register() isn't needed by
sdei_device_thaw().

Similarly, sdei_reregister_event_llocked() covers the shared and
private events in the regard of reenablement. The logic to cover
the private events isn't needed by sdei_device_thaw() either.

   sdei_event_register          sdei_device_thaw
      _sdei_event_register         sdei_reregister_shared
                                      sdei_reregister_event_llocked
                                         _sdei_event_register

This removes _sdei_event_register() and sdei_reregister_event_llocked().
Their logic is moved to sdei_event_register() and sdei_reregister_shared().
This shouldn't cause any logical changes.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c | 77 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
index cf1a37b40e24..361d142ad2a8 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
@@ -577,25 +577,6 @@ static void _local_event_register(void *data)
 	sdei_cross_call_return(arg, err);
 }
 
-static int _sdei_event_register(struct sdei_event *event)
-{
-	int err;
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sdei_events_lock);
-
-	if (event->type == SDEI_EVENT_TYPE_SHARED)
-		return sdei_api_event_register(event->event_num,
-					       sdei_entry_point,
-					       event->registered,
-					       SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_ANY, 0);
-
-	err = sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_register, event);
-	if (err)
-		sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_unregister, event);
-
-	return err;
-}
-
 int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
 {
 	int err;
@@ -618,7 +599,17 @@ int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
 	}
 
 	cpus_read_lock();
-	err = _sdei_event_register(event);
+	if (event->type == SDEI_EVENT_TYPE_SHARED) {
+		err = sdei_api_event_register(event->event_num,
+					      sdei_entry_point,
+					      event->registered,
+					      SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_ANY, 0);
+	} else {
+		err = sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_register, event);
+		if (err)
+			sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_unregister, event);
+	}
+
 	if (err) {
 		sdei_event_destroy(event);
 		pr_warn("Failed to register event %u: %d\n", event_num, err);
@@ -635,33 +626,6 @@ int sdei_event_register(u32 event_num, sdei_event_callback *cb, void *arg)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int sdei_reregister_event_llocked(struct sdei_event *event)
-{
-	int err;
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sdei_events_lock);
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sdei_list_lock);
-
-	err = _sdei_event_register(event);
-	if (err) {
-		pr_err("Failed to re-register event %u\n", event->event_num);
-		sdei_event_destroy_llocked(event);
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	if (event->reenable) {
-		if (event->type == SDEI_EVENT_TYPE_SHARED)
-			err = sdei_api_event_enable(event->event_num);
-		else
-			err = sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_enable, event);
-	}
-
-	if (err)
-		pr_err("Failed to re-enable event %u\n", event->event_num);
-
-	return err;
-}
-
 static int sdei_reregister_shared(void)
 {
 	int err = 0;
@@ -674,9 +638,24 @@ static int sdei_reregister_shared(void)
 			continue;
 
 		if (event->reregister) {
-			err = sdei_reregister_event_llocked(event);
-			if (err)
+			err = sdei_api_event_register(event->event_num,
+					sdei_entry_point, event->registered,
+					SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_ANY, 0);
+			if (err) {
+				pr_err("Failed to re-register event %u\n",
+				       event->event_num);
+				sdei_event_destroy_llocked(event);
 				break;
+			}
+		}
+
+		if (event->reenable) {
+			err = sdei_api_event_enable(event->event_num);
+			if (err) {
+				pr_err("Failed to re-enable event %u\n",
+				       event->event_num);
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&sdei_list_lock);
-- 
2.23.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-22 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-22 13:04 [PATCH v5 00/13] Refactor SDEI client driver Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Remove sdei_is_err() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Common block for failing path in sdei_event_create() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Retrieve event number from event instance Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Avoid nested statements in sdei_init() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Unregister driver on error " Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Remove duplicate check in sdei_get_conduit() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Remove redundant error message in sdei_probe() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Remove while loop in sdei_event_register() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Remove while loop in sdei_event_unregister() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Cleanup on cross call function Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Introduce sdei_do_local_call() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2020-09-22 13:04   ` [PATCH v5 12/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Remove _sdei_event_register() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] firmware: arm_sdei: Remove _sdei_event_unregister() Gavin Shan
2020-09-22 13:04   ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-28 22:13 ` [PATCH v5 00/13] Refactor SDEI client driver Will Deacon
2020-09-28 22:13   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200922130423.10173-13-gshan@redhat.com \
    --to=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.