All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] tpm_tis: Clean up locality release
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:32:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200929223216.22584-2-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929223216.22584-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

The current release locality code seems to be based on the
misunderstanding that the TPM interrupts when a locality is released:
it doesn't, only when the locality is acquired.

Furthermore, there seems to be no point in waiting for the locality to
be released.  All it does is penalize the last TPM user.  However, if
there's no next TPM user, this is a pointless wait and if there is a
next TPM user, they'll pay the penalty waiting for the new locality
(or possibly not if it's the same as the old locality).

Fix the code by making release_locality as simple write to release
with no waiting for completion.

Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 47 +--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index 92c51c6cfd1b..a9fa40714c64 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -134,58 +134,13 @@ static bool check_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static bool locality_inactive(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
-{
-	struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
-	int rc;
-	u8 access;
-
-	rc = tpm_tis_read8(priv, TPM_ACCESS(l), &access);
-	if (rc < 0)
-		return false;
-
-	if ((access & (TPM_ACCESS_VALID | TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY))
-	    == TPM_ACCESS_VALID)
-		return true;
-
-	return false;
-}
-
 static int release_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
 {
 	struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
-	unsigned long stop, timeout;
-	long rc;
 
 	tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_ACCESS(l), TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY);
 
-	stop = jiffies + chip->timeout_a;
-
-	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ) {
-again:
-		timeout = stop - jiffies;
-		if ((long)timeout <= 0)
-			return -1;
-
-		rc = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(priv->int_queue,
-						      (locality_inactive(chip, l)),
-						      timeout);
-
-		if (rc > 0)
-			return 0;
-
-		if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS && freezing(current)) {
-			clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
-			goto again;
-		}
-	} else {
-		do {
-			if (locality_inactive(chip, l))
-				return 0;
-			tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
-		} while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
-	}
-	return -1;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
-- 
2.28.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-29 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29 22:32 [PATCH 0/4] tpm_tis: fix interrupts (again) James Bottomley
2020-09-29 22:32 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2020-09-30  2:26   ` [PATCH 1/4] tpm_tis: Clean up locality release Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-30  2:26     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-30 21:19   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-09-30 23:03     ` James Bottomley
2020-10-01  0:01       ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-10-01 15:58         ` James Bottomley
2021-01-02  1:17           ` Laurent Bigonville
2020-10-01  2:01       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-01  4:49         ` James Bottomley
2020-10-01 17:48           ` James Bottomley
2020-09-29 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] tpm_tis: Fix interrupts for TIS TPMs without legacy cycles James Bottomley
2020-09-30  2:39   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-29 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] tpm_tis: fix IRQ probing James Bottomley
2020-09-30  2:40   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-29 22:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] Revert "tpm: Revert "tpm_tis_core: Turn on the TPM before probing IRQ's"" James Bottomley
2020-09-30  2:40   ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200929223216.22584-2-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.