All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/61] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2020 14:58:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201002125939.50817-16-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201002125939.50817-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes
now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the
shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c   |  6 +---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h   | 20 ++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c    | 34 ++++++++++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c     |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 10 +++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c  |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
index 3c2a3965eb35..af5d561de7dc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 			  const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops *ops,
 			  struct lock_class_key *key, unsigned flags)
 {
-	__mutex_init(&obj->mm.lock, ops->name ?: "obj->mm.lock", key);
+	mutex_init(&obj->mm.lock);
 
 	spin_lock_init(&obj->vma.lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->vma.list);
@@ -84,10 +84,6 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	obj->mm.madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
 	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&obj->mm.get_page.radix, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_page.lock);
-
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj))
-		i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex(to_i915(obj->base.dev),
-					       &obj->mm.lock);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 2faebe1fd8be..d34c6e2424f9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -299,27 +299,10 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 int ____i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 
-enum i915_mm_subclass { /* lockdep subclass for obj->mm.lock/struct_mutex */
-	I915_MM_NORMAL = 0,
-	/*
-	 * Only used by struct_mutex, when called "recursively" from
-	 * direct-reclaim-esque. Safe because there is only every one
-	 * struct_mutex in the entire system.
-	 */
-	I915_MM_SHRINKER = 1,
-	/*
-	 * Used for obj->mm.lock when allocating pages. Safe because the object
-	 * isn't yet on any LRU, and therefore the shrinker can't deadlock on
-	 * it. As soon as the object has pages, obj->mm.lock nests within
-	 * fs_reclaim.
-	 */
-	I915_MM_GET_PAGES = 1,
-};
-
 static inline int __must_check
 i915_gem_object_pin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
-	might_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+	might_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
 
 	if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count))
 		return 0;
@@ -363,6 +346,7 @@ i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 }
 
 int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
+int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 void i915_gem_object_truncate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
index 42946b1661c5..891bb32cfe3f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -191,21 +191,13 @@ __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 	return pages;
 }
 
-int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+int __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
 	struct sg_table *pages;
-	int err;
 
 	if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	/* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */
-	mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
-	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count))) {
-		err = -EBUSY;
-		goto unlock;
-	}
-
 	i915_gem_object_release_mmap_offset(obj);
 
 	/*
@@ -221,14 +213,22 @@ int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 	 * get_pages backends we should be better able to handle the
 	 * cancellation of the async task in a more uniform manner.
 	 */
-	if (!pages)
-		pages = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
-	if (!IS_ERR(pages))
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages))
 		obj->ops->put_pages(obj, pages);
 
-	err = 0;
-unlock:
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	/* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */
+	mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
+	err = __i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(obj);
 	mutex_unlock(&obj->mm.lock);
 
 	return err;
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	    !i915_gem_object_type_has(obj, I915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_IOMEM))
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
 
-	err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock);
 	if (err)
 		return ERR_PTR(err);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
index 153de6538378..4322e35cfe48 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ int i915_gem_object_attach_phys(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int align)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&obj->mm.lock);
 	if (err)
 		goto err_unlock;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
index dc8f052a0ffe..afc6e5b4dcf1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ static bool unsafe_drop_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 		flags = I915_GEM_OBJECT_UNBIND_TEST;
 
 	if (i915_gem_object_unbind(obj, flags) == 0)
-		__i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj);
+		return true;
 
-	return !i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj);
+	return false;
 }
 
 static void try_to_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
@@ -199,10 +199,10 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i915->mm.obj_lock, flags);
 
-			if (unsafe_drop_pages(obj, shrink)) {
+			if (unsafe_drop_pages(obj, shrink) &&
+			    mutex_trylock(&obj->mm.lock)) {
 				/* May arrive from get_pages on another bo */
-				mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
-				if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) {
+				if (!__i915_gem_object_put_pages_locked(obj)) {
 					try_to_writeback(obj, shrink);
 					count += obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 				}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
index b25a1a8c514a..55aa6fc3b518 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_userptr_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool
 	if (GEM_WARN_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj)))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	mutex_lock_nested(&obj->mm.lock, I915_MM_GET_PAGES);
+	mutex_lock(&obj->mm.lock);
 
 	pages = __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(obj);
 	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages))
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-02 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-02 12:58 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/61] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/61] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/61] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/61] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-06 12:25   ` kernel test robot
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/61] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/61] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/61] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/61] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/61] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/61] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/61] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 20:14   ` Ruhl, Michael J
2020-10-12 14:13     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-19 17:54       ` Ruhl, Michael J
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/61] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/61] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/61] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/61] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/61] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 23:08   ` kernel test robot
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/61] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/61] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-07  7:33   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-10-07  7:33     ` Dan Carpenter
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/61] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/61] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/61] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/61] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/61] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/61] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/61] drm/i915: Make intel_init_workaround_bb more compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/61] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/61] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/61] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/61] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/61] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/61] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/61] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/61] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/61] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/61] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/61] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/61] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 52/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 53/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 54/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 55/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 56/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 57/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 58/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 59/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 60/61] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 61/61] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 13:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Patchwork
2020-10-02 18:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-10-02 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/61] " Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201002125939.50817-16-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.