All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	<rafael@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
	"Sean V Kelley" <sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 6/6] docs: mm: numaperf.rst Add brief description for access class 1.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:05:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930140547.840251-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930140547.840251-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Try to make minimal changes to the document which already describes
access class 0 in a generic fashion (including IO initiatiors that
are not CPUs).

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
index 4d69ef1de830..86f2a3c4b638 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ nodes' access characteristics share the same performance relative to other
 linked initiator nodes. Each target within an initiator's access class,
 though, do not necessarily perform the same as each other.
 
+The access class "1" is used to allow differentiation between initiators
+that are CPUs and hence suitable for generic task scheduling, and
+IO initiators such as GPUs and NICs.  Unlike access class 0, only
+nodes containing CPUs are considered.
+
 ================
 NUMA Performance
 ================
@@ -88,6 +93,9 @@ The latency attributes are provided in nanoseconds.
 The values reported here correspond to the rated latency and bandwidth
 for the platform.
 
+Access class 1 takes the same form but only includes values for CPU to
+memory activity.
+
 ==========
 NUMA Cache
 ==========
-- 
2.19.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	<rafael@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 6/6] docs: mm: numaperf.rst Add brief description for access class 1.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:05:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930140547.840251-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930140547.840251-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Try to make minimal changes to the document which already describes
access class 0 in a generic fashion (including IO initiatiors that
are not CPUs).

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
index 4d69ef1de830..86f2a3c4b638 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ nodes' access characteristics share the same performance relative to other
 linked initiator nodes. Each target within an initiator's access class,
 though, do not necessarily perform the same as each other.
 
+The access class "1" is used to allow differentiation between initiators
+that are CPUs and hence suitable for generic task scheduling, and
+IO initiators such as GPUs and NICs.  Unlike access class 0, only
+nodes containing CPUs are considered.
+
 ================
 NUMA Performance
 ================
@@ -88,6 +93,9 @@ The latency attributes are provided in nanoseconds.
 The values reported here correspond to the rated latency and bandwidth
 for the platform.
 
+Access class 1 takes the same form but only includes values for CPU to
+memory activity.
+
 ==========
 NUMA Cache
 ==========
-- 
2.19.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-30 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-30 14:05 [PATCH v12 0/6] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator proximity domains Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator only domains Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] x86: Support Generic Initiator only proximity domains Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 15:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-30 15:51     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-30 14:05 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] ACPI: Let ACPI know we support Generic Initiator Affinity Structures Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05 ` [PATCH v12 4/6] ACPI: HMAT: Fix handling of changes from ACPI 6.2 to ACPI 6.3 Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] node: Add access1 class to represent CPU to memory characteristics Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-30 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-09-30 14:05   ` [PATCH v12 6/6] docs: mm: numaperf.rst Add brief description for access class 1 Jonathan Cameron
2020-10-02 16:55 ` [PATCH v12 0/6] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator proximity domains Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-02 16:55   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-02 16:55   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200930140547.840251-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.