From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [RFC] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu-perf-dependencies
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:06:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201012160633.GG16519@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0j=g6y53yk_+cPNnUYb6usrQmghCNuiHYc1vbpsypFtCQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 05:57:23PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:03 PM Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
>
> > The PSD domains (ACPI) and the new DT binding will tell
> > which CPUs are actually in the same clock domain for whomever is
> > interested, despite those CPUs not being in the same policy.
>
> And this information hasn't been used so far in those cases.
>
Indeed, do you see that will change for new heterogeneous CPUs ? Are there
any plans to use EAS on those ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] [RFC] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu-perf-dependencies
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:06:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201012160633.GG16519@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0j=g6y53yk_+cPNnUYb6usrQmghCNuiHYc1vbpsypFtCQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 05:57:23PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:03 PM Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
>
> > The PSD domains (ACPI) and the new DT binding will tell
> > which CPUs are actually in the same clock domain for whomever is
> > interested, despite those CPUs not being in the same policy.
>
> And this information hasn't been used so far in those cases.
>
Indeed, do you see that will change for new heterogeneous CPUs ? Are there
any plans to use EAS on those ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-12 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-24 9:53 [PATCH v2 0/2] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu performance dependencies Nicola Mazzucato
2020-09-24 9:53 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-09-24 9:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add devicetree binding for cpu-performance-dependencies Nicola Mazzucato
2020-09-24 9:53 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-08 13:42 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-08 13:42 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-09-24 9:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] [RFC] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu-perf-dependencies Nicola Mazzucato
2020-09-24 9:53 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-06 7:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-06 7:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-07 12:58 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-07 12:58 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-08 11:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-08 11:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-08 15:03 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-08 15:03 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-08 15:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-08 15:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-08 17:08 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-08 17:08 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-12 16:06 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-10-12 16:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-08 16:00 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-08 16:00 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-09 5:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-09 5:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-09 11:10 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-09 11:10 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-09 11:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-09 11:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-09 14:01 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-09 14:01 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-09 15:28 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-09 15:28 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-12 4:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-12 4:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-12 10:22 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-12 10:22 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-12 10:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-12 10:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-12 11:05 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-12 11:05 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-12 10:59 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-12 10:59 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-12 13:48 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-12 13:48 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-12 16:30 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-12 16:30 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-12 18:19 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-12 18:19 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-12 22:01 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-12 22:01 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-13 11:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-13 11:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-13 12:39 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-13 12:39 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-15 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-15 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-15 18:38 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-15 18:38 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-12 13:59 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-12 13:59 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-12 16:02 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-12 16:02 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-12 15:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-12 15:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-12 15:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-12 15:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-12 16:52 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-12 16:52 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-12 17:18 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-12 17:18 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-14 4:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-14 4:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-14 9:11 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-14 9:11 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-19 8:50 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-19 8:50 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-19 9:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 9:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 13:36 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-19 13:36 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-10-20 10:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20 10:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-13 13:53 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-13 13:53 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-10-14 4:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-14 4:20 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201012160633.GG16519@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=nicola.mazzucato@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.